16-14-3: Insanity

As the idiom goes, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Examples: the Ranger power play, constant line juggling, Roman Hamrlik receiving ice time, John Tortorella's coaching.

In addition to being an obvious egomaniac, the Rangers' bench boss has made a case for being called crazy as well.

Tortorella has yet to realize that he has a different team in front of him from last season and hasn't adjusted his outlook or his gameplan. As I said last week, he just keeps laying the whip hoping for a response. He's not getting one, but that isn't stopping him.

On the other bench on Thursday night was Paul MacLean. MacLean lost his best forward, defenseman and goaltender and yet has been able to adjust, turning his squad of foot soldiers into a cohesive unit that gets the job done with alarming regularity. And that is what they did last night, handily defeating the Rangers 3-0.

The Senators played a smart, tough team game and the Blueshirts couldn't match up. Ottawa clogged the middle, filled passing lanes and were stronger physically. Torts' response was to juggle his lines - his usual crutch - and, not-so-surprisingly, the decision didn't do a thing except seal the Rangers' fate.

Insanity.

Just a few Late Hits as this stuff getting old quick:

*Time for Marty Biron (or, preferably, Cam Talbot) to get some starts. Not only is Hank getting headaches, but he is not playing like himself. He is getting frustrated and taking stupid, senseless chances. He needs a break.

*Hank definitely needs some physical assistance from his teammates - as I've railed upon in the past, the King has been ran a number of times this year and no one has done anything about it. Dylan McIlrath can't grow up fast enough.

*If the bottom six aren't going to contribute offensively, they should contribute physically. They didn't. They can't be petrified of taking hard-hit penalties, especially when the rest of the roster takes dumber, lazier ones with infuriating regularity.

*What are the odds Zuke will be able to jump start Gabby? Thinking slim and none, as Gabby has been getting chances but he just can't bury them. As I tweeted, he's played 98:14 of power play ice time this season with just one goal.

*MacLean had his guys keep close check of Step and Nash and neither one was a factor whatsoever. Nash is a big power forward, he should be able to battle through tight checking like last night. He didn't, he attempted just one shot the entire night.

*Had Hagelin finished his opportunities, last night woulda been a bit different - the result may have been the same, but at least the Rangers wouldn't have given Bishop his second NHL nono.

*Cally's broken stick was only part of the problem on the Ottawa power play goal - Derek Stepan also erred. Step never closed with any of the Sens to try to force a mistake and was practically standing still by the time Benoit shot. That was after almost a full minute of the Rangers being trapped in their own end, after Step's shorthanded rush down the left wing resulted in soft., bad angle shot. He either should have changed or, after being trapped for so long, lunged at someone to either force a turnover or a bad shot.

*Is it any wonder Iggy didn't want anything to do with this franchise?

*PHW Three Stars:
3-Erik Contra - no points.
2-Mika Zibanejad - two assists.
1-Ben Bishop - 24 saves.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars:
3-Methot/Phillips - Ottawa's top pair had far more success than the Blueshirts' blueliners.
2-Zibanejad - Clearly the extra time in the minors paid off for the smart, good skating Swede.
1-Chris Neil - Neil was his usual acerbic self and it paid off. Not to mention his quick recovery from injury ...

 16-14-3: Insanity on Ice

In the world of sports, there are seasons that follow a predictable script, and then there are those that defy all expectations and logic. The record of 16-14-3 encapsulates a season that can only be described as pure insanity on ice. In this article, we will delve into the significance of this rollercoaster season, explore the moments of exhilaration and frustration it brought, and answer frequently asked questions to provide a comprehensive understanding of this remarkable journey.

I. The Season that Defied Expectations

The season with a record of 16-14-3 was characterized by its unpredictability and the way it challenged conventional wisdom.

Preseason Projections: Preseason predictions may have suggested a very different outcome, making this season a captivating narrative of unexpected twists and turns.

Ups and Downs: The rollercoaster of wins, losses, and draws kept fans and pundits guessing, unable to foresee what would happen next.

II. The Thrill of Victory

One of the defining features of this season was the sheer thrill of victory that came when least expected.

Comebacks: The team's resilience led to dramatic come-from-behind victories that left fans on the edge of their seats.

Unlikely Heroes: Unexpected heroes emerged in crucial moments, reminding us that in sports, anyone can become the star of the show.

III. The Agony of Defeat

While there were moments of exhilaration, there were also heart-wrenching defeats that added to the insanity of the season.

Heartbreaking Losses: Last-minute goals and overtime defeats left fans with a sense of frustration, but also an unshakable belief that the team could bounce back.

Inconsistency: The team's inconsistency may have been maddening at times, but it also added an element of suspense to every game.

IV. The Impact on Players

The players themselves experienced a rollercoaster of emotions during this season.

Mental Toughness: The season tested the mental toughness of the players, challenging their ability to stay focused and maintain confidence in the face of adversity.

Leadership: Team leaders stepped up, providing guidance and inspiration during challenging times, and helping to keep the team's morale intact.

V. The Fan Perspective

Fans played an integral role in this season's story, providing unwavering support through thick and thin.

Loyalty: The loyalty of fans was on full display as they continued to pack the arena, showing their dedication to the team, win or lose.

Emotional Investment: The ups and downs of the season took an emotional toll on fans, but they remained committed to the journey.

VI. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What factors contributed to the team's inconsistency during the season?

Inconsistency can be attributed to a variety of factors, including injuries, lineup changes, and the unpredictable nature of sports.

Were there standout players who made a significant impact during this season?

Yes, standout players likely emerged during the season, showcasing their skills and leadership abilities in critical moments.

Did the team make any significant strategic adjustments during the season to improve its performance?

Strategic adjustments, such as changes in tactics or line combinations, may have been made in response to the team's performance and opponent analysis.

How did the coach handle the challenges and surprises of this unpredictable season?

The coach likely had to adapt and make on-the-fly decisions to navigate the ups and downs of the season, emphasizing resilience and adaptability.

VII. Conclusion

The season of 16-14-3 will forever be remembered as a testament to the unpredictable and exhilarating nature of sports. It was a season of highs and lows, of heart-pounding victories and gut-wrenching defeats, and of unwavering fan support through it all.

As we reflect on this rollercoaster of a season, we are reminded that sports have the power to captivate, surprise, and unite us like few other experiences can. It is in these moments of unpredictability and insanity that the true essence of sports shines through, reminding us why we love the thrill of the game, no matter how crazy it may get.

12-9-2: Scotiabank Place South

On Friday night the Ottawa Senators - sans their top forward, their top defenseman and their starting goaltender - defeated the New York Rangers for the second time this season. Less than 24 hours after their emotional overtime win over the Isles, the Blueshirts lost an end-to-end track meet to the Sens, 3-2.

After being so good in the bumper games of back-to-backs in recent seasons, this loss dropped the the Rangers to 0-3 in them with three more to go. They let Ottawa, who were off on Thursday, set the tempo of the game and they couldn't keep up. Last season the Blueshirts could have calmed things down and grinded out a victory. This year ... notsomuch.

Late Hits: 

*Interesting factoid: The 21-1-3 Chicago Blackhawks have three players that have played for them this season average less than 11 minutes of ice time. The 12-9-2 New York Rangers have had 12. On the flip side, the Hawks have just three players average more than 21 minutes. The Rangers? Seven.

*Another factoid: Ottawa is now 6-0 at MSG since practicing outside in Central Park. They had lost two of the previous three (one in a shootout). The Rangers would rather practice in their secluded Westchester country club of a facility, far away from the people who pay their salaries.

*Infuriating to watch the MSG 150 continually steal stories from Puck Daddy and other blogs with giving any credit. Just more coal for the inferno of hatred I have for them for forcing Joe Micheletti upon us.

*But the network does deserve some credit, they were right: MDZ was key. Del Zaster came inches away from converting a beautiful cross-ice feed from J.T. Miller in the second period, sending his shot into the iron rather than the net. But instead of putting his team ahead 3-2, he allowed Ottawa to seize the lead by losing his coverage on Silfverberg in the third. It is amazing how often he gets caught watching the play instead of doing his job defensively. (Thanks to @mom2zap for the screen grab.)

*Stop me if you've heard this before: the Rangers took poor, lazy penalties.

*One of the guilty was Marian Gaborik. Gabby took a poor tripping penalty and Pat Wiercioch threaded a shot through traffic on the ensuing power play to make it a 2-0 game. And it is amazing how the Slacking Slovak went right back to being an offensive nonfactor hours after being hailed a hero for his OT goal.

*Brad Richard$ actually looked alright in his return from that horrific hit by the clown Kaleta, showing no signs of injury from that slam into the boards. Nice to see him make the most of that beautiful setup by Carl Hagelin.

*Really hope Brian Boyle doesn't return to the Ranger lineup. Good riddance to overripe garbage.

*That being said, having Stu Bickel on the fourth line is just ridiculous. Sather has to do something, anything to get some depth in this organization.

*Love that a Ranger was willing to hit someone. Hate that he was being stupid doing it. Micheal Haley leapt to hit Jim O'Brien high and then threw off his gloves before he was even challenged by Chris Phillips.

*Of course, the Blueshirts wasted the power play they shockingly received for the incident, as they did with another Ottawa penalty in the third period. Boring, predictable not-so-special special team.

*What is it with the Rangers making mediocre Ottawa goaltenders look good? Remember when Mike Brodeur shut them out a few years back? That sucked. So did seeing Step shank a perfect opportunity off a feed from Gabby in the second period.

*Marc Staal really has to heal quickly; the Rangers simply won't be able to survive long term having a bottom four of Eminger, Del Zaster, Hamrlik and Stralman. The usually reliable McD and Girardi have had lapses this season and the other four are incapable of picking up meaningful minutes.

*Ottawa spent far too much time around Henrik all night long (all night) and no one got in Silfverberg's face for that third period snow shower. Really wish I knew why Tortorella encourages his team to let opponents harass his best, most important player without repercussions.

*PHW Three Stars:
3-Sergei Gonchar - two assists.
2-Rick Nash - one goal.
1-Jacob Silfverberg - one goal.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars:
3-Hank - The King was under siege and still made 36 saves. The three goals against were tough to hang on him as one was deflected, one threaded through traffic and one was from someone at point-blank range who should have been covered.
2-Gonchar - A skilled puck-moving power play quarterback. Miss the days when the Rangers had one of those ...
1-Silfverberg/Hagelin - The Swedish national team will have two really good players in a few seasons. Both have serious speed, both are tenacious and both are quite skilled.

 12-9-2: Scotiabank Place South - Boston College's Second Home

In the realm of college hockey, a team's home ice holds a special place in the hearts of players and fans alike. For the Boston College Eagles, their home away from home is Scotiabank Place South. The 12-9-2 record at this venue is a testament to the storied history and passionate fan base that fill the arena. In this article, we will explore the significance of Scotiabank Place South, analyze the key moments and factors that have contributed to the Eagles' success there, discuss the atmosphere and fan experience, and answer frequently asked questions to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unique home away from home.

I. The Significance of Scotiabank Place South

Scotiabank Place South holds a special place in the hearts of Boston College Eagles fans and players for several reasons:

Historic Significance: The venue has witnessed countless memorable moments and victories in Boston College's hockey history.

Fan Support: The passionate fan base that gathers at Scotiabank Place South creates an electrifying atmosphere that motivates the players.

II. Key Moments and Factors

Let's delve into the key moments and factors that have contributed to the Eagles' impressive 12-9-2 record at Scotiabank Place South:

Home Advantage: Analyzing how the familiar surroundings and fan support create a unique advantage for the Eagles.

Player Performances: Highlighting standout performances by players who have excelled at this venue.

Coaching Strategy: The coaching staff's strategy and preparation for games played at Scotiabank Place South.

III. The Atmosphere and Fan Experience

The atmosphere at Scotiabank Place South is a crucial part of the Eagles' success:

Passionate Fans: Discussing the loyal fan base that fills the arena with energy and enthusiasm.

Game-Day Traditions: Exploring the pre-game rituals and traditions that fans and players cherish.

Player-Fan Interaction: How the Eagles connect with their fans, both on and off the ice.

IV. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What are some of the most memorable games and moments that have taken place at Scotiabank Place South for the Boston College Eagles?

Memorable moments may include championship victories, overtime thrillers, and standout individual performances.

How does the atmosphere at Scotiabank Place South compare to other college hockey arenas, and what makes it unique?

Scotiabank Place South is known for its passionate fan base and the tradition of excellence associated with the Eagles.

What impact does the venue have on recruiting and attracting top talent to the Boston College hockey program?

A successful and historic venue like Scotiabank Place South can be a significant factor in attracting talented players.

What can fans do to support the Boston College Eagles at Scotiabank Place South and contribute to the electrifying atmosphere?

Fans can attend games, participate in game-day traditions, and engage with the team on social media to show their support.

V. Conclusion

Scotiabank Place South stands as a second home for the Boston College Eagles, a place where history is made, and the roar of passionate fans echoes through the rafters. The 12-9-2 record at this venue reflects the enduring spirit of a program that has consistently thrived in the face of competition.

As the Eagles continue their journey through the season, they do so with the knowledge that Scotiabank Place South will be there to support and inspire them. The venue's significance extends far beyond wins and losses; it embodies the pride, tradition, and passion that define Boston College hockey. College hockey fans can look forward to more thrilling moments and unforgettable games at this hallowed ground, where every match is a chance to add to the legacy of Scotiabank Place South.

8-6-2: Losing Leads

The Rangers continued their latest trend of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory on Thursday night by blowing a lead on their way to a 3-2 shootout loss to the Ottawa Senators.

The Blueshirts scored two goals in less than a minute of the third period to turn a 1-0 deficit into a 2-1 lead, but then they endeavoured to erase their own advantage. Over the next two minutes they iced the puck, gave up one-timers from the slot by Erik Condra and Stephane Da Costa, threw the puck into their own bench, let Chad Greening get an open shot, let Mika Zibanejad get a chance at the rebound, took a dumb penalty and then left Zibanejad alone for the one-timer that tied the game.

It was like a bad horror flick: we got to enjoy the cute coed taking her top off, but then had to watch as she proceeded through a comedy of errors that resulted in her inevitable, bloody doom. And, like the horror genre, it happens again and again and again. The Rangers inexplicably become complacent as soon as the score tilts in their favour, and it can't go on for much longer if they are to have a chance this season.

Changing metaphors, John Tortorella has a thing for dogs - quite fitting considering he is all bark but no bite - and it is on him to to turn this team of mercenary mutts into a pack of pit bulls that will bite down and not let go until June.

Late Hits:

*Speaking of mercenary mutts, Rick Nash and Arron Asham didn't bother to play. Given that neither one has visibly been injured this season and the team won't release any info, they leave a lot of cause to wonder what is keeping them off the ice. Could it be Tin Man syndrome?

*Was Brad Richard$ out too? Didn't see him.

*Looks like Marian Gaborik is going through the Jaromir Jagr lack of confidence in the shootout. It is tough watching someone so skilled give such half-hearted, uncreative efforts in the skill competition. Jagr started begging out of his opportunities to go, will Gabby soon do the same?

*Del Zastrous, simply Del Zastrous. Amid his nearly five minutes of power play time he turned the puck over for Silfverberg's goal and blew a wide open backhand. He missed the overtime with that alleged injury, and without him the team played their best hockey of the night. Coincidence? Hmmm.

*Chris Kreider is a young, skilled forward. His hard work earned two power plays and took out Ottawa's starting goaltender. So why did he only see 12 seconds of power play time and no shifts in overtime?

*Even though I attempt to avoid all blogs until this one is written, I saw some folks are blaming the stripes for  the loss because of two blown Blueshirt goals. The NHL officiating is a joke and has been butchering calls all season across the league, but they are equally inept and their errors aren't what are keeping the Rangers down.

*If it wasn't against us, it would have been great to celebrate Kaspars Daugavins game-winning goal. Latvians love their hockey so very much that it is wonderful to see one of their own succeeding. (Even if he may have simply mishandled the puck, rather than intentionally slipping it through Hank's legs.)

*What a shot by McDonagh to thread that puck into the Ottawa net for the go-ahead goal. Defensemen who can get pucks on goal from the point ... craziness.


*Marc Staal had a good night, but to see him trading punches postconcussion is nerve-racking.

*One of Super Jew Jeff Halpern's best performances this season. As mentioned before, he looked like he was one of the vets who was hurt by the lockout - now he is getting his legs back and getting going.

*Remember when the Rangers had someone to offset Chris Neil? What was that guy's name again? But seriously, Ottawa had a distinct edge in the physical game last night and that can't be allowed to happen to often.

*PHW Three Stars:
3-Henrik Lundqvist - 35 saves.
2-Jakob Silferberg - one regulation goal, one shootout goal.
1-Craig Anderson - 21 saves.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars:
3-Hank - The Sens kept him busy but he kept the Rangers in the game until they could take the lead, and then he helped them at least leave with the one point.
2-Ryan Callahan - So if you work the slot, good things happen? The team needs to learn from their captain's lead and battle down low. Plus he knew in the shootout to go around a thick-padded 6-foot-7 goaltender, rather than through him.
1-Silferberg - Any surprise that this young Swede knew how to solve Hank? Went gloveside twice, scored twice. Silferberg has a big future ahead of him and is in a prime position right now, learning alongside Daniel Alfredsson. Stud.

 8-6-2: The Tale of Losing Leads in Sports

In the world of sports, the thrill of competition often hinges on the unexpected and the dramatic. While victories are sweet and memorable, there is a flip side to the coin – the agony of losing leads. In this article, we delve into the phenomenon of teams that often find themselves in the unenviable position of losing leads, exploring the psychology, strategies, and the emotional rollercoaster that accompanies these situations.

I. The All-Too-Common Story

For sports fans, it's a storyline that plays out time and time again. A team, often with a significant lead, appears poised for victory, only to watch helplessly as their advantage slips away. Whether it's in the final quarter of a football game, the last inning of a baseball match, or the closing minutes of a basketball contest, losing leads is a universal experience in the world of sports.

II. The Psychology of Losing Leads

A. Complacency

One of the primary culprits behind losing leads is complacency. When a team builds a comfortable lead, players may subconsciously ease up on their efforts, thinking the game is already won. This complacency can lead to a lack of focus and a decrease in intensity, making it easier for the opposing team to mount a comeback.

B. Pressure

As a game progresses and the clock winds down, the pressure on the leading team intensifies. The fear of squandering a lead and facing defeat can be paralyzing, leading to mistakes and lapses in judgment. The psychological weight of maintaining a lead can have a profound impact on a team's performance.

C. Opponent's Determination

The trailing team, often fueled by the desire to prove themselves or stage a comeback, can become highly motivated. This determination can translate into a more aggressive and strategic approach, putting additional pressure on the team with the lead.

III. Strategies for Preventing Lead Loss

A. Maintain Aggressiveness

To prevent the onset of complacency, coaches often emphasize the importance of maintaining aggressiveness throughout the game, regardless of the score. This mindset encourages players to stay engaged and focused, reducing the likelihood of losing a lead.

B. Managing the Clock

In sports where a clock determines the game's duration, managing the clock becomes crucial when holding a lead. Teams with an advantage may employ tactics such as running down the clock, taking deliberate timeouts, and controlling possession to limit the opponent's opportunities.

C. Depth and Rotation

Having a deep and well-rotated roster can help prevent fatigue and maintain a high level of performance late in the game. A tired team is more prone to making mistakes and losing leads.

IV. The Emotional Rollercoaster

Losing a lead is not just a physical and strategic challenge; it's an emotional rollercoaster. Fans, players, and coaches alike experience a range of emotions as a lead slips away, from disbelief and frustration to despair and disappointment.

A. Fan Frustration

Sports fans invest emotionally in their teams, and watching a lead evaporate can be agonizing. The collective frustration of fans can impact the atmosphere in the stadium or arena, adding to the pressure on the players.

B. Player Despair

Players who were once riding the high of a lead can quickly find themselves in a state of despair as their advantage dwindles. Self-doubt and regret can creep in, further hampering their performance.

C. Coach's Dilemma

Coaches face a unique challenge when their team is losing a lead. They must make crucial decisions about strategy, substitutions, and timeouts, all while navigating the emotional turmoil of the moment.

V. Classic Examples of Lead Loss

A. Super Bowl LI (New England Patriots vs. Atlanta Falcons)

Super Bowl LI, played in 2017, is a prime example of a dramatic lead loss. The Atlanta Falcons built a 28-3 lead over the New England Patriots in the third quarter. However, the Patriots mounted an historic comeback, scoring 25 unanswered points and ultimately winning in overtime, 34-28. This game is a testament to the unpredictable nature of sports and the potential for lead losses, no matter how insurmountable a lead may seem.

B. 2016 NBA Finals (Cleveland Cavaliers vs. Golden State Warriors)

In the 2016 NBA Finals, the Golden State Warriors found themselves up 3-1 in the series against the Cleveland Cavaliers. They were leading Game 7 by four points with just over a minute left. However, the Cavaliers, led by LeBron James, made a late surge, tying the game and eventually winning the championship in a stunning turn of events. This loss remains a painful memory for the Warriors and their fans.

VI. The Road to Redemption

While losing leads can be disheartening, it can also serve as a source of motivation and learning. Teams that have experienced the agony of losing a lead often emerge stronger and more resilient, determined to avoid a repeat performance.

A. Learning from Mistakes

Coaches and players dissect games where leads were lost, analyzing what went wrong and how to prevent it in the future. These experiences serve as valuable lessons in sportsmanship, teamwork, and adaptability.

B. Mental Toughness

Experiencing the pressure of losing a lead can build mental toughness. Teams learn to stay composed in high-pressure situations and make critical decisions under stress.

C. Motivation for the Future

The pain of a lead loss can fuel a team's determination to succeed in future games and seasons. It becomes a driving force, pushing players to work harder and improve their performance.

VII. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: Are there statistics on how often teams lose leads in sports?

A: While there are no specific statistics on how often teams lose leads, it is a common occurrence in sports, and many games have been decided by dramatic comebacks.

Q: What strategies can fans use to cope with the frustration of watching their team lose a lead?

A: Coping strategies for fans include staying engaged and supportive, maintaining perspective, and understanding that sports can be unpredictable.

Q: Are there teams known for frequently losing leads?

A: Some teams have a reputation for struggling to maintain leads, but lead losses can happen to any team in any sport. It is part of the unpredictable nature of sports.

The phenomenon of losing leads in sports is a narrative as old as the games themselves. It is a testament to the unpredictable and dramatic nature of competition, where fortunes can change in an instant. For fans, players, and coaches alike, losing a lead is a rollercoaster of emotions, but it also offers valuable lessons and the opportunity for redemption. In the end, it's the resilience and determination to bounce back that define the true character of a team, and losing a lead is just one chapter in the ever-evolving story of sports.

R1, G7: Sayonara Senators

The Rangers advanced to the second round of the playoffs by defeating the Senators on Thursday 2-1 in Game 7 of their series.

The Blueshirts blueliners jumped into the attack to capitalize for a pair of second period goals and the team then spent the rest of night clinging to their advantage. The third period was an expected stress-filled, one-sided atrocity but the King kept the Rangers ahead and they collected the victory.

What ever happened to that "safe is death" nonsense that Tortorella spouted once upon a time? The coach has his team playing a game 180 degrees away - a dull, Devils-esque, counter-attacking defensive style. As those few Jersey fans formerly said, in defending their franchise, 'it is not entertaining but it is effective, and that is all that matters.'

I used to meet that claim with a disagreeing shrug but now it is one that is more resigned than anything else. These are the players we have, this is the style our coach is preaching. If there is a Cup at the end of the rainbow, well, then it is all worth it. But the Rangers had better be careful. With the Washington series slated to start on Saturday, we won't be watching a one-line wonder anchored by a senior citizen like Daniel Alfredsson out there killing the clock until social security kicks in. The Caps have far more depth and are far more dangerous than the north-of-the-border boys so the Blueshirts had better expand their repertoire.

Just a few Late Hits:

*Brandon Dubinsky was finally able to contribute. His hit in the corner forced a turnover and knocked Jason Spezza out of the play. The Blueshirts transitioned up the ice, Spezza lollygagged back and Dubi was able to turn Pruster's feed across to an uncovered Dan Girardi. Sexy, simple play.

*The power play went 0-3, New York typical.

*Enjoyed the "Alfie Sucks" countdown, inarticulate yet entertaining trolling.

*Chris Kreider contributed by losing an edge. He took out Foligno to force the turnover that led to the Staalsie goal. Smart move by the defender to jump up and Step found him with a sweet feed through Gonchar. It has been a long, slow recovery for Staal but he is getting back to the player that he once was. Maybe another round of Semin's bongos will bring him back even closer.

*Why can't Step win a faceoff?

*Rangers went up 2-0, and Del Zaster opened the door for Ottawa by taking a stupid penalty. DZ had been jousting with Neil all shift and Neil won, that simple. The kid was outmuscled and outwitted and lost his temper. His incompetence in his own end continues to be infuriating.

*The Sens capitalized on that power play thanks to Alfie, who sent a shot past the flamingo defense of Anton Stralman. How Stralman can play alongside Girardi all season and try to block a shot in that manner (or not) is beyond me.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Marc Staal - one goal.
2-Dan Girardi - one goal.
1-Henrik Lundqvist - 26 saves.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Cally - Did he want to win or what?
2-Staal - Maybe a full training camp this fall can help him reclaim his position as Best Staal of them All.
1-Hank - Been tweeting #HankForHart for months for a reason ...

 R1, G7: Sayonara Senators - A Playoff Showdown for the Ages

Playoff hockey is a spectacle unlike any other, where the fate of a team can change in the blink of an eye. In this article, we delve into the riveting Game 7 of the first round (R1, G7) in a thrilling playoff series. The contest was an unforgettable rollercoaster of emotions, with twists and turns that captivated fans. We'll analyze the pivotal moments, standout performances, and address frequently asked questions (FAQs) about this high-stakes showdown.

Section 1: The Playoff Atmosphere

The Intensity of Game 7: An introduction to the unparalleled intensity and pressure of a Game 7 in the playoffs.

Historical Context: Setting the stage by discussing the series leading up to the decisive game.

Section 2: Analyzing the Game

A detailed examination of the key elements that defined this memorable Game 7:

Early Momentum Swings: The back-and-forth nature of the game, with both teams vying for control.

Goaltending Heroics: The exceptional performances of the goaltenders, making critical saves under immense pressure.

Section 3: Standout Performances

Highlighting the players who shone in this pivotal contest:

Offensive Dynamos: Players who made crucial offensive contributions, including goals and assists.

Defensive Wall: The defensive stalwarts who thwarted opponent's attacks and blocked crucial shots.

Section 4: The Turning Point

Examining the moment or moments that proved to be the turning point of the game:

Game-Winning Goal: A deep dive into the goal or play that ultimately decided the outcome.

Game-Changing Saves: Critical saves by the goaltenders that preserved the lead or tied the game.

Section 5: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Playoff Game 7s

Addressing common questions and discussions related to Game 7s in playoff hockey:

What makes Game 7s so special in the playoffs?

Exploring the unique drama and win-or-go-home nature of Game 7s.

How do players manage the immense pressure in a Game 7?

Insights into the mental and physical preparation that players undergo.

Are there any notable Game 7 traditions or superstitions among fans?

Discussing fan rituals and traditions associated with pivotal games.

Section 6: Conclusion

Game 7s in playoff hockey are where legends are made and memories are etched into the hearts of fans. The dramatic swings in momentum, the clutch performances, and the unforgettable moments all contribute to the allure of these contests. The Game 7 we've explored in this article, with its thrilling highs and gut-wrenching lows, serves as a reminder of the emotional rollercoaster that playoff hockey provides. As the postseason progresses, fans can look forward to more heart-stopping moments and the possibility of witnessing history unfold on the ice. In the world of playoff hockey, every game is a story waiting to be written, and Game 7s are the most exhilarating chapters of them all.

R1, G6: Stayin' Alive

Oh, the frustrations of being a Ranger fan, what a cross we have to bear. If the Rangers were capable of playing at the level that they did on Monday night, why the hell is this series going to seven games? The Blueshirts put together a terrific performance to top Ottawa 3-2 to level the series at three.

The boys were physical, they were smart, they were resilient, they were a first place team. It was one of the rare times this season that all elements worked efficiently: their best players were their best players and there was secondary scoring, solid special teams and incredible defense. Things just worked. And it was wonderful.

And now they have a chance to do it again on Thursday. And they had better do it again on Thursday.

Or else.

It's hard to organize all the reactions amid the sheer relief of surviving but I'll give it a shot in the Late Hits:

*Love the Code, it is one of my favourite things about our sport. Prust hits Karlsson, Neil hits Richards in response. Prust then fights Neil. You hit ours, we hit yours, time to dance. Bloody beautiful.

*That fight though ... that wasn't pretty. Poor Pruster is clearly not the pugilist he was before the Krys Barch fight broke everything that was fixed in his offseason shoulder surgery. But, as he has said, "it's just pain." After a string of underwhelming performances to start the series, Prust was a huge factor for the Rangers in this one. He and Rupp came out hitting and his fight against Neil signalled that the Rangers weren't ready to quit this series.

*It was no coincidence that the Rangers hit Erik Karlsson five times over the night and won the game. (They hit him five times total, total over the previous four matches.)

*Alfie! Alfie! Alfie! Invisible, except when being hit by John Mitchell of all people. Check that: except when being hit by Mitchell and when being stoned in front by Hank. That save by the King, with the game tied at one, was MASSIVE. If Alfredsson scored the go-ahead goal in his first game back, the roof would have blown off that building and it would have been all-but-impossible for the Rangers to recover.

*Mitchell on the power play? Mitchell on the penalty kill? Mitchell holding blackmail photos of Torts' wife. Well ... maybe not, but how do you explain it?

*Welcome back Hagelin. A nice, simple, tenacious performance. Bork!

*That Senator Silfverberg has a big future - looked a lot like that Nyqvist kid on Detroit. What is it with the influx of young, skilled Swedish forwards? Put him out there with Karlsson, Bishop, Stone and Zibanejad in the next few years and Ottawa could be really dangerous.

*Ever since people decided they needed third parties to mediate their sporting events there have been fans who have disapproved of the actions and decisions of those third parties. And when those decisions directly affect the results, well those fans voice their disapproval. This is me voicing my disapproval: Tim Peel needs to be relieved of his duties. You never want to see someone out of work, but officiating NHL hockey is clearly not something he is capable or competent of doing so he should be banished to the unemployment line. The calls throughout the night - on both sides - were not dubious, they were egregious.

*The USA! USA! chants at the Garden will finally be appropriate on Thursday when Step, Kreider and Callahan take the ice. The three all-American boys worked quite well together for enough shifts that they deserve a shot to stay together despite Torts' tendency to juggle lines. And, riffing off the U.S. aspect of it, it seemed like Step finally realized that 'a bruise on the leg is a hell of a long way from the heart.' The kid was playing at a level unseen from him this series to be sure.

*And congrats to Kreider: right time, right place, perfect release.

*Del Zaster had two of his better moments as a Ranger. First he made an outstanding keep-in on the Richard$ goal, then he lined up Neil with a hit. Sure he barely made contact and Neil milked it as much as he could, but seeing that Sen rolling around was outstanding. It was a nice measure of revenge after DZ left Staal outmatched in front on the opening goal of the game.

*Dubi picked up some of Boyle's ice time and most of his faceoff duties. He proved capable, but little more. This kid used to tease an impressive combination of size, power and hands and now he is little more than a third line plug. Kinda sad. Really woulda been nice if he could have helped Cally convert one of those shorthanded breaks.

*Pretty sure I saw Konopka get away with a clear headbutt on Rupp in the first period, just before he got hung for the ridiculous roughing call. Rupp, by the way, played three more shifts in the first, none in the second and just one in the third. He really had his legs for that one in the third, let me tell you. And he came out of the gate flying - well, as close to flying as Rupp gets.

*Two minutes for Stu? Really Torts? Can't deny that McDonagh did utterly phenomenal work in his extended minutes - minutes he pretty much needed to play - but keeping Bickel benched for so long only hurts the team in the long run.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Chris Neil - one goal.
2-Henrik Lundqvist - 25 saves.
1-Derek Stepan - one goal and two assists.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Richard$ - Hey, there is that power play quarterback we were promised!
2-Neil - The only thing that didn't work for him was his act behind the net. Hate him so very much, which means he is doing his job so very well.
1-McDonagh - Step collected a few points and the King came through with a few big saves but McD was a rock all night long (all night). As Girardi has faded ever so slightly since the All Star Game, McD has raised his game to another level. Love you Bob Gainey!

 R1, G6: Stayin' Alive - A Playoff Thriller for the Ages

Playoff hockey is a theater of emotions, where teams battle for survival and fans ride the rollercoaster of excitement. In this article, we delve into the heart-pounding Game 6 of the first round (R1, G6), a contest that epitomized the drama and intensity of playoff hockey. We'll analyze the pivotal moments, standout performances, and address frequently asked questions (FAQs) about this unforgettable playoff thriller.

Section 1: The Playoff Intensity

The Playoff Crucible: An introduction to the unique intensity and pressure of postseason hockey.

Series Context: Setting the stage by discussing the series leading up to this pivotal Game 6.

Section 2: The Game Unfolds

A detailed examination of the key elements that defined this memorable Game 6:

Early Drama: A recounting of the early moments of the game and the intensity that set the tone.

Goaltending Brilliance: Highlighting the exceptional performances of goaltenders and their role in keeping their teams in the game.

Section 3: Standout Performances

Recognizing the players who shone in this high-stakes contest:

Offensive Heroes: Analyzing the players who made clutch offensive contributions, including goals and assists.

Defensive Excellence: Singling out the defensive stalwarts who thwarted opponent's attacks and made crucial plays.

Section 4: The Turning Point

Examining the moment or moments that proved to be the turning point of the game:

Game-Tying Goal: A deep dive into the goal or play that evened the score and set the stage for the dramatic finish.

Overtime Drama: Discussing the overtime periods and the emotions they evoked among players and fans.

Section 5: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Playoff Thrillers

Addressing common questions and discussions related to thrilling playoff games:

What makes playoff overtime so captivating for fans?

Exploring the unique drama and sudden-death nature of playoff overtime.

How do players manage the immense pressure in crucial playoff games?

Insights into the mental and physical preparation that players undergo.

Are there any memorable fan reactions or traditions associated with playoff thrillers?

Discussing fan rituals and traditions that amplify the excitement of playoff hockey.

Section 6: Conclusion

Playoff thrillers like Game 6 are the essence of postseason hockey, where heroes emerge, legends are born, and emotions run high. The rollercoaster of emotions, the dramatic goals, and the relentless effort by both teams create indelible memories for fans and players alike. In the world of playoff hockey, every game is a story waiting to be written, and Game 6s are the chapters that leave a lasting mark. As the postseason continues, fans can look forward to more heart-stopping moments and the possibility of witnessing history unfold on the ice. The drama of playoff hockey is a testament to the enduring appeal of the sport, where every game is an opportunity for greatness and every moment is a chance to etch one's name in the annals of hockey history.

R1, G5: Gutless At The Garden

It is an odd thing that the 2011-12 New York Rangers, a team that clawed its way to the top not on skill but on hard work, would piss away their season so softly.

On Saturday night the Rangers were outworked for the fourth straight game of their playoff series against the Senators and lost 2-0. They moved one game away from elimination, trailing Ottawa 3-2 in the best of seven. I've overused T. S. Eliot's "The Hollow Men" in this blog but rarely has it been more true than now. The Blueshirts are ending their season "not with a bang but a whimper."

The team that led the NHL with 65 fights this season (0.79 per game) has just one bout in the series. And that is not for lack of provocation from the Senators, to be sure. That is because John Tortorella has tied the hands (or gloves to the hands) of the Ranger tough guys. Torts has taken the team away from a crash-bang, hard hitting, hard punching, forechecking team to one that sits back and reacts to their opponent. And Ottawa has used their team speed to take advantage of the time and space to dominate play. It's pathetic.

And, almost thankfully, it's almost over. All we have left to hope for is Carl Hagelin's youthful reckless abandon ignites the offence when he returns to action on Monday. That's right, a team with Ryan Callahan, Brandon Dubinsky, Marian Gaborik and Brad Richard$ (among others) needs a rookie to return its identity. Pathetic.

Late Hits

*As the Rangers have done all too often since the lockout, they inflated the opposing goaltender's numbers. Craig Anderson skated away with a 41 save shutout, but if he had to take a shower afterwards I'd be shocked. The Rangers shooters just fired the puck on net and rarely followed it. They didn't get into the slot, they didn't get into the crease. They aimed for the logo on Anderson's chest and skated away at the whistle.

*If Tortorella was indeed upset over the Neil hit on Boyle, why didn't he have anyone do anything about it? At this point he appears to be dressing Stu Bickel and Mike Rupp for no reason other than to meet the roster minimum, which is unfortunate.

*That hit, by the way, was totally clean. It was a great hit on a player not paying attention. So quit your crying. This is hockey.

*Neil has been one of the most valuable players in the series, to be sure. He has been throwing his body around, he has been contributing to the offense and has been capable backchecking. Doing exactly what Dubi should be doing for the Rangers.

*Yet another game where Erik Karlsson skated free. The Swede was hit once. Once. That makes for a total of five over the last four games. The linchpin to the Senator offense. Not that Del Zaster is in the same stratosphere of Karlsson (NOT EVEN CLOSE), but the Sens made sure to hit the Rangers lone "offensive defenseman" three times.

*Eight minutes of power play time, seven shots, no goals. Del Zastrous. New York typical.

*The one real goal against was abominable. John Mitchell abandoned his man Jason Spezza for a foolhardy poke check on Mark Stone and Stone smartly took advantage of it with a perfect pass. How Spezza's shot beat Hank five hole, well, that is beyond me. A terrible mistake by Hank. But you would think a goaltender should be allowed to survive one mistake while playing behind a first place team, wouldn't you?

*Chris Kreider just one shot in seven and a half minutes of play. If he was any more invisible his name would be Artem Anisimov.

*Perhaps Anisimov will show up in Game 6 if Torts deigns to pair him with Prust - the tough guy sparked Arty before (along with Jody Shelley), perhaps having the bruiser's heart will get him going again.

*Zenon Konopka played nearly 11 minutes (four of which were shorthanded), had an assist and won 10 of 12 faceoffs. Rupp played for five and a half and took a minor for charging. Ugh.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Jason Spezza - two goals.
2-Henrik Lundqvist - 28 saves.
1-Craig Anderson - 41 saves.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Anderson - Allowed one less softie than Hank.
2-Hank - One terrible goal aside, this game could easily have been four or five to zip.
1-Spezza - Spezza's first two goals of the series were more than enough to win on this night.

 R1, G5: Gutless At The Garden - A Tale of Playoff Heartbreak

Playoff hockey can be a rollercoaster of emotions, with games that leave fans on the edge of their seats. In this article, we delve into the unforgettable Game 5 of the first round (R1, G5), a contest that ended in heartbreak for one team. We'll analyze the pivotal moments, standout performances, and address frequently asked questions (FAQs) about this gut-wrenching playoff clash.

Section 1: The Playoff Atmosphere

Playoff Fever: An introduction to the heightened emotions and fervor that surround postseason hockey.

Series Context: Setting the stage by discussing the series leading up to this fateful Game 5.

Section 2: The Game Unfolds

A detailed examination of the key elements that defined this heart-wrenching Game 5:

Early Drama: A recounting of the early moments of the game and the intensity that set the tone.

Momentum Swings: Highlighting the shifts in momentum and the crucial plays that turned the tide.

Section 3: Standout Performances

Recognizing the players who shone in this high-stakes contest:

Offensive Heroes: Analyzing the players who made clutch offensive contributions, including goals and assists.

Goaltending Brilliance: Singling out the goaltenders who made sensational saves to keep their teams in the game.

Section 4: The Turning Point

Examining the moment or moments that proved to be the turning point of the game:

Game-Winning Goal: A deep dive into the goal or play that sealed the victory for one team and shattered the hopes of the other.

Late Drama: Discussing the frenetic final moments of the game and the desperation that ensued.

Section 5: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Playoff Heartbreak

Addressing common questions and discussions related to heart-wrenching playoff losses:

How do players cope with the emotional toll of a heartbreaking loss in the playoffs?

Insights into the mental and emotional resilience required to bounce back from disappointment.

What role does fan support play in consoling a team after a gut-wrenching loss?

Examining the comfort and encouragement that fans provide to lift their team's spirits.

Are there any memorable fan reactions or rituals associated with heartbreaking playoff losses?

Discussing the passionate and sometimes cathartic responses of fans who invest their emotions in the game.

Section 6: Conclusion

Game 5 of the playoff series was a testament to the emotional rollercoaster that is postseason hockey. The elation of victory and the agony of defeat are deeply intertwined in the fabric of the sport. While one team celebrated their triumph, the other grappled with heartbreak and disappointment. It is in these moments that the true character of athletes and fans alike is revealed. As we look ahead to future playoff battles, we remember that the pain of defeat makes the joy of victory all the sweeter. Playoff hockey remains an arena where legends are born, and unforgettable moments are etched into the annals of the sport's history. In the face of gut-wrenching losses, resilience, hope, and the promise of redemption are always on the horizon for those who dare to dream of playoff glory.

R1, G4: More OT Awfulness

The Rangers had a chance to take a stranglehold in their series against the Ottawa Senators on Wednesday and they blew it.

The Blueshirts blew an early 2-0 lead and ultimately lost 3-2 in overtime, letting the Sens draw even at two games apiece. John Tortorella has not had his team press the advantage once this season and he did not have them do it again last night. They take the lead and battle to hang on to it, praying that Hank will be up to the task. Well, one game after giving a dominating performance he could not. All three Senator goals were stoppable but bigger factor was the fact that the Rangers couldn't get any kind of attack together against an Ottawa defense that gave up 240 goals - the most of any team to make the playoffs.

It is getting harder and harder to figure out which team was the higher seed entering this series. That is not a testament to the Senators, but proof that the Rangers play down to the level of their opponents - something they have done all year. That year is about to end if they can't figure out how to finish off what should be an inferior foe.

Late Hits:

*One hit on Karlsson, three minutes into the game. This marks the third game in row that the Swedish defenseman hasn't been hit and the third game in a row where the Rangers were outplayed. Not a coincidence.

*Mike Rupp was the best Ranger during the overtime. Let me repeat that. Mike Rupp was the best Ranger during the overtime. On one hand, Rupp's playoff past is why the Rangers signed him (over Zenon Kenopka, who would actually have been far more of a help this season). On the other hand, HE IS MIKE F-ING RUPP!

*Why did no one go after Carkner? Instead of getting his comeuppance he got an assist. Oops.

*Helluva hit by Marc Staal on Jason Spezza. Helluva hit. And nice of Spezza to play it up to try to get Staal sent off. Sorry, didn't work softie.

*Speaking of soft, no Alfredsson again. While we made the superstar vs. rookie claim on the suspension decision to Hagelin, it is appearing more and more that both were equally important to their teams. Unfortunately, while the Sens are surviving, Hagelin's absence is killing the Rangers. The forecheck is not the same, the attack is not the same, the dump and chase is not the same ... the only good thing about this series extending to six games is that the kid will be back before it is too late.

*His replacement Chris Kreider continues to look out of place. Kreider has NHL skills, to be sure, but he is not a NHL-ready package. He looks lost out there at times, he disappears and he has blown the few scoring chances that he has been given on a silver platter. The college kid would certainly have been better served skating in Hartford (with JT Miller now) than being thrust into the middle of this chaos. We just have to hope that a supporting Garden crowd will give him the boost he needs to be relevant on Saturday.

*Nice to get two first period power play goals. Not nice to blow three second period power plays, one of which where they didn't get off a single shot. New York typical.

*Brian Boyle's scoring streak was snapped. Boyle played more than 19 minutes just three out of the previous 85 games. He never played more than 20 minutes. So it only makes sense that a desperate Tortorella would put him out for 20:54 in this one.

*Boyle took 28 faceoffs, Richard$ 23. The next-highest was Arty, who took four. Things worked out for Torts in Tampa when leaned hard on a young Richard$ and Vinny Lecavalier constantly, because they were superstars. Things are not working out here - he has to use more of his lineup.

*Stu Bickel had the save of the night in Game 3, so it only makes sense for Torts to keep him on the bench for most of this one. Stu got called for a nickel-dime penalty, McDonagh got called for two of them. And Mac just kept on playing on. That is not to say that they are equal - they are not - but that Torts is too hard on Stu. Konopka and Neil regularly made themselves at home around Hank but the Ranger head coach decided to keep his bruiser blueliner on the bench. Ridiculous.

*Derek Stepan was not good. Pointless in his last six, two goals in his last 21 games. Heard that he may be nursing an undisclosed injury and, given his level of play, would not be the least bit surprised if that was indeed the case.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Brad Richards - two assists.
2-Craig Anderson - 31 saves.
1-Kyle Turris - one goal.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Richard$ - Good numbers across the board but he couldn't help the Rangers when it counted.
2-Milan Michalek - The Czech, who happens to hail from the same hometown of Ales Kotalik, plays in all situations and finally broke through for a goal.
1-Sergei Gonchar - An offensive defenseman who contributes on the scoresheet? Heh, how about that? Del Zaster, one assist in his last eight games. (You had know I'd get him in this wrap at some point ...)

 R1, G4: More OT Awfulness - A Playoff Saga Continues

Playoff hockey is known for its thrilling, heart-pounding moments, and the unpredictability of overtime only intensifies the drama. In this article, we'll delve into the unforgettable Game 4 of the first round (R1, G4), a contest that extended into multiple overtimes, and analyze the pivotal moments, standout performances, and frequently asked questions (FAQs) about this epic playoff battle.

Section 1: The Playoff Allure

The Magic of Playoff Overtime: An introduction to the unique excitement and tension that overtime periods bring to postseason hockey.

Series Context: Setting the stage by discussing the series leading up to this marathon Game 4.

Section 2: The Game Unfolds

A detailed examination of the key elements that defined this extended playoff clash:

Endurance Test: Recounting the grueling nature of multiple overtime periods and the physical and mental toll on players.

Ebb and Flow: Highlighting the momentum swings and critical plays that kept fans on the edge of their seats.

Section 3: Standout Performances

Recognizing the players who shone in this marathon game:

Overtime Heroes: Analyzing the players who scored the critical goals in overtime and how they delivered under immense pressure.

Goaltending Brilliance: Singling out the goaltenders who made remarkable saves to keep their teams alive.

Section 4: The Turning Point

Examining the moment or moments that proved to be the turning point of the game:

Overtime Drama Unfolds: A deep dive into the goals, near-misses, and dramatic sequences that unfolded during the overtime periods.

The Game-Winner: Discussing the climactic moment that decided the game and the celebration that followed.

Section 5: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Playoff Overtime

Addressing common questions and discussions related to playoff overtime:

What is the longest game in playoff history, and how does it compare to this game's duration?

Exploring historic playoff marathons and how R1, G4 stacks up.

How do players stay mentally focused and physically conditioned during extended overtimes?

Insights into the mental fortitude and conditioning required to endure prolonged playoff battles.

Are there any famous playoff overtime rituals or superstitions among players and fans?

Discussing the unique traditions and superstitions that emerge during overtime games.

Section 6: Conclusion

Game 4 of the playoff series was a testament to the enduring allure of playoff hockey, where every shot, save, and goal can change the course of history. As the overtime periods stretched on, fans were treated to a rare and captivating display of determination, skill, and heart from both teams. In the end, there could only be one winner, but the legacy of this game will live on as a reminder of the incredible drama that playoff hockey can deliver. As we look ahead to future postseason battles, we can be certain that the magic of playoff overtime will continue to captivate fans and create moments that define the sport for generations to come.

R1, G3: Thank You Henrik ...

The King is a mighty crutch to have in hockey, as last night's 1-0 Ranger win proved. Henrik Lundqvist made 39 saves on the Sens to help give the Blueshirts a 2-1 lead in the best o' seven series.

It was a great result, given the not so great effort from the Rangers. Ottawa, without one of their top scorers, pinned the Blueshirts in their own end for long stretches and peppered Hank with shots. The Rangers transition game was nothing short of abominable as it was a tough chore to get out of their own zone, much less through the neutral zone and in on Anderson. Their puck pressure was poor, their forecheck was sporadic and they pissed away two full power plays and 24 seconds of a third.

However, all was not awful (especially the result). The boys got in a few good counterpunches but just could not finish. No Ranger will be getting suspended for any of his actions. No Ranger cowered beneath the physicality of his opponent. And Henrik Lundqvist showed some simply outstanding form. All are things to build on for Game 4 as the team hopefully turns this tough victory into an easier one on Wednesday.

Late Hits:

*Is there anything more awesome than seeing Hank get angry? He put up with Neil in his face all night and finally snapped when Konopka came calling. Konopka, one of the toughest guys in the NHL - a guy who had 307 PIM last season, 76 fights in his last three seasons. Hank's got some big Swedish meatballs, if you know what I mean.

*It is astounding how streaky (and thus frustrating) of a player Brian Boyle is, but you simply can not complain about the timing of this latest hot streak. On a night where Gabby was frustrated and Richard$ was invisible, Boyle kept his hot hand going. People have been saying it since before he was drafted - when Boyle is willing and able to use his size, he is a solid player. The rest of the time ... notsomuch. It is of little coincidence that Boyle's goals start going in once he is willing to use his size to make space in front of the net.

*Erik Karlsson may be a disciple of the school of Nick Lidstrom but it was Dan Girardi who best used one of the lessons taught by the Swedish superstar. One of Lidstrom's top moves is to use the ricochet off the endboards to get a puck through to the slot and Dan-O did just that. The puck bounced off the boards and came back to Boyle for the one-timer past Anderson. Simple, sexy stuff.

*Karlsson, by the way, was hit just once according to the official play-by-play (I didn't notice it) - and that was with an official scorekeeper who counted an outrageous 81 hits in a relatively timid game.

*Both Carl Hagelin and Daniel Alfredsson were missed by their teams. The Rangers were clearly lacking the speed and tenacity of Young Carl's forecheck and, without Alfredson's virtual ownership of Lundqvist the Sens couldn't score. Of course, Carl was Shanabanned so he had no choice. Alfie passed all of the concussion tests and just didn't bother to show up. That's a captain right there.

*That being said, gotta admire the Scotiabank Crowd for their 11:11 countdown and chant in his honour - they are respecting one of their own, a guy who has played in Ottawa his entire career. Ranger fans that mocked it ... most of you join in on "Potvin Sucks" and have no idea the origin of that chant so shush.

*Serious attaboy to Anton Stralman for his play in the final minute. Who knew he had that in him?

*Best save of the night? Not Hank on Turris. Not Anderson on Callahan. Stu Bickel on Jim O'Brien. Outstanding arm save by the big Minnesota boy. Despite being the unnecessary butt of Tortorella's ire often this season, Stu has helped save the Blueshirt blueliners by stepping in for Sauer with strong, capable play. It isn't flashy at all but it has certainly filled part of the huge gap left by Sauer's absence.

*Del Zaster ... not sure what is left to say anymore. He prizes his offense over his defense and yet he often doesn't even do that right. He was utterly incapable of carrying the puck out, he gambled and failed in the Ottawa end several times and his work on the power play is pedantic at best.

*Really had hoped Dubi would have had a far better game than he did. After his early ejection in Game 2, you would think he would have been even more riled up and ready to go. Unfortunately he had a largely timid performance, outside of the facewash to Foligno after the Sen dumped Cally in a post-whistle scrum. He has to be more involved.

*So does Chris Kreider. Kreider looked like a kid with no NHL experience out there but he definitely displayed the skills the scouts said he had. That was clearly evident right from the outset - his initial shift saw him playing proper Ranger hockey: dump, chase, hit and keep after it. This is a trial by fire and Kreider managed not to get burned in his first game. We'll see how he does in his second and beyond ...

*PHW Three Stars
3-Brian Boyle - one goal.
2-Craig Anderson - 22 saves.
1-Henrik Lundqvist - 39 saves.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Anderson - Seriously considered Girardi but Anderson does deserve recognition. He was hardly tested but when he was, he came though with solid saves.
2-Boyle - Outshined Richard$, outshined Spezza, outshined everyone due to his battle level. Outstanding.
1-Hank - Considered giving him all three stars for that effort. Outstanding.

 R1, G3: Thank You, Henrik - A Tribute to a Hockey Legend

In the world of professional hockey, certain names resonate not just with fans of a particular team but with the entire hockey community. Henrik, a legend in his own right, has etched his name in the annals of the sport's history. In this article, we'll delve into the memorable Game 3 of the first round (R1, G3), celebrating Henrik's illustrious career, analyzing his standout performance, and addressing frequently asked questions (FAQs) about this remarkable player's impact on the game.

Section 1: The Legacy of a Legend

Henrik's Journey: An introduction to Henrik's remarkable career, from his early days in the sport to becoming one of its most iconic figures.

The Game in Focus: Setting the stage by discussing the significance of Game 3 in Henrik's storied career.

Section 2: The Game Unfolds

A detailed examination of the key elements that defined this pivotal Game 3:

Henrik's Heroics: Reliving the moments of brilliance and clutch saves that highlighted Henrik's performance in this crucial game.

The Opposition: Analyzing the formidable opponents and the challenges Henrik faced during the game.

Section 3: Standout Performances

Celebrating the players and moments that defined this game:

Henrik's Impact: Highlighting Henrik's influence on the game, from his leadership on the ice to his mentorship off it.

Opposing Stars: Recognizing the opposing players who also left their mark on Game 3.

Section 4: The Turning Point

Examining the pivotal moment or moments that defined the game's outcome:

Henrik's Signature Saves: A close look at the breathtaking saves that became the signature of Henrik's career.

The Game-Changing Play: Discussing the game-altering play or decision that shifted the momentum in favor of Henrik's team.

Section 5: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Henrik's Impact

Addressing common questions and discussions related to Henrik's influence on the game:

What are some of Henrik's career milestones and records that stand as a testament to his greatness?

An exploration of Henrik's statistical achievements and records that solidify his legendary status.

How did Henrik's leadership extend beyond the ice, and what impact did he have on his teammates and the hockey community?

Insights into Henrik's leadership qualities, mentorship, and charitable contributions that endeared him to fans and peers alike.

What legacy does Henrik leave for the next generation of goaltenders and the sport of hockey as a whole?

Reflecting on the lasting impact Henrik's career will have on the future of goaltending and the game.

Section 6: Conclusion

Game 3 of the first round was not just a moment in Henrik's career; it was a testament to the indomitable spirit, skill, and passion that he brought to the sport. As fans, we're fortunate to have witnessed his incredible journey, from the dazzling saves to the moments of pure magic on the ice. Henrik's legacy extends far beyond the rink, serving as an inspiration for aspiring goaltenders and a symbol of excellence for the entire hockey world. In saying "Thank You, Henrik," we express our gratitude for the memories, the brilliance, and the enduring impact of a true hockey legend.

R1, G2: So Much For Home Ice

Several hours of retrospection have helped to find one single common thread among the many failures by the Blueshirts in Game 2 against Ottawa:

John Tortorella.

The Ranger bench boss made a plethora of mistakes in judgement and they cost his team a playoff game. Forgive me if that sounds familiar - as his errors cost the Blueshirts the Washington series in 2009 too - but his team tonight deserved a better fate.

Torts let his charges sit back on both leads they earned, apparently thinking that a one-goal advantage was enough in a playoff game ... a game against a team that scored 23 more goals than his own during the regular season. Instead they allowed the game-tying tally with less than five minutes to go and lost 3-2 early in overtime. Awful.

Torts saw the success the Rangers had in hitting Karlsson in Game 1 but did not demand they punish him again in Game 2 - Karlsson was hit twice. Twice. The guy was physically intimidated by all of the contact in the opener and played 30 minutes in this one. And he was hit twice. Inexcusable.

Torts kept Mitchell and Rupp off the ice entirely after the second period. Rupp may be largely useless, but Mitchell was actually having a solid outing before being stapled to the bench. By over-using the top lines in a defensive role, the skill guys had little energy to make honest attacks on a goaltender that they utterly owned in Game 1. And what makes it even worse is that Rupp's and Mitchell's counterparts - Chris Neil and Zenon Konopka - played a huge part for Ottawa.

The other Ranger with an edge, Stu Bickel, was limited to all of six shifts - two in the second period and one in the third. The remaining Blueshirt blueliners were physically worn down by overtime and were scrambling in their own end, leading to Neil's goal.

The head coach will have to get his head about him if the Rangers are to regain the momentum in this series. Luckily the Blueshirts had a 27-12-2 home record this year and a nearly identical away record of 24-12-5. But to replicate that regular season success the Rangers will have to replicate the physical play that brought them a win in the playoff opener: Karlsson needs to be abused, lines need to be better managed, bodies need to pile up around Anderson and goals need to pile up behind him.

This series depends on it.

Late Hits:

*Matt Carkner was the hero of the game for Ottawa because he did his job, above and beyond. He got revenge for Boyle's nuggies on Karlsson in Game 1 and intimidated the Rangers away from doing anything to the kid in Game 1. And he took a hard-working Ranger with him while doing it. That is a helluva performance by the no-talent neanderthal.

*Good job turtling Boyle, surely Claude Lemieux and Sean Avery are proud wherever they may be. It was Willie Huber channelling Jeff Bloemberg. You have to respect Dubi for doing the right thing but for him to even have to defend a 6-foot-7, 245 pound behemoth is ridiculous. Boyle tried to save face by taking on Neil but, of course, the Senator won that debate. And that final shift in overtime was full of fail for the big softie Boyle as he lost a defensive zone faceoff and lost his coverage, allowing Neil to win again. It is delightful that the BC alum has been able to provide some secondary scoring - someone, anyone needed to step up - but he still needs to be solid in his own end, that's his job.

*Callahan showed that, unlike the soft septuagenerian captain of Ottawa, he actually has some integrity and toughness. He ducked his head and took an elbow from Chris Phillips in the first period. Alfredsson ducked his head and took an elbow from Hagelin in the second and went down like a ton of bricks to draw a major penalty. Maybe if Cally collapsed and called it a night the Rangers would have received another five minute power play. Not that they would have scored on it but still ...

*A knuckle puck from Anton Stralman ensured that the Rangers escaped with one goal in their 10 minutes and 39 seconds of power play time. They had a man advantage for more than one-sixth of regulation and scored once - on a lucky shot at that. The power play has been a sore spot for much of this season but Tortorella keeps throwing the same personnel out there hoping for a different result. I do believe that that is the definition of insanity.

*Del Zaster had 6:17 of power play time and did not score or set up or even witness a single goal during that span. But he had 3:14 of shorthanded time and deftly redirected a shot in for Ottawa with his skate; perhaps the Red Bulls could use his services. Sure he picked off the pass to feed Fedotenko (who looked offsides) on the Boyle goal but that doesn't level the ledger. DZ's defensive play has been disgraceful from Day 1 and has not gotten any better. Did he have a good moment in the second period where he forced two turnovers? Yes. Was he constantly outmatched the rest of the time? Yes.

*Walcom and Walsh have shown their incompetence time and time again and yet are still given regular assignments for the NHL. Their work on this evening was atrocious. They battled to ensure that all of the calls evened out and "missed" blatantly obvious infractions inches away from them - for both teams. Just piss poor officiating.

*Brandon Prust = heart. Balls to the wall, every second of every shift. And he had one of the two hits on Karlsson!

*Cally, dude ... one on one with Craig Anderson, how do you blow that? Anderson's five hole opened up bigger than the Lincoln Tunnel - exactly as it did for Gabby in Game 1. And Cally chipped the puck into the goaltender's waiting glove. Heartbreaker. But it must be said that that late first period gaffe was the only egregious error in his evening as the captain put together another outstanding game. If this team goes down, it won't be from lack of effort by its leader.

*Speaking of Gabby, did the Slovakian Sniper dress for this game? Didn't notice him. Well, outside of the Foligno goal - what a terrible shift by the Ranger top line on that one.

*Nick Foligno had exactly the kind of performance Dubi should have been able to have if not for Boyle, full of gritty work around the opponent's net.

*What was the deal with the second-rate cover band playing every other break? Eesh. The music director finally got things right by playing some edgier music to match the mood but the hackney covers were just unnecessary.

*Absolutely love, love, love that the Minnesota guys who get the call to start the game wait to leave the blue line after the national anthem until the American flag is taken off the ice. Noticed it a few games ago with McD and Step and, on this night, Stuuuuu. Class. USA! USA!

*As mentioned after Game 1, those USA chants are ridiculous The Sens have seven Americans on their roster, the Rangers have seven Americans on their roster. And to chant that after the Swedish goaltender makes a save is just stupid.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Daniel Alfredsson - A convincing dive to draw a five minute power play.
2-Brian Boyle - one goal.
1-Chris Neil - one goal.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Hank - The King made 29 saves and could hardly be faulted on the three shots he missed.
2-Karlsson - The Swede controlled play singlehandedly for long stretches of the night.
1-Carkner - Mission accomplished.

 R1, G2: So Much For Home Ice - A Playoff Rollercoaster

Playoff hockey is known for its unpredictability and the ability of underdog teams to upset higher-seeded opponents. In this article, we'll take a deep dive into Game 2 of Round 1 (R1, G2) of a specific playoff series, analyzing the twists and turns of the game, discussing the impact of home-ice advantage, and addressing frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to playoff dynamics.

Section 1: The Importance of Home-Ice Advantage

Setting the Stage: Discussing the significance of home-ice advantage in playoff hockey, including crowd support and familiarity with the arena.

The Underdog's Challenge: Highlighting the pressure on higher-seeded teams to defend their home ice against determined underdogs.

Section 2: The Game in Focus

A detailed examination of the key elements that defined this pivotal Game 2:

Game Recap: Describing the game's progression, including goals, key plays, and standout performances.

Turning Points: Identifying the critical moments that shifted the momentum in favor of one team or the other.

Section 3: Home-Ice Advantage Tested

An analysis of how home-ice advantage played out in Game 2:

The Crowd's Impact: Discussing the role of the home crowd in energizing the team and influencing the game's flow.

The Underdog's Resilience: Exploring how the underdog team managed to maintain composure and disrupt the home team's advantage.

Section 4: Standout Performances

Celebrating the players and moments that defined this game:

Key Players: Recognizing the standout performances, including goalscorers, goaltenders, and playmakers.

Coaching Strategies: Discussing the coaching decisions that shaped the game's outcome.

Section 5: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Playoff Dynamics

Addressing common questions and discussions related to the dynamics of playoff hockey:

Why do underdog teams often perform well on the road during the playoffs?

Exploring the psychology behind underdog motivation and the pressure on higher-seeded teams.

How does the playoff atmosphere differ from the regular season, and how does it impact players' performance?

Discussing the heightened intensity and pressure that players experience in playoff games.

What can fans and teams expect in the upcoming games of the series, considering the unpredictability of playoff hockey?

Offering insights into the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in a playoff series.

Section 6: Conclusion

Game 2 of Round 1 showcased the essence of playoff hockey - the unpredictability, the passion, and the sheer determination of players and teams to secure victory. While home-ice advantage may have been tested, the underdog's resilience and the electrifying atmosphere added to the spectacle. As fans, we can only wait in anticipation for the next chapter of this playoff rollercoaster, knowing that each game brings new surprises and unforgettable moments. Playoff hockey, with its twists and turns, is a reminder that in the quest for the ultimate prize, anything can happen, and that's what makes it so captivating and beloved by fans around the world.