Odds & Ends

Apologies for not posting since the Rick Nash deal but, frankly, haven't been all that inspired. It's been bloody hot outside and not a whole helluva lot is happening in the NHL hockey world ... well, except the slow death spiral towards a lockout. And that is as depressing as the stifling heat and humidity.

Some random topics and random thoughts:

*RIP Bones Raleigh, one of the overlooked all-time Ranger greats. Stan Fischler, of course, knew him and wrote a nice piece that is worth checking out. It is a shame so many terrific players bled Blue and were all but lost in a history that the Rangers have chosen to ignore. You know, 1994 was amazing and all but the team did play 84 other seasons ...

*The news came out that that NBC will pay for this season no matter what, and if there is a lockout then extra year is added onto deal for no rights fee. Interesting. No word on if that means they get days, weeks, months back as well. If so, it may actually behoove the NHL to postpone the start of the season until just before the Winter Classic - that way, on the back end of the deal they have the Winter Classic in their pocket as negotiating power for a new deal. NBC would start the 2021-22 season, and be even more pressured to pay up if they want the sponsor-friendly outdoor game.

*Stop being furious at Gary Bettman. Yes, he is a smug, sleazy, smarmy former lawyer who lies to your face. But he is just a puppet of the powerful NHL owners. Ed Snider, Jeremy Jacobs, Jimmy Dolan - those are the true villains in this labour battle. They are blaming others for their financial mismanagement and capitalizing upon our everlasting passion for pucks to ensure they get away with it. Boardroom typical.

*Several pieces came out about the impact of a lockout on front office employees and on the Winter Classic. But also keep in mind the ancillary impact: spoke to the owner of a MSG-area bar the other day and the thought of losing Ranger fan income is driving him to drink (well, more than usual). After an anemic summer because of the renovation - no concert cash - losing the True Blue boozers could really hurt his business. While his particular pub could/should survive thanks to being in New York, you'd have to imagine other establishments in other cities may not be as fortunate.

*One good thing about a lockout - me looking on the bright side! - is it would give everyone the opportunity to expand their fandom internationally, even if the NHLers aren't allowed to steal jobs (the Elitserien has said no-go). Been to the Scandinavium twice so Frolunda is a certainty in Sweden, loooooved being in Zug (Zurich and Bern, notasmuch) so despite the Rangers losing to them, EVZ ole! Kings Park's Bobby Goepfert plays on the DEG Metro Stars in Germany so that's my DEL team. No love for the Czech league or the KHL, so that pretty much leaves England, Italy and Finland left for me to find teams. Puck around the planet!

*Still really, really hate the Arron Asham signing. Not for hockey purposes - the team needs someone who can and will fight for his teammates (Rupp sure as hell hasn't) but just because he is Arron Asham. It is not quite as egregious as Donald Brashear becoming a Blueshirt, but close.

*Del Zaster wants more than $2.5 million a year. Ha bloody ha.

*It's tough but try to temper your expectations for Chris Kreider this coming season, or whenever they play next. The kid showed he has serious talent, but now teams have seen him and his tendencies against NHL level defenders so they will be more prepared. It will be interesting to see how he fares, especially alongside Nash on the power play.

Wanted to unveil a feature this Friday but it looks like it will take at least another week, so stay tuned.

Odds & Ends

Senator Series Shanabans

For those not following on Twitter, I disagree with Brendan Shanahan's rulings today. Carl Hagelin was suspended for three games for his "elbow" on Daniel Alfredsson and Matt Carkner was suspended for one due to his assault on Brian Boyle.

Shanahan's reasoning was that Hagelin “finishes his check with his arms high, recklessly hitting Alfredsson high with his elbow.” Alright, an elbow high is bad.

Shanahan's reasoning was that Carkner "delivers two punches to Boyle's head, the second of which knocks Boyle to the ice. With Boyle down Carkner continues to throw punches, connecting at least five more times with a player who has chosen not to engage in this altercation." Punching a guy in the head is ok, but continuing to punch a turtle is bad.

These rulings display the utter hypocrisy of the NHL today: one unintentional high hit in the flow of play is three times more egregious than two direct punches to the head and five more to undefined locations upon a prone player's body.

Now add to the equation the $2,500 fine Shea Weber received for grabbing Henrik Zetterberg by the helmet and slamming the Swede's head into the glass. Zetterberg and Boyle were fine, Alfredsson did not return to the game. It is clear that Shanahan bases these punishments not on how egregious the action, but by the fallout of said action.

Shanahan's process is flawed and unfair.

Punishing Hagelin based on the fact that Alfredsson was hurt does not take into account the fact that the 39 year old has a long history of injuries. Alfredsson has not played a full season since his rookie year due to a litany of bumps, bruises and breaks. The laundry list of ouchies includes knocks to his hip, ankle, back, knee, head, jaw and "upper body" so it is of little surprise that a little bit of contact took him out yet again. Wolski gave him his first recorded concussion earlier this season and doctors (and Lindroses) have shown that it is easier to get another concussion once a player has already had one - if Alfredsson does indeed have another, which has yet to be diagnosed. Ryan Callahan took an elbow to the head from Chris Phillips in Game 2 but he didn't collapse like a house of cards so the play wasn't even reviewed.

Hagelin is classy and was, of course, apologetic for hitting his childhood hero. If anything, the way Hagelin handled himself will endear him even more into the hearts of Ranger fans. But he did make things worse by apologizing in his meeting with Shanny - as most kids learn, by saying "sorry" you are admitting that you've done something wrong. Hags may think he did something wrong but personally, I don't think he did. He finished a check and, if Alfredsson wasn't the NHL equivalent of Elijah Price, he would have skated off with a two minute minor, at most.

As for Carkner, he received most of the punishment he deserved in the game. The refs gave him the appropriate 2, 5 and 10 and all that should be left is a beating at the hands of a Ranger. It is not his fault that Boyle bitched out. And to suspend Carkner for a game that he likely would have been benched for makes the ruling even more silly - as an Sens fan explained to me, MacLean has alternated Carkner with Gilroy in recent weeks so it was more than likely that Carkner would have been out anyway.

So the Rangers lose an energetic, capable and clean (24 PIM in 64 games) kid for the next three games while Ottawa goes about business as usual in Game 3 without Carkner. By no means has justice been served, in any form. But what it is is what it is, and the series continues tonight. Let's hope that the Rangers can recover from the loss of Game 2 and the loss of Carl Hagelin - it is all that they can do.

 Senator Series Shanabans - A Deep Dive into Playoff Suspensions

Playoff hockey is known for its intensity, physicality, and high stakes. It's a time when players leave everything on the ice to chase the coveted Stanley Cup. However, with the heightened emotions and physicality, comes the increased potential for disciplinary actions. In this article, we'll take a close look at the Senator Series Shanabans, examining notable suspensions, the rationale behind them, and addressing frequently asked questions (FAQs) about player safety and playoff sanctions.

Section 1: The Playoffs' Physicality

The Playoff Atmosphere: Setting the stage by highlighting the unique intensity and physicality of playoff hockey.

The Role of Player Safety: Discussing the importance of player safety in the modern NHL.

Section 2: Notable Suspensions

A comprehensive examination of some of the most notable playoff suspensions handed out during the Senator Series:

Incident Recaps: Describing the incidents that led to suspensions, including hits, slashes, and altercations.

Impact on the Series: Analyzing how these suspensions affected their respective series and the teams involved.

Section 3: The Shanahan Factor

An in-depth look at Brendan Shanahan's role as the NHL's Senior Vice President of Player Safety and his approach to postseason disciplinary actions:

Shanahan's Decisions: Discussing how Shanahan and his team arrive at decisions regarding suspensions, emphasizing transparency and consistency.

Player Accountability: Exploring the concept of player accountability and the responsibility of maintaining a safe and competitive playing environment.

Section 4: Addressing Common Questions (FAQs)

Answering frequently asked questions about suspensions, player safety, and the playoff environment:

Why are suspensions more common in the playoffs?

An examination of the factors contributing to the increase in disciplinary actions during the postseason.

What impact do suspensions have on teams and their playoff aspirations?

Insights into how suspensions can alter the course of a playoff series and their implications for team success.

Are there any recent rule changes or updates aimed at improving player safety in the playoffs?

A discussion of recent rule changes and safety measures implemented to protect players during the postseason.

Section 5: Conclusion

In the heat of playoff battles, emotions run high, and the intensity reaches its peak. However, it's crucial to strike a balance between the passion of the game and player safety. The Senator Series Shanabans remind us that the NHL is committed to upholding its standards and ensuring that players are safe on the ice, regardless of the postseason stakes. While suspensions may temporarily alter the dynamics of a series, they serve as a powerful reminder that the safety of the athletes remains paramount. As fans, we can enjoy the thrilling moments of playoff hockey while knowing that the league is taking steps to protect its most valuable assets - the players themselves.

NHL Goes Bust In Vegas

Initially I was going to boycott the NHL Awards show for not giving Henrik Lundqvist a nomination for Vezina but I ended up watching anyway. What a bland, boring broadcast of what should have been a fun celebration. The house band played benign jazz but it could just as well been Muzak. Sure the league is loathe to promote the individual over the team but, just as with the All Star Game, this should have been all about the personalities that make up our game. Some more thoughts:

*You couldn't tell the show was in Vegas. Get a lounge act, Elvis impersonator, comedy act, hell, a white tiger or two. Not Chaka Kahn. As an entertainment reporter said to me, 'wow, big get, if it was 20 years ago.'

*Comedy would have been huge as the audience looked like a bunch of bored, mildly annoyed people sitting in a lobby waiting for a job interview.

*Things were so boring that I was hoping Jerry Bruckheimer would announce his intention to bring a team to Vegas while he was on-stage. At least then we would have something to talk about.

*And it looked terrible. Versus, or whoever produced it on site, had trouble balancing the bright colours and most shots looked waaaayy too saturated. Plus, like the Versus game broadcasts, the directors made many questionable camera cuts. At one point when Jean Beliveau was on stage they picked an overhead shot that looked down - we weren't trying to decide if someone scored, we want to see how well respected the elder gentleman of the NHL is.

*On that note, why were there no identifier lower thirds? They splashed this ridiculous thing that covered two-thirds of the screen when the winner was about to speak but not once did they show something that IDed whoever that smug host was (not Roenick). And why was that guy shaking hands afterwards? Is he running for mayor?

*This should have been on the NHL Network instead of Versus, or Versus should have at least allotted more time for it. They could have done so much more with the broadcast, gotten into more detail. Tim Thomas' Vezina acceptance speech (my favourite moment in the show) was truly touching when you consider what he went through to get to the NHL. But how many people know that?

*I know that the players themselves don't get to keep the original trophies - they get those small replicas - but you don't get those good photo ops where the winners would hold those up. Everyone took their little toy and walked away.

*It was incredible seeing Vlad Konstantinov on stage. He should have helped give out the Norris - but I understand the Russian thing early on. I do wonder what was backstage that distracted him so that Igor had to keep getting his attention.

*While hearing Pavel Datsyuk's broken english is amusing, perhaps it would be better to allow him to do his speech in Russian with a translator - then it wouldn't be so awkward. The bilingual Julien did a nice job covering both bases.

*BOOOOOOOO BETTMAN BOOOOOOOOO. Someone had to do it and apparently the folks who paid $500 a ticket weren't about to. What a loathsome little man.

*Kelly Hrudy had problems reading the prompter and Mark Messier ignored it. Mess ... dude, that was terrible. The Captain looked ready to break into tears (of course) as he reflected upon his career and the cold medicine trophy he was about to give out.

*Did I miss it or did they not announce the first, second and all rookie teams on the broadcast? That should have been part of the ceremony - if it wasn't, that's a shame.

And yes, I think Hank got screwed for Vezina. Sure, he didn't deserve to win - that rightly went to Timmy - but he carried a terrible team into the playoffs. Steve Mason had a better defense in front of him and Nik Backstrom's entire team played defense. Hank had Wade Redden. Ah well, there is always next year ...

 "NHL Goes Bust In Vegas: A Look at the Challenges and Consequences"

The National Hockey League's (NHL) venture into Las Vegas, Nevada, was once seen as a bold and exciting move, promising to bring the fast-paced sport of ice hockey to the entertainment capital of the world. However, as time has passed, the NHL's presence in Vegas has faced several challenges and controversies, leaving many to question the long-term viability of professional hockey in the desert city. In this article, we will delve into the challenges faced by the NHL in Las Vegas and explore the consequences of its struggles.

Section 1: The Promise of Vegas

1.1. The Expansion Hype

Explain the excitement and enthusiasm surrounding the announcement of the NHL's expansion team in Las Vegas, the Vegas Golden Knights.

1.2. Unprecedented Success

Discuss the surprising success of the Golden Knights in their inaugural season, reaching the Stanley Cup Final in 2018.

Section 2: Challenges Faced by the NHL in Vegas

2.1. Fanbase and Attendance

Analyze the struggles in building a consistent fanbase in a city known for its transient population and entertainment options.

2.2. Competition with Other Sports

Discuss how the NHL's presence in Vegas has to compete with other major sports leagues and events for attention and attendance.

2.3. Arena Location and Accessibility

Address the challenges presented by the location of T-Mobile Arena and the difficulties fans face in accessing it.

Section 3: Financial Struggles and Ownership Issues

3.1. Operating Losses

Explore the financial challenges faced by the Vegas Golden Knights and the significant operating losses incurred.

3.2. Ownership Concerns

Discuss controversies and concerns surrounding the team's owner, Bill Foley, and his business dealings.

Section 4: Potential Consequences

4.1. Relocation Rumors

Examine rumors and speculations about the potential relocation of the Vegas Golden Knights due to their financial woes.

4.2. Impact on Expansion Plans

Consider how the struggles in Vegas may affect the NHL's future expansion plans and decisions.

4.3. Community Engagement

Discuss the importance of community engagement and outreach in building a sustainable NHL franchise in a non-traditional market.

FAQs

1. Is the NHL's struggle in Vegas solely due to the location?

Explain that while location plays a significant role, other factors such as competition and ownership issues have also contributed.

2. Can the Golden Knights turn things around and become a successful franchise in the long term?

Highlight that with the right strategies and community support, it's possible for the team to overcome its challenges.

3. How does the NHL view expansion in non-traditional markets like Las Vegas now?

Mention that the NHL may become more cautious in its approach to expanding into non-traditional markets, considering the Vegas experience.

The NHL's venture into Las Vegas was a bold experiment that initially showed promise. However, the challenges faced by the Vegas Golden Knights have raised questions about the long-term viability of professional hockey in the city. While it's too early to declare the NHL's presence in Vegas a failure, it is clear that significant obstacles must be overcome to ensure the sport's continued success in this unique and challenging market. The league and the franchise will need to work together to address these challenges and find sustainable solutions, or else the NHL may find itself going bust in the desert.

Judging The Judgement

The word came down earlier that Donald Brashear will be suspended one game for his pregame antics, and five for his hit on Blair Betts.

The one game is basically an "our bad" by the league as it was their fault that he wasn't caught until they saw it on the news after the game. Even if Brash had been properly removed, had Colton Orr been playing you can be sure Brash wouldn't have just gone after any Ranger jersey and instead gone looking to get retribution against the guy who has handed him his lunch before. Or, more likely, gone after the guy who's job would have been to be around him and keep him in line.

Regardless, Brashear made the hit and he has to pay the piper to the tune of five games for it. There are several ways that you have to look at it. Brashear is a prior offender who often attempts to injure his opponents. He is not a skill player, his lone job is to play enforcer for a guy who doesn't need a bodyguard so he doesn't even play night in and night out. (Colton Orr did play every game, until Tortorella's Game 6 folly but we won't go there.)

Chris Simon was a prior offender and a useless goon who 'lost his mind' and hit the first person he saw. Ryan Hollweg took some stitches and was able to play, while Bettsy is done for the year (and perhaps has played his last game as a Ranger, given Sather's stupidity). So you can say that what Brashear did was comparable to, if not worse than, what Simon did and he got a lesser sentence.

The other Chris - Pronger - was also a regular offender and he unleashed a clearer, more vicious elbow at the head of Dean McCammond. That hit was in the playoffs and Pronger got one game for it. At the time they said the length was because of the gravity of the lost game - a Stanley Cup Final. This incident was in the opening round and it was done by someone who wasn't as important to his team and not a superstar. So six games for Brashear seems on the money in comparison to that.

But the final verdict is that you can't compare the events. Puck Daddy believes that the league got it right and that it is a fair ruling because it essentially knocks the role player out for a full series. I personally disagree as it put a player's livelihood at risk with an intentional high hit. If someone decides to play Tim "Dr. Hook" McCracken and chops at a head, you can believe that there will be more than a six game suspension. How is this any different? An intent to injure is an intent to injure. Brashear got hit and he wanted to lash out and hurt someone. And he did.

There has never been a clear-cut ruling to base future events upon. Politics, profile and the personal opinion of the judge all play into the equation. Considering that the track record of said judge is quite dubious, perhaps it is time for a new judge? As that isn't likely to happen, what will occur is that the Caps will get their captain back in the lineup, the Rangers lost their top penalty killer and likely the series and the NHL could very well get the dream matchup of Crosby v. Ovie. I don't subscribe to the conspiracy theory that this was intended from the start - there is still a little integrity left in the front office ... somewhere - but I certainly don't think the league minds.

 Judging The Judgment: Understanding the Role of Judges in the Legal System

Judges are often described as the backbone of the legal system, wielding immense power and responsibility. They play a pivotal role in interpreting and applying the law, ensuring justice is served, and upholding the rule of law. In this article, we will dive deep into the world of judges, exploring their functions, the qualities that make a good judge, and the frequently asked questions surrounding the judicial system.

The Role of Judges

Interpreting the Law: One of the primary functions of a judge is to interpret the law. This involves reviewing the statutes, regulations, and legal precedents relevant to a case and determining how they apply.

Impartiality: Judges are expected to be impartial and unbiased. They must set aside personal beliefs and opinions to ensure that every litigant is treated fairly and equally under the law.

Making Legal Decisions: Judges make legal decisions, including rulings on motions, evidentiary issues, and the admissibility of evidence. They also render final judgments in cases, deciding the outcome and any penalties or remedies.

Sentencing: In criminal cases, judges have the authority to determine the appropriate punishment for defendants who have been found guilty. This may include fines, probation, or imprisonment.

Presiding Over Trials: Judges preside over trials, ensuring that proceedings are conducted fairly and according to established legal procedures. They may also provide guidance to juries and rule on objections raised by attorneys.

Qualities of a Good Judge

What makes a good judge? While there is no one-size-fits-all answer, certain qualities are universally valued in the judicial profession:

Impartiality: A good judge must be neutral and unbiased, treating all parties in a case with equal respect and fairness.

Legal Knowledge: Judges must have a deep understanding of the law and its nuances to make informed decisions.

Integrity: Upholding the highest ethical standards is crucial. Judges must act with integrity and avoid any impropriety.

Decisiveness: Timely decision-making is essential in the legal system. Judges must be able to render clear, well-reasoned judgments.

Patience: Trials can be lengthy and complex. Patience is key when listening to arguments, reviewing evidence, and presiding over proceedings.

Good Communication: Judges need strong communication skills to explain legal concepts to juries, attorneys, and litigants.

Judicial Temperament: Maintaining composure and a calm demeanor, even in the face of pressure or contentious proceedings, is vital.

Frequently Asked Questions About Judges

Can judges be removed from office?

Yes, judges can be removed through various mechanisms, including impeachment (in the case of federal judges in the United States), disciplinary actions by judicial conduct boards, or through elections in some jurisdictions.

Do judges always follow the law?

Judges are expected to follow the law, but interpretation can vary. Judges may have different views on how statutes and precedents should be applied, leading to differing rulings.

How are judges selected or appointed?

The process for selecting or appointing judges varies by jurisdiction. It can involve election by the public, appointment by an executive authority, or a combination of both.

Can judges make decisions based on personal beliefs?

Judges are expected to set aside personal beliefs and make decisions based on the law. Rulings that are influenced by personal beliefs or biases can be grounds for appeal or disciplinary action.

What is judicial activism?

Judicial activism refers to judges interpreting and applying the law in a way that advances their own policy preferences or beliefs, rather than strictly adhering to the text and intent of the law. It is a subject of debate and controversy.

The Importance of an Independent Judiciary

An independent judiciary is a cornerstone of a democratic society. It ensures that the rule of law is upheld, and individuals' rights are protected. Judges must be insulated from political pressures and external influences to make impartial decisions.

Checks and Balances: The judiciary acts as a check on the power of the legislative and executive branches of government. It ensures that laws are consistent with the constitution and that government actions are lawful.

Protection of Rights: Judges safeguard individual rights and liberties. They make rulings that protect free speech, due process, equal protection, and other fundamental rights.

Legal Precedent: Judicial decisions create legal precedent, guiding future cases and helping to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.

Public Trust: An independent judiciary fosters public trust in the legal system. When people believe they will receive a fair hearing in court, they are more likely to respect and comply with the law.

Judges are the unsung heroes of the legal system, working diligently to ensure justice is served and the rule of law prevails. Their role is multifaceted, encompassing legal interpretation, impartiality, and decision-making. Qualities such as integrity, knowledge, and patience are essential in the pursuit of justice. Understanding the importance of judges and their role in maintaining a just society is crucial for upholding the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

Gotta Love The Rangers

The day after the trade deadline, before the 'new-look' team has even stepped on the ice, I got this in my e-mail:


And the best part of it is that they are raping us fans yet again. My season tickets, located in section 329, cost $52 each for a regular season game. For the first round that price is going up to $85!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is a 63% increase by my math. Are you kidding me???? Second round is $92, third is $125 and should the Rangers make the Cup (ha ha ha) my $52 seat goes up to $184 per game. I could only imagine what they are charging for the folks closer to the ice. Oh, and they are charging $25 to mail the tickets to your home. Perhaps the tickets come with the lube, making the package heavier - increasing shipping costs. For those curious, here was my rant about playoff ticket costs last season. Comparing the two, the Garden sees that they need to make the money earlier, thus the higher first round ticket prices.

The utter and complete disregard for the lifeblood of the franchise is disgusting. But then again, we should have expected it from Dolan. And Gary Bettman allows this to go on. For shame. And, of course, I am going to buy the tickets (minus the shipping, I'll pick them up, k? thx). So who is the stupid one here?

Dammit.

 Gotta Love The Rangers: A Journey Through Blueshirt Fandom

Fandom in the world of sports is a unique and passionate phenomenon. It brings people from all walks of life together, uniting them under the banner of their favorite team. For New York Rangers fans, also known as Blueshirt faithful, this sense of unity and devotion is unparalleled. In this article, we'll explore what it means to be a Rangers fan, the team's storied history, unforgettable moments, and answer some frequently asked questions about this iconic NHL franchise.

The Blueshirt Legacy

The New York Rangers, one of the Original Six NHL teams, have a rich and storied history dating back to their founding in 1926. They play their home games at the world-famous Madison Square Garden, making every game a memorable event in the heart of Manhattan. Let's delve into the essence of Rangers fandom:

Original Six Pioneers: As one of the Original Six franchises, the Rangers have a legacy of excellence that dates back to the early days of the NHL. They've won multiple Stanley Cups, cementing their place in hockey history.

Passionate Fanbase: Rangers fans are known for their passion and loyalty. Whether at home or on the road, they proudly don their blue and red jerseys, creating an electric atmosphere that energizes the team.

Madison Square Garden: "The Garden" is hallowed ground for Rangers fans. It's a place where lifelong memories are made, and the team's iconic history is celebrated. The arena's famous ceiling, adorned with banners, tells the story of championships won and legends born.

Unforgettable Moments

Over the years, the Rangers have given their fans countless unforgettable moments. Here are a few that stand out:

1994 Stanley Cup Victory: The Rangers' 1994 Stanley Cup win remains a cherished memory. Mark Messier's iconic guarantee and subsequent hat-trick in Game 6 of the Finals are etched in Rangers lore.

"The Save" by Mike Richter: Mike Richter's miraculous save against Pavel Bure in the 1994 Stanley Cup Finals is often referred to as "The Save." It preserved the Rangers' lead and their eventual championship.

Henrik Lundqvist's Brilliance: Henrik Lundqvist, affectionately known as "The King," provided Rangers fans with over a decade of goaltending excellence, earning the adoration of fans and several franchise records.

"Matteau! Matteau! Matteau!": Radio announcer Howie Rose's famous call of Stephane Matteau's double-overtime goal in the 1994 Eastern Conference Finals against the New Jersey Devils is eternally etched in the minds of Rangers fans.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the significance of the term "Blueshirt"?

The term "Blueshirt" is a reference to the Rangers' blue home jerseys. It has become synonymous with the team and its passionate fanbase.

Who are some of the Rangers' all-time great players?

The Rangers have had a storied history with a roster of legendary players, including Wayne Gretzky, Mark Messier, Brian Leetch, and Rod Gilbert, among others.

Have the Rangers won recent championships?

The Rangers' most recent Stanley Cup victory was in 1994. While they have made deep playoff runs in recent years, they have not secured another championship.

What makes being a Rangers fan special?

Being a Rangers fan means being part of a passionate and historic community. It means celebrating the team's successes and supporting them through the highs and lows, knowing that every game is a chance for something magical to happen.

Being a fan of the New York Rangers is more than just a pastime; it's a way of life. It's about celebrating the team's legacy, reveling in unforgettable moments, and wearing the blue and red with pride. From the Original Six era to the modern NHL, the Rangers have left an indelible mark on the sport, and their fans are an integral part of that legacy. Gotta love the Rangers – it's not just a slogan; it's a heartfelt sentiment that unites generations of Blueshirt faithful.

Horrific

That is the only way one can describe the All Stars skills broadcast on Versus right now. It may be the worst telecast of a sporting event I have ever seen, which includes the disgraceful display that Versus made with indoor lacrosse a few years back. The camerawork is poor, the directing is terrible, they are missing live action for bad-angle replays, they are not showing some replays, the ugly graphics promoting non-hockey garbage are everywhere, the announcers are doing a poor job (sorry Doc) ... wow is this awful.

If the NHL thinks they are going to sell the sport this way, they are sorely mistaken.

Any Publicity Is Good Publicity?

From NHL's daily media advisory today:

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
The Canada-themed Dec. 15 episode of CBS's "How I Met Your Mother" featured a Toronto Maple Leafs jersey.

How desperate is the NHL? They want to point out minutia like this and yet 'sloppy seconds' - which put hockey on every news and sports station - brought out a six game suspension?

*Shaking head*

 Any Publicity Is Good Publicity? The Complex Relationship Between Controversy and Public Perception

The age-old saying, "Any publicity is good publicity," suggests that any mention or attention a person, product, or organization receives, even if it is negative or controversial, can ultimately have a positive impact on their image or success. While this idea has persisted in the realm of public relations and marketing for years, it is not without its controversies and complexities. In this article, we will explore the concept of whether any publicity is, indeed, good publicity, examining its origins, examples, and the nuances that define this complex relationship between controversy and public perception.

I. The Origins of the Phrase

The phrase "Any publicity is good publicity" is often attributed to Phineas T. Barnum, a 19th-century showman and businessman known for his sensational promotional tactics. Barnum's belief in the power of publicity led him to create elaborate hoaxes and engage in various forms of sensationalism to attract attention to his shows and museums. While Barnum may have coined the phrase, its underlying idea has been around for centuries, rooted in the belief that any form of exposure can have a positive impact.

II. The Controversial Nature of Controversy

Controversy, by its very nature, is polarizing. It can capture public attention and generate conversations, but it can also alienate and offend. This duality underscores the complexity of the relationship between controversy and public perception. While some individuals or entities may benefit from the attention generated by controversy, others may suffer reputational damage.

III. Examples of Controversy and Public Perception

a) Celebrity Scandals: Celebrities often find themselves at the center of controversy, whether due to personal behavior, public statements, or legal issues. Some celebrities have successfully leveraged controversy to boost their careers, while others have faced public backlash and professional consequences.

b) Political Controversies: Politicians frequently navigate controversies, and their handling of these situations can significantly impact public perception. Skilled politicians may use controversy to rally their base, while others may see their approval ratings plummet.

c) Corporate Controversies: Companies that find themselves embroiled in controversies, such as product recalls or ethical scandals, face a delicate balancing act. How they respond can determine whether the controversy ultimately harms or strengthens their brand.

d) Media and Entertainment: In the digital age, media outlets and content creators often rely on sensational headlines and controversial content to attract views and engagement. While this strategy may boost short-term metrics, it can also lead to reputational risks.

IV. The Role of Social Media

The rise of social media has amplified the impact of controversy. Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram allow information to spread rapidly, making it challenging for individuals and organizations to control their narratives. Social media also provides a forum for public opinion to be expressed and shared, further shaping the perception of controversy.

V. The Fine Line Between Attention and Damage

One of the key challenges in assessing whether any publicity is good publicity lies in identifying the fine line between attention that boosts an individual or organization and attention that inflicts lasting damage. Factors such as the severity of the controversy, the response to it, and the values and beliefs of the target audience all play a role in determining the outcome.

VI. The Power of Redemption

For some, navigating controversy successfully can lead to redemption and a stronger public image. Individuals who take responsibility for their actions, make amends, and demonstrate personal growth may find that the public is willing to forgive and even support their comeback.

VII. Conclusion

The notion that any publicity is good publicity remains a contentious and debated concept. While there are instances where controversy has indeed led to positive outcomes, it is essential to recognize that not all forms of attention are created equal. The impact of controversy on public perception is highly context-dependent and contingent on numerous factors. As individuals, organizations, and public figures continue to grapple with the complexities of this relationship, the key lies in understanding when to court controversy and when to avoid it, always with a keen awareness of the potential consequences it may bring. Ultimately, the adage "Any publicity is good publicity" is a reminder that in the age of information and social media, managing one's image and reputation is both an art and a science.

No (Sense Of) Humour League

Moments after I left work today I received word that Bettman had suspended Sean Avery for his earlier comments, which he felt were - by the code with which he suspended Sean - "detrimental to the League or game of hockey."

This is, of course, ridiculous. How is golden boy Crosby crying to the referees at every infraction not detrimental to the game of hockey? It isn't very sportsmanlike. How is the league's own disciplinarian clearly having a double standard when it comes to deciding suspensions not detrimental to the game of hockey? Oh wait, neither of those are, because they protect the players whom the league has chosen to promote.

This league can't have any controversy, nor any personality. Look at the new ad for the Winter Classic - the players are drones going about their routines. There are no idiosyncrasies, there is nothing to make them unique. There is only the brand. Gotta uphold the brand. The boring, corporate brand. Because no one would tune in to watch personalty ... /sarcasm

I would say that free speech is a cause worth boycotting, but let's face it, Bettman doesn't care about empty seats in his buildings. Attendance is slipping, revenues are slipping, teams are laying off staff ... he doesn't care. He simply doesn't care. Not about you, not about me and certainly not about the game. He still has his job and the old codgers who hired him and keep him employed are so rich that they don't care about losing some cash on their toy teams. Colourful characters might make some noise, might make those owners actually take a look at their teams and see how in trouble they are. So let's keep everyone quite, let's keep them all regurgitating the same boring, blase cliches because they don't rock the boat. No characters are allowed, no actual emotion is allowed, no free speech is allowed. Especially for people like Sean Avery.

Hypocrisy In Hockey

The NHL has decided to allow goon Brandon Sugden to play this season. Sugden signed retirement papers with the Columbus Blue Jackets in 2006 but was invited to join the New York Islanders training camp. One little thing there, NHL rules state that a player must sit out a full year of professional hockey before being eligible to return from retirement. After retiring from the NHL, he "played" in the LNAH, that Quebec goon league. He had 37 fights in that league, 24 less than the leader but 10 more than Jared Boll, who led the NHL. All 30 NHL teams voted whether to allow Sugden back into the league and four said no. That should have been that but the league listened to his pathetic sob story and decided to break their own rules and let him back.

I know the Isles are left bottom trolling for talent, but to make a big deal of a minor goon like this clown is ridiculous. I am not heartless, I feel bad for his dad, but that should have nothing to do with it.

Bettman and the NHL are clearly against fighting (no matter what they say) so to let a former drug addict in just to make a dying man happy is insane. I don't know if they noticed, but Sugden was banned from a minor league for attacking a fan! The only thing Sugden is capable of doing on the ice is hurting players with actual skill. The NHL had psychos like him before - John Kordic, Link Gaetz, etc. - and have clearly discouraged one-dimensional maniacs since. So why now? Does the league really miss Chris Simon's inexcusable acts that they will allow another homicidal barbarian to join their ranks?

This is a tremendous mistake and I eagerly await the first Islanders/Penguins game so this lunatic can injure the NHL's golden child and give the league what they deserve.

 "Hypocrisy in Hockey: Exploring the Double Standards of the Game"

Hockey, often described as a sport known for its honor and integrity, has, like any other human endeavor, had its fair share of controversies and instances of hypocrisy. From on-ice incidents to off-ice controversies, the sport has grappled with double standards that raise questions about its commitment to fairness and inclusivity. In this article, we will delve into instances of hypocrisy in hockey, exploring the gray areas and addressing frequently asked questions (FAQs) on this complex topic.

Part 1: On-Ice Hypocrisy

1. Enforcement of Rules

Hockey is governed by a strict set of rules, but the enforcement of these rules can be inconsistent. Players may get away with actions that would result in penalties for others. This inconsistency can lead to frustration among players, coaches, and fans alike.

2. Violence vs. Skill

There is an ongoing debate in hockey about the balance between skill and violence. While the NHL and other leagues have taken steps to reduce dangerous hits and fights, there is still a level of tolerance for physicality that can result in injuries and concussions.

3. Star Treatment

Superstar players often receive preferential treatment from officials. They may be less likely to be penalized for infractions, which can create a perception of unfairness on the ice.

Part 2: Off-Ice Hypocrisy

4. Diversity and Inclusion

Hockey has made efforts to promote diversity and inclusion, but there are still challenges to overcome. The lack of representation of minority groups in coaching, management, and leadership roles raises questions about the sport's commitment to inclusivity.

5. Player Behavior

Incidents of off-ice misconduct by players, such as domestic violence or substance abuse, have at times been met with leniency from teams and leagues. This leniency can be seen as a double standard compared to the strict on-ice discipline.

6. Financial Disparities

The financial disparities between players and the average fan can also be viewed as a form of hypocrisy. While players earn significant salaries, ticket prices, and merchandise costs continue to rise, making it challenging for many fans to afford to support their favorite teams.

Part 3: Addressing Hypocrisy in Hockey

7. Consistency in Rule Enforcement

To address on-ice hypocrisy, there needs to be a commitment to consistent rule enforcement. This includes holding all players, regardless of their star status, accountable for their actions.

8. Promoting a Culture of Inclusivity

Off-ice hypocrisy can be addressed by actively promoting diversity and inclusion within the sport. This includes providing equal opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their background, and taking a strong stance against discriminatory behavior.

9. Transparency and Accountability

To address financial disparities and off-ice misconduct, transparency and accountability are essential. Teams and leagues should be transparent about their financial decisions, and players should be held accountable for their actions, both on and off the ice.

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

1. Is hockey more hypocritical than other sports?

Hockey is not inherently more hypocritical than other sports, but it does have its unique challenges and controversies. Every sport faces its own set of issues related to fairness and ethics.

2. Are there examples of positive change in addressing hypocrisy in hockey?

Yes, there have been positive changes in recent years, such as efforts to reduce dangerous hits and promote diversity in the sport. However, there is still work to be done to ensure consistency and fairness.

3. What can fans do to address hypocrisy in hockey?

Fans can support organizations and initiatives that promote fairness, inclusivity, and transparency in the sport. They can also hold teams and leagues accountable for their actions and decisions.

4. How can players contribute to addressing hypocrisy in hockey?

Players can use their platform to advocate for positive change in the sport. They can also lead by example through their behavior on and off the ice, promoting respect and inclusivity.

Hypocrisy in hockey, like in any other aspect of life, is a complex issue that requires ongoing attention and effort to address. While the sport has made strides in promoting fairness, inclusivity, and accountability, there are still instances where double standards persist.

To combat hypocrisy in hockey, there must be a collective commitment from players, teams, leagues, and fans to uphold the principles of the sport. This includes consistent rule enforcement, promoting diversity and inclusion, and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.

Ultimately, hockey's potential to be a beacon of honor and integrity remains within reach. By acknowledging and addressing instances of hypocrisy, the sport can continue to evolve and uphold the values that make it a beloved pastime for millions around the world.

NHL Awards Wrap

I have to keep this brief as its past 7 a.m., I just got home from work, photoshopped the Vezina onto a picture of the fattest man on earth and want to wake up by noon to watch Romania beat on the Italians in Euro 2008. So, lets get right into what happened in Toronto last night:

*Nabby got robbed by Flabby.

*The NHL hates Swedes (Backstrom and Zetterberg should have won; Hank has to watch the Krispy Kream Krybaby win the Vezina; and Nick Lidstrom doesn't count since he sounds like he is from Grand Rapids at this point).

*Bruce Boudreau looks like Mickey Rooney.

*Alexander Ovechkin is a more endearing superstar than Cindy Crosby ever will be.

*Ron MacLean is not funny.

*Not being able to speak English is (thanks Pavel).

*Versus can't tell time.

*Dom Hasek is still bitter about losing his starting job to Chris Osgood, even if Ozzie got him another ring.

*Pat Kane has hot jailbait sisters and his teammates, who are all older than him, are all trying to mack on them. Perverts.

*Surviving a mild case of cancer that didn't stop you from doing something like, say, playing hockey deserves an award.

*The NHL is secretly in love with Sean Avery.

*Billy Smith and Mike Bossy on the same awards show. Where's Dennis Potvin? Probably still out hunting Ulf Nilsson.

*Adam Graves is a better human being than you.

*Mr. Hockey is old. Like, really old. So is Red Kelly.

*Seeing Evgeni Malkin crushed again as a loser doesn't get old.

 "NHL Awards Wrap: Celebrating Excellence on the Ice"

Every year, the NHL awards ceremony is a highly anticipated event that honors the league's top performers, recognizing their exceptional skills, dedication, and contributions to the sport of hockey. In this article, we will take a comprehensive look at the NHL Awards, the winners, and what these accolades mean for the players and the league.

FAQ 1: What are the NHL Awards?

The NHL Awards is an annual event where the league celebrates its brightest stars by presenting a range of awards to players, coaches, and executives. These awards acknowledge achievements in various aspects of the game, from scoring prowess to sportsmanship.

The Hart Memorial Trophy: NHL Most Valuable Player

One of the most prestigious awards, the Hart Memorial Trophy, is given to the NHL's Most Valuable Player. The recipient of this award is typically a player who has had an exceptional impact on their team's success.

FAQ 2: Who are some notable recent winners of the Hart Trophy?

Recent Hart Trophy winners include Connor McDavid, Nikita Kucherov, and Taylor Hall, all of whom demonstrated outstanding skills and leadership on the ice.

The Vezina Trophy: NHL's Best Goaltender

Goaltenders are often the backbone of successful NHL teams, and the Vezina Trophy recognizes the league's best goaltender for their skill, consistency, and performance.

FAQ 3: Who are some legendary goaltenders who have won the Vezina Trophy?

Legends like Dominik Hasek, Martin Brodeur, and Carey Price have all been recipients of the Vezina Trophy, solidifying their places in NHL history.

The Norris Trophy: Excellence in Defense

Defensemen play a pivotal role in the NHL, and the Norris Trophy celebrates the best defensive player who excels in both guarding their net and contributing offensively.

FAQ 4: Can you name some recent Norris Trophy winners?

Recent Norris Trophy winners include Victor Hedman, Brent Burns, and Erik Karlsson, showcasing their exceptional skills on both ends of the ice.

The Calder Trophy: Rookie of the Year

Young talents entering the league often make an immediate impact, and the Calder Trophy honors the NHL's Rookie of the Year for their outstanding debut season.

FAQ 5: Who are some recent standout Calder Trophy winners?

Prominent NHL stars like Elias Pettersson, Auston Matthews, and Artemi Panarin have earned the Calder Trophy, setting the stage for promising careers.

The Selke Trophy: Outstanding Defensive Forward

The Selke Trophy celebrates the league's best defensive forward who excels in shutting down opponents and contributing to their team's success.

FAQ 6: Can you name some recent Selke Trophy winners?

Recent Selke Trophy recipients include Patrice Bergeron, Ryan O'Reilly, and Anze Kopitar, all known for their exceptional two-way play.

The Lady Byng Trophy: Sportsmanship and Skill

Sportsmanship is a cherished aspect of the NHL, and the Lady Byng Trophy recognizes the player who best combines skill, gentlemanly conduct, and dedication to the game.

FAQ 7: Who are some recent Lady Byng Trophy winners?

Notable recent winners of the Lady Byng Trophy include Aleksander Barkov, Ryan O'Reilly, and William Karlsson, who embody the spirit of sportsmanship.

The Jack Adams Award: Coach of the Year

Behind every successful team is a great coach, and the Jack Adams Award honors the NHL's Coach of the Year for their leadership, strategy, and ability to get the best out of their players.

FAQ 8: Can you name some recent Jack Adams Award winners?

Recent Jack Adams Award winners include Barry Trotz, Bruce Cassidy, and Jon Cooper, who guided their teams to remarkable seasons.

The Ted Lindsay Award: Peer Recognition

Formerly known as the Lester B. Pearson Award, the Ted Lindsay Award is voted on by the players themselves, making it a unique accolade that reflects the respect and admiration of one's peers.

FAQ 9: Who are some recent Ted Lindsay Award winners?

Players like Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl, and Nikita Kucherov have been recognized by their fellow NHL players with the Ted Lindsay Award.

: Celebrating Excellence

The NHL Awards ceremony is a special night for players, coaches, and fans alike. It provides a moment to recognize and celebrate the remarkable talent and sportsmanship that define the NHL. Beyond the accolades, these awards serve as a testament to the dedication and passion that drive players to excel on the ice. As we look forward to the next season, we anticipate new contenders and new stories of excellence in the world of hockey. Congratulations to all the winners, and here's to another exciting season of NHL action!

Proof Positive The NHL Hates NY

If the horrifying excuse for officiating hasn't been enough to give the Rangers the disadvantage, the league is now making up more rules to call the Blueshirts on. After yesterday's highly entertaining, exceptional job of screening Martin Brodeur by Sean Avery, the league has decided to legislate against him:

INTERPRETATION OF RULE 75 - UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT

NEW YORK/TORONTO (April 14, 2008) -- National Hockey League Senior Executive Vice President and Director of Hockey Operations Colin Campbell today issued the following advisory on the interpretation of Rule 75 - Unsportsmanlike Conduct: "An unsportsmanlike conduct minor penalty (Rule 75) will be interpreted and applied, effective immediately, to a situation when an offensive player positions himself facing the opposition goaltender and engages in actions such as waving his arms or stick in front of the goaltender's face, for the purpose of improperly interfering with and/or distracting the goaltender as opposed to positioning himself to try to make a play."

So it is perfectly acceptable for the player to wave his arms and stick around, as long as his ass is to the netminder? This is just another arbitrary rule for the incompetent officials to mangle. What happens if the puck is behind the net and is shot out to the point with a guy in the crease? If he doesn't see the puck come out and turn around quick enough, he could be culpable as he moves back and forth looking for the puck.

Say what you want about sportsmanship and honour, Sean Avery played the game within the rules and the amount of press that it got triggered the league to legislate against him. If this wasn't a playoff game, if this wasn't Martin Brodeur, if this wasn't Sean Avery, this rule wouldn't have been made. The league is as childish and immature as they claim Avery to be and its pathetic.

But at the end of the day, they are the people in charge and you can't do anything about it. The best possible solution? The Rangers need to win the Stanley Cup so Avery's name is immortalized forever.

 Proof Positive: Does the NHL Have a Bias Against New York Teams?

Sports fans often have strong opinions about officiating in their favorite leagues, and the NHL is no exception. Over the years, some New York sports enthusiasts have alleged that the NHL has displayed bias against New York teams, particularly the New York Rangers and the New York Islanders. In this article, we will examine some instances that have fueled this perception and delve into the broader discussion of officiating in the NHL.

FAQ 1: Is There Evidence of NHL Bias Against New York Teams?

While there isn't concrete evidence of bias, there have been instances that have raised eyebrows among New York hockey fans. These instances often involve controversial calls, missed penalties, or disciplinary actions taken by the NHL.

Controversial Calls and Missed Penalties

One of the most common sources of frustration for fans is the perception that referees and officials make controversial calls or overlook penalties that should have been called. This can lead to a feeling of bias when such incidents consistently appear to go against New York teams.

Disciplinary Actions and Suspensions

Some fans have also pointed to what they see as inconsistencies in how the NHL handles disciplinary actions, particularly in cases involving New York teams. Instances where players from New York teams receive harsher penalties or suspensions compared to players from other teams can contribute to this perception.

FAQ 2: What Are Some Notable Examples?

While it's important to note that officiating is subjective and open to interpretation, here are a few examples that have led to discussions about NHL bias against New York teams:

Controversial Goal Decisions: Instances where goals by New York teams were disallowed due to goalie interference or offside calls have sparked controversy. Fans argue that similar goals by other teams have been allowed.

Discipline for Aggressive Play: Some fans have criticized the league for what they perceive as uneven discipline for aggressive play. They point to situations where players from New York teams received suspensions for actions that went unpunished for players on other teams.

Penalty Disparities: In some games, there have been significant disparities in the number of penalties called against New York teams compared to their opponents. Fans often cite these discrepancies as evidence of bias.

The Bigger Picture: Officiating Challenges in the NHL

It's important to remember that officiating is a challenging aspect of any sport, and the NHL is no exception. The speed and physicality of hockey make it particularly difficult to make split-second decisions.

While the perception of bias against New York teams exists among some fans, it's essential to acknowledge that officiating in the NHL is a complex and challenging task. Mistakes and controversies will inevitably occur in any sport. While some instances may fuel the perception of bias, they should not overshadow the hard work and dedication of the officials who strive to maintain the integrity of the game.

In the end, the passion of fans is what makes sports so thrilling, and discussions about officiating are an integral part of that passion. Hockey fans in New York, like those in other cities, will continue to support their teams and voice their opinions, whether they believe the NHL has a bias against their beloved Rangers or Islanders or not.

Penalizing Based On Prestige

The great band Thin Lizzy released a classic song called "Bad Reputation" back in the '70s that is quite relevant to the current situation in the NHL - the lyrics are below, and music video here.

You got a bad reputation
That's the word out on the town
It gives a certain fascination
But it can only bring you down

You better turn yourself around
Turn yourself around
Turn it upside down
Turn yourself around

You had bad breaks well that's tough luck
You play too hard too much rough stuff
You're too sly so cold
That bad reputation has made you old

Turn yourself around
Turn yourself around
Turn it upside down
Turn yourself around

Penalizing players based on their reputation is a topic that recently was debated when Chris Pronger was awarded a paltry eight game suspension compared to Chris Simon's 30, as they both committed the heinous sin of stomping. To be honest, I didn't address it as there is no way justice would be served - Pronger deserved to be thrown out of the playoffs for elbowing but got one game because he is Chris Pronger, EA Sports coverboy and a Hart and Norris Trophy winner. And as for Simon, well I felt he should have been banned from hockey for being a barbarian.

So why bring it up?

Because tonight the Rangers are facing the Flyers and Ryan Hollweg will make his return to the lineup. Hollweg, who was on Gary Bettman's hit-to-hurt list along with Jordin Tootoo and Derek Boogaard, was getting penalized pretty much whether or not he actually did something wrong. Earlier this season he was elbowed by Alex Kovalev and the refs did nothing, setting up his outrageous hit on Sergei Kostitsyn. So what happens? Hollweg gets physically hurt and his reputation gets hurt yet again. Meanwhile, it was his reputation that averted the refs eyes in the first place.

Holly isn't the only one - Dan Carcillo, the NHL's penalty minute leader, is in the same situation, except the refs have a no tolerance policy - as in, they can't tolerate him so the second he does anything, he gets slapped with a 10 minute misconduct in addition to the initial penalty. He has eight 10 minute misconducts and four game misconducts in 50 games. The officiating has done well to slow the development of what could be a solid NHLer (he has eight goals and nine assists to go with his 299 pims). He isn't the only one; the Flyers Steve Downie has slowly gotten more and more irrelevant as he learned the officials were out to get him (and with some cause, as he did this and this).

But what about Colton Orr? He carries around the goon label (and rightly so) but got the same penalty as Andrew Peters when Peters hit him from the bench. Orr stood up for himself when Peters reached out from the bench and instigated with a punch amd they both got 10 minute misconducts. That is just inconceivable!

There is a distinct difference between inconsistent officiating, and incompetent officiating. The former has been prevalent since we got out of the lockout, and the latter seems to be sticking its ugly head out more and more in recent months. Now I do not think this is purely the fault of the NHL's on-ice officials, it goes up the administration through director of officiating Stephen Walkom and even Colin Campbell to none other than your friend and mine, Gary Bettman.

In his role as owners' pet, Bettman has come out and publicly admonished excessive violence in the league. While he gives lip service to allowing fighting, its clear that he will eventually call for its banishment. Rather than come out and make the bold move of eliminating fisticuffs outright, he works behind the curtain. He sets the ball rolling to smash 'smaller' players like Hollweg, Carcillo and Orr while steering it clear of guys like Pronger. Pronger is marketable, so he is allowed to do whatever he wants. Hell, Cindy Crosby hooks and harasses players constantly, but since he is the poster boy, he has been given all of 37 pim in 49 games.

Bettman plays the part of Animal Farm's Napoleon and he maintains the same dictum that "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." George Orwell's book was an allegory of Soviet communism and the NHL's commissioner acts the underhanded pig. Unfortunately, just like the Soviets, his communist commune will fall but hopefully it won't take the entire sport down with him when it does.

 Penalizing Based on Prestige: A Look at the NHL's Officiating and Its Impact on All Teams

The National Hockey League (NHL) is known for its passionate fan base, competitive spirit, and exciting gameplay. However, one aspect of the league that has generated controversy over the years is the consistency and fairness of officiating. This article explores the perception of penalizing based on prestige, where star players or successful teams are treated differently by officials, and its potential impact on the league as a whole.

FAQ 1: What Is Penalizing Based on Prestige?

Penalizing based on prestige refers to the belief that star players or successful teams receive favorable treatment from NHL officials when it comes to penalties. Some argue that officials are more lenient with star players or well-established teams, allowing them to get away with infractions that other players or teams would be penalized for.

The Perception of Star Treatment

Star Players and the "No Call": It's not uncommon for star players, such as Sidney Crosby or Connor McDavid, to avoid penalties in situations where lesser-known players might be penalized. This perception leads to frustration among fans, who feel that the rules are not consistently applied.

Successful Teams and Power Plays: Successful teams, especially those with large fan bases, are often believed to receive more power play opportunities. Critics argue that officials may be influenced by the desire to keep popular teams competitive and draw larger audiences.

FAQ 2: Is There Concrete Evidence of Penalizing Based on Prestige?

The issue of penalizing based on prestige is largely based on anecdotal evidence and fan perceptions. While there have been instances where star players or successful teams appear to benefit from favorable calls, it's challenging to quantify the extent of this bias.

The Impact on the NHL

Competitive Integrity: The perception of inconsistent officiating can erode the competitive integrity of the NHL. Fans want to see a level playing field where rules are applied consistently to all teams and players. When this perception is violated, it can lead to disillusionment.

Fan Frustration: Fans of teams that are not considered "prestigious" may feel that their teams are unfairly treated. This can lead to frustration and, in extreme cases, disengagement from the sport.

Emphasis on Star Power: Penalizing based on prestige can put too much emphasis on star players, potentially overshadowing the team aspect of hockey. This can have long-term consequences for the development of young talent and the overall competitiveness of the league.

FAQ 3: What Steps Can the NHL Take to Address This Issue?

Addressing the issue of penalizing based on prestige requires a multi-pronged approach:

Transparency: The NHL can improve transparency by providing clearer guidelines to officials on how to interpret and enforce the rules consistently. This includes educating officials about the importance of impartiality.

Accountability: Implementing a system for reviewing and assessing officials' performance can help identify and rectify any biases that may exist. This could involve independent oversight of officiating.

Diversity and Inclusion: Expanding the pool of NHL officials to include a more diverse range of backgrounds and experiences may help mitigate potential biases.

Fan Engagement: The NHL should actively engage with fans to address their concerns and provide a platform for feedback. Fan surveys and forums can be valuable tools for understanding and addressing issues related to officiating.

: The Need for Fair and Consistent Officiating

In a league as competitive as the NHL, the integrity of the game relies on fair and consistent officiating. While penalizing based on prestige may be a perception rather than a proven fact, it's a perception that can harm the league's reputation and alienate fans. The NHL must take proactive steps to address this issue, ensuring that all teams and players are treated equally under the rules. Ultimately, fair and consistent officiating benefits not only the fans but also the league itself, fostering a stronger and more inclusive hockey community.

Sometimes I Wonder ...

I really have no idea what in the world the NHL is thinking. The league named the full roster for the Eastern Conference just now and the lone Rangers representative is ...

*drum roll*

Scott Gomez???

Simply said, the league screwed up. No, not because they didn't name Henrik Lundqvist - the King played himself out of a spot after his torrid start. The Rangers representative in the corporate, I mean, midseason classic should have been Michal Rozsival. Instead they have a defensive corps of Andre Markov, Zdeno Chara, Brian Campbell, Sergei Gonchar, Tomas Kaberle and Kimmo Timonen.

Markov and Chara are the starters, no argument there. Campbell has one more point in one less game and has been probably the best player on the Sabres so he is fine. Gonchar plays with Cindy and, of course, has a ton of points, the most among Eastern defensemen. Kaberle has almost the same numbers as Rozy but was the only Toronto player to make it, which is puzzling (I'll get to that later). But Timonen doesn't belong in the ASG. Having watched several Flyer games - including last night - he has been solid, but utterly unspectacular. Plus, Mike Richards was named as one of the forwards so he is already representing Philly. Timonen has seven less points than Rozy (albeit in four less games), is the same -2, has no shorthanded points to Rozy's two and averages 10 seconds less ice time per game. So the two are comparable but Rozy has the edge.

In his place, the league named Gomez to the team ... over Evgeni Malkin, Marc Savard, Danny Briere, Ray Whitney, Corey Stillman, Zach Parise and Alex Kovalev - all of whom have more points on teams higher than the Rangers in the standings. Not to mention the omission of Mats Sundin, which is a mistake as such a respected veteran of the game should have gotten waved in at this point in his career - especially since he has 48 points in 44 games and is +10 on the horrid compost heap of the Leafs.

I imagine Toronto talk radio decrying the injustice and for once they would be right. But, considering that the game is at 6 p.m. on Versus on January 27th, not a lot of people (at least in the States) will be watching so it really doesn't matter now, does it?

 Sometimes I Wonder... Exploring the Complexities of Life's Questions

"Sometimes I wonder..." – a phrase that often prefaces moments of introspection, curiosity, and contemplation about the complexities of life and the universe. In this article, we embark on a journey to explore some of the profound questions that arise in our minds, from the mysteries of existence to the intricacies of human behavior. As we delve into these contemplative moments, we'll also address frequently asked questions (FAQs) that accompany the quest for understanding life's mysteries.

Section 1: The Wonders of Existence

1.1 Why Are We Here?

One of the most profound questions humans ponder is the purpose of our existence. Whether rooted in philosophical, religious, or existential beliefs, the question "Why are we here?" invites contemplation about the meaning of life.

1.2 The Universe and Beyond

Contemplation often extends to the universe and its vastness. Questions about the origins of the cosmos, the existence of extraterrestrial life, and the nature of black holes provoke awe and wonder.

1.3 The Passage of Time

Time is a constant companion in our lives, yet its nature remains enigmatic. We ponder the passage of time, the concept of eternity, and the impact of our brief moments in the grand timeline of the universe.

Section 2: The Complexities of Human Behavior

2.1 Understanding Emotions

Emotions are integral to the human experience, but they often elude complete comprehension. We wonder about the origins, triggers, and nuances of emotions like love, happiness, and grief.

2.2 Morality and Ethics

Questions of morality and ethics challenge our notions of right and wrong. We ponder the nature of good and evil, the foundations of ethical systems, and the complexities of decision-making.

2.3 The Human Mind

The human mind is a labyrinth of thoughts, memories, and perceptions. We wonder about the limits of human intelligence, the mysteries of consciousness, and the nature of free will.

Section 3: The Quest for Knowledge

3.1 Scientific Discoveries

Scientific wonderments continue to unravel the mysteries of the natural world. We explore the groundbreaking discoveries in physics, biology, and astronomy that expand our understanding of the universe.

3.2 Technological Advancements

Advancements in technology are transforming our lives. Questions about the impact of artificial intelligence, the potential of space exploration, and the ethics of biotechnology arise as we navigate an ever-evolving world.

3.3 The Search for Truth

The pursuit of truth is a fundamental human endeavor. We wonder about the role of philosophy, science, and spirituality in uncovering the deeper truths of existence.

Section 4: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

4.1 Is there a definitive answer to the question of life's purpose?

The question of life's purpose is deeply subjective and varies from person to person. Some find purpose in family, career, or personal passions, while others seek meaning through spiritual or philosophical beliefs.

4.2 What are some common strategies for dealing with existential questions and uncertainties?

Strategies for dealing with existential questions include self-reflection, seeking guidance from mentors or therapists, exploring spirituality or philosophy, and engaging in meaningful activities that align with one's values.

4.3 Why do humans have a natural inclination to wonder and seek answers?

Curiosity and the pursuit of knowledge are fundamental human traits. Our capacity for wonder and inquiry has driven scientific, cultural, and philosophical advancements throughout history.

4.4 How can contemplating life's mysteries enrich our lives?

Contemplating life's mysteries can lead to personal growth, a deeper appreciation for the world, and a sense of wonder. It can also foster empathy, intellectual curiosity, and a greater connection to others.

4.5 Are there limits to what humans can know and understand about the universe and existence?

While humans have made significant strides in understanding the universe, there may be inherent limits to our knowledge due to the vastness and complexity of the cosmos. However, the pursuit of knowledge remains an essential human endeavor.

"Sometimes I wonder..." is an invitation to embark on a journey of curiosity and introspection, a testament to the human spirit's innate desire to understand the world and our place within it. The questions that arise from these contemplative moments propel us forward, driving scientific inquiry, philosophical discourse, and the exploration of the human experience.

As we navigate the complexities of existence, we must remember that the quest for answers is as meaningful as the answers themselves. The act of wondering, exploring, and seeking understanding is a testament to the richness of the human experience, reminding us that life's mysteries are an integral part of what makes our journey both fascinating and profound.