Friday, October 24, 2008

7-2-1: Ref Interference Swats Jackets


The Columbus Blue Jackets were robbed on Friday night. Somehow both officials and the video judges in Columbus and Toronto all mistakenly agreed that Brandon Dubinsky's eventual game-winner was a fair goal even though he clearly redirected it in with his skate. It put the Blue Jackets back on their heels and allowed the Rangers to play from a place of strength. But what is done is done and the Blueshirts skated away with a 3-1 win. Considering how badly the team has played in recent games, we'll take it.

*First off, get well soon Tom Renney. After getting clocked in the head, he went down like a ton of bricks and had to be helped off of the bench. On NHL on the Fly they said he was doing fine so let's hope so; I never want to see the team in Perry Pearn's hands again. Yes, the team picked up their play, but it was for Renney - not the incompetent Pearn. His power play, by the way, went 1-for-7 and looked awful during a 5-on-3.

*I watched the game without any audio and have to say it was great not having to listen to Joe Micheletti. But I do have to say that the MSG production staff doing this game must have had no control over the cameramen. The Columbus crew had trouble following the puck and nearly gave me motion sickness as they swung back and forth. The MSG folks weren't perfect themselves, missing several faceoffs because of replays as well as the first Ranger goal.

*Speaking of faceoffs, the Rangers couldn't win one while in the offensive zone on the power play if their lives depended on it. It was horrifying to watch the seconds tick off as they were forced to retrieve the puck time after time after time.

*And they are lucky to have Henrik Lundqvist in the crease because yet again the special team allowed the disadvantaged team to get scoring chances. Hank made 25 saves in all and stood tall despite unrelenting pressure from Rick Nash, who could be great if he didn't play in Columbus.

*My boy Malik Kalinin really, really needs to be released or replaced. His display on Columbus' lone goal was atrocious. While he should have been able to get the handle on the bouncing puck, the least he could have done was take a smart penalty and hold up Jakob Voracek. Instead, he missed the puck and the man and Jake got two shots off, scoring on the second one. There are good penalties and bad penalties and he wasn't smart enough to take either. But he did take a stick to the face later on to draw a call so that's something ... right?

*Voracek, by the way, really showed why he is a top prospect. He has great hands, good size and - as he showed on the goal - breakaway speed. If RJ Umberger and the rest of the Columbus offense ever get in gear, Voracek could end up a Calder finalist. Especially since his teammate, Nik Filatov won't challenge him when he gets less than three minutes of ice time a game.

*The Ranger kids, meanwhile, were involved all over the ice. Ryan Callahan hit everything that moved, Marc Staal was the most physical he has ever been (not facing his own brother), Brandon Dubinsky had little trouble powering into the Columbus zone and Dan Girardi excelled in all three zones. The only disappointment was Nigel Dawes, who was ineffective yet again.

*Did Fedor Tyutin or Cristian Backman actually play? I saw they got ice time on the box score but can honestly say I didn't notice either of them all night. Actually, check that, I saw Backman standing nearby Rick Nash as he was giving Freddy Sjostrom the business after the final buzzer.

*It was great to see another former Ranger again. Manny Malhotra has certainly made a nice little career for himself after the Rangers ruined his early development. Where Danny Blackburn was overused, got hurt and is out of hockey, Manny was underused, overburdened with expectations and yet has carved himself a nice niche as an energy line center.

*Markus Naslund somehow got a pair of assists in this one. Can you imagine how good the Rangers will be if he, Chris Drury, Scott Gomez and/or Wade Redden actually remember how to score? I dream of that.

*Let's hope that tomorrow they take a few more pictures of Cindy Crosby that she never wants to be in again ...

*PHW Three Stars
3-Markus Naslund - two assists.
2-Dan Girardi - one goal and one assist.
1-Nik Zherdev - one goal and two assists.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Ryan Callahan - Cally had seven recorded hits. He is at his best when he is physically involved because it makes things happen. Too many Rangers are reactive rather than proactive and it was nice to see.
2-Pascal Leclaire - Leclaire made 29 saves on 32 shots and had absolutely no chance to get the other three. Girardi's goal came through a screen, Dubi kicked his in and Zherdev ... well there was no stopping that.
1-Zherdev - Circumstances got him his two assists, skill got him that goal. A soft touch to receive the puck and lightning fast hands to turn it over and put in the upper corner on the far side. Wow. If only he could do that on a regular basis ...



 "7-2-1: Referee Interference Swats Jackets - Examining Controversies and Challenges in NHL Officiating"



In the fast-paced and physically demanding world of professional hockey, the role of referees is paramount in ensuring fair play, enforcing the rules, and maintaining the integrity of the game. However, just like the players on the ice, referees are not immune to controversy and scrutiny. The incident labeled as "7-2-1: Referee Interference Swats Jackets" stirred debate and highlighted the challenges that NHL officials face. In this article, we will delve into the details of this particular incident, explore the broader issues surrounding referee interference, and address frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding officiating in the NHL.

The Controversial Incident: 7-2-1
Setting the Scene
The incident in question occurred during a crucial game in the NHL playoffs. The Columbus Blue Jackets, a team known for their resilience and determination, were facing off against a formidable opponent, with the series on the line. The score was close, the tension palpable, and the stakes incredibly high.

The Controversial Call
In the final minutes of the game, with the Blue Jackets pressing for a tying goal, a pivotal moment unfolded. A player from the opposing team, while attempting to clear the puck, collided with one of the referees, leading to a disruption in the Blue Jackets' offensive play. The incident resulted in a turnover, ultimately sealing the fate of the game.

Outcry and Debate
The controversial nature of this incident was immediately apparent. Fans, players, and analysts weighed in with their opinions. Some argued that the collision was purely accidental and that the referee was in a vulnerable position. Others contended that the interference swayed the outcome of the game and questioned the referee's positioning.

The Role and Challenges of NHL Officiating
The Referee's Role
In the NHL, referees play a crucial role in overseeing the game's flow, enforcing the rules, and ensuring the safety of players. They make split-second decisions on penalties, goals, and offside calls, often under intense scrutiny from players, coaches, and fans.

The Need for Consistency
Consistency in officiating is a perpetual challenge in professional sports. Referees must interpret and enforce the rules consistently across different games and situations. This consistency is essential for maintaining the integrity of the game.

The Human Element
NHL officials are human, prone to making mistakes, and subject to the limitations of human perception. While technology, such as video review, has been introduced to assist with certain calls, not all decisions can be reviewed, and the human element remains a part of the game.

Addressing Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About NHL Officiating
1. Can referee interference impact the outcome of a game?
Yes, referee interference can potentially impact the outcome of a game. In situations where a referee's positioning or actions affect the flow of play, it can lead to turnovers, goals, or penalties that may alter the game's course.

2. How are NHL referees trained and evaluated?
NHL referees undergo rigorous training and evaluation processes. They must demonstrate a deep understanding of the rules, excellent skating ability, and the ability to make quick, accurate decisions. Performance evaluations and feedback are ongoing throughout the season.

3. Can controversial calls be reviewed?
Certain controversial calls, such as goals and offside plays, can be reviewed using video technology. However, not all decisions are subject to review, and the on-ice officials' judgment remains final in many cases.

4. How do referees handle player and coach disputes?
Referees are responsible for maintaining order on the ice and managing player and coach disputes. They may communicate with players and coaches to explain decisions or issue warnings and penalties for unsportsmanlike conduct.

5. What steps are taken to improve officiating consistency?
The NHL continually works to improve officiating consistency through training, rule clarifications, and video review processes. Feedback mechanisms are in place to address concerns and enhance the quality of officiating.


The incident labeled as "7-2-1: Referee Interference Swats Jackets" serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges that NHL officials face in their role. While referees are tasked with upholding the rules and maintaining the integrity of the game, they are not infallible and can become inadvertent participants in the action on the ice.

Officiating in the NHL is a demanding and often thankless job, where split-second decisions can have far-reaching consequences. While technology and video review have been introduced to assist with certain calls, the human element remains an integral part of the game, subject to scrutiny and debate.

Controversial incidents, like the one discussed here, spark discussions about the role of officials, the need for consistency, and the impact of referee decisions on the outcome of games. They remind us that, in the world of professional sports, the line between fair play and controversy is often a fine one, and the debates surrounding officiating will continue to be a part of the fabric of the game.




No comments:

Post a Comment