40-30-9: No Heart In The Hub

There was golf on the television next to the one I watched the Ranger/Bruin game on and I can honestly say I'm not sure which was more boring. The Boston 1-0 victory kept the Ranger matinee curse alive and earned the Bruins the Eastern Conference title. Good for the B's. For the Rangers, it was just another pathetic, unacceptable loss at the worst possible time.

They had two big power plays in the third period and pissed both away. At regular strength they were outmuscled and outhustled. And if the Rangers lose on Tuesday at home against Montreal, the season will be over. No reason to waste their time getting beating up by Philly.

*The lone goal was pathetic. Rangers totally lost all semblance of control and chased the puck around before getting crossed up and trapped in one corner. Blake Wheeler sits wide open at the point and blows a knuckle puck past Hank. It was savable but there were a whole lotta bodies in his vicinity so it is hard to call soft ... just weak.

*There is a minute left, down 1-0 and your goaltender is on the bench - why would you put Chris Drury and Markus Naslund on the ice?

*Was there any clearer evidence that Naslund's heyday is long behind him than when Milan Lucic knocked him down with one hand early in the third period? Naslund used to power his way to the net against bigger, tougher players who weren't penalized for every hook and hit and now he got tossed like a child.

*Something that can perhaps be attested to Tom Renney's shortcomings is the fact that none of the lines have any chemistry - still. Renney never let any line aside from the fourth get settled and now Torts has tossed them around a bit as well. Passes rarely find players in stride and often leave the recipient in a bad position to make the play.

*Something that is indeed Tort's fault is his reluctance to use his fourth line. All Colton Orr did was hit people in the first period and Lauri Korpikoski hit a post in the third - the closest the team came to scoring all game.

*The Avery/Thomas incident was priceless. The refs clearly didn't see the incident and only reacted when Thomas came out of his crease to attack Avery. Since it was Avery, they had to calls something on him and they saw what on the video replay. Thomas didn't get anything for chopping at Avery, just two minutes for punching Freddie Sjostrom in the face - and with a blocker, that could be seen as intent to injure. I don't know if you have ever been nailed with a waffle to the face but I have, it hurts almost bad as a cross check to the face. Good work by Sean, it should have worked to throw Thomas off his game when you add in some offensive pressure but the Rangers couldn't muster any.

*On the officiating, how come Marc Savard got two minutes for cross checking and not five minutes for boarding? He intentionally hit Gomez in the numbers as Gomez was going towards the boards. A foot further and he could have turned into Travis Roy.

*To help save myself from some measure of misery, I watched the game on NESN. I would rather Homer McFanboy Jack Edwards to the annoying idiocy of Joe Micheletti. Feel free to point out some of his more egregious errors in the comments.

*The colour guy for NESN, who I won't even bother to get his name, clearly didn't bother to watch any Ranger games to prepare for this one. Edwards asked him questions about how the Rangers kill worked and what were some of the flaws and he had no answers. Amateur!

*As for Jack, well a teenage Ranger fan got a puck that was knocked into the crowd and Edwards said that the kid would be "a dead Ranger fan in a couple of minutes." How PC.

*And it was funny listening to Jack Edwards raving about Shane Hnidy's toughness while the defenseman went second man in on Chara/Mara at the end of the second period. I guess it is easy to be a big man when you can hide behind your captain and the visor on your helmet.

*Everyone else cringe when Morris nailed Wideman in the nuts with a slapshot?

*Everyone can attack Don Cherry all they want but more often than not, the man is right. When he is called xenophobic for picking on the softer, unmotivated foreigners folks rail on him. Sadly, when it comes to the pair of Niks, he is right. Borat was amazingly invisible despite being the size of a small house and Zherdev got off a few half-assed shots but that was it. That they can't get up and involved for games of this magnitude is an embarrassment.

*Rene whatever-his-name-is may be one of the worse anthem singers to do a hockey game. He was horrible, and the Boston fans seemed to be happy with his rendition. All the more reason for us to be thankful we have John Amirante.

*On the bright side, Wade Redden had one of his best games as a Ranger so far. Not only did he fill the crease and block a shot with Hank out of position in the second period, he also made a few decent stops and took a shot or two.

*How sad is it that the only positive thing I could find in the debacle was Wade Redden's performance? I want to puke.

*PHW Three Stars
3-PJ Axelsson - one assist.
2-Blake Wheeler - one goal.
1-Tim Thomas - 31 saves.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Ryan Callahan - Cally was the lone player aside from Hank to play from puck drop to buzzer. Sadly it was just too easy for the Bruins to key on him and keep him away from the net. He is too small to be a big threat against a team like the Bs.
2-Hank - With the Rangers stumbling around their zone for two periods Hank kept them in the game. He made a half dozen big saves and gave the Blueshirts a chance to win.
1-Chara - The Boston captain was every bit as responsible for shutting out the Rangers as Thomas was. He made big stop after big stop, swift passes and huge shots.

 40-30-9: No Heart In The Hub - Analyzing a Season of Struggles

The world of professional sports is often characterized by the highs and lows of competition, and for the Boston Bruins in the 2020-2021 season, it was no different. The team's 40-30-9 record left many fans disappointed, especially given their high expectations. In this article, we will delve into the season, examining the factors that contributed to their struggles, and answer some frequently asked questions about the challenges faced by the Bruins.

The 2020-2021 Boston Bruins Season

Injuries and COVID-19: The season began with several key players sidelined due to injuries, including Tuukka Rask, David Pastrnak, and Brad Marchand. Additionally, the ongoing pandemic created disruptions as players were placed on the COVID-19 protocol list.

Scoring Woes: The Bruins struggled to find consistent scoring throughout the season. Despite having star players like Patrice Bergeron and Pastrnak, they often found themselves in low-scoring games.

Goaltending Concerns: The absence of Tuukka Rask for a significant part of the season exposed goaltending weaknesses. Rookie Jeremy Swayman showed promise, but the lack of an experienced netminder was evident.

Power Play Struggles: The power play, which had been a strength in previous seasons, faltered. It struggled to convert on opportunities, affecting the team's ability to win tight games.

Inconsistent Play: The Bruins' performances were inconsistent, which made it challenging to build momentum. They would have impressive wins followed by frustrating losses.

FAQs About the Bruins' Season

What role did injuries play in the Bruins' struggles?

Injuries significantly impacted the Bruins' season. Losing key players disrupted lines and forced younger, less experienced players into prominent roles.

Did COVID-19 have a significant impact on the team's performance?

The pandemic did create challenges, as players were forced to miss games due to health and safety protocols. These disruptions affected team chemistry and consistency.

Why did the power play struggle so much this season?

The power play's struggles were due to a combination of factors, including a lack of movement and creativity, predictable plays, and opposing teams adjusting to their strategies.

Were there any bright spots in the season?

Yes, there were. Rookie Jeremy Swayman showed great promise in goal, and younger players like Jake DeBrusk had moments of brilliance. The team's penalty kill remained strong.

What lessons can the Bruins take away from this season?

The season highlighted the need for improved depth, especially in the goaltending position. The team also needs to focus on offensive creativity and consistency.

Looking Ahead

While the 2020-2021 season was undoubtedly challenging for the Boston Bruins and their fans, it's essential to remember that sports seasons are often characterized by ups and downs. This season served as a learning experience, highlighting areas for improvement and potential changes.

Key Takeaways for the Bruins:

Recovery from Injuries: Ensuring the team is healthy and ready for the upcoming season will be a priority. This includes addressing any ongoing health concerns and building depth in case of future injuries.

Offensive Creativity: The Bruins need to focus on revamping their power play and finding ways to generate more consistent scoring opportunities. This may involve strategic changes and player development.

Goaltending Solutions: The team should explore options to strengthen their goaltending position, whether through free agency, trades, or developing their young netminders.

Consistency and Team Chemistry: Working on consistency and improving team chemistry will be crucial to avoiding the highs and lows seen in the previous season.

While the 2020-2021 season may have left Bruins fans disappointed, it's important to view it as a stepping stone rather than a setback. Every season in professional sports presents unique challenges, and the Bruins have an opportunity to learn from their experiences and come back stronger in the future.

The 40-30-9 record serves as a reminder that even storied franchises like the Boston Bruins face adversity. With the right adjustments, a focus on player development, and a commitment to addressing weaknesses, there is every reason to believe that the Bruins can once again become a formidable force in the NHL. Fans will undoubtedly be eagerly awaiting the next season, hoping for a return to the glory days of Boston Bruins hockey.

Peepin' Foes: Boston Bruins

Where We Are: In better shape now that Rich Peverley and the Moose helped tame the Panthers. Florida's game in hand is gone so now getting in the playoffs has less to do with how they do and everything to do with how the Rangers play. The on-again-off-again intensity is troublesome at this time of year and mental slips like those that plagued the Blueshirts against the Canes are unacceptable.

Where They Are: Oh, first place and on a five game win streak. That's all.

Who To Watch For: MSG pointed out during the Carolina game that Mark Recchi leads all active players in goals against the Rangers. Former Blueshirt Marc Savard is still stellar and David Krejci seems to be following in his footsteps to become a top notch setup man with 11 assists in his last nine games. Milan Lucic seems to have been completely healed from his injuries earlier this season and is playing some scary hockey. Zdeno Chara is always scary and Dennis Wideman may be the most underappreciated defenseman in the NHL.

What To Watch For: The Rangers have been notoriously terrible in matinee matches either from sleeping in and never getting started or taking midafternoon naps and falling apart later on. There is no possible excuse for them not to come out of the gates flying given the gravity of their situation.

What We'll (Hopefully) See: Wade Redden not on the power play. Rozy to return strong and actually shoot the puck. Colton Orr to see more than three minutes of time against the oversized Bruins. Markus Naslund to find whatever gas is left in the tank and hit the accelerator for the last four games. Chris Drury to rediscover some of the magic he had when he played for BU and earned a spot in the Beanpot Hall of Fame. Tim Thomas to show the usual big contract signing hangover.

Also Check Out: Hub Hockey, Stanley Cup of Chowder and Cornelius Hardenbergh and the Hockey Blog Adventure.

 Peepin' Foes: Boston Bruins - A Closer Look at the Beantown Hockey Heroes

The Boston Bruins, one of the National Hockey League's (NHL) Original Six franchises, have a storied history filled with triumphs, legendary players, and passionate fans. In this article, we'll take an in-depth look at the Boston Bruins, their rich history, notable players, and what to expect from the team in the upcoming season. We'll also address some frequently asked questions about this iconic NHL franchise.

The Legacy of the Boston Bruins

Origins of Greatness: Founded in 1924, the Boston Bruins quickly established themselves as a powerhouse in the NHL. They won their first Stanley Cup in 1929 and have since added six more to their collection.

Bobby Orr Era: The 1970s were dominated by the legendary Bobby Orr, widely regarded as one of the greatest defensemen in NHL history. Orr led the Bruins to two Stanley Cup victories in 1970 and 1972.

Ray Bourque: After Orr's departure, another iconic defenseman, Ray Bourque, carried the Bruins' legacy. Despite not winning a Cup with Boston, Bourque's impact on the franchise and the city is immeasurable.

The Patrice Bergeron Era: In recent years, the Bruins have been led by Patrice Bergeron, an elite two-way center. Under his leadership, the team reached the Stanley Cup Final twice in 2011 and 2013, winning the latter.

The 2022-2023 Boston Bruins Season

Roster Overview: The Bruins' roster features a mix of seasoned veterans and young talents. Bergeron, Brad Marchand, and David Pastrnak remain the core of the team's offense, while Charlie McAvoy anchors the defense.

Goaltending Situation: Tuukka Rask has been a stalwart in the Bruins' net for years, but his future with the team is uncertain due to injury concerns. Jeremy Swayman, a promising rookie, could step into a more prominent role.

Coaching Staff: Bruce Cassidy, the head coach, has been instrumental in the team's success. His tactical approach and ability to develop young talent have earned him praise.

Expectations: Bruins fans have high hopes for the upcoming season. With a strong core of players, they aim to compete for the Stanley Cup once again.

FAQs About the Boston Bruins

What is the significance of the "Big Bad Bruins" nickname?

The "Big Bad Bruins" nickname is a nod to the team's physical style of play in the 1970s. They were known for their aggressive and intimidating play on the ice.

Why is Bobby Orr considered one of the greatest NHL players of all time?

Bobby Orr revolutionized the defenseman position. His offensive prowess and ability to control the game from the blue line were unprecedented. He remains the only defenseman to win the NHL scoring title (Art Ross Trophy) twice.

Has the team's playing style evolved over the years?

Yes, the Bruins have adapted to changes in the game. While they were known for their physical play in the past, they now emphasize a more balanced, skill-based approach.

What is the "Curse of Ray Bourque"?

The "Curse of Ray Bourque" refers to the notion that the Bruins' inability to win a Stanley Cup during Bourque's career was a sort of curse. This "curse" was famously broken when Bourque won the Cup with the Colorado Avalanche in 2001 after being traded.

Looking Ahead

The Boston Bruins, with their rich history and passionate fan base, are always a team to watch in the NHL. As they prepare for the upcoming season, fans eagerly anticipate another exciting chapter in the franchise's storied history. With experienced veterans and promising young talent, the future looks promising for the Beantown hockey heroes.

In conclusion, the Boston Bruins are more than just a hockey team; they are a symbol of pride for the city of Boston and a testament to the enduring legacy of the NHL's Original Six. Whether you're a die-hard Bruins fan or a casual observer of the sport, the Boston Bruins continue to capture the imagination of hockey enthusiasts around the world, and their story is far from over.

Another Mistake

New York Rangers President and General Manager Glen Sather announced today that defenseman Corey Potter has been assigned to the Hartford Wolf Pack of the American Hockey League (AHL).

John Tortorella missed a fantastic opportunity to send a message to his team. With Rozy returning, Tortorella should have kept Corey Potter in the lineup and benched Wade Redden. A move that bold in a run for the playoffs would have sent a message that half-assed, incompetent play will not be accepted - from rookies or from veterans. Rozy would have stepped right into Redden's roll of doing nothing during the power play and playing a soft defensive game while Potter would be rewarded for his solid play so far. The kid has not been half the defensive liability that Redden was and he scored a goal in just his fifth game. Redden has three goals in 77 games despite being an "offensive defenseman."

This is just another disappointment in a season full of them that could very well result in an early summer. For shame Torts, I thought you were better than this.

 Another Mistake - Navigating Life's Learning Curve

Mistakes are an inevitable part of the human experience. From the smallest slip-ups to significant errors, we all encounter them throughout our lives. In this article, we'll explore the concept of making mistakes, why they happen, how they impact us, and the valuable lessons we can extract from them. We'll also address some frequently asked questions about the nature of mistakes and how to cope with them.

The Universality of Mistakes

Everyone Makes Mistakes: It's important to acknowledge that mistakes are universal. No one, regardless of their intelligence, skill, or experience, is immune to making errors.

The Range of Mistakes: Mistakes come in various forms. They can be minor, like misplacing your keys, or major, like making a poor financial decision. Some mistakes are personal, while others have far-reaching consequences.

The Fear of Failure: Many people fear making mistakes because they associate them with failure. This fear can hold them back from taking risks or pursuing their goals.

Understanding Why We Make Mistakes

Human Nature: To err is human. Our brains are wired to learn from trial and error. Making mistakes is a fundamental part of our learning process.

Cognitive Biases: Cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and overconfidence, can lead us to make errors in judgment. These biases affect our perception of reality and decision-making.

External Factors: Stress, fatigue, and external pressures can impair our judgment and increase the likelihood of making mistakes.

The Impact of Mistakes

Emotional Responses: Mistakes often elicit strong emotional responses, including frustration, embarrassment, and guilt. These emotions can be challenging to navigate.

Learning Opportunities: While mistakes can be emotionally challenging, they also provide valuable learning opportunities. They offer insights into what went wrong and how to avoid similar errors in the future.

Personal Growth: Overcoming mistakes can lead to personal growth and resilience. Learning from failures can make individuals more adaptable and better equipped to handle future challenges.

Extracting Lessons from Mistakes

Acceptance: The first step in learning from mistakes is accepting that they happened. Avoiding denial and acknowledging the error is crucial.

Self-Reflection: Take time to reflect on the mistake. What led to it? Were there warning signs? What can you do differently next time?

Problem-Solving: Mistakes often arise from specific problems or challenges. Identify these underlying issues and work on solving them to prevent similar mistakes in the future.

Forgiveness: Don't forget to forgive yourself. Beating yourself up over a mistake can be counterproductive. Remember that making mistakes is part of being human.

FAQs About Making Mistakes

Is it okay to make mistakes?

Absolutely. Making mistakes is a natural part of life. They provide opportunities for growth and self-improvement.

How do I cope with the fear of failure?

Acknowledge your fear and remind yourself that failure is not the end. It's a stepping stone toward success. Embrace the lessons it offers.

What if my mistake has serious consequences?

Serious mistakes can be challenging to navigate, but it's crucial to address them head-on. Seek guidance from trusted sources, and take steps to make amends or rectify the situation.

How do I prevent making the same mistake repeatedly?

Learning from mistakes involves self-awareness and proactive measures. Identify patterns and triggers that lead to the mistake, and consciously work on avoiding them.

Mistakes are not to be feared; they are to be understood, accepted, and embraced as part of the human journey. Every mistake is a potential opportunity for growth, resilience, and personal development. By acknowledging our errors, learning from them, and forgiving ourselves, we can navigate life's learning curve with grace and wisdom. Remember, the road to success is often paved with the lessons learned from our missteps, making every mistake just another step forward in our journey.

Welcome Back Jed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Even though Puck Daddy made a snide comment in his Death Watch today about it, he did alert us to some fantastic news - Jed has made it back to the NHL!!!!!!!

From the Preds homepage:

Nashville Predators President of Hockey Operations/General Manager David Poile announced today that the club has recalled forward Jed Ortmeyer from the Milwaukee Admirals of the American Hockey League.

Ortmeyer, 30 (9/3/78), has 23 points (10g-13a) in 55 games since joining the Admirals on Dec. 3, 2008 – he missed the first 24 games of the season due to a knee injury sustained in Nashville’s game against Dallas on Feb. 23, 2008, his last NHL game played. In 2007-08 – his first season with the Predators – the Omaha, Neb., native played in 51 games, recording four goals and four assists.

Since 2003-04, the 6-1, 188-pound right wing has played in 228 career NHL contests, tallying 32 points (13g-19a).

After the aforementioned knee injury Jed had blood clot issues again and he battled to get back on the ice. He did it and he now has made it back to the show. I hope he sticks, he deserves it.

Go Jed!!!!!

 Welcome Back Jed!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - A Homecoming Story

In the world of sports and fandom, few moments are as heartwarming and exciting as the return of a beloved player to their former team. In this article, we'll dive into the heartwarming story of Jed, a player who recently made a triumphant return to his former team, and explore the significance of such homecomings in the world of sports. We'll also answer some frequently asked questions about these emotional reunions.

The Tale of Jed

Jed's Early Years: To understand the significance of Jed's return, we need to go back to the beginning of his career. Jed was a young and promising talent when he first joined the team that would become his second family.

The Departure: After several successful seasons, Jed left the team, a decision that left fans heartbroken. Whether it was a trade, free agency, or any other reason, his departure marked the end of an era.

The Journey: During his time away, Jed continued to play for different teams, experiencing highs and lows, personal and professional growth, and even championship victories. His journey was filled with ups and downs, but the memories of his first team and the bond with the fans never faded.

The Emotional Return

The Announcement: The news of Jed's return sent shockwaves through the sports world. Fans couldn't believe it, and social media was abuzz with excitement.

The Homecoming Game: The day of Jed's return to his former team was marked on every fan's calendar. The atmosphere in the stadium was electric, with fans wearing jerseys bearing his name and waving banners with messages of welcome.

The Standing Ovation: When Jed stepped onto the field or court, the crowd erupted in a deafening ovation. Tears welled up in the eyes of fans, players, and even the stoic sportscasters.

The Significance of Homecomings

Fan Loyalty: Homecomings highlight the unwavering loyalty of sports fans. They demonstrate that a player's connection with a team and its supporters transcends time and distance.

Redemption Arcs: For some players, returning to their former team represents a redemption arc. It's a chance to rewrite history, prove themselves once again, and bring closure to unfinished business.

Community Impact: The return of a beloved player can have a positive impact on the community. It boosts ticket sales, merchandise revenue, and overall team morale. It can even inspire young athletes in the area.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do players leave their teams in the first place?

Players may leave for various reasons, including contractual issues, better career opportunities, or personal preferences. It's not always an easy decision.

Do all players return to their former teams?

No, not all players get the opportunity to return to their former teams. It often depends on team management decisions, player performance, and timing.

Are homecomings always successful?

While homecomings are often met with enthusiasm, success on the field or court isn't guaranteed. It depends on the player's performance, team dynamics, and various other factors.

What happens after a player retires?

After retirement, players may pursue careers in coaching, broadcasting, or other areas related to the sport. Some choose to remain connected to their former teams in different roles.

The return of a beloved player to their former team is a story that resonates deeply with sports fans. It's a narrative of loyalty, redemption, and the enduring bond between athletes and their supporters. Jed's return, like many others before him, serves as a reminder of the emotional power of sports and the ability of a single player to unite a community and inspire a new generation of fans. As we continue to witness such heartwarming homecomings, we're reminded that in sports, as in life, the stories of comebacks and reunions are often the ones that touch our hearts the most. Welcome back, Jed!

40-29-9: Yet Another Letdown

For every thrilling game the Rangers played this season, they followed it up with an utterly disappointing loss: a 3-2 shootout win over the Pens, then a 6-2 trouncing by the Canadiens (Dec. 3 and 4); a 5-4 battle over the Isles, then a 2-1 loss to the Caps (Dec. 29, Jan. 3); a 3-2 overtime win against the Hawks, a 3-0 loss to the Pens (Jan. 16 and 18); a 5-3 stabbing of the Sabres, a 2-1 loss to the Sens (Mar. 21 and 22).

And now a 3-0 shutout of the Devils that is bookended by a 4-2 loss to the Canes. As regular readers know, I believe that it comes down to the leadership and personality makeup of the team. These guys, with Drury as their captain, simply don't have the killer instinct. When the game was tied 2-2 I was just waiting for the breakdown to happen and - surprise, surprise - it did.

First a simple crossing play on the right wing boards gets Chad LaRose a step ahead of Borat and then Markus Naslund thought he was killing a penalty and waved his stick at Rod Brind'Amour. Two times the Rangers don't play the body and stick with their men, two times the puck ended up behind Hank.

There were plenty of opportunities for the Rangers to get the edge before the hurricane struck - a puck goes through Gomez's legs in the slot, Avery misses a one-timer from the doorstep - but the Blueshirts never had the momentum, never maintained any pressure and never truly gave themselves a chance to win.

*Granted, the lack of momentum and pressure had a lot to do with the parade to the penalty box that set the mood for the night. The officiating decided to share the limelight with the players and called everything they saw for the first period. It is not a terrible thing that Dunkin' Donut Koharski is retiring, one can only hope that Steve Kozari follows.

*On that note, how do they not call something during the second period tussle between Antropov and Tim Gleason? Gleason threw down his gloves to start a fight. Sean Avery dropped a glove when he was being tossed around by David Clarkson last game without showing any hostility and got a roughing call while Gleason drops both of his mitts and throws a punch but escapes unscathed.

*Tuomo Ruutu deserved a dive on the Girardi penalty that set up the first goal of that game. He sold a soft hit and the refs bought it. That simple. Horribly sad, but true. Even with four officials clogging up the ice, they still miss much. And, by the way, Ruutu is as much of a dirtbag as his idiot brother. They are cases number one and two why the instigator penalty should go away.

*The Ranger penalty kill was fantastic as per usual. The Carolina power play goal came on a screen where Paul Mara picked up the far man while Marc Staal stood watching his brother - just like he did on the Canes second goal - and allowed Chad LaRose to get loose to tip in a tally. Freddie Sjostrom and Bettsy were both stellar and neither one has a contract for next season. Just something to point out.

*Stat of the night: Colton Orr - five shifts, 3:10 of ice time. Yes, he took an iffy penalty (his stick snapped on a hit and Jussi Jokinen tripped over a broken piece of it) but Orr has gone from a solid contributor to a virtual nonentity. For a team that has trouble playing the body and playing physical hockey, this is clearly a mistake. Carolina was never scared to go to the net, to battle in the tough areas and it showed as they were free to move the puck around the Ranger zone much of the night.

*Hank, who took that scary as hell hit by Ruutu early on, rarely came to the top of his crease and it cost him on those long distance shots. I mean, he usually plays deep but he seemed too scared to challenge the shooters - he just sat back and waited for the defense to fall apart in front of him.

*Wade Redden. Wade "Out and Drown" Redden. Played just a hair over 20 minutes, six of which on the power play. The special unit has been awful all season long. Redden has seen a ton of time on the special unit all season long. Coincidence? I think NOT!

*Congrats to Corey Potter on his first NHL goal - it was a beautiful shot through traffic. He didn't panic when he got the puck, he saw where he was, took a step and let loose a heavy shot that went past Ward. Nice work kiddo.

*The other Ranger goal was scored by Dan Girardi which begs the question, where was Zherdev, Antropov and Drury? Avery, Callahan and Gomez kept creating chances, Naslund is nothing more than a body in a jersey at this point and Dubi was inexplicably limited in ice time (even though he nearly scored twice that I counted). So again I ask, where was Zherdev, Antropov and Drury? Around 56 minutes played and 0 quality scoring chances from them.

*OT - The Bronx Is Burning was a terrible show on ESPN that no one watched. Why is MSG promoting it so hard? Is it a pathetic attempt to deflect the fact that they will have no programming between May and September?

*Anyone else find it funny that Sam and Joe managed to catch the lone shift played by Dwight Helminen? That may have been the only amusement I got out of this game and it may only get worse heading into Boston on Saturday. For all of the terrible play, you have to admit that this final stretch has made for some edge-of-your-seat hockey ...

*PHW Three Stars
3-Ray Whitney - two assists.
2-Eric Staal - one goal and one assist.
1-Chad LaRose - two goals.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Dennis Seidenberg - Joe Corvo played 27 minutes but I think Seidenberg was just a hair better in the Carolina zone. Sure Cam Ward had 36 saves, but he really didn't have to work all that hard as Seidenberg helped steer the rebounds away.
2-Staal - Eric wins this round of the battle of the brothers.
1-LaRose - It seems like LaRose does something right during every Hurricane game I watch. Tonight he did a lot of things right - he hit, he killed penalties and he went to the net.

 40-29-9: Yet Another Letdown - Analyzing the Season's Challenges

In the world of sports, every season is a rollercoaster ride of emotions. Teams and fans experience highs and lows, triumphs and disappointments. In this article, we'll dive into the 40-29-9 season of a particular sports team and analyze the challenges they faced. We'll explore the factors contributing to their letdown and answer some frequently asked questions about the ups and downs of a sports season.

The Season in Review

Promising Beginnings: The season started with high hopes and expectations. The team was coming off a successful previous season, and fans were eager to see them build on that success.

Inconsistent Performances: As the season progressed, the team's performances became increasingly inconsistent. They would have impressive winning streaks followed by frustrating losing streaks, leaving fans bewildered.

Injuries and Roster Changes: Injuries to key players and mid-season roster changes disrupted team chemistry. These challenges forced the coaching staff to make adjustments on the fly.

The Impact of Letdowns

Fan Frustration: Fans invest emotionally in their teams, and repeated letdowns can lead to frustration and disillusionment. Social media becomes a platform for venting frustrations and demanding changes.

Team Morale: Within the locker room, letdowns can affect team morale. Players may start to doubt themselves or the coaching staff's strategies, creating a tense atmosphere.

Playoff Implications: Letdowns during the regular season can have direct implications for playoff chances. Falling short of expectations may mean missing the playoffs entirely or having a lower seed.

Analyzing the Factors

Injury Woes: Injuries are an inevitable part of sports, but their timing and severity can significantly impact a season. Losing key players for extended periods can derail a team's success.

Lack of Depth: A lack of depth in the roster can exacerbate the effects of injuries. Teams with strong bench players are often better equipped to weather the storm.

Coaching Decisions: Coaching decisions, including strategies, lineups, and in-game choices, play a pivotal role in a team's performance. Missteps in these areas can lead to letdowns.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a team recover from a mid-season letdown and make a deep playoff run?

Yes, it's possible. A mid-season letdown can serve as a wake-up call for both players and coaches. If the issues are addressed and improvements are made, a strong playoff run is within reach.

What can fans do to support their team during a disappointing season?

Fans can continue to show their support by attending games, wearing team merchandise, and engaging positively on social media. Constructive criticism is valuable, but toxic negativity can be detrimental.

Do letdowns always lead to major changes within a team, such as coaching changes or player trades?

Not always. The response to letdowns varies from team to team. Some may opt for major changes, while others may stick with the existing roster and coaching staff, believing in their ability to bounce back.

Are there any benefits to a disappointing season in the long run?

While disappointing seasons are tough, they can serve as learning experiences. Teams can identify weaknesses, make necessary adjustments, and emerge stronger in future seasons.

In the world of sports, letdowns are an unfortunate but inevitable part of the journey. The 40-29-9 season analyzed in this article serves as a reminder that even in the face of disappointment, there are opportunities for growth, learning, and eventual success. Fans, players, and coaching staff must navigate the ups and downs with resilience and determination, knowing that the story of a season is not defined by its letdowns but by the collective effort to overcome them. As the season comes to a close, there's hope for a brighter future and the chance to turn disappointment into motivation for the next campaign.

Peepin' Foes: Carolina Hurricanes

After playing one must-win game, the Rangers are faced with another tonight down in NASCAR country. Let's hope the Blueshirts manage to avoid making automaker jokes and keep their momentum going against the Canes. The two teams have played the same number of games (77) but Carolina holds a two point edge and sixth place in the East. Given that the Habs are one point back with a game in hand, and Florida is just two points back in ninth place, a loss will be painful and needs to be unacceptable. Let's just hope the Rangers realize that.

Where We Are: Not necessarily the same team that lost to Carolina back on March 9th. That was a 3-0 loss, the only shutout of the month of March. There has been no positive consistency on this team in any part of their game - negatively, the power play had continued to be terrible. Who knows which team will play? The motivated mob that beat the Devils? The choke artists that failed in Atlanta? It is hard to say so we will just have to tune in to see ...

Where They Are: Oh, the Canes are only one of the hottest teams in the NHL as they ride a six game win streak. Granted, two of those wins were over the struggling Maaarrrrrttttyyy but they still are pretty much on point.

Who To Watch For: Anton Babchuk has been huge on the blueline and has three power play goals in his last six games - that is one more than Wade Redden has scored all season long. Babchuk started the season getting 14 or so minutes per game while Redden has seen 20+ for most of the year. Yeah. Rod Brind'Amour was terrible for most of the year as my fantasy losses can attest to but now that I've been knocked out of the playoffs, Brind'Amour has been doing his best to keep the Canes in them. Bastard. And you can't forget Ray Whitney, one of the most underrated players in the NHL over the last decade.

What To Watch For: Cam Ward standing on his head. Ward was the lone 'hot' goalie that the Rangers faced in March and he skated away with a shutout. Can he do it again? Also see how the Rangers handle the officiating - has Sean truly found Zen? Erik Cole, Chad LaRose and Scott Walker (if he can get over his headaches) are all quite capable of playing smart, physical hockey that results in goals.

What We'll (Hopefully) See: Sean being Sean. Hank being the King. Marc beating Eric in the battle of the Staals. The power play actually skating, cycling and scoring. That's not too much to hope for, is it??

Also Check Out: Red and Black Hockey, Canes Country and Lord Stanley's Blog.

 Peepin' Foes: Carolina Hurricanes - A Deep Dive

In the world of professional sports, rivalries often ignite the most fervent passions among fans. This article delves into one such rivalry, examining the Carolina Hurricanes, a team that has consistently posed a challenge to its opponents. We'll explore the history, strengths, and strategies of the Carolina Hurricanes, and answer some frequently asked questions about this formidable team.

The History of the Carolina Hurricanes

A Relocation Tale: The Hurricanes were born out of the relocation of the Hartford Whalers in 1997. The team was initially based in Greensboro, North Carolina, before settling in Raleigh in 1999.

Stanley Cup Glory: The franchise achieved its greatest success in the 2005-2006 season when they captured the Stanley Cup. The championship run remains a source of pride for both the team and its fans.

Strengths of the Carolina Hurricanes

Depth at Forward: The Hurricanes boast a deep roster of talented forwards who can contribute both offensively and defensively. This depth allows them to roll four lines consistently, keeping their players fresh.

Strong Defensive Core: Carolina has invested in a robust defensive core, which is key to their success. They excel in limiting high-quality scoring chances and are a force to be reckoned with on the penalty kill.

Goaltending: Goaltending is often the backbone of a successful team, and the Hurricanes are no exception. They have reliable netminders who can steal games and provide stability in high-pressure situations.

Strategies and Playing Style

Pace and Puck Possession: The Hurricanes play an up-tempo, possession-based style of hockey. They prioritize maintaining control of the puck, using their speed to move quickly through the neutral zone and create scoring opportunities.

Aggressive Forecheck: Carolina's forecheck is relentless. They pressure opponents in their defensive zone, forcing turnovers and capitalizing on mistakes.

Transition Game: Quick transitions from defense to offense are a hallmark of the Hurricanes' strategy. They look to catch opponents off guard during line changes or turnovers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are some of the notable players in Carolina Hurricanes history?

Notable players include Ron Francis, Eric Staal, Cam Ward, Rod Brind'Amour, and more recently, Sebastian Aho and Andrei Svechnikov.

How does the Hurricanes' fanbase compare to other NHL teams?

The Hurricanes have a passionate fanbase known for unique traditions like the "Storm Surge." While they may not be the largest fanbase in the NHL, they are dedicated and bring energy to games.

What are the biggest rivalries involving the Carolina Hurricanes?

Rivalries with teams like the Washington Capitals, Pittsburgh Penguins, and Boston Bruins have developed over the years due to playoff matchups and intense regular-season contests.

What are the Hurricanes' prospects for the upcoming season?

Predicting a team's performance in a given season can be challenging, but the Hurricanes, with their strong roster and competitive spirit, are likely to be in the playoff conversation once again.

The Carolina Hurricanes have carved out a prominent place in the NHL with their exciting brand of hockey and commitment to success. Their history, strengths, and strategies make them a formidable foe for any opponent. As the Hurricanes continue to evolve and strive for future championships, they remain a team to watch and a source of pride for their dedicated fanbase. Whether they are competing for a Stanley Cup or engaging in memorable rivalries, the Hurricanes are sure to leave their mark on the world of professional hockey.

New Poll!

I caught the end of the 6-1 slaughter of the Devils at the hands of the Penguins tonight and realized something - I loathe both franchises. It was nice to see Mmmaaaaaaarrrrrrtttyyyy get lit up, but horrible to see Cindy score. And thus, a new poll was born (over to the right).

So who do you hate more?

 New Polls: Shaping Public Opinion and Democracy

Polling is an integral part of modern democratic societies. It provides insight into public opinion, helps politicians understand voter preferences, and informs policy decisions. In this article, we will explore the significance of polls, how they are conducted, their impact on democracy, and address some frequently asked questions about polling.

The Role of Polls in Democracy

Informing Political Campaigns: Polls are essential for political campaigns. They help candidates identify key issues that resonate with voters and allocate campaign resources effectively.

Public Opinion: Polls gauge public sentiment on various topics, including social issues, economic policies, and more. This information can guide policymakers in crafting legislation that reflects the will of the people.

Election Predictions: Polls play a crucial role in predicting election outcomes. They provide a snapshot of where candidates stand in the race, helping voters make informed decisions.

How Are Polls Conducted?

Sampling: Pollsters select a representative sample of the population they want to study. The sample should reflect the diversity of the entire population to ensure accurate results.

Question Design: The phrasing of questions is critical. Leading or biased questions can produce inaccurate results. Pollsters strive to craft neutral and unbiased questions.

Data Collection: Polls can be conducted through various methods, including phone interviews, online surveys, or in-person interviews. The method chosen can impact the accuracy of the poll.

Data Analysis: Once data is collected, it is analyzed to draw meaningful conclusions. Statistical techniques are used to account for any biases in the sample.

The Impact of Polls on Democracy

Accountability: Polls hold politicians accountable to the electorate. Knowing that their approval ratings are constantly monitored can encourage politicians to be responsive to their constituents.

Voter Engagement: Polls can motivate voters to participate in elections. If a race is close, it may energize more people to vote.

Policy Influence: Public opinion polls can influence policy decisions. Elected officials may adjust their positions or policies based on polling data.

Media Coverage: Polls are often covered extensively by the media, shaping public discourse and informing citizens about the state of the nation.

Frequently Asked Questions About Polling

Are polls always accurate?

No, polls are not infallible. They are based on samples, and errors can occur due to sampling bias, methodology, or unforeseen changes in public sentiment.

What is the margin of error in a poll?

The margin of error reflects the range within which the true population parameter is likely to fall. It is typically expressed as a percentage.

Can polls be manipulated?

Polls can be manipulated through biased question design or selective reporting of results. Reputable polling organizations adhere to strict ethical guidelines to maintain their credibility.

How can I tell if a poll is reliable?

Look for polls conducted by reputable organizations with transparent methodologies. Additionally, consider the sample size, margin of error, and whether the questions are unbiased.

Conclusion

Polls are powerful tools that help shape democracy by informing political campaigns, reflecting public sentiment, and influencing policy decisions. While they are not infallible and should be interpreted with caution, well-conducted polls provide valuable insights into the collective mindset of a nation. As we continue to navigate the complexities of modern society, polls will remain a crucial instrument for understanding and responding to the diverse needs and preferences of the people.