Hey Glen, Save My Money

As the hockey world prepares to loosen the pursestrings on Tuesday and spend our season ticket money on the horses that are expected to bring the cart to the Cup, I can't help but be really concerned - especially as a Ranger fan.

The post-Cup Blueshirts were notorious for bad decisions when it comes to free agents; before you start, the jury is still out on Dru and Gomer. Before the lockout they were attempting to improve upon Frankenstein's monster with a part here and a part there. Those pieces certainly didn't match and the lumbering result never made it to the stage to tap dance with its creator. After the labor tragedy, the monster spoke Czech and made it to the stage but could barely do more than a two-step.

The brain now knows what to do in the spotlight, but Tuesday will determine way too many of the body parts that has to do the dancing. If you look back at the Cup winners since 1994 they all had a corps (get it?) made up primarily of home-grown or long-term talent and the biggest parts of those teams came from top picks after the team completely fell on its face. The Rangers fell on their face but blew the draft picks (five top 10 picks in the 10 years after the Cup). They never were able to draft Steve Yzerman, Mike Modano, Vinny Lecavalier, Eric Lindros (who turned into Peter Forsberg) or Eric Staal. Recent Ranger drafts appear to have been able to produce a nice bounty but the main parts of this monster still need to be signed in free agency.

We have a goaltender, that's for sure, but beyond that there are a lot of positions where we may have something down the line, but nothing right now. We don't have a No. 1 defenseman (Rozy is free). We don't have a power play quarterback (and we haven't since Leetchy left). We don't have a scoring winger (Jagr appears as good as gone). We don't have a heart (bye Sean, we loved having you). This is pretty damned depressing. As I said, we may have solid substitutes in a few years - Marc Staal, Bobby Sanguinetti, Alexei Cherepanov, Brandon Dubinsky, respectively - but we don't have it now. Replacements for 2008-09 will have to come from a shallow free agent pool that will incite salaries that are certain to send this league to another lockout when the CBA runs out.

I've been asked many times who I want the Rangers to sign and, while I think it would be neat to see Sundin or Orpik or a few others, I have to say that I would probably be happiest if the Rangers stood pat. This hired gun thing, the picking up pieces of different puzzles and hoping they fit together isn't the right way to build a team. The time when it worked to win a Cup is long gone. In the last few years the monster got some new parts grafted on so it could shuffle around and get the crowd to clap but that's about it. It isn't until the Ranger brass puts him together the right way that he will be able to dance with Stanley. If the current crop of Ranger free agents want to leave, let them go, but don't bother breaking the bank to replace them. Use the extra money earmarked for salaries towards the planned renovation of the Garden.

In a few years we should have a team worth playing in it.

Misplaced Priorities

Lucky Number 13?

Thirteen is an infamous unlucky number and just five New York Rangers have donned the number in franchise history.

Jack Stoddard was the first. Stoddard played 80 games for the Rangers in the early '50s and I know nothing about him other than his numbers. Thirty years later Bob Brooke wore it as a big third-line center (if my memory holds). The next decade saw the most famous 13 (so far) in Sergei Nemchinov, who won the Cup. Sergei was one of the best checkers in the league for a short period of time and also will go down as one of the Rangers best draft picks - 12th round, 244th overall in the 1990 draft. Trading him at the 1997 deadline was one of the many errors that the Blueshirts made while disassembling a great team. Another of the mistakes of the post-Cup era, Valeri Kamensky, also wore #13. It's a shame he could never recreate the magic he had with the Aves. And the fifth and final Ranger (so far) to wear 13 was tough guy Richard Scott, who was called up a few times before the lockout but never amounted to anything.

Will Mats Sundin be the sixth??

While Sam over at Rangers Report doesn't see signing Sundin as a good move, I do. I mentioned it in a post a month ago and see no reason to change my mind. Sam, among others, have held Sundin's age against him and that is just a mistake. The Swede was as good as he ever was last season and brings an air of dignity and class to the team that will be necessary should Sather not re-sign Shanny. Sundin provides the big body in the middle that the Rangers needed so badly and, if the Blueshirts can fit him in while re-signing Jagr, can you imagine the two on the power play together? He also would provide support to Henrik, which could help him finally avoid that dreadful mid-season slump that has cost him the Vezina the last two years. (Yes he was a finalist the last three but I don't think he really had a chance to beat Kipper in '06.)

Handing Sundin a one year contract works because the unrestricted free agent class of next summer features some fantastic younger players including Marian Gaborik, Vinny Lecavalier (although rumour has it he is signing an extension on July 1st) and the Sedin twins and the restricted free agents are even better: Evgeni Malkin, Paul Stastny, Eric and Jordan Staal to name a few - all of whom should be well worth offer sheets if they don't get big money deals before then.

Signing Sundin to a short-term deal would keep star-power on Broadway and keep the Rangers in contention while ensuring that the future of the team is allowed to mature until they are capable of grabbing the reins themselves. You satisfy the yuppies in the purples and Blue-bloods in the blues at the same time.

Get that man a contract.

Must Read Musings 2

Just a warning, this has nothing to do with the Rangers:

Whether it is because I have been in the media so long or because the media has so consistently produced mountains of generic drivel, I rarely read an article that makes me sit up and think, 'wow, that was amazing.' Yes Sean Avery's insight into his own life was remarkable, but that was because of the content rather than the way it was described. Sometimes you have a great topic and sometimes you have great writing, but I have found that lately it is rare that the two come together. I often lament the lack of beautiful sports writing in modern journalism but an article that I read today has renewed my faith.

Harlan Goode of The Washington Times did a profile of Alexander Ovechkin's older brother that I found utterly marvelous. The cynical side of my brain says that the piece is so incredible because it isn't sports writing, it is the story of a person working a job. But while that is true, but I instead chose to look at it as a sports story that transcends its genre and appreciate it all the more.

Much like with the Avery piece, I won't do it a disservice by excerpting a random part of it. You just have to read it yourself.

Must-Read Musings

A thanks to Greg over at Puck Daddy for putting up a fun post about Sean Avery today. His piece is a fun read, but the really interesting article is Avery's on MensVogue.com.

I won't excerpt it, you just have to read the whole thing.

Remarkable.

NHL Draft: Day 2 Talk

I had started up a long analysis of each of the players that the Rangers picked with plenty of links but let's face it, who cares? I haven't seen these kids play and there are plenty of places that the same info can be found (Blueshirt Bulletin is a good one, as always and the Rangers also looked at their new additions).

Instead I will just throw out some big picture notes:

*The Islanders were one of the big winners in the draft, picking up 13 players to restock their system. That's incredible and some of the picks are actually good prospects. Hartford will be in for one helluva fight in a few years.

*Speaking of the Pack, the Rangers dealt away Alex Bourret to Phoenix so they could draft Czech defenseman Tomas Kundratek in the third round. Kundratek was the highest-rated Czech in the draft but really, does that mean much? Every country has its ups and downs in development and the CR has rarely produced top flight defensemen with Petr Svboda and Tomas Kaberle being two exceptions. And don't throw Rozy out there as he has been pretty damn mediocre but the Rangers thrust him into the No. 1 spot because Jagr loves him. Bourret may have been fat and lazy but he still put up the points, especially in the clutch - 15 in 12 playoff games with the Pack. Who knows how he could have developed if the Rangers actually invested some time in him?

*Then again, while other teams ping-ponged up and down the draft with deals, the Rangers were relatively quiet. They made two moves - the Bourret deal and the reacquisition of their own fourth round pick for next year's fourth rounder and the seventh rounder from this year. They used the fourth rounder on WHL late blooming winger Dale Weise.

*With a gamble on a late bloomer like Weise, they also rolled the dice for their sixth rounder, Mitch Gaulton. Gaulton could end up a total stud or a total bust as he is coming off of a major injury. But I guess, like with all draft picks, it's really a crap shoot.

*There was no guessing when it came to the best story out of Ottawa. David Carle, the brother of San Jose defenseman Matt, was expected to be a early round pick. During the pre-draft physicals, Carle was diagnosed a heart condition that puts him at risk for sudden cardiac death if he exerts himself too strenuously. He withdrew his name from the NHL draft but the Tampa Bay Lightning used their last pick on him anyway. New owner Oren Koules said, "The kid worked his whole life to be drafted in the NHL, and I don't see a reason he shouldn't be." It was an incredibly classy move and I tip my hat to him and the Lightning organization for making it - it's the people that make this sport so great.

NHL Draft: Round 1 Thoughts and Observations

I was at work so I missed the beginning of the draft on Versus but followed online and was at the bar in time to watch the Rangers draft the Jason Biggs look-alike, Mike Del Zotto. The Blueshirt Bulletin has a good look at him, pointing out that he tumbled in the draft and fell in the Rangers lap. When I had made my top five choices for the Rangers pick at No. 20, I had figured he would be off the board. Then again, I probably wouldn't have picked him anyway. From all of the scouting reports that I have read, he is a lesser version of a prospect we already have - Bobby Sanguinetti. (And, as I just read, Inferno over at Rangers Review sees it the same way.)

Don't get me wrong, I am glad the Rangers went after Del Zotto as opposed to one of the seven kids picked who come in under 170 pounds, but it isn't like this kid is a physical defenseman by any means. And let's face it, that is what this organization sorely needs so Sather had better put some of those types in Ranger jerseys on Saturday (or on July 1st). Del Zotto has great offensive skills but is surely at least two years away from challenging for a blueline slot on Broadway.

As for the other local teams, the Islanders shrewdly turned their first round draft pick into four picks - all within the first three rounds of either this year and next. Oh yeah, and they still got the type of player they wanted most: a playmaking center to work with Kyle Okposo. Joshua Bailey seems to have all of the tools and I have to say its very disappointing to see the Isles do so well.

The Devils also managed to procreate picks by dealing their selection twice. They went from 21st to 24th and added second and third round picks. However, I do think Lou stumbled with the first rounder in taking Mattias Tedenby. The Swede was the third-ranked Euro skater, but he is also 5'10, 176 and years away from the NHL. I thought it was certain that they would take Scott Stevens wannabe John Carlson as he was still on the board but whatever, one less dominating physical defenseman to face in the division (Carlson ended up in Washington).

A few other notes:
*In another questionable move, the Flyers got rid of their playoff hero R.J. Umberger for a first round pick. Umberger, who went to Ohio State, should be a nice draw for the Jackets, but what was Philly thinking? Their boy finally develops into an NHL player and they deal him for a first round pick? I am sure money came into it as they are rumoured to have re-signed Jeff Carter for five million a year for three years but still, a first round pick for the one Flyer other than Mike Richards who consistently performed in the playoffs? Eesh.

*Credit to Don Maloney for adding Olli Jokinen but I am not sure losing Keith Ballard was worth it. Jokinen is sure to boost the Desert Dogs offense, but you would think Maloney would want the Phoenix youth to learn from a winner, not some guy who hasn't ever played in the playoffs. Ballard has a big upside still while Jokinen is on the downslope. And Nick Boynton may have never developed into the stud he was supposed to be in Boston, but he was still pretty dependable for the Coyotes.

*Once the dust settled from their two moves, Calgary essentially dealt away Alex Tanguay for Mike Cammalleri and a second round pick while dropping eight spots in the first round. I can't say I care as neither Tanguay nor Cammalleri have been fantasy sports studs over any prolonged period of time (I knew I shoulda traded Camms after that red hot start last year. I knew it!).

*I am against plastering broadcasts with graphics, but TSN needs to be a little more proactive. Sitting in a loud bar with no audio, I had no idea what was going on. GMs were flipping picks and there were no graphics explaining the deals to be had that I saw until Washington dealt Steve Eminger.

Let's hope TSN, and the Rangers, do a better job tomorrow. Until then, cheers!

Something To Ponder/Annoy

Why is it that both the Devils and the Islanders are holding draft parties tonight while the Rangers aren't doing anything for their fans? And they wonder why they get buried in the New York sports sections?

Ah, I have an idea! They are probably plotting how much more money they can get out of us for our season tickets next season ...

My Apologies

I haven't posted much this week. I wanted to but I find it difficult and ridiculous to post about Sean Avery's taste in swimwear. The players' lives off of the rink are irrelevant (unless you are an opponent, then it becomes fodder). And the politics, well these are just getting ridiculous.

I feel obligated to address the idiotic litigation, so I will just say this: While I am far from a fan of the Dolans, having them removed as the owners of the team (while they maintain ownership of the Garden) would remove the Rangers from New York city so I can't say I am in favour. The Rangers are right in that the NHL is operating like a monopoly, whether it's within their rights or not.

Gary Napolean is continuing to drag the game down in the public eye and wants to ensure that everyone goes down with him. Is it any wonder he gets booed by fans everywhere? His powertrip has steadily driven the sport into the ground and because we, as fans, love our hockey so much we have allowed it - just so we still have a sport.

The Rangers are a big enough target that he can attack them without much retribution - he can't possibly pick on Toronto or Montreal - and the small teams are the ones that make up his primary powerbase. But one has to wonder, once he starts flexing his 'muscles' against the Dolans, how soon until other owners sit up and think, "hey, that could be me that he is going after" and depose their pet commissioner? I hope it's sooner rather than later ...

In the meantime, the draft is tonight. Well, the first round of it anyway. Splitting the draft into two days is just silly and ruins most of the appeal of it. The NHL won't get any better ratings or coverage just because the opening round is on a Friday night and it pisses the hardcore fans who would actually sit and watch hours of the draft off. Of course I will still cover it, but I won't be happy about it! Goshdiddlydarnit. Kevin over at BMR put together a fantastic guide to watching that is a must-read. So check it out and make sure to come back here this weekend for a recap of how the Rangers did.

*Fingers crossed*

Good Luck Mike!

... you'll need it.

Mike Richter is among the players under consideration for a spot in the hallowed Hall of Fame on Tuesday.

The 17 men who will choose up to four new inductees for the Hall are: NHL senior vice-presidents Jim Gregory (who also chairs the committee) and Colin Campbell; former general managers Emile Francis, Pat Quinn, Serge Savard, Harry Sinden and Bill Torrey; former players Lanny McDonald, Peter Stastny and John Davidson; former coach Scotty Bowman; media members Dick Irvin, Mike Emrick, Eric Duhatschek, Mike Farber and Yvon Pedneault and former International Ice Hockey Federation general secretary Jan-Ake Edvinsson.

Now none of those people have done the Rangers any favours - including J.D., who gave us gonorrhea, I mean Christian Backman, as a parting gift. But J.D. appeared to be good friends with Mike Richter so who knows? Maybe he will help get his buddy a pass, even if he is a former Ranger who helped erase J.D.'s failure in '79 from the minds of most Ranger fans.

Other former Rangers eligible for consideration include Rick Middleton, Pavel Bure, Glenn Anderson, Kevin Lowe, Steve Larmer and Pat Verbeek. Adam Oates, Doug Gilmour, Dino Ciccarelli, Phil Housley, Igor Larionov, Guy Carbonneau, Dale Hunter, Kevin Dineen, Claude Lemieux and Tom Barrasso.

This is an incredibly mediocre group so pretty much any of them have a shot. Richter vs. Barrasso is a good battle but in the end, the former Pen prevails. He has more wins, one more Cup and a Vezina while Richter has one Stanley and the World Cup of Hockey win and - as many Russians know - international achievements are often overlooked when it comes to the Hall. But I don't think either of them deserve to be enshrined.

That being said, I think Larionov will make it. The Professor earned three Stanley Cups in over 900 NHL games along with two Olympic golds, a Canada Cup gold, four World Championship golds and two World Junior golds for USSR/Russia. That's a lot of hardware right there. Sure Anderson won six Cups, but he was never a major contributor to any of the six.

Puck Daddy makes a good case for Bure, Ciccarelli and Gilmour but I would have a hard time putting two of those three in. The one I wouldn't mind seeing was Bure. The Russian Rocket was an injury case but scored a ton of goals so while I think he came up well short of his potential, I can see him Cam Neely-ing his way in. As for the other two: Ciccarelli never won anything and racked up some points in the goaltending-poor '80s and Gilmour never reached superstar status (at least outside of Toronto - he was good in Calgary but Toronto needed a hero and he gave them one).

So who do I put in the Hall? Larionov.

That's it.

The committee should not feel forced to fill out the draft class just for the sake of filling out the draft class. It's that philosophy that got such mediocre players as Bernie Federko, Dick Duff and Larry Murphy into the Hall. As the saying goes, its the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of Very Good. Ushering in middling talent who did not reach the pinnacle of their positions, who did not exemplify the best qualities of hockey players or that did not dominate in any way, means or form belittles the true honour that a place in the Hall bestows.

 "The Journey of a Legend: Mike's Farewell to the Ice"

In the world of professional sports, there are few individuals who transcend their respective games to become true legends. Mike, whose journey we will explore in this article, is undoubtedly one of those rare individuals. As he bids farewell to the ice and embarks on the next chapter of his life, it's an opportune moment to reflect on his remarkable career, his impact on the sport, and what lies ahead.

FAQ 1: Who is Mike, and why is he important in the world of sports?

Mike, whose full name is Michael Anderson, is a legendary figure in the world of ice hockey. His career, which spanned over two decades, is marked by numerous accolades, records, and a lasting impact on the sport.

The Early Years

FAQ 2: Where did Mike's journey in hockey begin?

Mike's journey in hockey began in his hometown of Edmonton, Canada, a city known for producing many hockey stars. From a young age, he displayed exceptional talent and a deep love for the game.

A Storied Career

FAQ 3: What are some highlights of Mike's career?

Mike's career is studded with highlights, including multiple Stanley Cup victories, MVP awards, and numerous records. He played for several NHL teams, leaving an indelible mark on each franchise.

Leadership and Legacy

FAQ 4: What made Mike a true leader on and off the ice?

Mike's leadership qualities were evident throughout his career. He was known for his work ethic, sportsmanship, and dedication to his teammates. He served as a captain for several teams, and his impact in the locker room was immeasurable.

Records and Achievements

FAQ 5: Can you highlight some of Mike's records and achievements?

Certainly, Mike's list of records and achievements is extensive. He holds the record for the most career goals by a left-winger and is among the top scorers in NHL history. His contributions to his teams' successes are immeasurable.

The Farewell Tour

FAQ 6: How did Mike's retirement announcement impact the hockey world?

When Mike announced his retirement, it sent shockwaves through the hockey community. Fans and fellow players alike paid tribute to his incredible career, and teams organized special events to honor his legacy.

Life Beyond Hockey

FAQ 7: What are Mike's plans for life after retirement?

While Mike's retirement from professional play marks the end of an era, it's also the beginning of a new chapter in his life. He has expressed interest in mentoring young players, getting involved in charitable work, and spending more time with his family.

Impact on the Sport

FAQ 8: How has Mike's career influenced the sport of hockey?

Mike's career has had a profound impact on the sport of hockey. His dedication, skill, and sportsmanship set an example for aspiring players. His records and achievements serve as benchmarks for future generations.

: A Legend's Legacy

As Mike bids farewell to the ice and transitions into retirement, his legacy in the world of sports is secure. He leaves behind a storied career, a legion of devoted fans, and a lasting impact on the sport of ice hockey. Mike's journey serves as a testament to the power of dedication, hard work, and love for the game. While he may no longer lace up his skates for professional play, his presence in the hockey world will endure, inspiring generations to come. We wish Mike the best in all his future endeavors, and thank him for the memories he's given us throughout his extraordinary career.

Finding Future Blue

While some pundits (especially Larry Brooks) have the Rangers looking for a future replacement for Jaromir Jagr, at No. 20, the Rangers just aren't going to find one in this draft. Actually, in theory, the Rangers already have one waiting in the wings: last year's top pick Alexei Cherepanov. If Cherry can't make it out of the Red, the Blueshirts already have good young wingers in Nigel Dawes, Ryan Callahan and Petr Prucha in the NHL and Alex Bourret, Hugh Jessiman (haha) and Lauri Korpikoski just waiting for a shot.

The Rangers head into the draft with six picks over the seven rounds: 20, 51, 75, no pick in the fourth, 141, 171 and 201.

While the Blueshirts are known for just picking the best pick available, they would be foolish not to pick a defenseman or three. They picked just one blueliner over the last two drafts and this year's crop is thick with quality prospects. Plus, let's face it, there isn't much depth on the team right about now. Andrew Hutchinson, Marek Malik, Paul Mara, Michal Rozsival and Jason Strudwick are all free agents and at least two of them are as good as gone - Malik and Mara. As for the other three, you have to figure that Hutch will leave looking for a guaranteed NHL spot, Strudwick isn't a top six defenseman so who cares and Rozy will not be worth the money he wants - especially now that he underwent hip surgery.

That leaves the Rangers with Dan Girardi, Fedor Tyutin, Marc Staal, Christian Backman, Thomas Pock, Michael Busto, Michael Sauer, Corey Potter and Bobby Sanguinetti. Backman - who was actually drafted two spots before that Scott Gomez guy back in 1998 - is utterly worthless. Sauer is coming off injury, Busto couldn't get out of the ECHL, Sather seemingly hates Pock and Bobby needs pro seasoning. And that means that the Rangers need to move to solidify the blueline and fast.

The top prospects who are clearly NHL-ready are at the top of the draft (top four or five) so Sather would have to make a deal - maybe someone will take the 20 pick with Prucha? Somehow I don't think so and if the offering price is higher, I wouldn't bother. Prucha was the one Ranger youngster not to carve a role out for himself last season and despite his dedication, he doesn't really have a place on the team anymore since Nigel Dawes came in. Regardless, the Rangers need blueliners so here are five guys I've read good things about that should be fitted for a new hat:

*John Carlson: He is not one of the Hanson Brothers kids, but he does have a mean streak. He's big - 6'2", 212 - and patterns his game after Scott Stevens. I couldn't think of one player I hated more that I wanted to have on my team than Stevens. Carlson could be perfect. Plus it would be a nice jab at the Devils since they supposedly have him in their sights at No. 21.

*Colten Teubert: He is taller than Carlson and has better experience (WHL vs. USHL). He definitely doesn't back down and I remember seeing him hammer some kid back in that stupid Russia/Canada series last summer. The Rangers could certainly use a big hitter ... (understatement of the offseason right there.) And NHL.com just did a profile on him and his penchant for hitting.

*Shawn Lalonde: An OHL kid that has tasted the bitterness of team failure with Belleville (they lost to Kitchener in several big games), Lalonde could/should use that as motivation to push himself harder to be the Lidstrom-esque defenseman he wants to be. They say he has the tools, so why not? He was coached by former Binghamton Rangers coach George Burnett and the Ottawa Citizen said some good things about him.

*Jack Gardiner: The thought of an American high school kid getting picked is unnerving but Gardiner has already made the good call to commit to Wisconsin. Mike Eaves is a helluva coach and UW has done well with Rangers in the past (Richter, Granato, Brian Mullen, Bruce Driver). Gardiner is very mobile and would be a decent safety net should Sanguinetti not work out.

*Jyri Niemi: Outside of Kimmo Timonen, Finland hasn't produced a stud defenseman in almost 20 years. Maybe they're due? Niemi supposedly has a Souray-esque slap shot and man, the Rangers could have used that this past season. He may turn out to be a Sami Salo clone without the injury problem so that would be nice.

For all of the prognosticating, the amateur draft is a crapshoot and we will just have to wait and see how things work out three, four years down the line. Any immediate help will come on July 1st (or thereafter) so this coming weekend's draft will just be some fun fodder to fill the time (and the blog) until the free agent signing begins.

 "Finding Future Blue: The Art and Science of Scouting NHL Prospects"

In the high-stakes world of professional sports, the ability to identify and nurture young talent is paramount. For NHL teams, scouting prospects is a meticulous and essential process. In this article, we delve into the fascinating world of scouting and explore the methods, challenges, and impact of finding future blue-chip players who will don the NHL jersey one day.

FAQ 1: What is the role of scouting in the NHL?

Scouting plays a pivotal role in the NHL by identifying and evaluating young players with the potential to make it to the big leagues. These scouts are tasked with analyzing a player's skillset, potential, and character to determine if they have what it takes to excel at the NHL level.

The Beginnings

FAQ 2: When does the scouting process start for NHL prospects?

The scouting process often begins when players are in their early teens. Junior leagues, college hockey, and international tournaments like the World Junior Championships are fertile grounds for scouts to identify emerging talent.

The Art of Scouting

FAQ 3: What are some key qualities scouts look for in potential NHL prospects?

Scouts assess a wide range of qualities, including skating ability, hockey IQ, physical attributes, work ethic, and character. These factors, combined with a player's age and potential for development, play a critical role in the scouting process.

The Tools of the Trade

FAQ 4: What tools do scouts use to evaluate prospects?

Scouts utilize various tools, including video analysis, statistical data, and advanced analytics, to evaluate players. However, in-person evaluations remain a cornerstone of scouting, as they provide valuable insights into a player's performance under real game conditions.

Global Talent Pool

FAQ 5: Where do NHL teams scout for talent?

NHL teams cast a wide net, scouting talent not only in North America but also across Europe, Russia, and other international hockey hotspots. This global approach allows teams to access a diverse pool of prospects.

Challenges in Scouting

FAQ 6: What are some challenges scouts face in evaluating prospects?

Scouts encounter numerous challenges, including the unpredictability of young athletes' development, the pressure to make accurate assessments, and the competition among teams for the best talent.

The Draft and Development

FAQ 7: How do NHL teams utilize scouting information in the draft and development process?

The information gathered during scouting plays a crucial role in the NHL Entry Draft. Teams make selections based on their evaluations of prospects' potential and needs. Once drafted, players enter a development system designed to prepare them for NHL play.

Success Stories

FAQ 8: Can you provide examples of NHL stars who were discovered through scouting?

Certainly, NHL legends like Wayne Gretzky, Mario Lemieux, and Sidney Crosby were all scouted as young prospects and went on to have illustrious careers. These success stories highlight the importance of effective scouting.

The Impact on Teams

FAQ 9: How does effective scouting impact NHL teams?

Effective scouting is the lifeblood of NHL teams. It can lead to the discovery of future franchise players and, ultimately, championships. Conversely, poor scouting can result in missed opportunities and setbacks for a team.

: The Ongoing Quest for Talent

In the NHL, finding future blue-chip players is an ongoing quest. Teams invest significant resources, time, and expertise in scouting to identify the next generation of hockey stars. While scouting is a combination of art and science, its importance cannot be overstated. It is the foundation upon which successful NHL franchises are built. As fans, we eagerly await the emergence of these prospects, knowing that they carry with them the hopes and dreams of both their teams and the entire hockey community. The next time you watch a young player dazzle on the ice, remember that their journey to stardom likely began with the watchful eyes of a dedicated scout.

NHL Awards Wrap

I have to keep this brief as its past 7 a.m., I just got home from work, photoshopped the Vezina onto a picture of the fattest man on earth and want to wake up by noon to watch Romania beat on the Italians in Euro 2008. So, lets get right into what happened in Toronto last night:

*Nabby got robbed by Flabby.

*The NHL hates Swedes (Backstrom and Zetterberg should have won; Hank has to watch the Krispy Kream Krybaby win the Vezina; and Nick Lidstrom doesn't count since he sounds like he is from Grand Rapids at this point).

*Bruce Boudreau looks like Mickey Rooney.

*Alexander Ovechkin is a more endearing superstar than Cindy Crosby ever will be.

*Ron MacLean is not funny.

*Not being able to speak English is (thanks Pavel).

*Versus can't tell time.

*Dom Hasek is still bitter about losing his starting job to Chris Osgood, even if Ozzie got him another ring.

*Pat Kane has hot jailbait sisters and his teammates, who are all older than him, are all trying to mack on them. Perverts.

*Surviving a mild case of cancer that didn't stop you from doing something like, say, playing hockey deserves an award.

*The NHL is secretly in love with Sean Avery.

*Billy Smith and Mike Bossy on the same awards show. Where's Dennis Potvin? Probably still out hunting Ulf Nilsson.

*Adam Graves is a better human being than you.

*Mr. Hockey is old. Like, really old. So is Red Kelly.

*Seeing Evgeni Malkin crushed again as a loser doesn't get old.

 "NHL Awards Wrap: Celebrating Excellence on the Ice"

Every year, the NHL awards ceremony is a highly anticipated event that honors the league's top performers, recognizing their exceptional skills, dedication, and contributions to the sport of hockey. In this article, we will take a comprehensive look at the NHL Awards, the winners, and what these accolades mean for the players and the league.

FAQ 1: What are the NHL Awards?

The NHL Awards is an annual event where the league celebrates its brightest stars by presenting a range of awards to players, coaches, and executives. These awards acknowledge achievements in various aspects of the game, from scoring prowess to sportsmanship.

The Hart Memorial Trophy: NHL Most Valuable Player

One of the most prestigious awards, the Hart Memorial Trophy, is given to the NHL's Most Valuable Player. The recipient of this award is typically a player who has had an exceptional impact on their team's success.

FAQ 2: Who are some notable recent winners of the Hart Trophy?

Recent Hart Trophy winners include Connor McDavid, Nikita Kucherov, and Taylor Hall, all of whom demonstrated outstanding skills and leadership on the ice.

The Vezina Trophy: NHL's Best Goaltender

Goaltenders are often the backbone of successful NHL teams, and the Vezina Trophy recognizes the league's best goaltender for their skill, consistency, and performance.

FAQ 3: Who are some legendary goaltenders who have won the Vezina Trophy?

Legends like Dominik Hasek, Martin Brodeur, and Carey Price have all been recipients of the Vezina Trophy, solidifying their places in NHL history.

The Norris Trophy: Excellence in Defense

Defensemen play a pivotal role in the NHL, and the Norris Trophy celebrates the best defensive player who excels in both guarding their net and contributing offensively.

FAQ 4: Can you name some recent Norris Trophy winners?

Recent Norris Trophy winners include Victor Hedman, Brent Burns, and Erik Karlsson, showcasing their exceptional skills on both ends of the ice.

The Calder Trophy: Rookie of the Year

Young talents entering the league often make an immediate impact, and the Calder Trophy honors the NHL's Rookie of the Year for their outstanding debut season.

FAQ 5: Who are some recent standout Calder Trophy winners?

Prominent NHL stars like Elias Pettersson, Auston Matthews, and Artemi Panarin have earned the Calder Trophy, setting the stage for promising careers.

The Selke Trophy: Outstanding Defensive Forward

The Selke Trophy celebrates the league's best defensive forward who excels in shutting down opponents and contributing to their team's success.

FAQ 6: Can you name some recent Selke Trophy winners?

Recent Selke Trophy recipients include Patrice Bergeron, Ryan O'Reilly, and Anze Kopitar, all known for their exceptional two-way play.

The Lady Byng Trophy: Sportsmanship and Skill

Sportsmanship is a cherished aspect of the NHL, and the Lady Byng Trophy recognizes the player who best combines skill, gentlemanly conduct, and dedication to the game.

FAQ 7: Who are some recent Lady Byng Trophy winners?

Notable recent winners of the Lady Byng Trophy include Aleksander Barkov, Ryan O'Reilly, and William Karlsson, who embody the spirit of sportsmanship.

The Jack Adams Award: Coach of the Year

Behind every successful team is a great coach, and the Jack Adams Award honors the NHL's Coach of the Year for their leadership, strategy, and ability to get the best out of their players.

FAQ 8: Can you name some recent Jack Adams Award winners?

Recent Jack Adams Award winners include Barry Trotz, Bruce Cassidy, and Jon Cooper, who guided their teams to remarkable seasons.

The Ted Lindsay Award: Peer Recognition

Formerly known as the Lester B. Pearson Award, the Ted Lindsay Award is voted on by the players themselves, making it a unique accolade that reflects the respect and admiration of one's peers.

FAQ 9: Who are some recent Ted Lindsay Award winners?

Players like Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl, and Nikita Kucherov have been recognized by their fellow NHL players with the Ted Lindsay Award.

: Celebrating Excellence

The NHL Awards ceremony is a special night for players, coaches, and fans alike. It provides a moment to recognize and celebrate the remarkable talent and sportsmanship that define the NHL. Beyond the accolades, these awards serve as a testament to the dedication and passion that drive players to excel on the ice. As we look forward to the next season, we anticipate new contenders and new stories of excellence in the world of hockey. Congratulations to all the winners, and here's to another exciting season of NHL action!

Good Luck Hank!

Tonight is the NHL Awards show. It will be on Versus for the extremely bored. While I don't care for awards shows, or Versus for that matter, there is some interest as a Ranger will be involved.

While Brandon Dubinsky got jobbed in the Calder contention (Two Blackhawks? C'mon! They were terrible and Dubi solidified the game of a slumping superstar while helping the Rangers make the playoffs. Playoffs. Remember them Chicago? Didn't think so.), Henrik Lundqvist made the final three nominees for the Vezina Trophy as best goaltender.

His competition will be fierce: Evgeni Nabokov had a helluva year while Fatso - Marty Brodeur - made it on reputation. Again.

While their goals against average were both slightly better, neither Nabby nor Fatty can claim to have put together 10 shutouts behind a defense that features such stalwarts as Marek Malik, Christian Backman, Jason Strudwick. And neither the Sharks nor the Devils played as poorly as the sloppy, chemistry-challenged Rangers did for several stretches over the season. For all of the Rangers stupid penalties, they killed 84.6 of them - two percent higher than the Devils - and you know that a team's best penalty killer is its goaltender. Granted, Nabokov led San Jose to the best p.k. in the league (NY was sixth), but I'll ignore that part. Aren't stats great??

So on that note, we wish Henrik Lundqvist the best of luck as he heads to Toronto for the third straight year as a nominee for the Vezina Trophy. Let's hope this one is the charm and he brings back the hardware to Broadway!

 "Good Luck Hank! Henrik Lundqvist's Impactful Career and Future Endeavors"

When it comes to legendary goaltenders in the National Hockey League (NHL), few names shine as brightly as Henrik Lundqvist's. After 15 remarkable seasons as the face of the New York Rangers, Lundqvist embarked on a new journey, leaving a profound impact on the team and its fan base. In this article, we'll celebrate the career of "Hank" Lundqvist, his contributions to the Rangers, and what the future holds for this beloved hockey icon.

FAQ 1: Who is Henrik Lundqvist?

Henrik Lundqvist, affectionately known as "King Henrik," is a Swedish goaltender who became an NHL legend during his tenure with the New York Rangers. Born on March 2, 1982, in Åre, Sweden, Lundqvist's journey to NHL stardom is nothing short of extraordinary.

Early Career and Path to the NHL

Lundqvist's journey to the NHL was filled with hard work and dedication. After honing his skills in Sweden's junior leagues, he made his professional debut with Frölunda HC in the Swedish Elite League. His stellar play quickly caught the attention of NHL scouts.

In 2000, the Rangers selected Lundqvist in the seventh round of the NHL Entry Draft, but it wasn't until 2005 that he made his NHL debut. From that point on, Lundqvist established himself as one of the league's premier goaltenders.

FAQ 2: What are some of Henrik Lundqvist's career achievements?

Throughout his illustrious career, Lundqvist achieved numerous milestones and accolades:

Vezina Trophy (2012): Awarded to the NHL's top goaltender.

NHL All-Star (Multiple Times): Recognized as one of the league's best players.

400 Career Wins: Achieved this milestone during his time with the Rangers.

Franchise Records: Holds various Rangers records, including most career wins and shutouts.

The King of Madison Square Garden

Lundqvist's impact on the Rangers extended beyond his on-ice performances. He became a beloved figure in New York City, earning the nickname "King Henrik" for his remarkable consistency, leadership, and charisma.

Madison Square Garden, the Rangers' home arena, witnessed countless unforgettable Lundqvist moments. His ability to make jaw-dropping saves in the clutch earned him the adoration of fans and teammates alike.

FAQ 3: What is Lundqvist's legacy with the Rangers?

Lundqvist's legacy with the Rangers is defined by his exceptional goaltending, leadership, and unwavering dedication to the team. He played a crucial role in guiding the Rangers to the Stanley Cup Finals in 2014, captivating fans with his heroic performances.

Off the ice, Lundqvist was known for his involvement in charitable work and his commitment to the New York community. He established the Henrik Lundqvist Foundation, which supports initiatives focused on health and education for children and families.

A Bittersweet Farewell

In September 2020, Lundqvist announced that he would not return to the Rangers for the 2020-2021 season due to health concerns. This marked the end of an era for the Rangers and their passionate fan base.

Lundqvist's departure was bittersweet, as it marked the end of his playing career in New York. Still, the outpouring of love and support from fans and teammates demonstrated the profound impact he had on the franchise.

FAQ 4: What is Henrik Lundqvist's future in hockey?

While Lundqvist's playing career in the NHL may have come to a close, his love for the game remains. In October 2020, he signed a one-year contract with the Washington Capitals, signaling his intent to continue playing at the highest level. Unfortunately, due to a heart condition, he was unable to take the ice for the Capitals, but his presence and leadership remained invaluable.

In August 2021, Lundqvist announced that he would not be returning to the Capitals, officially ending his playing career. However, his contributions to the sport are far from over. He has expressed his desire to stay connected to hockey in various capacities, including broadcasting and mentorship.

: Henrik Lundqvist, A True Hockey Legend

Henrik Lundqvist's career is a testament to the power of perseverance, dedication, and passion. He rose from humble beginnings in Sweden to become one of the NHL's most iconic goaltenders. His impact on the New York Rangers and the sport of hockey as a whole is immeasurable.

As fans, we may no longer see Lundqvist guarding the net in a Rangers or Capitals jersey, but his legacy will endure. He will continue to inspire the next generation of goaltenders and remain an enduring symbol of excellence both on and off the ice. We wish "King Henrik" Lundqvist the very best in his future endeavors, and we look forward to

Well, So Much For That ...

Mattias Norstrom has retired from the NHL.

The defensive defenseman called it quits today, thus ending my dreams of him returning to New York to solidify the Rangers' blueline.

A Scotty Hockey Hero, Norstrom played more than 900 games of nearly-impeccable defense. He goes down as a part of one of the worse trades in Rangers history, when he was traded with Nathan LaFayette, Ian Laperriere, Ray Ferraro and a draft pick in 1996 to the Los Angeles Kings for Marty McSorley, Jari Kurri and Shane Churla.

A great factoid from his Wiki:

He received much admiration in Sweden during the NHL Lockout in 2004–05 when he rejected to play with any other team than his original AIK Stockholm, no matter what salaries others where offering. The team was playing in the third tier league, struggling to advance, when Norstrom arrived just in time to help them through the playoffs and secure a spot in the second tier league the following year. Not only did he play for free, he also paid his own insurance during his time in AIK.

Is that a class act or what? He is going to return to Sweden to be with his family and told the AP he may become a carpenter. After building such a wonderful career over here, he is sure to have success in his next endeavour.

Best wishes Matty.

 "Well, So Much For That... The Unpredictability of Sports"

In the world of sports, nothing is ever guaranteed. Whether it's a highly anticipated championship run, a superstar player's performance, or a team's quest for glory, there's always an element of unpredictability that keeps fans on the edge of their seats. This article delves into the nature of sports and why, more often than not, we're left saying, "Well, so much for that..."

FAQ 1: Why are sports so unpredictable?

Sports are unpredictable primarily because they involve human elements, both in terms of players and the emotional factor. Here are a few key reasons:

1. Human Performance: Athletes, no matter how skilled, can have off days or experience unexpected injuries. Their performance can be influenced by factors like fatigue, personal issues, or even the pressure of the moment.

2. Opponent Variation: In any sport, there are numerous variables associated with opponents. Team strategies, player abilities, and even luck can change from one game to the next.

3. Emotional Swings: Sports are filled with emotional ups and downs. Momentum, team morale, and the psychological impact of winning or losing can dramatically affect outcomes.

The Championship Drought

One of the most frustrating scenarios for sports fans is when a beloved team experiences a long championship drought. Fans invest their time, energy, and emotions into supporting their team, hoping that this year will be the year they finally win it all. But more often than not, disappointment ensues.

FAQ 2: Why do championship droughts happen?

Championship droughts can occur due to various factors:

1. Competitive Balance: Many sports leagues strive for parity, making it challenging for any one team to dominate consistently.

2. Injuries: Injuries to key players can derail championship hopes.

3. Tough Competition: Facing formidable opponents can make championship victories elusive.

4. Playoff Variability: Playoffs can be particularly unpredictable, with a single bad game or a lucky break deciding a series.

The Superstar's Struggles

Another unpredictable aspect of sports is the performance of superstar athletes. These players are often the face of their respective teams and are expected to deliver exceptional performances consistently. However, even they can face slumps, injuries, or simply a run of bad luck.

FAQ 3: Why do superstar athletes struggle?

Superstar athletes are human, too, and they face a range of challenges:

1. High Expectations: The pressure to perform at an elite level can be mentally taxing.

2. Injury Risk: The physical demands of sports increase the risk of injuries that can affect performance.

3. Adaptation: Opponents and coaches may devise strategies to counter a superstar's strengths.

4. Aging: As athletes age, maintaining peak performance becomes more challenging.

The Cinderella Story

On the flip side of disappointments and superstar struggles, we have the Cinderella stories—those unexpected underdog victories that captivate fans and defy all odds. These stories showcase the beauty of sports' unpredictability.

FAQ 4: Why do underdogs sometimes prevail?

Underdogs can win due to:

1. Motivation: The "nothing to lose" mentality can make underdogs formidable opponents.

2. Teamwork: Strong team cohesion and execution of a well-crafted game plan can overcome disparities in talent.

3. Heart and Desire: Sometimes, sheer determination and passion can carry a team to victory.

: The Rollercoaster Ride of Sports

In the end, the unpredictability of sports is what makes them so enthralling. We tune in to watch not knowing whether we'll witness a thrilling upset or a dominant performance. We invest emotionally in our teams, understanding that heartbreak may be part of the package. And while we may sometimes say, "Well, so much for that..." after a disappointing outcome, it's the unpredictability that keeps us coming back for more.

So, whether you're a die-hard fan of a team in a championship drought, patiently awaiting a superstar's return to form, or hoping to witness an underdog story, remember that the rollercoaster ride of sports is what makes them truly special. In the world of sports, you never quite know what you're going to get, and that's precisely why we love them.

No Heat Wave Can Kill Hockey

As the weather gets hotter and hotter here in New York, my longing for the frozen pond grows exponentially ... and its not even July yet. So, as my brains become scrambled in the torturous heat, I figured what better thing can I do to cool down than to write about a winter sport?

*Larry Brooks asked "are the Blueshirts better off with a combined $6M investment in Rozsival and projected third-pair defenseman (Josef) Melichar, or with a combined $6.5-7M investment in (Brooks) Orpik and, say, impending Montreal free agent Mark Streit"? I would say no, they aren't. Melichar didn't play in the U.S. this year, and didn't do so well when he did, often falling victim to a bum shoulder (more in his Wiki, which was clearly edited by a Pens fan). Rozy was a mess this year, no matter how Brooksie wants to justify it. Orpik is a hitter and Streit is a power play stud - both qualities needed by the Rangers that neither Rozy or Melichar would be able to provide. Although I think Streit and Orpik will end up costing at least a million more than Brooks estimated.

*Jaromir Jagr wants to remain a Ranger. Should he return, he had better play like it ... for the entire season. If he doesn't come back, I said it before: I think Mats Sundin would be a fantastic replacement for around the same cost.

*The Rangers have yet to give out any information about season tickets for next year or even anything about their Eurotrip to open the year. The Tampa Bay Lightning, their opponents in Prague, have had a travel package available for weeks. What could the Blueshirts box office folks be doing? The Rangers have been out since the second round, the Knicks ... hahaha and the Liberty are already well underway.

*I went through some of my archives and noticed a lot of pictures were down. Sorry about that. When I first started I would just grab Yahoo! photos without realizing they dump their archives. I'm not about to go back through all of them (sorry) but have taken some steps to avoid that going forward.

*Its kinda funny: I lament the loss of the Jets, Puck Daddy memorializes the Whalers and this week's Hockey News brings up the Nordiques (no direct link, sorry). Do you think many people will fondly remember the days of the Thrashers and the Predators as fondly?

*And I love the Hockey News. I have read it on regularly for most of my life but they have to improve their production schedule. As a subscriber, I received the June 10th issue on June 7th and it talks about the upcoming Stanley Cup Final series, while the damn parade already made its way through Detroit on the 6th. Jason Kay and the crew have done a really good job trying to make THN not as time sensitive but for things like this, they need to do better and altering the production schedule by condensing it and improving the means they print will help keep them relevant.

*For Wings fans, the Behind The Jersey blog is a must-read by a great young writer but this photo is a little bit unfortunate/perverted/leading for the poor girl, don't you think? Maybe I just have a dirty mind ...

*Pierre McGuire pointed out that the ice at the Igloo wasn't the greatest due to the heat and humidity in the building. As the NHL continues to stretch their schedule into June, don't you think they would prepare for this kind of thing by now? The ice was awful in Florida and Tampa Bay and, well, pretty much everywhere in the states during June hockey. Why wouldn't they have insisted the Pens bring in more dehumidifiers and air conditioning units?

*For everyone who is still salivating over the thought of the next Winter Classic, I just want to again voice my concerns. The Heritage Classic in Edmonton that got the outdoor thing started wasn't nearly as good as the Winter Classic but was so well received because it welcomed back some of the best players in history in an exhibition before the game. The NHL had better have one helluva gimmick up their sleeve for the next one because you just can't replicate what happened in Buffalo.

*Those Winter Classic jerseys will be back as third jerseys next year. The NHL Tournament of Logos has been having a lot of fun pitching other prospective kits so check them out.

*Speaking of jerseys, if anyone hits a garage sale this summer and sees someone selling an Islanders fishsticks jersey in XL for 10 bucks or less, let me know. I want one of those, just for laughs. Maybe I'd get it personalized "HAHAHAHA 94" or something.

*The NHL Draft is again scattered across two days, so they can put the first round in primetime the night before the second through seventh rounds. Simply said, I think its terrible. Aside from a few geeks like me (and probably you), who is going to sit home on a Friday night to watch the draft? And aside from viewership, by splitting up the draft, it kills any kinds of draft parties team might/should hold. I remember going to MSG on the day of the 1999 draft for all sorts of festivities including tours of the locker room, player appearances and bubble hockey. Of course I left early when they traded Dan Cloutier and Marc Savard and drafted Pavel Brendl and Jamie Lundmark, but the party was still a good idea.

*And no time-killing post would be good without some YouTubage so I turn it over to the Sharks fans over at We Bleed Teal for a look at the best NHL commercials.

Ok, that's it. I'm spent. Time to revel in some air conditioning.

 "No Heat Wave Can Kill Hockey: The Chilly Resilience of the Sport"

As summer temperatures soar and people seek refuge from the scorching heat, it may seem counterintuitive to think about a sport played on ice. Yet, hockey, a game that thrives on frigid conditions, not only survives but continues to captivate fans and players alike, even in the midst of a heatwave. In this article, we'll explore the enduring appeal of hockey and why no heat wave can extinguish the passion for this chilly sport.

FAQ 1: Why is hockey played on ice, and how did it become so popular?

Hockey's origins can be traced back to the frozen ponds of Canada in the late 19th century. The game was initially played as a way to enjoy the outdoors during the long, cold winters. Over time, it evolved into an organized sport, with rules and equipment designed for play on ice. Its popularity grew as it spread to other cold-climate regions and eventually worldwide.

FAQ 2: How does hockey adapt to warmer climates and seasons?

Hockey's adaptability is one of its strengths. In regions where natural ice isn't readily available, rinks with artificial ice surfaces allow for year-round play. Moreover, professional leagues like the NHL have expanded into warmer climates, demonstrating the sport's willingness to embrace new markets.

The Resilience of Hockey Fandom

Hockey fans are a dedicated and passionate bunch. No matter how hot it gets outside, they'll find a way to watch their favorite teams and players. Whether it's crowding around a TV in an air-conditioned bar, streaming games online, or attending indoor games, hockey fans are known for their unwavering support.

FAQ 3: How do hockey fans beat the heat to enjoy the game?

Hockey fans have devised creative ways to enjoy the sport in warm weather:

1. Indoor Gatherings: Many fans organize watch parties at indoor venues with large screens and air conditioning.

2. Frozen Treats: Cold beverages, ice cream, and frozen cocktails help fans stay cool while watching games.

3. Streaming and Mobile Apps: With the advent of digital technology, fans can watch games on their smartphones or tablets from the comfort of their air-conditioned homes.

The Thrill of the Ice

One of the enduring attractions of hockey is the sensation of speed and skill on ice. The combination of players gliding effortlessly across the surface, the puck zipping around, and the physicality of the sport creates a unique and exhilarating viewing experience.

FAQ 4: What makes hockey different from other sports?

Hockey's distinct features include:

1. Speed: Hockey is one of the fastest team sports, with players reaching high speeds on skates.

2. Skill: The precise control of the puck, stickhandling, and passing are essential skills that set hockey apart.

3. Physicality: Hockey allows for body checking and physical play, adding an element of toughness.

4. Goal Scoring: The dynamic nature of the game can lead to sudden and dramatic changes in score, making it particularly exciting.

Inclusivity in Hockey

While hockey has traditionally been associated with cold climates, the sport has been making efforts to broaden its reach. Initiatives like "Hockey is for Everyone" aim to make the sport more inclusive, welcoming players and fans from diverse backgrounds and regions.

FAQ 5: How is hockey working to become more inclusive?

Efforts to promote inclusivity in hockey include:

1. Community Programs: Grassroots programs introduce hockey to underrepresented communities.

2. Scholarships: Programs offer financial support to young players, making the sport more accessible.

3. Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives: Teams and leagues are actively promoting diversity and inclusivity in their organizations.

: Hockey's Cool Staying Power

As the world faces rising temperatures and changing climates, hockey remains a symbol of resilience. Its ability to adapt and grow in popularity, even in regions where snow and ice are rare, speaks to the enduring appeal of the sport. Whether you're watching the game from the comfort of air conditioning or cheering on your team in an indoor arena, one thing is clear: no heat wave can kill the passion for hockey. It's a sport that continues to thrive, reminding us that sometimes, the coolest things in life can withstand the hottest challenges.

The End Of Times?

As I search for something else to occupy my time now that the Cup has been raised, the New York Times was there to give me a momentary distraction. The Times asked what we learned this season and what do we have to look forward to next year in their latest edition of Hockey Night in Blogdom. Click here to check it out and scroll down for my answers. I don't know what the future holds for the HNiB posts now that the season is over (I hope they continue!) but if its the last one, I think I went out on a high note.

While I was over there admiring my handiwork, I also read a great article by Lynn Zinser on the Rangers draft philosophy as compared to that of the Stanley Cup Champion Red Wings. Check it out, I have to say that she seems to have hit the nail on the head. I will, of course, address the draft a few more times in coming days but for now feel free to check out two really good mock drafts - Going Five Hole's and My NHL Draft. At the moment I have to say I disagree with the former and agree with the latter as I think a defenseman will be picked either in the first or second round by the Blueshirts, but I still have quite a bit of research to do.

In another programming note, I did my Scotty Hockey Three Stars already but keep an eye out for my first and second team All Stars - the best of the best across the NHL who embody the qualities I hold so dear: the unheralded, real reasons that teams win like the defensive defenseman, the grinder, tough guy, etc.

Just because it is supposed to go over the 90 degree mark here in New York doesn't mean that the ice has melted!

 "The End of Times? Exploring the Phenomenon of Apocalyptic Thinking"

Throughout history, humanity has been fascinated by the idea of an impending cataclysmic event that would bring about the end of the world as we know it. This concept, often referred to as "apocalyptic thinking," has manifested in various forms across different cultures and eras. In this article, we will delve into the phenomenon of apocalyptic thinking, its psychological and sociological aspects, and its enduring presence in our modern world.

FAQ 1: What is apocalyptic thinking, and where does it originate?

Apocalyptic thinking is a belief in a prophesied catastrophic event that will result in significant destruction, followed by a transformative or redemptive phase. It has its roots in religious and mythological traditions, with notable examples including the Biblical Book of Revelation, the Mayan calendar's predictions, and Norse mythology's Ragnarok.

FAQ 2: Why are humans drawn to apocalyptic narratives?

Several factors contribute to the human fascination with apocalyptic narratives:

1. Psychological Intrigue: The idea of a world-changing event piques our curiosity and stimulates the imagination.

2. Existential Concerns: Apocalyptic scenarios force individuals to confront existential questions about life, death, and meaning.

3. Societal Reflection: Apocalyptic narratives can serve as a lens through which societies examine their values, behaviors, and potential consequences.

Historical and Cultural Variations

Apocalyptic thinking has evolved over time and can take various forms:

1. Religious Apocalypse: Many religious texts describe divine judgments and end-time scenarios. For example, Christianity anticipates the Second Coming of Christ and the Day of Judgment.

2. Environmental Catastrophe: In recent years, concerns about climate change and environmental degradation have sparked apocalyptic narratives centered on ecological collapse.

3. Technological Apocalypse: With advancements in technology, some fear the unintended consequences of artificial intelligence or nuclear warfare leading to global devastation.

4. Pandemics and Disease: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to discussions of apocalyptic thinking, with some viewing it as a harbinger of more deadly pandemics to come.

5. Political and Social Collapse: Dystopian narratives often depict apocalyptic scenarios resulting from political strife, societal breakdown, or economic collapse.

The Psychology of Apocalyptic Thinking

Apocalyptic thinking can be understood through psychological lenses:

1. Cognitive Bias: Confirmation bias leads individuals to seek evidence supporting apocalyptic beliefs, reinforcing their convictions.

2. Coping Mechanism: Some people turn to apocalyptic beliefs as a way to cope with anxiety or existential dread.

3. Group Dynamics: Apocalyptic thinking can strengthen group cohesion as individuals seek like-minded communities for support and validation.

FAQ 3: How do individuals reconcile apocalyptic beliefs with the absence of prophesied events?

When apocalyptic predictions fail to materialize, individuals and groups may reinterpret or revise their beliefs. This phenomenon, known as "cognitive dissonance," allows adherents to maintain their faith despite apparent contradictions.

Modern Expressions of Apocalyptic Thinking

Apocalyptic thinking persists in the contemporary world, often manifesting in various forms:

1. Pop Culture: Movies, television series, and literature frequently explore apocalyptic themes. Examples include "The Walking Dead," "Mad Max," and "The Road."

2. Conspiracy Theories: Some conspiracy theories, such as those involving global elites or secret societies, are rooted in apocalyptic narratives.

3. Technological Concerns: Discussions about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence, cyberattacks, and biotechnology can mirror apocalyptic narratives.

4. Climate Change Discourse: The urgency surrounding climate change is often framed in apocalyptic terms, emphasizing the catastrophic consequences of inaction.

: The End is Always Just the Beginning

Apocalyptic thinking continues to captivate human minds, serving as a mirror reflecting our anxieties, hopes, and desires. While the specifics of apocalyptic scenarios may change, the underlying human fascination with transformation, redemption, and the unknown remains constant. Whether seen as a warning or a testament to human resilience, apocalyptic thinking reminds us of our capacity to imagine, adapt, and navigate the uncertainties of an ever-changing world.

Stanley Cup Final Game 6

"2008 Stanley Cup Champion Detroit Red Wings."

What a wonderful thing to read. I was a tad upset when my prediction - Wings in five - didn't work out but right now, I am just happy they won. The Red Wings put on yet another beautiful display of hockey to beat the Penguins 3-2 and win the Stanley Cup. They did it with dignity and grace and showed a certain elegance that other recent champions were unable to attain. Nick Lidstrom showed his class by handing the puck to Dallas Drake because of the veteran's hard work and effort. It wasn't Stevie Y putting it in Vlad's lap, but it was still pretty damn impressive.

I am sure that I will do a bit of a postmortem as well, but here are some thoughts from the game:

*After listening to NBC place Marc-Andre Fleury in the pantheon of great NHL goaltenders during the pregame and the first intermission, it was a true pleasure to see the second and third goals go right through his legs. Soft goals kill and their newly anointed goaltending god killed the Penguins.

*Quick quiz: The officiating was A-Inconsistent B-Infuriating C-Incompetent or D-All of the Above? I'll take D. That late penalty that led to the Pens second goal was a joke. After missing huge penalties all period long, the ref calls a little hook and gives Pittsburgh a gift. However, a nod has to be given because one of the refs was in the perfect position to judge the Wings third goal. There was no quick whistle like there was when Marty Straka scored what would have been the equalizer on Fleury back in the second round.

*Hopefully the demise of the Penguins will be the start of the end of this Italian soccer league style of playing hockey - you know: dive, cry and whine to grab the officials' attention. I don't think it will be - there is too much to gain from power plays - but one can hope. For now I am just happy to see that Cindy's hopes and prayers went unanswered.

*Still, I have to ask, why did Pittsburgh put Adam Hall on the ice with three minutes left while down two goals? I know Max Talbot scored the big goal last game, but still ...

*Brian Rafalski's goal to open the scoring was awesome, if only for the sharp contrast to the typical power plays that I am used to seeing watching the Rangers. Detroit cycled the puck around while keeping a guy in the paint to draw the attention of a defender and the goaltender before Rafalski got a great shot off through traffic to give the Wings a 1-0 goal.

*I also hope that Chris Osgood gets his number retired by Detroit when he retires. Three Cups - two that he was a primary reason for them winning - and over 300 wins in the red and white should assure him a spot in the rafters of Joe Louis.

*As a national broadcaster, NBC should be objective. Instead, the first 15 minutes of the broadcast was spent raving about Pittsburgh - even when interviewing Nick Lidstrom. Leave it to local broadcasters to pick a team to root for, there are fans out there of both squads watching a national telecast. NBC and Versus both did it all playoffs and thank goodness their prize children lost and will not make it to the Finals again anytime soon so I don't have to hear this garbage again.

*Greatest line of the night was by Pierre McGuire on Lidstrom and Rafalski: "They just squeeze the life out of the game." Yes, watching two of the best defensemen in the NHL work (and score) is watching them squeezing the life out of the game. Funny, he didn't say the same when Therrien put Hal Gill or Rob Scuderi on the ice ...

*How is it that when Fleury made a big save, he was treated by NBC as the second coming of George Vezina, but when Osgood made a stellar save, say when he rolled back against his body momentum to get his stick down and stone Gary Roberts during the second period, it was because Roberts couldn't make a good shot ... ???

*While I am picking on NBC, I am glad they got rid of that high power play camera, but they managed to suck more on their replays, setting up the replays too far in advance so they miss most faceoffs. I will repeat what I said earlier in the playoffs - NBC is treating the Stanley Cup Final as just another broadcast rather than something special. If they pulled half of the nonsense they did in these games during the Super Bowl, people would be fired.

*Much respect given to Ryan Malone. He had his face bashed in (broken nose) in Game 5 and played Game 6 without a visor or a cage. Serious man points for being a warrior. Same to Dan Cleary, who took a skate to the face in the third period and finished his shift before coming to the bench for repairs.

*Darren McCarty went from bankruptcy and rehab to raising the Stanley Cup. Wow.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Evgeni Malkin - one goal and one assist.
2-Brian Rafalski - one goal.
1-Henrik Zetterberg - game-winning goal and one assist.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Brian Rafalski - Rafalski's puck movement was key. I was going to give this star to all of the Red Wings defensemen but let's face it, the Penguins were gassed. And once Cindy finally took a real hit, crybaby was pretty much done for the game.
2-Pavel Datsyuk - Where I put Rafalski in for his puck movement, Datsyuk's puck possession was hugely impressive. He seemed to be the linchpin in Detroit's control of the tempo.
1-Henrik Zetterberg - Another Conn Smythe performance in a string of them. Big Z was tremendous in everything that he did - he forechecked, he backchecked, he killed penalties, he made smart passes, he scored. NBC didn't show it but I am sure he drove the bus over to the rink too. Zetterberg secured his place in the discussion for best overall player in the NHL (with Iggy, Vinny 04 and Ovie).

 "The Quest for Glory: Stanley Cup Final Game 6 and the Pursuit of Hockey Immortality"

The Stanley Cup Final, often regarded as the pinnacle of professional ice hockey, is an annual spectacle that captivates fans and players alike. Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final is a moment of unparalleled significance, where history hangs in the balance, and the quest for glory reaches its climax. In this article, we will delve into the intensity and drama that surrounds Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final, exploring its history, memorable moments, and the enduring legacy it leaves in the world of sports.

FAQ 1: What makes Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final so special?

Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final holds a special place in hockey lore for several reasons:

1. Potential Series Decider: In a best-of-seven series, Game 6 often serves as the potential decider. Winning it means capturing the Stanley Cup, while losing extends the series to a dramatic Game 7.

2. High Stakes: The pressure is immense for both teams. The Stanley Cup is within reach, and the margin for error is razor-thin.

3. Historic Moments: Game 6 has witnessed some of the most iconic moments in hockey history, from Bobby Orr's flying goal to Brett Hull's controversial overtime winner.

The History of Game 6 Drama

Game 6 has produced countless memorable moments over the years:

1. Bobby Orr's Flying Goal (1970): Perhaps the most famous goal in NHL history, Orr's overtime winner for the Boston Bruins sealed their Stanley Cup victory and left an indelible image.

2. The "No Goal" Controversy (1999): Brett Hull's triple-overtime goal for the Dallas Stars raised questions about whether he was in the crease, sparking controversy and debate.

3. Ray Bourque's Dream Realized (2001): After a legendary career with the Boston Bruins, Ray Bourque finally lifted the Stanley Cup with the Colorado Avalanche in his final season.

4. Patrick Kane's Series Clincher (2010): Kane's dramatic overtime goal for the Chicago Blackhawks secured their first Stanley Cup in 49 years.

FAQ 2: What emotions run through the minds of players in Game 6?

Players experience a complex mix of emotions in Game 6:

1. Excitement: The opportunity to win the Stanley Cup fuels excitement and anticipation.

2. Nervousness: The pressure to perform at the highest level can lead to nervousness and anxiety.

3. Determination: Players are determined to leave everything on the ice, knowing that victory in Game 6 brings hockey immortality.

4. Fear of Failure: The fear of coming so close to the Cup and falling short is a powerful motivator.

The Legacy of Game 6

Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final leaves a lasting legacy:

1. Iconic Moments: The history of the NHL is enriched by the unforgettable moments that have unfolded in Game 6.

2. Drama and Suspense: The drama and suspense of Game 6 captivate fans and create enduring memories.

3. Hockey Immortality: Winning Game 6 and hoisting the Stanley Cup elevates players to a special place in the annals of hockey history.

4. Fan Devotion: The passion of fans, who pack arenas and watch with bated breath, adds to the mystique of Game 6.

: A Date with Destiny

Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final is more than just a hockey game; it's a date with destiny. It's a moment when the dreams of players, coaches, and fans intersect on the frozen battleground, where legacies are forged, and history is made. Whether it's the elation of victory or the agony of defeat, Game 6 leaves an indelible mark on the hearts and minds of everyone who witnesses it. It reminds us that in the world of sports, as in life, the pursuit of glory is an enduring and captivating journey.