Evaluating The Overtime

After watching the Rangers lose in a shootout to the Islanders last night I got to thinking about how awful it was for a game to be decided in the skill competition. While a fellow Ranger fan pointed out to me that the sloppy play by both teams showed how ties should still be allowed as neither team played well enough to win. But this is not a debate as to whether or not there should be shootouts, but rather is the value of overtime has lessened.

By my math, an astounding 125 out of the 217 extra-time games (as of the games finished on March 4th) have been decided in shootouts. The Edmonton Oilers won 14 of the 17 shootouts they participated in. Having seen a few of their games, after a minute or so into the overtime, they start playing not to lose rather than to win since they have a better chance coming out on top in the one-on-one competition rather than the four-on-four overtime.

And they aren't the only team. The Rangers are one of them as well. Disagree? Then how can you explain them putting slower skaters out on the ice *cough, cough, Marek Malik, cough* when there is more room to skate? Ryan Callahan, the fastest Ranger in yesterday's loss, was relegated to the bench (as was the red hot Nigel Dawes) for the slower - yet more responsible - Brendan Shanahan.

The league initially made overtime 4-on-4 to increase scoring with more room. That clearly is not happening as 58% of games that go beyond regulation remain even. Shootouts are certainly a fan-friendly device to decide games but the brass tacks of it is that hockey becomes an individual sport, which it is not. The shootout certainly isn't going to go away, so what is the solution?

Rather than turning to the idea of 3-on-3 play, how about a change to the offside rules? The league could make it a carry-over offsides where a player can already be in the offensive zone as long as the puck is carried over the blueline or can get rid of the blue line entirely. Do these sound familiar? They should, at least for folks who play(ed) roller hockey. There was a lot more scoring in Roller Hockey International and that wasn't necessarily a symptom of lesser-quality players. Having lax offsides rules opens up the ice surface even farther and allows longer home run passes and even cherry picking. The latter has some negative connotations but shouldn't.

Say a team wants to send one of their guys to camp out at the far crease. If the other team leaves a defender there, then its a 3-on-3 situation in the zone. If they leave the player alone with the goaltender, then its a 4-on-3 in deep. Say the three are able to get the puck out, then the goaltender can try to come out of his crease to challenge the goal hanger or stop the home run pass, which increases the odds of a good scoring chance even farther.

If the five minute extra period still doesn't produce a winner, then you can still have the skill competition declare a winner, but I would rather see games ended based on team play rather than individual. And by changing up the offsides, that increases those odds.

 Evaluating Overtime in the NHL: Strategies, Stats, and Excitement

Overtime in the NHL is a thrilling and often heart-pounding spectacle. In this article, we'll delve into the world of NHL overtime, exploring its strategies, statistical trends, and why it continues to captivate fans worldwide.

FAQ 1: How Does NHL Overtime Work?

In regular-season NHL games, if the score is tied at the end of regulation, teams play a sudden-death overtime period. Overtime features three-on-three play for a maximum of five minutes. If no goal is scored, the game proceeds to a shootout.

Strategies in NHL Overtime:

Puck Possession: Possessing the puck is paramount in overtime. Teams often prioritize controlled entries into the offensive zone.

Line Selection: Coaches choose lines that combine speed, skill, and chemistry, given the open ice in three-on-three play.

Defensive Responsibility: While offense is crucial, teams must remain defensively responsible to prevent odd-man rushes.

FAQ 2: Overtime Stats and Trends

Let's explore some interesting statistics and trends in NHL overtime:

Shootout vs. Overtime Goals: Overtime goals are often seen as more legitimate victories than shootout wins. Teams tend to value the extra point from an overtime win over a shootout win.

Goalie Performance: Goaltenders play a crucial role in overtime. Some goalies excel in three-on-three situations, while others struggle. This disparity can influence team strategies.

Early vs. Late Goals: Statistically, more goals are scored early in overtime, often within the first two minutes. Teams may be more aggressive at the start to secure the win quickly.

Home Advantage: Historically, home teams have a slight advantage in overtime. Familiarity with the home arena's layout and last change privileges can make a difference.

FAQ 3: Memorable Overtime Moments

NHL overtime has delivered countless unforgettable moments:

Stanley Cup Winning Goals: Overtime goals in the Stanley Cup Final, like Bobby Orr's famous "Flying Goal" in 1970, are etched in hockey history.

Playoff Heroics: Players like Patrick Kane and Martin St. Louis have made their mark with clutch overtime goals in the playoffs.

Longest Overtime: The longest NHL playoff game went into six overtime periods in 1936. Mud Bruneteau of the Detroit Red Wings scored the game-winner after 116 minutes and 30 seconds of overtime.

FAQ 4: Evolution of Overtime Formats

The NHL has experimented with overtime formats over the years:

Five-Minute Overtime: Prior to the 1983-84 season, ties were common in the NHL. Overtime was introduced to reduce the frequency of ties.

Four-on-Four: From 1999-2000 to 2015-16, four-on-four overtime was used. This format aimed to create more open ice and increase scoring.

Three-on-Three: In 2015-16, the current three-on-three format was introduced to maximize excitement and reduce the number of shootouts.

FAQ 5: Shootout vs. Overtime: Fan Opinions

The shootout, introduced in the 2005-06 season, remains a polarizing aspect of NHL overtime. Some fans love the one-on-one drama it creates, while others prefer the purity of overtime play.

Shootout Fans: Supporters argue that shootouts add a unique, skills-based element to the game and provide closure to games without a clear winner.

Overtime Purists: Purists believe that shootouts can be anticlimactic, favoring a return to more extended overtime play to determine a winner.

: Overtime's Enduring Allure

NHL overtime remains a captivating facet of the game, combining skill, strategy, and heart-pounding moments. Whether it's the thrill of a breakaway in a shootout or the sheer chaos of three-on-three play, overtime continues to keep fans on the edge of their seats. As the NHL evolves, so too will its approach to overtime, but one thing remains certain: the excitement it generates will endure for generations of hockey fans to come.

A Little Of This, A Little Of That

With the Rangers off and a long Monday at work, I didn't post anything yesterday so today I feel like I was all lazy and stuff. To make it up to y'all, I will post two today - tonight's game wrap and this. So, what is it? Not a Faith No More song, but some odds and ends that I've found/saw/thought/whatever:

*The guys at Way Offside came up with a great term for the idiocy that has been perpetrated by the Flyers Steve Downie: Downie's Syndrome. Love it.

*According to Larry Brooks' article today in the Post, Tom Renney said, "Going 0-2-1 was disappointing. There are things I like, but part of our game seems to have vanished." Part?!? The Rangers got embarrassed out west, I would say most of their game was gone.

*Speaking of the Post, apparently they have an online blog too, called The Blue Seats. Apparently I had looked at it before but had discarded it, and looking again I can see if was for good reason: It isn't written by Brooks, it is two nobodies at the Post that write a fan blog. While I do greatly appreciate fan blogs (*ahem*), I don't want one from an accredited news source. As crappy and in-the-bed-with-the-Islanders as Newsday as, Steve Zipay's On The Rangers Beat does a magnificent job of blogging, well, on the Rangers beat. If I wanted a little bit of opinion with my information, then Sam Weinman's Rangers Report is the place to go. But, not only are the writers at The Blue Seats mediocre, they are also being unprofessional as the Post is supposed to be MSM (MainStream Media).

*If you haven't been keeping up with Zipay's On The Rangers Beat, he pointed out the possibility that the Rangers could open the season in Sweden, although its far from a done deal. While I thought a Czech vacation would be great, Sweden would be even better and it wouldn't hinge on the Rangers keeping Jagr in the offseason ... It also would likely be in one of the coolest-looking arenas I've ever seen.

*Now I don't speak Swedish, and I definitely don't speak Czech, but nonetheless I've been invited to help out over at The Dark Ranger's page. I haven't written anything for him yet, but you can be sure I will link Scotty Hockey to whatever I write, if only for the whoring, I mean, ego boost, lol.

*I kinda laughed at the play, but it appears that Marty Straka really did give himself a concussion in Edmonton. Feel free to clink the link for more info on the Rangers heading into tonight's game against Tampa Bay.

*The NHL announced the starters for the All Star Game. For shame to 'lil lundqvist lover' and the other Ranger fans out there - Marty Brodeur beat Hank for East starter by 45,000 votes. Not that many people will watch the thing on Sunday, January 27th at 6 p.m. in Atlanta, but whatever. I stand by my musing that the All Star Game should be the annual outdoor game but that cannot happen until 2011 (next year's ASG is in Montreal as part of their Centennial Celebration and there likely won't be one in 2010 due to the Vancouver Olympics).

*Stories like this never get old. So great to see ...

*One last thought before I get going - Mirtle presented an interesting idea to extend overtime to 10 minutes. As strange as it seems, I am actually really intrigued - if only to avoid some shootouts (I still think we need to avoid three-point games but that is for another blog, another time). Mirtle makes a great argument for extending the four-on-four; what do you think?

 A Little Of This, A Little Of That: Embracing the Diversity of Life

"A Little Of This, A Little Of That" is a phrase that beautifully encapsulates the rich tapestry of life, where experiences, cultures, and ideas interweave to create a vibrant and diverse world. In this article, we embark on a journey to celebrate this diversity, exploring its significance, the benefits it brings, and the ways it enriches our lives. Additionally, we'll address frequently asked questions (FAQs) that delve into the intricacies of embracing the multifaceted nature of existence.

Section 1: The Significance of Diversity

1.1 A Kaleidoscope of Experiences

Life is a compilation of experiences, both big and small. From moments of joy to trials and tribulations, the diversity of human experiences shapes our individual journeys.

1.2 Cultural Mosaic

Cultural diversity is a cornerstone of humanity. Different cultures contribute their unique customs, traditions, cuisines, and art forms, enriching the global cultural mosaic.

1.3 Intellectual Tapestry

Intellectual diversity encompasses a wide range of thoughts, ideas, and philosophies. It fosters critical thinking, innovation, and a deeper understanding of the world.

Section 2: The Benefits of Embracing Diversity

2.1 Fostering Tolerance and Empathy

Interacting with people from diverse backgrounds fosters tolerance and empathy. It allows us to see the world from different perspectives, promoting understanding and compassion.

2.2 Cultural Exchange

Cultural exchange leads to the sharing of traditions, music, dance, and culinary delights. This exchange of knowledge and experiences strengthens cultural bonds and appreciation.

2.3 Innovation and Creativity

Diversity of thought is a catalyst for innovation and creativity. Diverse teams bring fresh ideas and solutions to the table, driving progress in various fields.

Section 3: Embracing Diversity in Daily Life

3.1 Travel and Exploration

Traveling exposes us to diverse cultures, landscapes, and people. It broadens our horizons, challenges stereotypes, and encourages a deeper appreciation for the world.

3.2 Education and Learning

In educational settings, embracing diversity can be achieved through curricula that reflect different cultures and histories. It encourages students to think critically about global issues.

3.3 Community Engagement

Engaging with diverse communities and volunteering can be a powerful way to learn about and contribute to the well-being of others. It promotes social cohesion and unity.

Section 4: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

4.1 Why is diversity important in the workplace?

Workplace diversity fosters a variety of perspectives, leading to better decision-making, improved problem-solving, and a more inclusive corporate culture.

4.2 How can individuals overcome biases and prejudices related to diversity?

Overcoming biases involves self-awareness, education, and empathetic listening. Challenging preconceived notions and engaging in open dialogue can help combat prejudices.

4.3 Is it possible to embrace diversity without diluting one's cultural identity?

Yes, embracing diversity does not mean compromising one's cultural identity. It means recognizing the value in different perspectives while preserving one's own heritage.

4.4 How can parents teach their children about the importance of diversity?

Parents can introduce their children to diverse books, films, and experiences, encourage open conversations about different cultures, and lead by example through their own interactions.

4.5 What are some challenges associated with diversity, and how can they be addressed?

Challenges include cultural misunderstandings and communication barriers. These can be addressed through education, cultural sensitivity training, and open dialogue.

"A Little Of This, A Little Of That" celebrates the beauty of life's diversity, where myriad experiences, cultures, and ideas converge to create a world filled with vibrancy and richness. Embracing this diversity brings us together, fosters empathy, and fuels progress and innovation.

As individuals, we have the privilege and responsibility to engage with and contribute to this diversity. Whether through travel, education, or community involvement, we can actively promote understanding and unity in a world that is all the more beautiful for its differences. By doing so, we honor the intricate tapestry of life and recognize that it is the mingling of "a little of this and a little of that" that makes existence truly extraordinary.