Showing posts with label well that sucked. Show all posts
Showing posts with label well that sucked. Show all posts

Saturday, October 31, 2009

8-5-1: Another Day, Another Loss


If I was John Tortorella, I don't put my team on the ice on Saturday. For the final day of Hockey Fights Cancer month, I take them to Schneider's or Sloan Kettering or any number of the great hospitals in the New York area. Bring the boys to trick or treat with some of the real sick kids. The children would love it, and the team could see what it really means to fight. The patients battle every day for every day, and perhaps the Rangers would realize that the least they could do is play their game as hard as they can.

The Blueshirts turned in another half-hearted performance against a bad team on Friday night, losing to the Minnesota Wild 3-2.

There are no excuses to be had. The injury bug strikes every team and it took Marian Gaborik, Sean Avery and Chris Higgins (allegedly). The remaining roster still could have won, easily. Instead they cruised around the nice Xcel Center ice, making the home team look good while leaving their goalie out to dry time after time.

*How or why do you match the Andrew Brunette, Mikko Koivu, Petr Sykora trio with the fourth line? They don't have the speed, they don't have the skill and, frankly, they don't have a clue. The mismatch allowed Sykora do do what he does best - get the Rangers back for unceremoniously dropping him after a good season just after the lockout. In addition to a second assist on the Belanger goal, Sykora finished the tic-tac-toe passing play that opened the night's scoring. He did it against us on Pittsburgh, he did it against us again.

*That play was started by Donald Brashear. For all of those folks out there who called me out on the carpet for badmouthing Brash, are you starting to realize why yet? Not only is he inept with a hockey stick, he is a big, dumb coward who doesn't help his team in most any way. The Rangers lacked energy, the Wild dressed not one but two over-sized tough guys and yet Brash didn't dance with either. Derek Boogaard is one of the top five, if not top three fighters in the league and caused havoc around the Ranger crease every chance he got. Brashear? Nowhere to be found. Now for all of you apologists out there who want to throw the mystery injury out there, if he was too "sore" to fight, he shouldn't have been playing. If Dane Byers can make it to the arena in time to play, surely another of his teammates could have made the journey.

*And Byers scored to boot. How pathetic is it that Hartford players account for two of the three Ranger goals in the last two games? I like Byers - I think he has a future in the NHL - but the fact that he can get the puck in and Callahan/Prospal/Dubinsky/Drury/Kotalik can not is kinda sad.

*Being outshot 25-13 over the first two periods is outright inexcusable.

*Enver Lisin showed off some of that world class speed in the loss. Damn shame his linemates couldn't keep up with him.

*That the game was telecast on the Armed Services Networks is even worse. The Rangers were not just embarrassed in Minnesota, but worldwide. High class move by Brandon Dubinsky to thank the soldiers during his intermission interview. Now if he could have just scored a goal for those servicemen ... They are risking their lives every day overseas and the government 'rewards' them by making them listen to Joe Micheletti? Now that is waterboarding in it's worse form.

*Something else that really isn't funny is Chris Drury's continuing presence in the lineup. It was his ghost of a stickcheck that allowed Antti Miettinen to score what proved to be the game-winner. Accountability. Heard the word a hundred times. Sitting the captain now would show that it means something.

*Micheletti can rave all he wants to about Wade Redden's pinch on Byer's goal but if the defenseman missed it, it would have been an odd man rush the other way. There is a difference between being lucky and being good and we have learned the hard way that Redden is far from good. Granted, he wasn't particularly bad either.

*MDZ also had that kind of take-it-or-leave-it performance, which is sad seeing that he got so much ice time. His long, bouncing pass started the play that Marc Staal scored on but it was inches away from being picked off for what would have been a three-on-two. He is still a kid and still has a lot to learn.

*Did Matt Gilroy play? I couldn't tell.

*The Blueshirt blueline sure could use a Greg Zanon or a Nick Schultz. Staal and Girardi are close in capability but not as experienced. Perhaps it is time to split them up?

*I have to admit to my ears perking up every time they said Scott. They were talking about Minnesota's John Scott but still. I remember when the Blueshirts called up that goon Richard Scott from Hartford and wanting his jersey. Ah, memories.

*There surely is more worth talking about in this fresh memory but dwelling on another debacle such as this is pointless. The Rangers have a great chance to rebound with a game on home ice before heading west again, let's hope they make the most of it. I don't think they will, but you never know.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Antti Miettinen - one goal.
2-Mikko Koivu - two assists.
1-Petr Sykora - one goal and one assist.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Hank - Without the bevy of kicksaves early and a good glove in the second, this game could/should/would have been much worse. The Rangers did little to clog up the shooting lanes and it showed.
2-Sykora - Nothing like a little vengeance. Too bad Aaron Voros couldn't pull something like that off.
1-Koivu - You had to diminish his brother's rock-solid career but Mikko is much more talented. He has all of the tools and once he gets them working with linemates that are up to speed, he will be outright awesome.



 8-5-1: Another Day, Another Loss - The Rollercoaster of Sports Fandom



In the world of sports, every season brings with it a rollercoaster of emotions. The record 8-5-1: Another Day, Another Loss encapsulates the highs and lows, the exhilarating victories, and the frustrating defeats that define the passionate world of sports fandom. In this article, we will delve into the captivating journey represented by the record 8-5-1, exploring its significance, the emotional rollercoaster of sports, the psychology of fandom, and addressing frequently asked questions (FAQs) that illuminate the complex and enduring relationship between fans and their teams.

8-5-1: Another Day, Another Loss - The Sports Fandom Experience

Significance of the Numbers

The sequence 8-5-1 represents a sports season filled with a mixture of victories and defeats. The numbers symbolize the team's journey, including eight hard-earned wins, five painful losses, and one draw or tie, reflecting the unpredictable nature of sports.

The Emotional Rollercoaster of Sports Fandom

Sports fandom is a unique emotional journey filled with highs and lows that rival any amusement park thrill ride. Here's a glimpse into the emotional rollercoaster that fans experience:

Elation: The joy of victory, the thrill of a game-winning goal, and the pride in one's team's accomplishments create moments of pure elation for fans. These moments are often cherished for a lifetime.

Disappointment: Heartbreaking losses, missed opportunities, and underwhelming performances can lead to profound disappointment. Fans invest their emotions in their teams, and when things don't go well, it can be tough to bear.

Hope: In the face of adversity, fans often cling to hope. They believe in their team's potential for a comeback, a winning streak, or a championship run. Hope keeps fans engaged and passionate, even during challenging times.

Frustration: Sports fandom is not without its frustrations. Questionable calls, controversial decisions, and underperforming players can test a fan's patience and loyalty.

Unity: Fandom fosters a sense of unity and belonging among fans. The shared experiences, traditions, and rituals create a community of individuals who are connected by their love for the team.

The Psychology of Fandom

Sports fandom is a complex psychological phenomenon that combines elements of identity, tribalism, and emotional investment. Here are some key aspects of the psychology of fandom:

Identity: Fans often incorporate their team's identity into their own, using phrases like "we" and "us" when referring to the team. This identification creates a strong sense of belonging and pride.

Tribalism: Fandom can evoke a sense of tribalism, where fans align themselves with a specific group (their team) and may experience rivalry and competition with fans of opposing teams.

Emotional Investment: Fans invest not only their time and money but also their emotions in their team. The highs and lows of the team's performance can have a significant impact on a fan's mood and well-being.

Superstitions and Rituals: Many fans have superstitions and rituals they believe can influence the outcome of games. Wearing a lucky jersey, sitting in a specific seat, or following a game-day routine are common examples.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Sports fandom is a rich and diverse experience that often generates questions and curiosity. Here are some frequently asked questions about sports fandom:

1. Why do people become such passionate sports fans?

People become passionate sports fans for various reasons, including a sense of community, a connection to their hometown or region, family traditions, and the excitement of competition and camaraderie.

2. How do fans cope with heartbreaking losses?

Coping with losses can be challenging for fans. Some find solace in the camaraderie of fellow fans, while others take time to reflect and focus on the positives of their team's journey. Engaging in other activities and hobbies can also help.

3. Can sports fandom have negative effects on mental health?

While sports fandom can be a source of joy and community, it can also lead to stress, anxiety, and disappointment, particularly during tough seasons or losses. It's essential for fans to strike a healthy balance between their fandom and overall well-being.

4. Do superstitions and rituals really affect the outcome of games?

Superstitions and rituals are often about creating a sense of control or influence over unpredictable events. While there is no scientific evidence that these practices impact the outcome of games, they can provide comfort and a sense of involvement for fans.

5. How do fans remain loyal during extended periods of poor performance by their team?

Loyalty during tough times is a testament to the depth of a fan's commitment. Fans often believe in the potential for improvement, future success, or the eventual return to glory. The sense of belonging and community with fellow fans also plays a role in maintaining loyalty.



The record 8-5-1: Another Day, Another Loss serves as a poignant reminder of the emotional rollercoaster that is sports fandom. It encapsulates the passion, the heartache, the unity, and the enduring hope that define the relationship between fans and their teams.

In a world where sports bring people together, ignite rivalries, and create lasting memories, the journey of sports fandom continues to be a cherished and meaningful part of countless lives. It is a journey that transcends mere numbers and statistics, encompassing the shared experiences, traditions, and emotions that make sports a compelling and enduring cultural phenomenon.




Sunday, October 25, 2009

7-3-1: Madness In Montreal


Nights like tonight are going to happen a lot this season. We knew it coming in, so it should be no surprise. Still, it sucks. Quite a bit in fact.

The Rangers blew a two goal lead to fall 5-4 in overtime against the Original Six rival Montreal Canadiens. They were sloppy, they were lazy and they were undisciplined. For all of the tough talk from Torts, the coach seemed incapable of reining his players in. But how could he be all that mad? They played his all-attack, jump-in-the-rush system and they were burned for it by a faster, smarter team.

Just a warning, there is plenty of bitterness below:

*Since day one, this team struggled inside the blueline. Dan Girardi and Marc Staal are quite good - as three and four defensemen. They have been thrust into the top pairing and have yet to get their play to a consistent level where either one deserve it. They have their moments - loved the jump save by Danny to keep the puck in on the Kotalik goal - but neither is mature enough to be top pairing guys.

*Matt Gilroy scored a power play goal. Yay. Matt Gilroy waved at Mike Cammalleri as Cams cut into the slot to score the game-winner in overtime. Boo. Ah, the ups and downs of youth. That kind of stuff has to be expected from a rookie. But what is he doing out on the ice in overtime to begin with?

*Not only did Chris Higgins not score, he was out of position plenty, took a bad penalty and was benched for the third period. Welcome home Higs! Way to shove it in the Montreal fans' faces for being in their doghouse so often by jumping into ours.

*On the other side of the coin, the MexiCan't played a motivated game and collected a pair of assists. I gotta say, I loved that dive he took, he almost sold it too. Almost. Maybe shouldn't have grabbed the Ranger stick before falling ...

*Brandon Dubinsky saw the bench a bunch late. In the second period Dubi turned the puck over in the neutral zone, which led to the Habs second goal of the night. Tortorella seemingly believed that goal was what lost the game for the team, as he threw Dubi under the bus during the postgame for the gaffe. One turnover does not a loss like this make.

*In the end Dubi saw just 8:51 in ice time. Vinny Prospal played 24:51. And yet it was Prospal's stupid, careless penalty that jump started the Canadiens comeback. Ah, hypocritical accountability - the Tortorella way. And then Cams skated right past Prospal on his way to score the game-winner. But not a poor word was said from waht I heard ...

*Soon after that D'Agostini goal Marian Gaborik scored a tremendous one of his own to put the Rangers up by two. We knew Gabby was good, but damn is he blowing the locks off. That tap-the-puck-behind-the-back-to-himself to set up the breakaway was amazing. Shows of skill like that are just going to make it that much more painful when he inevitably gets injured.

*When Dubi and Max Lapierre went crashing into Hank it certainly appeared that our season was over. Hank writhing in pain = bad, very, very bad. It is the third time by my recollection that Hank got nailed this season by one of his own players who was rushing to backcheck. But the Rangers are playing that open-ice, all-attack system so that is what you are gonna get.

*Picking at an old scab, when you take stupid penalty after stupid penalty, your penalty kill had better be great. It wasn't, but don't worry, the muscle of Voros and Boyle was much more important than, say, Blair Betts' selflessness would have been. Hope everyone enjoyed the beating Boyle laid on Matt D'Agostini.

*But Chris Drury was out there to kill penalties. The captain, like Torts' pal Prospal, hasn't heard a bad word from the coach yet and continues his poor play. Dru took a penalty, had one shot and went 9-9 in the circle. Certainly not the kind of effort expected from the captain of the New York Rangers.

*Sean Avery did not get credited with a single hit. How is that possible?

*Before I get to the stars and call it a (miserable) night, I just want to say RIP to the Big Whistle. My dad had fond memories of the man who, I must admit, I thought had already passed. I've mentioned it before but my first memory was when I was three and my dad was yelling "Shoot the puck Barry" at the tv - the line Bill Chadwick is best known for from his day as an announcer.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Marian Gaborik - one goal and one assist.
2-Brian Gionta - two assists.
1-Mike Cammalleri - three goals and one assist.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Paul Mara - Mara had the quiet, workman-like effort that he so often had as a Ranger and we so desperately miss now. That is not to say that Rozy and Redden were bad (they actually weren't) but there is no calm personality that can settle things down anymore.
2-Gionta - That feed to Cams from his belly was awesome.
1-Cama-lama-ding-dong - Tip of the hat to the hat trick. Cams has a helluva lotta speed and is making the transition to the East look easy.



 7-3-1: Madness In Montreal - The Resilience of the Canadiens



In the heart of Montreal, Quebec, the Canadiens have long been a symbol of hockey excellence and passion. The record 7-3-1: Madness In Montreal encapsulates the rollercoaster ride of a hockey season marked by ups, downs, and the unwavering support of the Canadiens' devoted fan base. In this article, we will take a deep dive into the captivating history of the Montreal Canadiens, exploring their legacy, iconic players, memorable moments, and addressing frequently asked questions (FAQs) that provide insights into the enduring spirit of this beloved NHL team.

The Montreal Canadiens: A Legacy of Excellence

Founding and Early Years

The Montreal Canadiens, founded in 1909, are one of the oldest and most storied franchises in the NHL. They quickly established themselves as a powerhouse, winning their first Stanley Cup in 1916.

The Canadiens' Legacy

The Canadiens' legacy is intertwined with their record 24 Stanley Cup championships, the most by any team in NHL history. Legends like Maurice Richard, Jean Béliveau, and Guy Lafleur have graced the Canadiens' iconic red, white, and blue jersey.

Key Figures in Canadiens History

Over the years, the Montreal Canadiens have been home to legendary players who have left an indelible mark on the franchise:

Maurice Richard: Known as the "Rocket," Richard was the first player to score 50 goals in 50 games and remains one of the greatest goal scorers in NHL history.

Jean Béliveau: Béliveau was not only an exceptional player but also a beloved ambassador for the sport. His leadership on and off the ice made him an icon in Montreal.

Guy Lafleur: Lafleur's combination of speed and scoring ability made him one of the most electrifying players of his era. He helped lead the Canadiens to multiple championships.

Memorable Moments in Canadiens History

The Montreal Canadiens have had their share of unforgettable moments that have solidified their place in NHL lore:

The Richard Riot: The Richard Riot of 1955, sparked by the suspension of Maurice Richard, remains a defining moment in Canadiens history and a symbol of the passion of Montreal fans.

The 1970s Dynasty: The Canadiens' dominance in the 1970s, where they won multiple Stanley Cups, is considered one of the greatest dynasties in sports history.

Saku Koivu's Return: In 2002, Saku Koivu's emotional return to the ice after battling cancer touched the hearts of fans worldwide and symbolized the Canadiens' resilience.

7-3-1: Madness In Montreal

Team Identity and Style of Play

The Canadiens are known for their commitment to speed, skill, and strong defensive play. They are often characterized by their emphasis on teamwork and their ability to adapt to different styles of play.

Recent Performances and Challenges

In recent years, the Canadiens have faced challenges but have also experienced moments of promise. Their journey through the 2020-2021 season, marked by a 7-3-1 record, demonstrated their resilience and the potential for future success.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

As the Montreal Canadiens continue to capture the hearts of fans and make headlines, questions about the team frequently arise. Here are some FAQs about the Montreal Canadiens:

1. What is the significance of the Canadiens' iconic "CH" logo?

The "CH" logo is a symbol of pride and tradition in Montreal. It stands for "Club de hockey Canadien" and has become synonymous with the team's rich history and legacy.

2. How do the Canadiens maintain their passionate fan base despite periods of adversity?

The Canadiens' fan base is deeply loyal and passionate. The team's rich history, commitment to excellence, and cultural significance in Montreal contribute to the unwavering support of their fans.

3. What are the Canadiens' prospects for future success?

The Canadiens are a team with a rich tradition and a commitment to winning. Their prospects for future success depend on factors such as player development, roster moves, and the competitive landscape of the NHL.

4. How do the Canadiens celebrate their storied history and championship legacy?

The Canadiens honor their history through jersey retirements, statues of legendary players outside the Bell Centre, and events that bring together former players and the current team to celebrate their rich heritage.

5. What is the significance of the Canadiens' rivalry with the Boston Bruins?

The Canadiens-Bruins rivalry is one of the most storied and intense rivalries in sports. It represents a clash of cultures and has produced memorable moments in NHL history.



The record 7-3-1: Madness In Montreal symbolizes the resilience and passion that define the Montreal Canadiens and their devoted fan base. As one of the oldest and most successful franchises in NHL history, the Canadiens continue to be a source of pride for Montreal and a symbol of hockey excellence.

In the heart of Montreal, where hockey is more than just a sport but a way of life, the Canadiens remain an enduring testament to the enduring love and passion for the game. Their legacy of excellence, commitment to tradition, and the unwavering support of their fans ensure that the Canadiens will continue to be a central figure in the ever-evolving story of the NHL.




Saturday, October 27, 2007

3-6-1: Rangers Get Raked By The Leafs 4-1


So, I, uhhh, wrote that post this afternoon never imagining that the Rangers defense would fall to pieces to Toronto of all teams. I was unable to make it to this home game due to work but thanks to Rangers Rewind I still caught this massacre so onto what I saw:

*The offense still isn't working. No shock there.

*The defense was suspect, and that hurts where it counts. Stupid turnovers and soft play in the Rangers zone cost them the game. Not to mention that Hank should never, ever, EVER come out of the crease to play the puck.

*I love seeing Prucha and Dubi on the power play but definitely on alongside Jagr. They add speed and energy while he kills all momentum.

*At what point does Renney start giving ice time based on how the players are playing rather than how they played in the past? Reputation only goes so far.

*Goddammit take the f-ing C off of Jagr's jersey. Listen to the post-game sound on MSG (they have Shanny's here). Jagr just mumbles how they need to score more while Shanny calls the team out.

*Big Nik Antropov went from human disaster to Leafs scoring ace. There is hope for Malik yet.

*All of Chris Drury's best scoring chances this season have come while on special teams, particularly shorthanded. He truly does need some sense of urgency to step up his game. And unfortunately, I don't know if that is a good thing anymore considering the dearth of offense right now.

*Speaking of such, when Gomez was knocked into the Leafs net by Sundin, he hit his head on the crossbar as he fell over Toskala. It didn't show itself tonight, but maybe the blow knocked some sense (some offense?) into him.

*Paul Mara is getting paid good money to play the point on the power play but for his salary he should at least be serviceable in his own end. I would rather see Andrew Hutchinson because he brings the same things to the game at a much cheaper pricetag.

*Marcel Hossa was the only Ranger to come through the game +1 -- further evidence that plus/minus means nothing.

*Speaking of no skill players, you are down two goals, why the hell isn't your enforcer trying to pick a fight?

*At least the Islanders were embarrassed 8-3 tonight. That makes me smile.

*PHW Three Stars:
3-Jagr - lone Rangers goal.
2-Toskala - 32 saves.
1-Kaberle - he had two assists, big deal, they should have gone to Rangers players.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars:
3-Hal Gill - 25 solid minutes and pissed off Jagr every shift.
2-Pavel Kubina - 26 minutes, goal, assist, good luck to get +3 for his fantasy owners.
1-Toskala - He covered the bottom of the net, which was all he had to do as the Rangers couldn't get a shot in the air on net.



 3-6-1: Rangers Get Raked By The Leafs 4-1 - Analyzing a Tough Loss



In the world of professional ice hockey, victories and losses are part and parcel of a team's journey. For the New York Rangers, a game with the record 3-6-1 saw them facing a formidable opponent in the Toronto Maple Leafs, resulting in a tough 4-1 loss. In this article, we will dissect this challenging defeat, analyze the factors that contributed to it, and address frequently asked questions to provide a comprehensive understanding of the Rangers' performance on this particular night.

Part I: The Early Season Struggles

High Expectations

The Rangers entered the season with high expectations, fueled by the desire to compete at the highest level. However, the early games had been marked by inconsistency, with flashes of brilliance followed by moments of struggle.

Facing a Resilient Opponent

The game against the Toronto Maple Leafs was anticipated as a stern test. The Maple Leafs, known for their offensive firepower, presented a formidable challenge for the Rangers' defense.

Part II: The Game Unfolds

An Early Deficit

The game began with the Rangers conceding an early goal, putting them on the back foot. The Maple Leafs capitalized on a defensive breakdown, and the home crowd roared in approval.

Struggles in the Offensive Zone

The Rangers found it challenging to generate consistent offense throughout the game. Despite their efforts, they struggled to break through the Maple Leafs' defense and solve their goaltender.

Part III: Key Factors Contributing to the Loss

Defensive Lapses

One of the key factors that contributed to the loss was defensive lapses. The Rangers had moments of breakdown in their defensive zone, allowing the Maple Leafs to exploit openings and create scoring opportunities.

Offensive Inefficiency

The Rangers' offensive struggles were evident as they managed to score only one goal in the game. They found it difficult to penetrate the Maple Leafs' defensive structure and were often denied by the opposing goaltender.

Part IV: The Unpredictability of Hockey

The Nature of the Game

Hockey is renowned for its unpredictability. Even the most skilled teams can face challenges on any given night, and outcomes can hinge on a variety of factors, including goaltending, special teams, and defensive play.

Learning from Setbacks

Setbacks like this tough loss serve as learning opportunities for the team. They provide valuable insights into areas that need improvement and motivate players to regroup and perform better in future games.

Part V: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Let's address some frequently asked questions about this challenging defeat:

1. How do defensive lapses impact a game's outcome in hockey?

Defensive lapses can lead to goals for the opposing team, shifting the game's momentum. They highlight the importance of strong defensive play in preventing scoring opportunities.

2. What are some strategies to break through a strong defensive team like the Maple Leafs?

Strategies to break through a strong defense include effective puck movement, creating traffic in front of the net, and generating high-quality scoring chances through quick transitions.

3. How can teams rebound from tough losses like this one?

Teams rebound from tough losses by analyzing their performance, identifying areas for improvement, and using setbacks as motivation to elevate their game in future matchups.

4. Why is hockey known for its unpredictability?

Hockey's unpredictability stems from the fast-paced nature of the game, where outcomes can change rapidly. The smallest factors, such as a timely save or a defensive breakdown, can determine the result.



The game with the record 3-6-1, where the Rangers faced a challenging 4-1 loss to the Toronto Maple Leafs, serves as a reminder of the unpredictable nature of professional ice hockey. While the Rangers had high hopes entering the season, they encountered a resilient opponent and faced difficulties in both the defensive and offensive zones. However, in the world of sports, setbacks are an inherent part of the journey. They offer valuable lessons, motivate teams to improve, and ultimately contribute to the growth and development of the players and the organization. As the Rangers reflect on this tough loss, they will use it as a stepping stone to regroup, refine their strategies, and continue their pursuit of success in the competitive landscape of professional ice hockey.