After winning six of their first eight games at the Garden this season, the Rangers fell to 1-5-3 in their last nine by losing 2-1 in overtime to the worst team in the NHL.
Yeah. No place like home.
Aside from the one victory, they scored two or less goals in the other eight games and only managed one this afternoon despite chance after chance after chance. These guys oughta pay dues to Ironworker Locals 40 & 361 for all of those shots that hit post or crossbar. It was bad. So very, very bad. (Like that half-hearted joke.)
But at the same time, it is hard not to be a little happy with the game. The Rangers got a point, and they did get one puck in ... showing just how low the bar was dropped with the Philadelphia debacle last week. Things are not good in the Garden right now but there are signs of a better future. The question is, will we get there before it is too late?
There were more shots on goal, there were a few cohesive attacks and the defense didn't do too many dumb things. Of course, the majority of the shots weren't good, many of the drives were offsides, the power play was atrocious and defensive lapses allowed the two goals against but it's a new year so let's not think of those things. At least until they start outright losing and getting embarrassed by teams that are above .500.
Teams like, say, Boston on Monday.
But seriously, if I did that, I wouldn't be able to put together many observations from this game for you guys so perhaps I will put the whole 'look at the bright side' outlook on hold for a few minutes:
*The Rangers had several good rushes but aborted them themselves by pulling up short and looking for passes. That shows just how low the confidence level is at this point and but it takes just one herculean effort to turn it around with so many games this month.
*Brian Boyle (of all people) came out of the gate on fire during the Rangers strong start with several hits and nearly a fight but, like most of his teammates, he faded to obscurity as the grind of the afternoon went on.
*Aaron Voros wasn't even given that chance. I remember seeing him all of once in the game even though the event summary says he got four shifts for 2:18 of ice time. Really, for that much, what's the point of dressing him at all?
*Chris Drury proved most skeptics correct by showing that he is incapable of doing much outside of the Ranger end. And, even then, he panicked twice in the Ranger zone and threw the puck over the boards once and down for an icing the other time. Ladies and gentlemen, your Ranger captain and member of Team USA. *The standard NHL goal is four feet high, six feet wide Chris Higgins, try to shoot the puck inside it.
*While we may doubt the effort from Redden at times ... ok, all the time ... let it be said that MDZ has not let up one bit. The kid is one of the few Rangers consistently getting involved in the action chasing the puck, playing the body and getting himself into good positions to move the puck. He is making a slew of mistakes but that comes with the territory; he is a teenager.
*I felt Hobey fared better but the coaching staff isn't putting him into many big spots. He had one great rush down the ice but went into traffic and ended up being below the goal line before trying to take a shot. Oops.
*Going to the net, however works. For everyone. The curious question is why the Rangers don't realize that. Dubi scored that way in Carolina, Gabby scored that way in this game. And yet power play after power play is spent with the players out on the perimeter ... I just don't get it. *Erik Christensen is settling in to the first line pretty well but it appeared that Torts was already shuffling him to the wing and putting Dubi back in the middle. It doesn't seem to work for either of them.
*I counted just two Whalers jerseys in the crowd, which I find quite disappointing. I mean, it was nice to have a crowd made up primarily of Ranger fans but the lack of flow and lack of goals kept the audience hushed for most of the afternoon.
*PHW Three Stars
3-Marian Gaborik - one goal.
2-Ray Whitney - one goal.
1-Cam Ward - 27 saves.
Scotty Hockey Three Stars3-Cam Ward - Dude made two goos saves I remember but was beat six seven times; he got the win because of Ranger incompetence, not because of stellar netminding.
2-Gabby - It is like he is playing in a void. There is Gaborik and then there is everyone else.
1-Aaron Ward/Matt Cullen - It is remarkable how well these guys play when they face the Rangers when you consider how poorly they played while they were Rangers. What could they possibly have against the organization that gave them outrageous multi-million dollar contracts despite being completely mediocre players? And yet they are all over the ice, pressing the action, playing physically - doing everything they didn't while wearing Blueshirts. Bastards.
19-17-5: There's No Place Like Home, Right?
Home is often seen as a sanctuary, a place of comfort and familiarity where we find solace and security. However, the concept of "home" can vary significantly from person to person, depending on their cultural, social, and personal experiences. In this article, we will explore the multifaceted idea of home and its various interpretations, shedding light on the complexity of this fundamental human experience. We will also address some frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to the concept of home.
Table of Contents
Defining Home: More than Four Walls
Cultural Perspectives on Home
The Emotional Connection to Home
The Modern Challenge: Nomadism and Displacement
Creating a Sense of Home
FAQs about the Concept of Home
1. Defining Home: More than Four Walls
Home is often seen as a physical space, a house or apartment where one lives. It provides shelter, safety, and a place to rest. However, the definition of home extends beyond bricks and mortar. Home is where people find a sense of belonging, where they connect with their past, and where they envision their future. It encompasses not only the physical environment but also the emotional, psychological, and social dimensions of our lives.
2. Cultural Perspectives on Home
Cultural backgrounds and traditions play a significant role in shaping how individuals perceive and value their homes. Here are some examples of cultural perspectives on home:
1. Eastern Concept of Home: In many Asian cultures, the concept of home is deeply tied to family and ancestral roots. Homes are often multigenerational, and family members have a strong sense of duty to care for and maintain the family home. Home is a place for honoring ancestors and preserving traditions.
2. Western Individualism: In contrast, Western cultures, particularly in North America and Europe, often emphasize individual autonomy and independence. Homes are viewed as personal spaces where one can express their individuality and privacy. The focus may be on creating a sense of self within the home environment.
3. Indigenous Notions of Home: Indigenous cultures around the world often have unique perspectives on home. For many Indigenous communities, home is intricately linked to the land. It represents a sacred connection to nature and the spirits of the land. Displacement from ancestral lands can result in profound emotional and cultural loss.
3. The Emotional Connection to Home
Beyond its physical attributes, home is a place where people experience a wide range of emotions. It's where they feel loved, nurtured, and understood. Home is often associated with positive memories and a sense of security. However, it can also evoke feelings of nostalgia and longing, particularly for those who have left their childhood homes or experienced loss.
Nostalgia: Nostalgia is a powerful emotion associated with home. It's the wistful yearning for the past, a sentimental attachment to the memories and experiences tied to a particular place or time. Nostalgia often leads people to seek out elements of their past in an attempt to recapture a sense of home.
Homesickness: Homesickness is the feeling of longing for home when one is away. It can be especially challenging for individuals who have relocated for work, education, or other reasons. Homesickness is a testament to the profound emotional connection people have with their homes.
4. The Modern Challenge: Nomadism and Displacement
In today's globalized world, the concept of home is being redefined. The rise of digital nomadism, the increased mobility of the workforce, and the displacement of communities due to conflict and environmental factors are challenging traditional notions of home.
Digital Nomadism: Some individuals and families have adopted a lifestyle that allows them to work remotely and travel extensively. While this offers flexibility and adventure, it can also disrupt the conventional idea of a stable, fixed home.
Refugees and Displacement: Millions of people around the world have been forced to leave their homes due to conflicts, persecution, and environmental disasters. For these individuals, the search for a new home is a matter of survival and safety, often involving immense hardship and uncertainty.
5. Creating a Sense of Home
Creating a sense of home is not limited to physical spaces; it can also involve cultivating a feeling of belonging and comfort wherever one goes. Here are some ways people create a sense of home:
Cultural Communities: Many immigrants and expatriates form cultural communities in their new homes, where they celebrate traditions, cuisine, and languages from their countries of origin. These communities provide a sense of familiarity and belonging.
Personalization: Personalizing living spaces with familiar items, family photos, and cherished possessions can transform a new or temporary residence into a more comforting and familiar environment.
Relationships: Building relationships and support networks in a new location can help individuals feel connected and establish a sense of home.
6. FAQs about the Concept of Home
Q1: Can a person have more than one home?
A1: Yes, many people have multiple homes, each with its unique significance. For example, one may have a childhood home, a current residence, and a vacation home, each holding different emotional connections.
Q2: How do people cope with homesickness when living far from home?
A2: Coping with homesickness involves staying connected with loved ones through technology, building new relationships in the current location, and creating a sense of familiarity through routines and activities that evoke the feeling of home.
Q3: Is home ownership necessary to establish a sense of home?
A3: No, home ownership is not a prerequisite for feeling at home. Renting or living in communal spaces can also provide a strong sense of home. It's the emotional and psychological connection that matters most.
Q4: Can a person feel at home while traveling frequently or living a nomadic lifestyle?
A4: Yes, some individuals embrace a nomadic lifestyle and find a sense of home in their ability to adapt to new environments and form connections with people along the way. Home, in this context, may be more about the journey than a fixed location.
7. Conclusion
The concept of home is a multifaceted and deeply personal experience. It encompasses not only physical spaces but also emotional connections, cultural traditions, and a sense of belonging. Whether it's a place of comfort and nostalgia, a haven for cultural identity, or a source of emotional connection, home remains a central and evolving aspect of human existence.
As the world continues to change, with increasing mobility and displacement, our understanding of home will adapt and expand. Ultimately, home is a reflection of our shared human need for connection, security, and a place to call our own, regardless of its form or location.
No comments:
Post a Comment