Showing posts with label Gomez. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gomez. Show all posts

Sunday, September 21, 2008

The Captain Conundrum

There is much debate of late over who will become the 25th captain of the New York Rangers. From all that I have read, and I am not about to link all of the pieces as both MSM and bloggers are weighing in on it left and right, everyone seems to think this is a two horse race: Chris Drury vs. Scott Gomez.

I find it remarkable and completely disagree with either choice. First off, let's look at why they are the leading candidates: Both have won Cups, both can put up some points, both are signed to well-paid, long-term contracts. The arguing points used by proponents of each against the other is that Drury is too quiet and Gomez acts too immature. Both statements are true, and that should disqualify each of them in the battle for the captaincy.

Markus Naslund and Wade Redden both have worn letters before but both fall into the same category as Drury as leaders by example. Captains of that ilk work in Detroit, in Colorado and in Ottawa but they don't work here. History has proven that.

New York needs a cult of personality to lead them, and none of the aforementioned 2008-09 Rangers qualify as that. Mark Messier, widely acknowledged as The Captain, was one. Neither his predecessor (Kelly Kisio) nor his successors (Brian Leetch and Jaromir Jagr) had the power to force their will upon others, to motivate others and to resuscitate others. They were great, great hockey players but they couldn't make those around them great.

And New York demands greatness.

Is that quality in the current Ranger locker room? In skill ... perhaps but, at least at the moment and at least on the surface, not in personality. Drury and Gomez are both good hockey players and proven winners but Drury keeps to himself and Gomez smiles in postgame interviews after losses. The short term solution for this is to spread three A's around until someone steps up and brings the team with them.

Perhaps the captaincy could go to Staal, Girardi, Dawes or Callahan but not yet. The C brings with it a legacy and it should not be tarnished just because fans or pundits feel that somebody has to have it.



 "The Captain Conundrum: The Role and Impact of Team Captains in Sports"



The captaincy in sports is a position of great honor and responsibility. Captains are often seen as the symbolic leaders of their teams, representing the values and spirit of their respective sports organizations. In this article, we delve into the captaincy role, its significance, and the challenges captains face. We also address frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide a comprehensive understanding of the captaincy conundrum in sports.

The Role of Team Captains
Leadership and Inspiration
Team captains are expected to be leaders both on and off the field. They inspire their teammates through their work ethic, commitment, and dedication to the team's success. Captains often set the tone for the team's culture and attitude.

Communication and Decision-Making
Captains play a crucial role in communication between coaches and players. They relay instructions, strategies, and feedback from the coaching staff to their teammates. Captains are also involved in on-field decision-making, such as choosing to bat or field in cricket or making tactical adjustments in soccer.

Representing the Team
Captains serve as the face of their teams. They represent their organizations at press conferences, promotional events, and interactions with fans. Captains are responsible for upholding the team's reputation and values in the public eye.

The Significance of Captaincy
Tradition and Legacy
The captaincy role is steeped in tradition and legacy. Many sports organizations have a rich history of iconic captains who have left a lasting mark on their teams. The captain's armband or badge carries a sense of heritage and honor.

Unity and Teamwork
Captains promote unity and teamwork. They ensure that players work cohesively, putting aside personal differences for the greater good of the team. Captains foster an environment of mutual respect and support.

Accountability and Responsibility
Captains are held accountable for the team's performance and conduct. They are responsible for maintaining discipline on and off the field. Captains must lead by example and address any issues within the team.

The Challenges of Captaincy
Pressure and Expectations
Captains face immense pressure and high expectations. They are expected to perform consistently at a high level while also motivating their teammates. The weight of leadership can be mentally and emotionally taxing.

Balancing Act
Captains must strike a delicate balance between their on-field and off-field responsibilities. Managing the demands of leadership, training, and personal life can be challenging and require strong time management skills.

Handling Adversity
Captains are often tested in times of adversity. Whether facing a losing streak, injuries, or off-field controversies, captains must maintain composure and guide their teams through challenging periods.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. How is a team captain selected?
The process of selecting a team captain varies by sport and organization. In some cases, coaches or team management appoint captains based on leadership qualities and experience. In others, players may vote to elect their captain.

2. Can a player be a captain without being the best performer on the team?
Yes, a player can be a captain without being the best performer in terms of statistics or skills. Leadership qualities, work ethic, and the ability to inspire teammates are often more critical factors in captaincy selection.

3. Are there different types of captains, such as on-field and off-field captains?
Yes, some sports teams have multiple captains, each with a specific role. For example, there may be a captain who primarily leads on the field during games and another who focuses on off-field responsibilities, such as community outreach and media relations.

4. Can a captain be removed from their position?
Yes, captains can be removed from their position by team management or through a team vote, depending on the organization's policies. Common reasons for removal may include a loss of leadership effectiveness or disciplinary issues.

5. Are there female team captains in male-dominated sports?
Yes, female team captains can and do exist in male-dominated sports. While it may be less common, the selection of captains is based on leadership qualities and not gender.


The role of team captain in sports is one of great significance and responsibility. Captains serve as leaders, motivators, and representatives of their teams. They uphold traditions, foster unity, and shoulder the weight of expectations. The challenges they face are numerous, from handling pressure to maintaining a balance between leadership and personal life.

As we watch our favorite sports teams compete, it's important to recognize and appreciate the dedication and leadership of captains. They play a vital role in shaping team culture and inspiring their teammates to achieve greatness. So, the next time you see a captain leading their team onto the field, remember the captaincy conundrum they navigate and the profound impact they have on the world of sports.




Thursday, July 5, 2007

A few follow ups ...

First off, I would be remiss if I didn't wish Jed Ortmeyer the best in Nashville. As many of you know, he was my favourite player and I think his heart and work ethic will be missed. As for Karel Rachunek and Kevin Weekes going to the Devils, haha. I would have thought that Lou would have realized that he already signed a European puck moving defenseman with no heart that didn't work out (Vlad Malakov) and it cost him a first round draft pick just to get rid of him. As for Weeeeeeeeekes, he did his job here but never was a true starter so good luck to him in filling the skates of Chris Terreri and Craig Billington.

And so I posted my last blog, and sent around and one of the responses I got was:
"what is he talking about that it worked with having Euro team...Did it? First round lost to the Devils and choking to Buffalo to me does not mean that it works."

Now I don't know about you, but I think this guy is an idiot. After not making the postseason for seven years, Sather builds a comfort net around Jagr and we make the playoffs two years in a row (and the second time we were essentially 7.7 seconds away from the Eastern Conference Finals). I would say that plan works and has set the team in the right direction. Look at the Blackhawks - they signed some big name, big ticket free agents after the lockout and were one of the worse teams in the NHL.

And because of the insane deals that we gave Gomez and Drury, it looks like Sean Avery is going to head to arbitration. On several message boards it was brought up for debate if it would be a big deal if we lost him after the year and some Rangers fans actually said it wouldn't be at all because of the two signings and because of the guys we have in, and are heading to, Hartford ... my response:

Man you guys are quick to turn on a guy. Need I remind everyone that we hailed Sean as a hero as his coming to the team pretty much turned around our season. And don't anyone say that we could have done it without him because that sure as hell isn't true. His drive and fire ignited a team that was headed for the golf course and turned us into a powerhouse heading into the playoffs. Yes he disappeared against the Sabres. So what? We wouldn't have even faced the Thrashers if he didn't come to the team. Jagr, Renny and company even said as much, and now you guys are willing to throw him away because we got two playmaking forwards and have some halfway decent prospects. That's just ridiculous.

Some doom and gloom ...

I am just going to mention in here that I am not so sure about the Rangers signings of Scott Gomez and Chris Drury. Defenders of the deals can go on about how Gomez is younger than Nylander, has more potential and has won a Cup but the one priceless point is that Jaromir Jagr liked playing alongside Nylander. That simple. When we came out of the lockout Glen Sather got players that made Jagr happy and he played his best hockey since he left Mario's side. Now we get rid of one of the main people that he loved playing with.

I don't care if Gomez is going to turn into Adam Oates or Dale Hawerchuk or whoever, if these big ticket signings piss Jagr off, he could very well revert back to the player he was in Washington when he was unhappy and we will go right down the tubes to where we were in the late 90s. Yeah, we had Gretz and some other big ticket signings, but we had no chemistry and we went NOWHERE. Not to mention that signing Gomez and Drury to these insane contracts will certainly cause unrest among Henrik, Avery and Shanny as they have already proved their meddle in a Blueshirt and now Glen will try to lowball them to fit everyone under the cap ...

I see the doom and gloom because when we had a plan and went with it, things worked, even if I didn't agree with it. Glen was going to rebuild so we traded Leetch, the greatest American player ever. Fine. Glen wanted to build for the post-lockout NHL and do it around Jagr by signing seven Czech players, fine. Teams with North American flavour have won Cups, no team that had that many Euros, nor a Euro captain ever has. But I was willing to go with it, and it worked. Now let's blow it up by getting rid of one of the linchpins and go after the big ticket names? It doesn't seem like a plan, it seems like an attempt to grab headlines when we should be trying to grab the Cup.