Suck It Up

So I had started to do a long-winded piece on the problems the NHL has had in presenting the games, both in the arenas and on television, and you know what? I decided that I don't care. Not now.

The league has botched the marketing of the game for years, the Garden has whitewashed their game presentation so its bland fodder for corporate clients and I don't care. Not now.

The officiating has been ... well, I won't even get started on that one.

We may sit on the eve of something pretty damn impressive, so why should we bitch endlessly about things out of our control? That does include officiating, by the way - every blog on the web can complain about the ineptness of the refs and that won't sway Gary Bettman, so at this point, why bother?

This is the time of year that hockey players show distinction from their fellow athletes by toughing it out. Broken bones, open wounds ... who cares: The Stanley Cup is in sight.

Now is the time for us, as fans, to tough it out. The pitiful officiating isn't going to change their ways (unless Sean Avery dares to try something else new), the droll game night operations folks aren't going to get any better, the inept, annoying colour commentators on television aren't going to become any more watchable.

Deal with it. You have to, and you know why? Because the excitement that they try so hard to manufacture is already there. You bring it. I bring it. We all bring it.

Thunderous ovations, nail-biting silences, unadulterated joy, crushing misery. It's all there and it all starts with the determination of the players and is reinforced with our passion. And that is something that the commissioner has never understood. You can't force that upon the unwilling; that depth of emotion is instilled in the fabric of the game and it calls to those who truly get it - those who appreciate every blocked shot, every clearing pass, every hit, every shift. That's us, and that is something they won't take away from us. It survived the goons. It survived the trap. It survived the lockout.

We are in the throes of the playoffs folks and when that beautiful, beautiful trophy is raised in the air none of the petty nonsense will matter anymore. So suck it up, quit your crying and let's just enjoy some hard-fought, leave-it-all-on-the-ice hockey.

I reserve the right to take everything I just wrote back the second the refs buy into another one of Mmmmmaaaaarrrttttyyy's dives and it costs us the game.

ChatGPT

Title: Suck It Up: The Power of Resilience

Introduction

"Suck it up" is a phrase often heard in various contexts, from sports fields to workplaces and even in personal challenges. It embodies the concept of resilience, the ability to bounce back from adversity, and continue moving forward. In this article, we'll explore the significance of resilience, why it's essential in our lives, and how we can cultivate it.

FAQ 1: What Is Resilience?

Resilience is the capacity to recover quickly from difficulties, adapt to change, and face adversity with courage and determination. It's not just about enduring hardships; it's about growing stronger through them.

The Power of Resilience

Resilience is a valuable trait that can positively impact various aspects of our lives:

1. Personal Growth

Resilience enables personal growth by encouraging individuals to view challenges as opportunities for learning and self-improvement. When we face adversity, we're often pushed out of our comfort zones, which can lead to personal development and self-discovery.

2. Mental Health

Resilience is closely linked to mental health. People with higher levels of resilience tend to experience lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. They have the tools to cope with life's difficulties effectively.

3. Success

In professional settings, resilience is a key factor in achieving success. Those who can adapt to changing circumstances, navigate setbacks, and persist in their pursuits are more likely to reach their goals.

4. Relationships

Resilience can improve relationships by helping individuals manage conflicts, forgive, and bounce back from relational challenges. It fosters empathy and understanding, which are crucial in maintaining healthy connections with others.

FAQ 2: How Can I Develop Resilience?

Developing resilience is a continuous process. Here are some strategies to help you cultivate this essential quality:

1. Embrace Challenges

Rather than avoiding or fearing challenges, welcome them as opportunities for growth. Each obstacle you overcome strengthens your resilience.

2. Build a Support Network

Surround yourself with a support network of friends, family, or professionals who can provide emotional support and guidance during tough times.

3. Practice Self-Care

Take care of your physical and mental health through regular exercise, a balanced diet, sufficient sleep, and relaxation techniques. A healthy body and mind are better equipped to handle adversity.

4. Cultivate a Positive Mindset

Optimism can significantly impact your ability to be resilient. Focus on solutions rather than dwelling on problems, and practice gratitude to maintain a positive outlook.

5. Learn from Failure

Failure is a part of life. Instead of seeing it as a setback, view it as a stepping stone to success. Analyze what went wrong, learn from your mistakes, and apply those lessons to future endeavors.

6. Develop Problem-Solving Skills

Strengthen your problem-solving skills to tackle challenges head-on. Break problems down into smaller, manageable tasks, and develop a plan to address them.

7. Maintain Flexibility

Be open to change and adaptable in your approach. Rigidity can hinder resilience, while flexibility allows you to adjust to new situations.

8. Seek Professional Help

If you're struggling to cope with adversity, consider seeking guidance from a therapist or counselor. They can provide valuable tools and strategies to build resilience.

Resilience in Real Life: Inspirational Stories

Nelson Mandela: The former South African president endured 27 years in prison during the fight against apartheid. Despite this, he emerged from captivity with a spirit of forgiveness and reconciliation, leading his nation to a new era of unity.

J.K. Rowling: The author of the Harry Potter series faced numerous rejections from publishers before achieving international success. Her resilience and determination played a crucial role in her journey to becoming one of the world's most beloved authors.

Malala Yousafzai: After surviving a Taliban assassination attempt, Malala continued to advocate for girls' education. Her unwavering commitment to her cause earned her the Nobel Peace Prize.

Thomas Edison: Edison famously said, "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work" while inventing the light bulb. His resilience and perseverance ultimately led to one of the most transformative inventions in history.

Conclusion

Resilience is not just a trait possessed by a fortunate few; it's a quality that can be developed and strengthened over time. By embracing challenges, seeking support, practicing self-care, and maintaining a positive mindset, you can enhance your ability to bounce back from adversity and lead a more fulfilling life. Remember, it's not about avoiding difficulties but facing them with courage and determination, saying, "I can suck it up and overcome this."

Penalizing Based On Prestige

The great band Thin Lizzy released a classic song called "Bad Reputation" back in the '70s that is quite relevant to the current situation in the NHL - the lyrics are below, and music video here.

You got a bad reputation
That's the word out on the town
It gives a certain fascination
But it can only bring you down

You better turn yourself around
Turn yourself around
Turn it upside down
Turn yourself around

You had bad breaks well that's tough luck
You play too hard too much rough stuff
You're too sly so cold
That bad reputation has made you old

Turn yourself around
Turn yourself around
Turn it upside down
Turn yourself around

Penalizing players based on their reputation is a topic that recently was debated when Chris Pronger was awarded a paltry eight game suspension compared to Chris Simon's 30, as they both committed the heinous sin of stomping. To be honest, I didn't address it as there is no way justice would be served - Pronger deserved to be thrown out of the playoffs for elbowing but got one game because he is Chris Pronger, EA Sports coverboy and a Hart and Norris Trophy winner. And as for Simon, well I felt he should have been banned from hockey for being a barbarian.

So why bring it up?

Because tonight the Rangers are facing the Flyers and Ryan Hollweg will make his return to the lineup. Hollweg, who was on Gary Bettman's hit-to-hurt list along with Jordin Tootoo and Derek Boogaard, was getting penalized pretty much whether or not he actually did something wrong. Earlier this season he was elbowed by Alex Kovalev and the refs did nothing, setting up his outrageous hit on Sergei Kostitsyn. So what happens? Hollweg gets physically hurt and his reputation gets hurt yet again. Meanwhile, it was his reputation that averted the refs eyes in the first place.

Holly isn't the only one - Dan Carcillo, the NHL's penalty minute leader, is in the same situation, except the refs have a no tolerance policy - as in, they can't tolerate him so the second he does anything, he gets slapped with a 10 minute misconduct in addition to the initial penalty. He has eight 10 minute misconducts and four game misconducts in 50 games. The officiating has done well to slow the development of what could be a solid NHLer (he has eight goals and nine assists to go with his 299 pims). He isn't the only one; the Flyers Steve Downie has slowly gotten more and more irrelevant as he learned the officials were out to get him (and with some cause, as he did this and this).

But what about Colton Orr? He carries around the goon label (and rightly so) but got the same penalty as Andrew Peters when Peters hit him from the bench. Orr stood up for himself when Peters reached out from the bench and instigated with a punch amd they both got 10 minute misconducts. That is just inconceivable!

There is a distinct difference between inconsistent officiating, and incompetent officiating. The former has been prevalent since we got out of the lockout, and the latter seems to be sticking its ugly head out more and more in recent months. Now I do not think this is purely the fault of the NHL's on-ice officials, it goes up the administration through director of officiating Stephen Walkom and even Colin Campbell to none other than your friend and mine, Gary Bettman.

In his role as owners' pet, Bettman has come out and publicly admonished excessive violence in the league. While he gives lip service to allowing fighting, its clear that he will eventually call for its banishment. Rather than come out and make the bold move of eliminating fisticuffs outright, he works behind the curtain. He sets the ball rolling to smash 'smaller' players like Hollweg, Carcillo and Orr while steering it clear of guys like Pronger. Pronger is marketable, so he is allowed to do whatever he wants. Hell, Cindy Crosby hooks and harasses players constantly, but since he is the poster boy, he has been given all of 37 pim in 49 games.

Bettman plays the part of Animal Farm's Napoleon and he maintains the same dictum that "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." George Orwell's book was an allegory of Soviet communism and the NHL's commissioner acts the underhanded pig. Unfortunately, just like the Soviets, his communist commune will fall but hopefully it won't take the entire sport down with him when it does.

 Penalizing Based on Prestige: A Look at the NHL's Officiating and Its Impact on All Teams

The National Hockey League (NHL) is known for its passionate fan base, competitive spirit, and exciting gameplay. However, one aspect of the league that has generated controversy over the years is the consistency and fairness of officiating. This article explores the perception of penalizing based on prestige, where star players or successful teams are treated differently by officials, and its potential impact on the league as a whole.

FAQ 1: What Is Penalizing Based on Prestige?

Penalizing based on prestige refers to the belief that star players or successful teams receive favorable treatment from NHL officials when it comes to penalties. Some argue that officials are more lenient with star players or well-established teams, allowing them to get away with infractions that other players or teams would be penalized for.

The Perception of Star Treatment

Star Players and the "No Call": It's not uncommon for star players, such as Sidney Crosby or Connor McDavid, to avoid penalties in situations where lesser-known players might be penalized. This perception leads to frustration among fans, who feel that the rules are not consistently applied.

Successful Teams and Power Plays: Successful teams, especially those with large fan bases, are often believed to receive more power play opportunities. Critics argue that officials may be influenced by the desire to keep popular teams competitive and draw larger audiences.

FAQ 2: Is There Concrete Evidence of Penalizing Based on Prestige?

The issue of penalizing based on prestige is largely based on anecdotal evidence and fan perceptions. While there have been instances where star players or successful teams appear to benefit from favorable calls, it's challenging to quantify the extent of this bias.

The Impact on the NHL

Competitive Integrity: The perception of inconsistent officiating can erode the competitive integrity of the NHL. Fans want to see a level playing field where rules are applied consistently to all teams and players. When this perception is violated, it can lead to disillusionment.

Fan Frustration: Fans of teams that are not considered "prestigious" may feel that their teams are unfairly treated. This can lead to frustration and, in extreme cases, disengagement from the sport.

Emphasis on Star Power: Penalizing based on prestige can put too much emphasis on star players, potentially overshadowing the team aspect of hockey. This can have long-term consequences for the development of young talent and the overall competitiveness of the league.

FAQ 3: What Steps Can the NHL Take to Address This Issue?

Addressing the issue of penalizing based on prestige requires a multi-pronged approach:

Transparency: The NHL can improve transparency by providing clearer guidelines to officials on how to interpret and enforce the rules consistently. This includes educating officials about the importance of impartiality.

Accountability: Implementing a system for reviewing and assessing officials' performance can help identify and rectify any biases that may exist. This could involve independent oversight of officiating.

Diversity and Inclusion: Expanding the pool of NHL officials to include a more diverse range of backgrounds and experiences may help mitigate potential biases.

Fan Engagement: The NHL should actively engage with fans to address their concerns and provide a platform for feedback. Fan surveys and forums can be valuable tools for understanding and addressing issues related to officiating.

: The Need for Fair and Consistent Officiating

In a league as competitive as the NHL, the integrity of the game relies on fair and consistent officiating. While penalizing based on prestige may be a perception rather than a proven fact, it's a perception that can harm the league's reputation and alienate fans. The NHL must take proactive steps to address this issue, ensuring that all teams and players are treated equally under the rules. Ultimately, fair and consistent officiating benefits not only the fans but also the league itself, fostering a stronger and more inclusive hockey community.

$ Money, Money, Muhnayyyyyyy $

For those that haven't heard, MSG has released the pricing structure for playoff tickets. For my seats in Section 329, which are normally $46 a piece, they will go up to $75, $90, $125 and $200 in each of the four rounds of the playoffs. As I have two seats, should we get home advantage through the playoffs (which we won't), the total cost would be $3,925. That is about $500 cheaper than the cost of the entire regular season and preseason (which they force you to buy) ... that's 16 games for the about the price of 42.

There are some things to keep in mind: like Ranger reporter Sam Weinman said, you have to make the playoffs first and the way Hank has played recently, there is some question. But, as I said before, we won't have home ice so that's at least one game back per round, or $960. Three grand is an awful lot of money, but lets face it: its the playoffs in New York, of course its expensive.

Fans are crying out how insane the price jump is, but prices are even worse in Toronto for Maple Leaf fans where tickets are sky high for regular season games. Thankfully for them, they don't have to pay for the playoffs since their team never makes it anymore, so we can't compare second-season prices. People are also forgetting that tickets at the decrepit cesspool that is the Mausoleum are more expensive than the Garden at certain levels. That will of course change - probably around the time the new MSG opens - but by that time these inflated playoff prices will be cheap for even regular season tickets.

Ever since Bettman had owners lower prices coming out of the lockout, costs have dramatically gone up. I just am not shocked in the least since salaries are basically back to where they were before 2004 and are going ever higher, salary cap or not. For whatever lip service Bettman and the owners game to thanking the fans for their loyalty during the lockout, if you actually believed they cared about you or me then you are sadly mistaken. Just like the proprietors of any businesses, they care about the bottom line and would say whatever it took to keep us shelling out our money for their product. They made nice and it worked, people came back.

I just find it hard to believe the amount of outcry that I am hearing. How are Ranger fans crying foul now? How did they not see the writing on the wall when the insane long term deals were given to Gomez and Drury, not to mention the extension that was handed to Lundqvist last month? Dolan has to sign those paychecks and he sure as hell isn't going to dip into his trust fund to pay for them.

He doesn't care that the True Blue fans are kept away from the games. The type of person in the seat doesn't matter in the least as long as there is a person in the seat. He knows as well as you do that the diehards will do whatever they can, pay whatever they can to come to the games. And if they can't? This is New York, someone else will buy their ticket. There are eight million people in this city, plus tourists, and only 18,200 seats Dolan's minions can sell. He will continue to jack up the prices until those seats go empty, which likely won't happen anytime soon.

So what does it come down to? Suck it up. This is a case where the pessimist in me was proven right and I, for one, am not the least bit shocked to be proven right. What can you say? I mean, cest la vie - such is life. Businessmen care about making money, not making nice. You and I will keep paying as long as we can afford to. After we will just have to watch the games on tv and listen to Joe Michaletti every night.

Oh god ...

 Money, Money, Muhnayyyyyyy - A Deep Dive into the Economics of Professional Sports

In the world of professional sports, money plays a pivotal role at every level. From the salaries of athletes to the revenue generated by teams and leagues, finances are a constant topic of discussion and debate. In this article, we will take a comprehensive look at the economics of professional sports, exploring how money is earned, spent, and distributed across various sports and leagues.

FAQ 1: How Do Professional Sports Leagues Generate Revenue?

Professional sports leagues generate revenue through multiple channels:

Television Contracts: Broadcast rights agreements with networks are a significant source of income. These contracts grant networks exclusive rights to televise games and events, leading to substantial payouts for the leagues.

Ticket Sales: Ticket sales for games and events are another primary revenue stream. Teams sell tickets to fans who attend games in person, and prices can vary widely based on the popularity of the sport and the team's performance.

Merchandise Sales: The sale of team merchandise, including jerseys, hats, and memorabilia, contributes significantly to revenue. Fan loyalty and brand appeal drive merchandise sales.

Sponsorships and Advertising: Professional teams often partner with corporate sponsors who pay for advertising space in stadiums, on jerseys, and during broadcasts.

Licensing: Licensing agreements allow leagues and teams to earn money by granting the use of their logos and branding on products, video games, and more.

Digital Streaming: With the rise of digital platforms, leagues have increasingly turned to streaming services and online content to reach a global audience.

FAQ 2: How Are Athletes Compensated?

Athletes' compensation varies widely based on factors like the sport, level of play, and individual performance:

Salaries: In many team sports, athletes receive salaries as part of their contracts. These salaries can range from modest amounts for lower-tier leagues to multi-million-dollar contracts in top professional leagues.

Bonuses: Athletes often earn performance-based bonuses for achievements such as winning championships, achieving statistical milestones, or earning awards.

Endorsements: Many athletes secure lucrative endorsement deals with companies looking to capitalize on their popularity and image. Endorsement earnings can surpass their playing salaries.

Prize Money: In individual sports like tennis and golf, athletes compete for prize money, which can be substantial for major tournaments.

Appearance Fees: Some athletes receive appearance fees for participating in events, exhibitions, or promotional activities.

FAQ 3: How Is Revenue Distributed Within Leagues?

Revenue distribution within leagues can vary depending on league policies and collective bargaining agreements:

Revenue Sharing: Some leagues employ revenue-sharing systems, where a portion of revenue is distributed evenly among teams to maintain competitive balance.

Luxury Tax: In leagues like the NBA, teams that exceed a certain salary cap threshold pay a luxury tax, which is then distributed among teams that stay within the cap.

Gate Receipts: Teams often retain a significant portion of gate receipts, but a portion may be shared with the league.

National TV Revenue: National television revenue is typically shared among all teams in a league, providing a more equitable distribution.

FAQ 4: The Impact of COVID-19 on Sports Economics

The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on professional sports:

Loss of Revenue: With games played without fans or postponed, leagues and teams suffered substantial revenue losses, affecting player salaries, team budgets, and league operations.

Digital Transformation: The pandemic accelerated the shift to digital platforms, with leagues and teams investing in streaming services and digital content to engage fans and generate revenue.

Labor Agreements: Negotiations between players' unions and leagues led to temporary changes in salary caps and revenue-sharing arrangements to navigate the financial challenges posed by the pandemic.

: Money's Role in the Game

Money is an integral part of professional sports, influencing everything from player contracts to fan experiences. The economics of sports are complex, and the financial health of leagues, teams, and athletes relies on a delicate balance between revenue generation and expenditure management.

As we continue to witness the ever-evolving landscape of professional sports, it's clear that the pursuit of money, whether through broadcast deals, sponsorships, or merchandise sales, will remain a driving force behind the industry's growth and transformation. Understanding the financial aspects of sports enriches our appreciation of the games we love, reminding us that in the world of sports, money truly makes the world go 'round.

Evaluating The Overtime

After watching the Rangers lose in a shootout to the Islanders last night I got to thinking about how awful it was for a game to be decided in the skill competition. While a fellow Ranger fan pointed out to me that the sloppy play by both teams showed how ties should still be allowed as neither team played well enough to win. But this is not a debate as to whether or not there should be shootouts, but rather is the value of overtime has lessened.

By my math, an astounding 125 out of the 217 extra-time games (as of the games finished on March 4th) have been decided in shootouts. The Edmonton Oilers won 14 of the 17 shootouts they participated in. Having seen a few of their games, after a minute or so into the overtime, they start playing not to lose rather than to win since they have a better chance coming out on top in the one-on-one competition rather than the four-on-four overtime.

And they aren't the only team. The Rangers are one of them as well. Disagree? Then how can you explain them putting slower skaters out on the ice *cough, cough, Marek Malik, cough* when there is more room to skate? Ryan Callahan, the fastest Ranger in yesterday's loss, was relegated to the bench (as was the red hot Nigel Dawes) for the slower - yet more responsible - Brendan Shanahan.

The league initially made overtime 4-on-4 to increase scoring with more room. That clearly is not happening as 58% of games that go beyond regulation remain even. Shootouts are certainly a fan-friendly device to decide games but the brass tacks of it is that hockey becomes an individual sport, which it is not. The shootout certainly isn't going to go away, so what is the solution?

Rather than turning to the idea of 3-on-3 play, how about a change to the offside rules? The league could make it a carry-over offsides where a player can already be in the offensive zone as long as the puck is carried over the blueline or can get rid of the blue line entirely. Do these sound familiar? They should, at least for folks who play(ed) roller hockey. There was a lot more scoring in Roller Hockey International and that wasn't necessarily a symptom of lesser-quality players. Having lax offsides rules opens up the ice surface even farther and allows longer home run passes and even cherry picking. The latter has some negative connotations but shouldn't.

Say a team wants to send one of their guys to camp out at the far crease. If the other team leaves a defender there, then its a 3-on-3 situation in the zone. If they leave the player alone with the goaltender, then its a 4-on-3 in deep. Say the three are able to get the puck out, then the goaltender can try to come out of his crease to challenge the goal hanger or stop the home run pass, which increases the odds of a good scoring chance even farther.

If the five minute extra period still doesn't produce a winner, then you can still have the skill competition declare a winner, but I would rather see games ended based on team play rather than individual. And by changing up the offsides, that increases those odds.

 Evaluating Overtime in the NHL: Strategies, Stats, and Excitement

Overtime in the NHL is a thrilling and often heart-pounding spectacle. In this article, we'll delve into the world of NHL overtime, exploring its strategies, statistical trends, and why it continues to captivate fans worldwide.

FAQ 1: How Does NHL Overtime Work?

In regular-season NHL games, if the score is tied at the end of regulation, teams play a sudden-death overtime period. Overtime features three-on-three play for a maximum of five minutes. If no goal is scored, the game proceeds to a shootout.

Strategies in NHL Overtime:

Puck Possession: Possessing the puck is paramount in overtime. Teams often prioritize controlled entries into the offensive zone.

Line Selection: Coaches choose lines that combine speed, skill, and chemistry, given the open ice in three-on-three play.

Defensive Responsibility: While offense is crucial, teams must remain defensively responsible to prevent odd-man rushes.

FAQ 2: Overtime Stats and Trends

Let's explore some interesting statistics and trends in NHL overtime:

Shootout vs. Overtime Goals: Overtime goals are often seen as more legitimate victories than shootout wins. Teams tend to value the extra point from an overtime win over a shootout win.

Goalie Performance: Goaltenders play a crucial role in overtime. Some goalies excel in three-on-three situations, while others struggle. This disparity can influence team strategies.

Early vs. Late Goals: Statistically, more goals are scored early in overtime, often within the first two minutes. Teams may be more aggressive at the start to secure the win quickly.

Home Advantage: Historically, home teams have a slight advantage in overtime. Familiarity with the home arena's layout and last change privileges can make a difference.

FAQ 3: Memorable Overtime Moments

NHL overtime has delivered countless unforgettable moments:

Stanley Cup Winning Goals: Overtime goals in the Stanley Cup Final, like Bobby Orr's famous "Flying Goal" in 1970, are etched in hockey history.

Playoff Heroics: Players like Patrick Kane and Martin St. Louis have made their mark with clutch overtime goals in the playoffs.

Longest Overtime: The longest NHL playoff game went into six overtime periods in 1936. Mud Bruneteau of the Detroit Red Wings scored the game-winner after 116 minutes and 30 seconds of overtime.

FAQ 4: Evolution of Overtime Formats

The NHL has experimented with overtime formats over the years:

Five-Minute Overtime: Prior to the 1983-84 season, ties were common in the NHL. Overtime was introduced to reduce the frequency of ties.

Four-on-Four: From 1999-2000 to 2015-16, four-on-four overtime was used. This format aimed to create more open ice and increase scoring.

Three-on-Three: In 2015-16, the current three-on-three format was introduced to maximize excitement and reduce the number of shootouts.

FAQ 5: Shootout vs. Overtime: Fan Opinions

The shootout, introduced in the 2005-06 season, remains a polarizing aspect of NHL overtime. Some fans love the one-on-one drama it creates, while others prefer the purity of overtime play.

Shootout Fans: Supporters argue that shootouts add a unique, skills-based element to the game and provide closure to games without a clear winner.

Overtime Purists: Purists believe that shootouts can be anticlimactic, favoring a return to more extended overtime play to determine a winner.

: Overtime's Enduring Allure

NHL overtime remains a captivating facet of the game, combining skill, strategy, and heart-pounding moments. Whether it's the thrill of a breakaway in a shootout or the sheer chaos of three-on-three play, overtime continues to keep fans on the edge of their seats. As the NHL evolves, so too will its approach to overtime, but one thing remains certain: the excitement it generates will endure for generations of hockey fans to come.

21-20-5: Finding Comfort In The Familiar

The Rangers who showed up for Monday's game in Pittsburgh were more like the Rangers of late than the ones who played against Montreal. I was nervous that the team had actually decided to play some hockey. Clearly not; its amazing what you can get used to. Like watching the Rangers pitiful excuse for a power play (which could have easily won the game for them but instead went 0-6).

I ate a late dinner and watched Jeopardy, tuning in seven minutes in to see the Rangers down 2-0 already. I honestly considered turning it back off again but thought it to be a better alternative than Wheel of Fortune. How wrong I was. This is pretty much train of thought as the game goes on from where I started:

First Period
*So Evgeni Malkin (who scored the first two goals) runs Rozy eight minutes into the game and Ryan Hollweg and Colton Orr are on the ice and do nothing? This team has no heart. For shame.

*The NHL can spin it all they want but Versus is bad for the game. The main game camera had troubles following the puck, the audio was horrendous (levels were everywhere!), supers/fonts were misspelled (two K's in Jarkko, morons) and the third man in the broadcast - Bob Harwood - was useless.

*Versus' low cameras showed JarKKo Ruutu clearly jabbing Rozy in the face when Jagr tapped his stick up but Doc and the idiot doing colour - whose name isn't worth knowing - instantly blamed Jagr. Let's face it folks, Jagr doesn't try particularly hard and rarely shows his strength. He didn't hit Ruutu's stick with the same force it hit Rozy in the face. But whatever, there is no way they will call an even game when media superstar Cindy Crosby is playing.

*Doc is spending an inordinate time talking about the referees and linesmen. I don't care if this no-name guy hit his 2,000th game. Officials should be invisible. I don't want to know about them, I don't want to hear from them, I just want an evenly called game. And we all know that we don't get that so why bother giving these idiots personality?

*I did not record this, and there will be no Rangers in 60, so I can't go back and take a second look. If you see something different, feel free to use the comments and let me know.

*Let me get this right - Kris Letang cross checks Rozy, he throws an elbow back and the kid goes down like he is shot. No diving call, just a roughing call (?) and a 5-on-3 that, of course, they converted to make it 3-0. I should be outraged, but I just reread the other stuff I already wrote and it makes sense - nationally-broadcast game with the league's centerpiece franchise with referees who have no qualms with calling things unevenly ...

*I really hope that the AP and Reuters have shooters there because this is going to be a long post and will need some pretty pictures to keep people reading ... aside from my wonderful commentary, of course.

*Can anyone explain to me why Malik and Rozy were reunited for this game? I won't even dispute Malik's place in the lineup - Tom Renney clearly can't see what everyone else can - but why reunite two players who have both been utterly incompetent in the Rangers zone all season long?

*I like how the sweat towel on Cindy's shoulder during the first intermission interview was perfectly placed so you could see the Versus logo. You know what? The network still sucks. When does bull riding come back on? Oh wait, after the game Caddyshack 2 will be on! Quite possibly the worse sequel to a movie ever. Kinda fitting that it airs on the primary network that covers hockey in America, right?

*Love the intermission show guys - at the end of the segment a promo for the All Star Game comes up and the guy just says "All Star Game is coming up; you can read it folks." Nice! Very professional.

*So, Orr vs. Laraque ... I wish we had a heavyweight too.

Second Period
*I like seeing the kid line on the power play - Dubi, Pru and Dawsie - but having Toots on the blueline for it is a mistake, the quiet Russian is too conservative (not a bad thing at regular strength but a negative when on the power play and down 3-0).

*Do you think that Marcel Hossa is sleeping with Renney's daughter? That's the only explanation I can think of why he has been on the team so long and getting second line ice time. Eight points in 34 games. Playing on the second line, or even the first at times. Adn the only reason he is +7 is because all of the goals that come when he is trying to kill penalties don't count towards +/-. As the kids are playing so well, why can't we see P.A. Paranteau up here rather than Hossa?

*Ooo, credit to Malik for a good defensive play - he lumbered back in time to break up a 2-on-1 with Cindy and Armstrong. Hooking is illegal but since he was using his stick on Army rather than Cindy, its ok. Besides, they already gave Pitt a 3-0 lead. How much more do they want to help?

*Doc just confused Jaromir Jagr with Ryan Hollweg, saying Hollweg missed a shot high and wide. Is it that he can't imagine Jagr missing? Or that he actually thinks the Rangers would put Hollweg on the power play?

*I love that the Penguin fans still boo Jagr every time he touches the puck. It isn't like he helped them to two Stanley Cups or anything ... now when he leaves the Rangers, I will feel comfortable booing him because he really hasn't led us anywhere. Getting a ton of garbage power play points in the regular season does not a champion make.

*Well, I'm not sure anyone can dog Hank for this one, he has made some big saves, none bigger than the shorthanded 2-on-1 at the end of the second.

*I honestly loathe the studio gang for Versus. As insightful as Eddie O's observations are, Keith Jones is droll and Brian Engblom is just incomprehensible. Get rid of that ridiculous hair already you idiot. And what makes it worse is that they keep going with their inside jokes on air. Like it is supposed to make sense to the viewers? The show is supposed to be about the game, not them or their oversized egos.

*Why is Versus interviewing Gonchar? Are the Rangers in a meeting, did they not allow someone to take the mic? Or are my conspiracy theories about the league only caring for Pittsburgh correct?

*Eddie O. thinks that Hank will get a huge, long-term contract - one bigger and longer than Phaneuf's ... somehow, I don't think so, and if it does come to pass, then that is a mistake as I would take Phaneuf over Hank. Oh yes, I went there. Its harder to get a defenseman of Phaneuf's quality than it is to get a good goaltender. Look at Ty Conklin, who is tearing stuff up.

Third Period
*Scott Gomez has gotten all of the best chances for the Rangers. Where is Jagr?

*Why doesn't Malkin get an interference penalty when he runs right at Hank and makes no effort to avoid the contact? Is it because Crosby was passing himthe puck and setting up a possible highlight-reel goal?

*I mentioned Paranteau as the next call-up for the Rangers but maybe they should try Andrew Hutchinson - the guy they got for Matt Cullen. He has 28 points in 35 games and can't be much worse than Malik defensively, so why not give him a try? It might break up the monotony of the Malik/Strudwick rotation.

*I ask where is Jagr and he then shanks a shot that finds its way in under Conklin for a power play goal to get the Rangers on the board. Its cheap but it

*Major props to Hank - he managed to stop a try by Army from below the goal line.

*Wooooo!!! Jagr makes it 3-1 and Hossa responds by taking a stupid, stupid penalty! Now this is getting so stupid/embarrassing/typical it's funny.

*The Rangers really have no chemistry, no flow and little urgency. It was really sad to watch them play so poorly as they 'tried' to come back.

*Good for Malkin, he played well and got the hat trick. How great of it come on a hat night. I wish the Rangers had nice giveaways. Haven't gotten a hat from them in years.

*I love the Rangers youth. At least they had the pride to play to the final buzzer as the 'stars' didn't. Great to see them standing up for themselves, and Marc Staal being smart by keeping Adam Hall close as they paired up because Hall could have hammered him.

*Seeing Renney stand there stone faced and watching Jagr go off with his head hung low says everything. Where is Pat Burns and how soon can we get rid of the moody Czech? And on that note, the three stars:

*PHW Three Stars
3-Cindy - two assists.
2-Conklin - 43 saves.
1-Malkin - hat trick.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Rock Out With Your Conk Out - dude was solid to get yet another win, he is 10-0-1 now. This is the guy who lost the Stanley Cup for Edmonton!! Who'da thunk it?
2-Malkin - he outplayed Cindy and was the best player on the ice.
1-Georges Laraque - he physically intimidated the Rangers right off the bat and they never recovered. That's all that it took.

 21-20-5: Finding Comfort in the Familiar - A Hockey Season Review

In the world of sports, every season is a unique journey filled with highs, lows, and moments that resonate with fans and athletes alike. The record 21-20-5 signifies a specific chapter in a hockey team's season, one that holds significance beyond the numbers. In this article, we'll explore the meaning of 21-20-5: "Finding Comfort in the Familiar." We'll delve into the context of the season, the challenges faced by the team, and address frequently asked questions (FAQs) that provide insights into the dynamics of an NHL season.

Section 1: Decoding 21-20-5

1.1 21 - Games Won

The number 21 represents the total number of games won by the team during the season. Each win is a testament to the team's skills, strategies, and determination.

1.2 20 - Games Lost

The number 20 signifies the total number of games lost by the team during the season. Losses, while difficult, are opportunities for growth and learning.

1.3 5 - Overtime/Shootout Losses

The number 5 represents the total number of games in which the team lost in overtime or a shootout. These closely contested games highlight the fine margins in professional hockey.

Section 2: Finding Comfort in the Familiar

2.1 Navigating the NHL Season

An NHL season is a grueling journey marked by a series of games, each with its unique challenges. "Finding Comfort in the Familiar" suggests that the team drew strength from their experience and familiarity with the season's ups and downs.

2.2 The Importance of Consistency

Consistency is a coveted trait in sports. Teams aim to maintain a level of performance that allows them to compete at a high level, even in the face of adversity.

2.3 The Role of Familiar Faces

Familiarity with teammates, coaching staff, and systems can provide a sense of stability and comfort in a long and demanding season. Cohesion among players is essential for success.

Section 3: The Challenges Faced

3.1 Injuries and Roster Changes

Injuries to key players and roster changes can disrupt a team's rhythm and strategy. Adapting to these challenges is a crucial aspect of a successful season.

3.2 Goaltending

Goaltending is often referred to as the backbone of a team. Goaltenders must consistently perform at a high level to give their team a chance to win.

3.3 Navigating Winning and Losing Streaks

Winning and losing streaks are common in sports. Teams must manage the psychological aspects of these streaks and find ways to build on success or bounce back from defeats.

Section 4: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

4.1 How does a team's regular-season record impact their playoff chances?

A team's regular-season record determines its position in the standings and influences its playoff seeding. A strong record can lead to home-ice advantage in the playoffs.

4.2 What strategies do teams use to maintain consistency throughout the season?

Teams focus on maintaining a strong team culture, setting goals, and emphasizing the process of improvement. Leadership from coaches and captains is essential in this regard.

4.3 How do injuries affect a team's performance, and how do teams cope with them?

Injuries can disrupt a team's lineup and strategy. Teams cope by relying on depth players, adjusting game plans, and providing rehabilitation and recovery support to injured players.

4.4 What role does goaltending play in a team's success?

Goaltending is a cornerstone of NHL success. Goaltenders are the last line of defense and can make or break a team's chances. They must possess strong reflexes, positioning, and mental toughness.

4.5 How do teams prepare for important matchups against specific opponents?

Teams prepare for important matchups by studying opponents' tendencies, strengths, and weaknesses. Coaches develop game plans and strategies tailored to exploit the opponent's vulnerabilities.

21-20-5: "Finding Comfort in the Familiar" represents a season of hockey marked by challenges, victories, and the unwavering commitment of a team to navigate the unpredictable journey of an NHL season. In the world of sports, every game is an opportunity to learn, improve, and persevere. Moments of adversity are met with resilience, and moments of triumph are celebrated with humility.

As fans, we appreciate not only the wins but also the effort, dedication, and heart that players pour into every game. "Finding Comfort in the Familiar" serves as a reminder that in the ever-changing landscape of sports, there is strength in familiarity, and the journey itself is as meaningful as the destination. Whether a season is marked by success or challenges, it's the collective spirit of the team and the unwavering support of fans that make each NHL season a compelling and unforgettable chapter in the sport's rich history.

Yankee Stadium? No Thanks ...

I like John Dellapina. I think he does a very good job as a Rangers beat writer for the Daily News. I read his blog regularly. But I have to say that I think his story yesterday was a little crazy. Granted, it was just good reporting, but it again broaches the idea of an outdoor game in New York - specifically at Yankee Stadium between the Rangers and the Islanders.

Frankly, its a bad idea.

Simply said, Yankee Stadium would suck as a venue. The Daily News tried to give people an idea of what the rink would look like with what BMR called the Worst. Photoshop. Ever. BMR also gave some venues just as ridiculous as Yankee Stadium, you know, like the moon.

You may laugh but the House that Ruth built is really not suited for an outdoor hockey game between the Rangers and Islanders, no matter how badly Bettman would love to market it. Having been to the Stadium, and having gone to the Winter Classic in Buffalo, I feel safe saying that this is a really bad idea. It's one thing to have Buffalo and Pittsburgh, it's another to get the Rangers and Islanders. The Sabres and the Penguins have little bad blood between them; the Blueshirts and Fishermen certainly do as one of the biggest rivalries in the game. Could you imagine the PR fiasco that would result if another Chris Simon incident happened before a national audience on New Years? Or even another brawl? The league is clearly not in favour of fighting, just think of what Bettman would do if this happened again ...

That isn't to say that the fans wouldn't love it, but they -- we -- are another problem. I don't think I have ever been to a single game against the Islanders where a fight in the stands didn't break out. Now, in recent years they have been small in scale and not very damaging but in the mid 80's, the tussles were legendary. Now move them to the Bronx, where its almost impossible to move around. I went to a Yanks/Sawx game last season and watched as security struggled to run single file along the upper deck to get to a drunken fight near the top. That game (strangely) wasn't even sold out but a Rangers/Isles game would be a packed house of 57,545 hockey fans. Not necessarily a recipe for disaster, but certainly one that would need large amounts of crowd control.

Another factor would definitely be the weather. Everyone raved about the snow in Buffalo, but at the same time back in the city it was in the 40s and a week later, the mid-60s. That doesn't bode well for good ice conditions. Granted, the NHL's ice gurus would have more than a week to set up (likely three months since the Yankees won't make the postseason without some pitching), but for as much magic as they can whip up, if Mother Nature is not cooperative, it could make for an awful game.

And that's another thing - the Winter Classic was an amazing experience, but even I can admit that the quality of hockey was really quite poor. Do we want to waste what could be an important divisional battle on what should be an exhibition game?

You know I would be right there if the league did set this game up, but I truly think that the league should explore other options first: primarily the idea of moving the All Star Game outdoors. As I've said several times, it would bring the league's brightest stars out under the sky and into millions of homes on New Years Day. It also would not demean a regular season game that could eventually have playoff implications. What happens if Buffalo misses the playoffs by one point this season? Or what about the Rangers? If Buffalo makes it by one point over the Blueshirts, fans should be outraged because the two Winter Classic teams clearly did not put forth their best effort and still earned points in the standings.

I know I would be furious, and you should be too. And that is the main reason why the NHL should not place a regular season outdoors at all, and certainly not in Yankee Stadium.

 Yankee Stadium? No Thanks... Exploring the Rich History and Unique Experience of America's Ballpark

In the world of sports, few venues hold the same level of reverence and history as Yankee Stadium. The mere mention of its name conjures images of baseball legends, iconic moments, and a storied tradition that spans generations. However, not everyone shares the same sentiment when it comes to this hallowed ground. In this article, we'll explore the complex relationship some fans have with Yankee Stadium, the reasons behind the sentiment of "No Thanks...," and address frequently asked questions (FAQs) that shed light on the ballpark's unique identity.

Section 1: The Legacy of Yankee Stadium

1.1 A Monument to Baseball

Yankee Stadium is often referred to as the "House that Ruth Built" in honor of the legendary Babe Ruth, who played a significant role in its construction. It's a place where the history of baseball itself is enshrined.

1.2 Legendary Players and Moments

The stadium has been home to some of the greatest players in baseball history, from Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig to Derek Jeter and Mariano Rivera. It's witnessed historic moments, including World Series victories and iconic home runs.

1.3 The Bronx Bombers

The New York Yankees, known as the "Bronx Bombers," have won a multitude of championships and are one of the most successful franchises in sports history. The stadium is synonymous with their legacy.

Section 2: The "No Thanks..." Perspective

2.1 Opposing Fans' Dilemma

For fans of opposing teams, visiting Yankee Stadium can be a bittersweet experience. The dominance of the Yankees over the years has created a sense of rivalry and, at times, frustration.

2.2 The Intimidation Factor

Yankee Stadium's reputation as a fortress of baseball excellence can be intimidating for visiting teams and fans. The expectations and history can cast a shadow over the opposition.

2.3 Ticket Prices and Accessibility

Attending a game at Yankee Stadium can be costly, and ticket prices can deter some fans. Additionally, the stadium's location in the Bronx may present accessibility challenges for certain visitors.

Section 3: The Unique Experience

3.1 The Architecture

Yankee Stadium's architecture pays homage to the original venue while incorporating modern amenities. The iconic frieze, inspired by the original stadium, adorns the upper deck.

3.2 Monuments and Memorials

The stadium features monuments and plaques dedicated to Yankees legends, creating a sense of reverence and history. Monument Park is a must-visit for baseball enthusiasts.

3.3 The Roll Call

The Bleacher Creatures, a dedicated group of fans, engage in the "Roll Call" during games. They chant the names of Yankees players until each acknowledges them. It's a unique tradition that adds to the atmosphere.

Section 4: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

4.1 Why is Yankee Stadium considered one of the most iconic sports venues in the world?

Yankee Stadium's history, legendary players, and the success of the New York Yankees have contributed to its iconic status. It's a place where baseball history has been made.

4.2 What is Monument Park, and why is it significant?

Monument Park is an outdoor museum within the stadium that honors Yankees legends. It's significant because it pays tribute to the franchise's storied history and its most revered players.

4.3 How can fans of visiting teams enjoy their experience at Yankee Stadium?

Visiting fans can appreciate the history and architecture of the stadium, enjoy the unique traditions, and engage in good-natured banter with Yankees fans. It's an opportunity to immerse oneself in the rich baseball culture.

4.4 Why do some fans have mixed feelings about attending games at Yankee Stadium?

Mixed feelings may arise due to the Yankees' dominance, the rivalry with other teams, ticket prices, and accessibility concerns. However, many fans still cherish the opportunity to witness a game at this historic venue.

Yankee Stadium stands as a testament to the enduring legacy of baseball and the New York Yankees. It's a place where history and tradition merge with modernity, creating an atmosphere unlike any other in sports. While some fans may approach it with a "No Thanks..." perspective due to rivalry or logistical factors, many others hold it in the highest regard, viewing it as a sacred space where the spirit of baseball lives on.

Ultimately, Yankee Stadium is more than just a ballpark; it's a symbol of the passion, history, and culture that surround the sport of baseball. Whether you're a Yankees fan, a supporter of an opposing team, or simply an admirer of the game, a visit to this iconic venue offers a chance to connect with the heart and soul of America's pastime, where the echoes of legends and the cheers of fans continue to resound through the decades.

Writin' On The Rails

So, stuck on the Amtrak for the better part of a day, I figured I would keep a rambling diatribe of nonsense on the Winter Classic, the Rangers and whoknowswhat. Just warning you now, I have no idea where this will go:

*The Toronto Star floated the idea that the NHL needs to hold an outdoor game in New York City, a major market. As much as I think that it would be something truly wonderful, it is also utterly impossible. The writer, Rick Westhead, first off says that the game should be held in Central Park. While idealistic in terms of images, its also utterly impossible as there is no way they can build the necessary seating and amenities in a national park. He then says Giants Stadium could easily host a game, and it could ... but it would be a logistical nightmare for New York hockey fans to get to as the Meadowlands are very, very difficult to access as any Jets or Giants fan can attest to. The Yankee Stadium idea had been a cool one, and very well could have worked except for some piping. Perhaps the new Yankee Stadium or the soon-to-be-completed Citifield will be able host the game. Regardless, it is rarely cold enough to make hosting a game in New York worthwhile - the ice would be horrible (even worse than in the Garden!). Mr. Westhead wants an outdoor game in a major market, he should look no further than Soldier Field in Chicago or even Gillette Stadium outside of Boston. Both receive hockey weather, hockey fans and are major U.S. markets.

*Another interesting idea that I saw last night was a proposition that the next outdoor game should be an All Star game. I forgot where I saw that but it really is a genius idea. There isn't much hitting anyway, and an outdoor game adds a spectacle to what usually is a boring, corporate mid-season exhibition game. The same article mentioned placing it in Quebec City, which would be fantastic and very scenic. As I've mentioned in the past, I am all for placing the All Star game in a non-NHL city. How about making a five year run of it around Europe in 'football' stadiums, with at least one in Red Square in Moscow? They already played one outdoor game there, why not another? Regardless, I certainly think that both the All Star game and the spectacle that is an outdoor game would be better served together rather than seeing a regular season game wasted outdoors. As much fun as yesterday was, the quality of hockey was subpar and, as playoff spots will be hard to come by, the points in every game should be contested for under ideal conditions.

*Something that I didn't see mentioned anywhere in coverage of yesterday's game, it looked like the Sabres fans handed their sticks into the crowd as they walked off the field. I think that that is an fantastic gesture. It really is great that teams are doing more to recognize fans and realize that sports are a two way street. In the NHL all things seem to have started with the Rangers - first the raising of the sticks (now mimicked across the league) and hopefully soon the puck throwing (Rangers chosen as stars of the game - except for Jagr, of course - throw a puck into the crowd, not to forget Nicky Fotiu's old habit back in the day).

*I can't believe I included the 'Crosby is a p---y' story in my game blog ... my parents, loyal readers both, are sure to give me hell for using an obscenity.

*The Rangers are heading out on a three-game west coast swing starting tonight. I still plan on doing post-game blogs so feel free to stop by first thing in the morning!

*So January 24th is coming up. The Rangers are retiring Leetchie's number and grown men will be crying all throughout New York. My hope and guess is that it will be a short and sweet ceremony as he is a humble guy. Its just a shame that it will come in the second of back-to-back games against the Atlanta Thrashers of all teams. So I guess that means it will be a packed house to start, and maybe even for most of the first period but after that the Garden will be a ghost town. Gotta love New York fans sometimes.

*Some more on the Winter Classic: Buffalo knows cold weather and most everyone was dressed appropriately - in ski pants or cold weather hunting gear. It was kind of funny to see bright orange and camouflage body suits at a hockey game.

*I really wish I coulda tailgated a bit, it really looked like everyone was having a good time.

*I had an extra ticket to the game. There was no one in the near vicinity of the stadium scalping tickets, which I found strange. I didn't end up minding, it just gave me more bench space to put my souvenirs on so they didn't have to sit in the puddles on the ground beneath the seats. But, according to the other people in the row, the ticket could have fetched at least $300 bucks. Initially I responded quite dubiously, but then it was pointed out that over 11,000 people watched the game on the big screens in the HSBC Arena. That's dedication, and stupidity ... I coulda used that cash, lol.

*Speaking of cash, I was considering a trip up to Montreal later this season but think I will pass. As awe-inspiring as a game in Montreal would be, I think that money will be better spent for the playoffs. Although it will come down to whom the Rangers play (if we even make it); I am not about to revisit Buffalo. Last year's 5-2 Game 1 loss to the Sabres was enough for me.

*I have to admit that I was surprised that there weren't giveaways of any sort at the Winter Classic. With the corporate sponsors, I would have thought that someone would have done something, if only silly pompoms or something of that sort. I saw one kid with Amp thundersticks but that was it. It certainly wouldn't have detracted from the legion of people buying stuff ...

*I mentioned last night that the merch was overpriced; here are some numbers from what I saw: programs $10, t-shirts $30, thermal shirts $45, hoodies $75, replica jersey $175. Pucks at one stand were $15, at another, $10. And none of the four stands that I went by had the cool RBK hat that I wanted or the furry winter hat that woulda made a neat gift. Disappointing.

*I don't particularly care for Pittsburgh, and I think I already said this, but man, the Penguins' throwback jerseys were gorgeous. Such a fantastic shade of baby blue with black trim, the league did well to have the Pens don them for the game. The Sabres wore their throwback whites, which are miles above the crap that they wear now. Also, if you didn't get a chance to see it, the Sabres staff were wearing awesome varsity jackets with huge logos. They need to start selling those around Buffalo, they will make a mint.

*A limo ran right into the side of the bus that I was on as we were in the mass exodus and the bus driver didn't get out or blink. Strange. The bus was ok, the limo wrecked its bumper/driver-side light and the woman who was sitting where it hit was a little shaken.

*I guess it is all in what you get used to but it was amazing how well the Buffalo people dealt with snow. Everyone seemed able to drive in it, and even then, cleanups were pretty quick. I never felt out of control or in any kind of danger, unlike when driving in inclement weather on Long Island. Those people are crazy and incompetent.

*Do you think that in Gary Bettman's wildest wet dream he ever imagined just how idyllic the Winter Classic would be? Cindy assists on the first goal, makes a few amazing plays and scores the game-winner ... in a shootout. It snows though most of the game, yet the sell-out crowd doesn't budge, making for an incredible atmosphere and some really fat wallets. And some had thought that the game wouldn't be as good as the last one because Edmonton-Montreal had their alumni play before hand (some of the best players of the last 20 years) and because of the iconic picture of Jose Theodore with the toque. And now this ... and the best question: how could they possibly top it next time???

*Hockey teams used to travel by rail to face each other and, midway through my 10 hour journey today, its of little surprise to me that the old-time players used to hate the other teams. I'll be quite surly by the time I get off and I, luckily, won't have to take on a bunch of well-rested, home-fed Canadiens/Bruins/Red Wings/whatever.

And on that note, I'm gonna pass out and up this when I get home. I hope it makes some sense. And if not, too bad!!!

 Writin' On The Rails: The Fascinating World of Train Travel Writing

The rhythmic clatter of wheels on tracks, the ever-changing landscapes rolling by, and the romantic allure of the open road – train travel has long captured the imaginations of writers and travelers alike. From Mark Twain's tales of the Mississippi River to Agatha Christie's murder mysteries on the Orient Express, train journeys have inspired some of the most iconic literature in the world. In this article, we'll delve into the world of train travel writing, exploring its history, its enduring appeal, and answering frequently asked questions (FAQs) about this unique genre.

Section 1: The History of Train Travel Writing

1.1 The Pioneers

The origins of train travel writing can be traced back to the mid-19th century when railroads were expanding rapidly. Writers like Paul Theroux and Bill Bryson paved the way with their adventures on the rails, chronicling their journeys across countries and continents.

1.2 Travelogues and Memoirs

Train travel writing took the form of travelogues and memoirs. Writers not only described the landscapes but also delved into the people, cultures, and stories they encountered along the way.

1.3 Fictional Journeys

In addition to travelogues, train travel found its way into fiction. Iconic novels like "Murder on the Orient Express" by Agatha Christie and "The Great Train Robbery" by Michael Crichton used trains as settings for thrilling stories.

Section 2: The Appeal of Train Travel Writing

2.1 The Romance of the Rails

Train journeys exude a sense of romance and nostalgia. The clickety-clack of the tracks and the camaraderie of fellow passengers create an atmosphere ripe for storytelling.

2.2 The Unfolding Scenery

One of the unique aspects of train travel writing is the ever-changing scenery. Writers describe the landscapes – from sweeping vistas to hidden hamlets – that pass by their window, offering readers a visual feast.

2.3 Encounters and Conversations

Train journeys are inherently social experiences. Travelers meet people from all walks of life, leading to fascinating encounters and conversations. These interactions provide rich material for writers.

Section 3: Notable Train Travel Writers

3.1 Paul Theroux

Known for his extensive train journeys through Africa, Asia, and the Americas, Paul Theroux's travelogues, like "The Great Railway Bazaar," have become classics in the genre.

3.2 Bill Bryson

Bill Bryson's witty and observant writing style shines in books like "In a Sunburned Country" and "A Walk in the Woods," where he often incorporates train travel into his adventures.

3.3 Agatha Christie

Agatha Christie's "Murder on the Orient Express" is a masterpiece of the mystery genre, set on the luxurious train as it travels from Istanbul to Calais.

Section 4: FAQs about Train Travel Writing

4.1 What makes train travel writing unique compared to other forms of travel writing?

Train travel writing combines the romance of the rails, the ever-changing scenery, and the rich tapestry of human interactions, creating a distinctive and captivating narrative.

4.2 Are there any modern train travel writers who continue this tradition?

Yes, contemporary writers like Monisha Rajesh, who penned "Around the World in 80 Trains," and Andrew Martin, known for "Belles and Whistles," are carrying the torch of train travel writing.

4.3 Can anyone be a train travel writer, or does it require a specific set of skills or experiences?

While a passion for travel and storytelling is essential, becoming a train travel writer doesn't require a specific set of skills. However, a keen eye for detail, a love of exploration, and an ability to connect with people are valuable traits.

4.4 What are some of the challenges faced by train travel writers?

Train travel can be unpredictable, with delays, crowded cars, and logistical challenges. Writers must adapt to these circumstances and find creative ways to tell their stories.

Section 5: Conclusion

Train travel writing is a genre that beautifully captures the essence of the journey – the sights, the sounds, and the stories that unfold along the way. From the pioneers of the 19th century to modern-day adventurers, writers have used the rails as a canvas to paint vivid narratives of exploration and discovery.

The allure of train travel, with its romantic charm and ever-changing landscapes, continues to inspire both seasoned writers and aspiring storytellers. Whether it's a cross-country adventure or a short commuter trip, there's a captivating tale waiting to be written on the rails, keeping this literary tradition alive and well in the 21st century.

No Wonder No One Likes Hockey

Hockey, by far, is the best sport in North America to watch in person. But it is not even one of the top four sports anymore. As Bettman has moved so many teams into the States, and the large assortment of minor league teams all over the country, it is not for lack of availability.

The main reason is that the game is virtually-impossible to follow if you are not in the actual arena. While this could degenerate into yet another ESPN Is Trying To Kill Hockey post, it is more a Goddamn, Why Do You Suck So Much post.

First off, I got out of work a bit late so I missed the start of the game. I got into my car in the middle of the first period and had to search the entire AM dial on the radio to try to find the game. ESPN Radio, which usually has the games, instead was covering basketball - that's a rant for another time. So I searched and searched, and finally found it, where? Bloomberg Radio.

What???

The Islanders air their games on a financial radio station. What a joke. Plus the promos they air are hilarious: they had Ruslan Fedotenko doing a station ID and he can barely speak english. Awesomely bad.

There was very little that was awesome about the actual broadcast, with the colour guy piping in nonsense as play was going on and the play-by-play guy responding rather than *ACTUALLY DOING HIS JOB* and explaining what was happening.

So I massaged the interpretation of the speed limits and made it home in time to watch Versus for the second and third periods. And I gotta tell you, was it hard to watch.

The director tried to 'take you closer to the play' by using a number of angles and some tight shots, but that just made it impossible to tell what was going on. It didn't help that the camera guys clearly had trouble keeping track of the puck.

The second intermission two-way with Dennis Miller was ridiculous. The guy was laughed out of Monday Night Football for being incredibly unfunny and Versus gives him a late night sports show? And they waste some of the little broadcast time they devote to hockey talking to him? Are you kidding me?

I am pretty much as diehard as you can get and if it wasn't that it was a Rangers-Isles game, I would have changed the channel.

The NHL hired John Shannon a few years back to be the VP of Broadcasting and to improve the on-air product. Either he is utterly incompetent or has been handcuffed by the NHL's insane decision to give the game over to the clowns at Versus. The guy worked at Hockey Night In Canada and ran Leafs TV so he knows hockey. But, judging by the Versus product, he knows nothing about trying to sell the game to Americans. Those fools at Versus prove night after night that they are still trying to find their way. Yes they have improved exponentially from when they first went on the air, but they still lag behind even the mediocrity that is the FSN regional networks.

The league's marketing monkeys aren't helping much by selling NHL commercials to air on Versus. So they waste a ton of money to play these (ridiculous) commercials and preach to the choir? If I went through all of the effort to find Versus on my cable system and then to actually pay a premium for the colossal pile of cow shit, and then tuned in to watch the game, I clearly like hockey. Why the hell are you wasting money trying to sell it to me?

I know I am not saying a whole lot more than what has already been said but at some point someone has to say enough is enough. Attendance is down, newspaper coverage is down, television highlight coverage is minimal ... hell, several people I have spoken to had no idea the NHL came back after that catastrophic lockout ... the league simply has to do a better job selling itself and forcing its main national broadcast partner to improve its coverage. Yes the league has a lot of hot young players but if things keep going as they have been, the future will be very bleak.

User

European Vacation

So how does a vacation to the Czech Republic sound to you?

Sounds pretty neat to me. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is reporting that the Penguins and the Tampa Bay Lightning have been approached to start next season in Prague.

Months ago I said that the NHL should take the All Star game there and the league is now willing to put regular season games over there and I think that is fantastic - it's a more realistic hockey venue than London was and those games sold out.

The only issue I have is the choice of teams in this case are quite questionable as the premier Czechs in the league aren't on those teams. Granted the Bolts have Vinny Prospal, Jan Hlavac, Filip Kuba and the Pens have Petr Sykora, they don't hold the appeal of, say, Jaromir Jagr, Dom Hasek or Patrik Elias ... maybe its the thought of sending top ambassador Sidney Crosby or maybe they think the Pens or the Bolts will win the Cup but I still think that the Rangers would be a better team for publicity's sake ... and I wouldn't mind taking a vacation to go see them.

But I do think I would need some Czech lessons first:

How about you? Wanna go?

 "European Vacation: Exploring the Old World's Treasures and Traditions"

Europe, with its rich history, diverse cultures, stunning landscapes, and iconic landmarks, has long been a dream destination for travelers. From the romantic streets of Paris to the historic ruins of Rome, the continent offers a tapestry of experiences waiting to be woven into your travel story. In this article, we'll embark on a virtual European vacation, exploring some of the Old World's treasures, traditions, and hidden gems. We'll also answer frequently asked questions to help you plan your own European adventure.

Part I: The Allure of Europe

Historical Significance

Europe is a living history book. Its cobblestone streets, medieval castles, and ancient ruins are testaments to the continent's historical significance.

Cultural Diversity

Each European country is a world unto itself, with its own language, cuisine, traditions, and customs. From the flamenco of Spain to the fjords of Norway, Europe is a continent of endless cultural exploration.

Part II: Iconic Destinations

Paris, France

Known as the "City of Love," Paris offers the Eiffel Tower, Louvre Museum, and charming neighborhoods like Montmartre. Savor croissants at a café and cruise the Seine River.

Venice, Italy

Venice's romantic canals and historic architecture make it a unique destination. Explore St. Mark's Square, take a gondola ride, and savor authentic Italian cuisine.

Part III: Hidden Gems

Hallstatt, Austria

Nestled by a serene lake and surrounded by the Dachstein Alps, Hallstatt is a picturesque village. Its charming streets, wooden houses, and salt mines make it a hidden gem.

Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia

A natural wonder, Plitvice Lakes is a series of cascading lakes and waterfalls surrounded by lush forests. Hike the wooden walkways and witness the vibrant turquoise waters.

Part IV: European Traditions

Oktoberfest, Germany

Experience the world's largest beer festival in Munich. Enjoy traditional Bavarian music, food, and, of course, a variety of beers in massive beer tents.

La Tomatina, Spain

In the town of Buñol, locals and tourists gather for the world's largest food fight. It involves throwing ripe tomatoes at each other, creating a unique and colorful spectacle.

Part V: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Let's address some frequently asked questions about traveling in Europe:

1. Is it better to visit multiple countries in one trip or explore a single country in depth?

Both options have their merits. Visiting multiple countries allows you to experience diverse cultures, but exploring a single country in depth lets you immerse yourself in its traditions and history.

2. How can I save money while traveling in Europe?

Consider traveling during the shoulder season, staying in budget accommodations, using public transportation, and enjoying local street food.

3. Is it essential to learn the local language before traveling to Europe?

While it's helpful to know a few basic phrases, many Europeans speak English, and language barriers can often be overcome with gestures and a friendly attitude.

4. How can I respect local customs and traditions while traveling in Europe?

Research local customs before you go, be mindful of dress codes and etiquette, and always ask for permission before taking photos of people.

5. What's the best way to travel between European cities?

Europe has an extensive rail network that makes train travel convenient and scenic. Additionally, budget airlines offer affordable flights between major cities.

A European vacation is an opportunity to immerse yourself in history, culture, and natural beauty. From the iconic landmarks of Paris and Venice to the hidden gems of Hallstatt and Plitvice Lakes, Europe offers an array of experiences to satisfy every traveler's curiosity. Whether you're sipping wine in Tuscany, hiking in the Swiss Alps, or exploring the historic streets of Prague, Europe invites you to create memories that will last a lifetime. So, pack your bags, embark on your own European adventure, and let the Old World's treasures and traditions captivate your heart and soul.

I Hate Yuppies

So I am out at the US Open tennis tournament for work and it strikes me how much like Rangers hockey it is. Seriously - there are a ton of yuppies, talking on their cells and ignoring play. The prices for everything are exorbitant and the people in the good seats are the quietest fans. It's kinda gross, and exactly what Gary Bettman wants the NHL experience to be like - white-washed, boring corporate crap. Granted, the US Tennis Association makes a ton of money out of this, and that is what Gary and his handlers want at the end of the day. They don't care about the product, just the bottom line.

It's kinda sad, but quite understandable.

The difference is, or should be, is that the sport of hockey started with regular people, where tennis was a royal sport. Tennis was played by the ancient Egyptians and adopted by monks in France. From there it entered the court (bad pun intended) and now its a yuppy country-club sport. Hockey, while its ancient origins are still being found out, rose to popularity on lakes and rivers in Canada as explorers adopted the lacrosse-ish game of the natives. From then on it went to bored farm kids and beyond. Hockey has always been a blue collar game and taking it away from its roots (and the widest fanbase) makes it something else, and I hope I am not around to see it.

NHL Drops The Ball

Unfortunately, in no surprise, the NHL is not streaming the Canada/Russia Super Series on NHL.com. Versus did not pick up coverage (of course) and TSN in Canada has implemented restrictions so people out of the Great White North can not watch on the station's broadband website.

This is quite disappointing but, as I said, no surprise as the NHL has proven quite inept when it comes to marketing the sport of hockey or its stars. For shame.

EDIT: Thanks to a guy on the Rangers board, I found a website to watch a stream of the games - http://www.hockeywebcasts.com/. I love the interweb.

Who Needs Canadian Hockey Fans?

"The Nashville Predators announced Wednesday that Craig Leipold has signed a letter of intent to sell the team to a group of local investors for nearly $200 million."

More on that here.

This is the second letter that Leipold signed, and he is a fool with misplaced loyalties. He ditched the deal he struck with the creator of the crackberry when Basille wanted to move the team to *gasp* Canada!!!!!!!!!

How dare someone want to move a professional hockey franchise to a geographical area where the support would be virtually limitless, where tickets are passed down from fathers to sons and most games sell out! Instead the group that Leipold is selling to has pledged to keep the Preds in the Music City and thus pledged to lose millions a year. While some of it is their money to lose, but the league does revenue share so the Preds will be a money pit that successful teams dump hard earned cash into.


I don't know about you but there is no way I am going to take a winter hockey vacation to Nashville of all places. Hmm, let's see, what other sights are there? Ooo, Graceland, the Grand Ole Oprey, yee haw! I'm a hockey fan, you can't get my fat ass on a mechanical bull.

This is just another move by puppetmaster Gary to save face as he swore up and down that he was dedicated to the 30 teams the league had. He also wants as many teams in America as possible so you can be sure if it was Edmonton looking to move to Houston he would not block the move and hail it as a victory. Idiot.