Saturday, June 19, 2010

Why Not Arnott?


The saying goes that sometimes the biggest moves are the ones you don't make. What usually goes unsaid is that it cuts both ways.

Today the Devils reacquired Jason Arnott in a deal with Nashville for a second round pick next year and right wing Matt Halischuk, a low-level prospect. Glen Sather either did not get in on the negotiations for Arnott's services or he decided that the Predator captain wasn't worth it. Either way, the Rangers are less off for not swinging the deal.

Let's look at why:

*Adding Arnott would have given the Rangers a first line center. Having a depth chart of Arnott-Dubinsky-Anisimov-Drury would have made the middle a position of strength. (Yes, Drury would be manning the fourth line; as he showed at the Olympics, that is where he excels.)

*While his leadership was questioned in Nashville, he still brings 1,205 NHL games, 939 points and a Stanley Cup ring to the table (numbers include playoffs).

*At 6'5, 220 Arnott would have provided size the Rangers need, and at a far higher skill level than Brian Boyle. Boyle should go to Hartford, directly to Hartford, without passing go and without collecting a NHL salary.

*His experience as a big man and his particular skill set would have provided a perfect role model for Brandon Dubinsky, who did not particularly progress in his development last season.

*While waiver wire addition Erik Christensen showed some chemistry with Marian Gaborik, he certainly did not draw the defenders to him. Everyone watching knew Christy was going to look for Arnott 49 times out of 50 before taking things himself - after the defense has secured the zone. Arnott forces teams to take notice of him and is willing to go hard to the slot - something that would open more ice up for our Slovak sniper.

*With one year left on his contract, Arnott would have bought the Rangers a season for Derek Stepan to learn the pro game in either the AHL or the WHL.

*Despite a string of injuries the last few years, Arnott still has averaged better than 0.7 points per game. Drury, by the way, averaged 0.42 last season. And if those injuries were a concern, well, look at Gaborik last season.

*On the Devils, Arnott will make himself quite familiar with the front of the crease in front of Henrik. Not good. Not good at all.

As the move was not made, the Rangers are still without a top pivot. If they want to re-sign Christensen, that works but they can't give the lip service that they are going to make the playoffs and make a run for the Cup. And that is fine - this team is long (long, long, long) overdue for a rebuild. Let Prospal walk, re-sign Brodie Dupont and give him a shot at the roster, bring up Bobby and Dane and Dale (Weise), trade Rozy for picks (or a bag of pucks) and banish Redden from Broadway.

But let's face it, that is about as likely as Dolan selling the team and Sather offering an official apology for his reign of ridiculousness. It is still far, far too early to condemn him for the coming season but letting Arnott go to Jersey may be the biggest move he made.



 "Why Not Arnott? A Closer Look at the Impact of Leadership in Sports"



Leadership is a defining quality in the world of sports. It can be the catalyst that propels a team to victory or the glue that holds a group of athletes together during challenging times. One individual who exemplified exceptional leadership in the realm of hockey is Jason Arnott. In this article, we'll explore the impact of leadership in sports, focusing on Jason Arnott's career and contributions as a captain. We'll also address frequently asked questions about leadership in sports.

The Leadership of Jason Arnott

Jason Arnott, a former NHL player, captained multiple teams during his career, including the Edmonton Oilers and the New Jersey Devils. His leadership style and impact on and off the ice offer valuable insights into what makes a great captain in professional sports.

Lead by Example: Arnott was known for his strong work ethic and commitment to the game. He led by example, consistently giving his best effort and demonstrating a dedication to improving his skills.

Communication: Effective communication is a hallmark of great leadership. Arnott was known for his ability to communicate with his teammates, fostering a sense of unity and understanding among the players.

Resilience: Leadership often involves facing adversity head-on. Arnott's resilience in the face of challenges and his ability to bounce back from setbacks inspired his teammates.

Accountability: As a captain, Arnott held himself accountable for his actions and expected the same from his teammates. This created a culture of responsibility within the team.

Motivation: Captains are often tasked with motivating their teammates. Arnott's words and actions inspired his fellow players to perform at their best.

The Impact of Leadership in Sports

Team Cohesion: Effective leaders in sports can bring a diverse group of athletes together, fostering a sense of unity and camaraderie. This cohesion is often a key factor in a team's success.

Player Development: Leaders can mentor and guide younger players, helping them grow both as athletes and individuals. This mentorship contributes to the long-term success of a team.

Adaptability: Leaders in sports must be adaptable, able to handle changing circumstances and make quick decisions under pressure. This quality is invaluable in high-stakes situations.

Resilience: In the face of adversity, a strong leader can instill resilience in the team, helping them bounce back from setbacks and maintain a positive mindset.

Inspiration: Great leaders inspire their teammates to push their limits and achieve their full potential. Their actions and words motivate others to strive for excellence.

FAQs on Leadership in Sports

1. Can leadership be developed, or is it an innate quality?

Leadership can be developed over time. While some individuals may have innate leadership qualities, others can acquire and refine leadership skills through experience, mentorship, and self-awareness.

2. Are leaders in sports always the team captains?

Not necessarily. While team captains often serve as leaders, leadership can emerge from various roles within a team. Coaches, veteran players, and even younger athletes can exhibit leadership qualities.

3. How does leadership impact the performance of individual players?

Leadership can positively influence individual players by providing guidance, support, and motivation. It can enhance their confidence and help them perform at a higher level.

4. What challenges do sports leaders face in managing a team?

Sports leaders must navigate various challenges, including conflicts within the team, external pressures, and the need to make tough decisions that may not be popular with all players.

*5. Can a team be successful without a strong leader?

While it is possible for a team to achieve success without a strong leader, effective leadership often plays a pivotal role in a team's ability to reach its full potential and maintain consistency.



Leadership in sports is a dynamic and influential force that can shape the destiny of a team. Jason Arnott's career and contributions serve as a shining example of the impact a strong leader can have on and off the ice. Through qualities like leading by example, effective communication, resilience, accountability, and motivation, sports leaders create a culture of success that extends far beyond the game itself.

As we celebrate the legacy of leaders like Jason Arnott, we recognize the enduring importance of leadership in sports. It is a force that inspires, unifies, and propels teams to greatness, making it a cornerstone of the sporting world and a source of inspiration for athletes and fans alike.




No comments:

Post a Comment