Tuesday, February 14, 2012

37-13-5: Not So Big, Not So Bad


The Rangers visited Boston for the second time this season and they skated away with two points for the second time this season. Three weeks after Marian Gaborik scored to give the Blueshirts a 3-2 overtime win, the team needed no such heroics on Tuesday. Well, no one moment of heroics - Hank put forth his usual herculean effort to give the Rangers a 3-0 shutout victory over the reigning Stanley Cup champion Bruins.

If the Bs are indeed the gritty Americans who rebelled against England, well then the Rangers are a tough band of vikings led by a Swedish King who have conquered the Causeway. Hank has played the Bruins 25 times in his career and is 18-5-2 with six shutouts, a gaa that is roughly 1.50 and a save % of roughly .950. While nothing will ever unseat this as my favourite Lundqvist save vs. Boston, he made several sharp stops among his 42 saves on this night. And his serfs served up three goals against Timmy Thomas and the team was able to skate away with a heckuva win.

Late Hits:

*Yet again the Rangers did not play 60 minutes. A bad start allowed the Bruins to press the action for the first 15 minutes before the Blueshirts showed up to play. And yet, when those 15 minutes were over it was the Rangers who were ahead thanks to a power play goal (of all things). Boston pressed the action all night, dominating play and attempting an astounding 79 shots but the Rangers won. Remarkable.

*The Blueshirts blocked 22 shots and just two were not credited with at least one: Staal and Stepan. Weird how the puck bounces sometimes.

*The other key to victory aside from the King was how the Rangers handled Zdeno Chara. The biggest of the Bruins was not given any time or space anywhere on the ice and Boston couldn't adapt without their cap. The Rangers were constantly all over the Slovak with Arty battling him behind the Boston net, Derek Stepan checking him hard at the Ranger blueline, Hank stopping six of his shots and McD banking the puck off of one of his beanstalks for the second Ranger goal.

*If you aren't contributing on the scoreboard you have to contribute elsewhere. And that is exactly what Brad Richard$ did in this one. Richard$ showed off his ice sight with solid defensive positioning and smart passing to move the puck to good spots.

*Torts had to limit the minutes Del Zaster and Stralman saw because they just can't keep up with talent like Boston. If Sauer is indeed done for the season, Sather would be best served bringing in a big body to help out. Hal Gill as a Ranger? Feels dirty to say but might be necessary.

*What is Mike Rupp's purpose again? He was even on the ice when Bruins crashed the Ranger net and nothing.

*So thankful Pruster didn't throw down with Lucic. He would give Lootch a run for his money but his shoulder probably would not survive.

*Dubi just missed making my stars but with an assist and 10 stitches, he certainly made a good case.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Ryan McDonagh - one goal.
2-Ryan Callahan - one goal.
1-Henrik Lundqvist - 42 saves.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Arty - Shocked as you are that he is here and yet the big Russian kid had one of his best games to date. He did not back down physically to anyone, won a battle against Chara and scored with a sexy snipe.
2-Cally - Grind on captain, grind on.
1-Hank - All hail.



 37-13-5: Not So Big, Not So Bad - Deciphering the Numbers in Sports



In the realm of sports, numbers hold a unique significance. They encapsulate the triumphs and tribulations of athletes and teams, often providing a narrative of their journey. One such set of numbers that has sparked discussions and debates in various sports communities is 37-13-5. In this article, we will delve into the meaning behind 37-13-5, dissect its significance, and answer frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide a comprehensive understanding of this numerical enigma in the world of sports.

Deciphering 37-13-5

At first glance, 37-13-5 might appear as a cryptic code. However, these numbers represent a set of figures that are deeply rooted in the context of sports. To break down the sequence:

37 signifies the total number of games played by a sports team or athlete in a specific season or time frame.
13 represents the number of victories or wins achieved within those 37 games.
5 denotes the number of draws or ties recorded during the same period.
In essence, 37-13-5 provides a snapshot of a team's or athlete's performance record, encapsulating their win-loss-draw ratio over the course of a season or defined timeframe.

The Significance of 37-13-5

The significance of 37-13-5 lies in its ability to encapsulate a team's or athlete's journey within a concise set of numbers. Here are some key takeaways from this statistic:

Performance Evaluation: 37-13-5 offers a quick assessment of a team's or athlete's performance. It serves as a reference point for fans, analysts, and stakeholders to gauge how well the team or athlete has fared during the specified period.

Context Matters: While the numbers themselves are informative, context plays a pivotal role in interpreting the significance of 37-13-5. Questions arise, such as: Were the wins against formidable opponents? Were the draws a result of closely contested matches? Has there been improvement compared to previous seasons?

Motivation for Improvement: For a team or athlete, 37-13-5 can serve as motivation for improvement. Wins can boost confidence, draws may indicate areas for growth, and losses can provide valuable learning experiences.

Fan Engagement: Fans often engage in passionate discussions and debates based on these statistics. 37-13-5 becomes a common reference point for fans to analyze and share their perspectives on a team's performance.

Historical Record: 37-13-5 becomes a part of the historical record, providing insights into a team's performance in a specific season. It enables comparisons with past and future seasons.

Interpreting 37-13-5: FAQs

Is a 37-13-5 record considered good in sports?

The evaluation of a 37-13-5 record as good or not depends on the specific sport, league, and the team's or athlete's expectations. In some contexts, it may be exceptional, while in others, it might be average or below par.

What does the number of draws (5) indicate?

The number of draws (5) suggests that the team or athlete had games that ended without a clear winner or loser. Draws can imply that the team or athlete faced tough opponents or that their matches were closely contested.

How does 37-13-5 compare to previous seasons?

To assess whether 37-13-5 is an improvement or decline compared to previous seasons, historical records must be examined. If the current season's record is better than past seasons, it could be considered an improvement.

What factors contribute to a team's or athlete's win-loss-draw record?

Numerous factors can influence a team's or athlete's record, including the level of competition, injuries, team dynamics, coaching strategies, weather conditions, and external variables.

Can a 37-13-5 record lead to championship contention?

A 37-13-5 record can position a team or athlete well for championship contention, but success in playoffs or championships often depends on various other factors, such as knockout rounds, opponent strength, and performance in high-pressure situations.

Is 37-13-5 considered a balanced record?

A record of 37-13-5 could be considered balanced if the draws indicate that the team or athlete is competitive and capable of both winning and avoiding significant losses. The concept of balance can be subjective and dependent on the sport's context.



In the dynamic world of sports, 37-13-5 serves as a numerical summary, encapsulating a team's or athlete's journey, accomplishments, and challenges. These statistics provide a reference point for fans, analysts, and stakeholders, sparking discussions and debates about performance and potential. While they offer valuable insights, it is crucial to remember that context is key when interpreting these numbers, and they are just one part of the larger narrative in the ever-evolving world of sports.




No comments:

Post a Comment