Bashing Brash, Day 1

Glen Sather was right, there will be cheers for Donald Brashear at MSG. Given the price increase at MSG, more and more of the diehard, knowledgeable hockey fans have been pushed out. This is not to say that there aren't some puckheads who will root for Brash - you see Redden and Poti jerseys out there, so there are misguided members of the faithful - but the vast majority will not get behind a player with Brashear's history. The cheers will come, however, from the few corporate clients that come - they don't know the game, they don't care about the game, they just want to see a little violence.

And Donald Brashear will certainly provide that. Brashear is a vicious fighter who throws punches with little-to-no regard for personal safety. When Colton Orr would just start launching punches, you knew he was in trouble. He was a more surgical striker who used his size and leverage to work in his defense while he picked his spot for the big blasts. Whether in tight or at arms length, Brash just rears back and throws. I want to trash Brash for it, but let's face it - it has worked for him. He will hit the 1,000 game mark this season, no small feat for a brawler.

The question is how much fighting will he actually do? According to Hockeyfights.com, the past-his-prime brawler had just 11 fights last season and has not had more than 15 in a season since 2002. Just how prolific can he be? Glen can claim that Brashear will fit in Tortorella's system well but Brash scored double digits in goals just once in his career, back in 2000. So since he isn't about to score, what will he contribute to the system? A forecheck of high elbows, slashes and cross checks?

Aside from the outright bitch-slap to the faces of the True Blue and every player in the locker room, the decision to sign Brashear is a slap in the face of the sport. He blatantly ignores the Code on the ice but teams keep picking him up because of the success of all-out-warfare fighting style. It has gotten him suspended time after time from the NHL and even suspended for a dozen games in a league based around fighting! At the time brash put it back on the league, saying that everyone there was picking on him, trying to make a name for themselves.

I'm sorry, there is no excuse for breaking the Code. It is Brashear's readiness to denigrate our sport with his barbarity that I loathe him and won't be among those cheering when he steps out on the ice in a Blueshirt this fall or any other time.

So, each day this week, I am going to post a YouTube of the animal in action. Today's fine feature will be the Quebec senior league incident that caused the aforementioned 12 game suspension:

And Glen Sather signed this guy.

 "Bashing Brash, Day 1: The Complex Career of Donald Brashear"

Donald Brashear, a name that often elicits strong reactions from hockey fans and players alike. In this article, we embark on a journey to explore the complex career of Donald Brashear, a man who played the role of both enforcer and skilled player during his time in the NHL. We'll delve into his background, playing style, notable moments, and controversies. Additionally, we'll address frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide a comprehensive view of this polarizing figure in hockey history.

Section 1: The Early Days

1. From Quebec to the NHL

Donald Brashear was born on January 7, 1972, in Bedford, Indiana, but grew up in Val-Bélair, Quebec. We explore his early life and the path that led him to the National Hockey League.

2. The Enforcer Emerges

Brashear's reputation as an enforcer began to take shape during his junior hockey days. We examine the pivotal moments that shaped his identity as a tough player on the ice.

Section 2: Brashear's Style of Play

1. The Enforcer's Role

In a league known for its physicality, Brashear embraced the role of the enforcer. We discuss the responsibilities and challenges that came with being a protector of teammates.

2. Surprising Skills

While often associated with fighting, Brashear possessed surprising hockey skills. We explore his ability to contribute offensively and his versatility as a player.

Section 3: Notable Moments

1. Memorable Fights

Brashear engaged in numerous memorable fights during his career, squaring off against some of the NHL's toughest enforcers. We revisit some of these iconic battles.

2. Unexpected Goals

Despite his role as an enforcer, Brashear occasionally found the back of the net in surprising fashion. We highlight some of his most unexpected goals.

Section 4: Controversies and Incidents

1. On-Ice Incidents

Brashear's career was not without controversy. We delve into some of the on-ice incidents and altercations that made headlines during his time in the NHL.

2. The Marty McSorley Incident

One of the most infamous incidents involving Brashear was the Marty McSorley stick-swinging incident. We explore the aftermath of this controversial event.

Section 5: Impact on the Sport

1. The Role of Enforcers

Brashear's career coincided with a period of debate about the role of enforcers in the NHL. We discuss the evolving perspectives on fighting in hockey.

2. Brashear's Legacy

Beyond the controversies and fights, Brashear's legacy includes his post-retirement endeavors, such as coaching and his contributions to the hockey community.

Section 6: FAQs About Donald Brashear

1. How many fights did Donald Brashear engage in during his NHL career?

Brashear participated in over 200 fights during his NHL career, establishing himself as one of the league's most prominent enforcers.

2. Did Donald Brashear ever win any championships during his NHL career?

While Brashear did not win a Stanley Cup during his career, he did reach the Stanley Cup Finals with the Vancouver Canucks in the 1993-1994 season.

3. What were some of the most memorable fights involving Donald Brashear?

Some of the most memorable fights involving Brashear include his battles with Bob Probert, Georges Laraque, and Tie Domi, among others.

Donald Brashear's career in the NHL was marked by physicality, versatility, and controversy. As an enforcer, he played a vital role in protecting his teammates, but he also possessed surprising hockey skills that often went unnoticed. His legacy is a complex one, with debates about the role of enforcers in hockey continuing to this day. This article serves as the first chapter in our exploration of Brashear's career, shedding light on the man behind the enforcer's role and setting the stage for a deeper dive into his impact on the sport of hockey.

Bring Back The Brawler!

Larry Brooks mentioned in his Sunday column that:

"The Rangers, by the way, have made no effort to re-sign Colton Orr, who will have no trouble at all scoring a multi-year deal within hours of the opening of the market. We're told Florida is keenly interested in the heavyweight."

Orr simply has to be re-signed by the Rangers. Sure John Tortorella doesn't care for fourth lines, doesn't care for fighters and wants to make the team faster. It doesn't matter: Tortorella and the Rangers need Colton Orr.

It is no coincidence that the first time that Colton Orr was scratched all season long was the only one where a Ranger was seriously injured. As I said back then, had Orr remained in the lineup Donald Brashear would have had someone to worry about on the ice. Instead he had free reign to hit whomever he liked and he did, costing the Rangers their top defensive forward and penalty killer Blair Betts.

Colt missed eight games in '07-08 and the enforcer role had to be passed around; the results weren't pretty. Remember Brandan Shanahan wrestling Steve Ott? Or Dubi holding on for dear life against Mike Komisarek? Horrifying.

Orr made $550k last season with a cap hit just under that. Aaron Voros made $1.2m with a cap hit of a cool mill - exactly what it will be the next two seasons. Waive him, send him to the minors and offer Orr that much money and the tough guy should stick around. Sather was willing to realize his mistake with Fritsche and Rissmiller, it is time he finished cutting ties with the triumverate of mediocrity.

Voros proved that not only can't he skate/stickhandle/score/pass/check but he can't fight either. Dane Byers and Justin Soryal both may be able to take care of themselves but they are both kids. Byers has the tools to be a power forward and shouldn't destroy his hands fighting every Flyer, Islander and Devil goon. Soryal might be able to turn into a major league tough guy but he has to get more experience and take his damned visor off first. No matter their youthful exuberance and willingness to throw down the mitts, neither one can step into the skates of a tough guy like Orr.

Orrsie is a top-five NHL heavyweight and in the seemingly never-ending grind of the regular season, having a player like that is invaluable in keeping the skill players safe and the fans interested. Sather shouldn't let him get away.

 "Bring Back The Brawler: The Role of Enforcers in Hockey"

Hockey is a sport known for its speed, skill, and physicality. While skillful plays and spectacular goals often take center stage, there has always been a place in the game for players who excel in a different aspect: the enforcers. These rugged and fearless individuals are known for their willingness to drop the gloves and protect their teammates, making them an integral part of hockey history. In this article, we'll explore the role of enforcers in hockey, the evolution of their role, and the debate surrounding whether it's time to bring back the brawler.

Section 1: The Enforcer's Historical Role

1.1. The Birth of Enforcers

Explain how the concept of enforcers emerged in hockey, dating back to the early days of the sport.

1.2. Intimidation and Deterrence

Discuss how enforcers have traditionally served as a deterrent to dirty plays and provided a sense of security for skill players.

Section 2: The Changing Landscape

2.1. Rule Changes

Explore how rule changes, such as stricter penalties for fighting, have affected the role of enforcers in the modern game.

2.2. Emphasis on Speed and Skill

Discuss the shift in focus towards speed and skill in the NHL and its impact on the demand for enforcers.

2.3. Safety Concerns

Acknowledge the increasing concern for player safety and the long-term consequences of fighting.

Section 3: Arguments for Bringing Back the Brawler

3.1. Protecting Skill Players

Argue that enforcers can still play a vital role in protecting skill players from dangerous hits and cheap shots.

3.2. Maintaining Accountability

Highlight the idea that having enforcers on the ice can hold players accountable for their actions.

3.3. Providing Entertainment

Acknowledge the entertainment value that fights bring to the game and how they can energize both players and fans.

Section 4: Arguments Against Bringing Back the Brawler

4.1. Declining Relevance

Discuss how enforcers have become less relevant in a game that prioritizes speed and skill.

4.2. Safety and Health Concerns

Address the growing concern about player safety and the potential risks associated with fighting.

4.3. Evolution of Hockey Culture

Explore how the culture of hockey has shifted towards a more inclusive and sportsmanlike approach.

FAQs

1. Can enforcers coexist with the modern style of play?

Explain that while enforcers can adapt to the modern game, their role may be limited compared to the past.

2. Are there any current players who embody the enforcer role?

Mention a few players who still embrace the enforcer role but emphasize their rarity.

3. How can the NHL balance player safety and the desire for physicality?

Suggest that the NHL can achieve a balance through stricter penalties for dangerous plays and a continued emphasis on player safety.

The debate over whether to bring back the brawler in hockey remains a contentious one. While some argue that enforcers play a crucial role in protecting skill players and maintaining accountability, others believe that the game has evolved beyond the need for fighting. As the NHL continues to adapt to changing dynamics and priorities, the role of enforcers may continue to evolve. Regardless of the outcome, one thing remains clear: the enforcer will always hold a special place in hockey history, reminding us of a time when toughness and fearlessness were celebrated on the ice.

Letter To The Editor

... it's not like Ottawa GM Bryan Murray is going to trade the highly skilled [Jason] Spezza for Colton Orr, the Rangers enforcer who might actually have been the worst full-time NHLer in the league this year. Orr managed just one goal and five points despite appearing in all 82 regular season games. And while he didn't see a lot of ice time (6:29 per game), he still had one of the worst plus-minus ratings in the league (minus-15). --Sam McCaig, "Anti-Awards Full Of Stars", page 14 of The Hockey News, May 11, 09/Vol. 62 No. 24.

That was actually published in the bible of hockey, which I was reading on the way home from work just now. It made me a bit ... frustrated so I decided to submit a letter to the editor in response when I got home and figured I would share in here as well:

I understand that The Hockey News doesn't hold much regard for fighting in hockey (in it's current state at least) but for the top hockey publication to summarily dismiss the contributions of one of the top pugilists - even in a column - is irresponsible.
In the Anti-Awards piece of the May 11th issue, Sam McCaig said that New York Ranger Colton Orr "might actually have been the worst full-time NHLer in the league this year." He followed up the claim with some statistics, all of the offensive variety (points, ice time and +/-).
Mr. McCaig neglected to point out that New York was among the league leaders in fewest games lost to injury, something that has a lot to do with luck and a lot to do with Colton Orr's presence. Having one of the top enforcers in the game helped dissuade opposing teams from borderline or outright illicit actions against its players. Case in point: Orr was taken out of the lineup for two playoff games and one of the opposition players felt he had the license to take out a Ranger. Would Orr's presence have stopped Donald Brashear from breaking Blair Betts' face? Not necessarily. But would Brashear have had other things to concern himself with while out on the ice had Orr been there? Certainly.
Just because a player couldn't positively contribute to Mr. McCaig's fantasy hockey team shouldn't give him the right to slur one of the unsung heroes of the game.
Thank you for your time.

So, what are your opinions? Was Colton Orr the worst player in hockey? As many of you are Ranger fans I can guess your answer so feel free to express who you think was the worst player in the game was. And no, you can't use DP as an answer as the Islander goalie really wasn't in the game at all. Five games, franchise goaltender, 12 more years to go. Ha ha!

Letter To The Editor

Blueshirt Brawlers

Talk about limiting and even eliminating fighting is everywhere nowadays and I am not about to get into just how stupid I see it (very, very stupid). Instead, I wanted to take a look at a half dozen of the top tough guys in Ranger history. These are guys who made sure that the other team stayed in line - no, Aaron Voros didn't make the cut. I know you are shocked. It wouldn't be right to rank them, as one could hardly compare Ching Johnson to Tie Domi as they played in two entirely different eras and had different roles.

There are some players well worthy of consideration that I omitted, I know - feel free to make their cases in the comments. I admittedly leaned upon the stellar writing of hockey historian Joe Pelletier for Johnson. Every Ranger fan should spend some time reading his profiles of Ranger legends - it is a wonderful history lesson about all of the guys that the franchise has undeservedly forgotten about (and some they haven't). It was a little surprising that Joe didn't have Lou Fontinato but Leapin' Louie made my list:

*Ching Johnson - Ching played defense in the early days of the Blueshirts and by all accounts was the best defensive defenseman in team history. Partnered first with Taffy Abel and then Earl Seibert, they gave the Rangers a shutdown pairing that has been unseen in the Garden henceforth and rarely rivaled around the NHL. Ching's real name was Ivan, and he earned his nickname "Ivan the Terrible" by being the toughest sonofabitch on the block (50th and 8th). He was the backbone of two Stanley Cup winners and assuredly would have won the Norris Trophy if it existed back then (the first was awarded in 1954). The closest players in recent history to compare to him that I can imagine would be a Scott Stevens or Zdeno Chara.

*Lou Fontinato - He may have looked like a frail old man a few weeks ago at Bathgate/Howell night but Fontinato was a big time tough guy. He fought everyone from Gordie Howe to Rocket Richard to Frank Mahovlich and apparently even the fans (2:05 mark).

*Nick Fotiu - Mr. X from the Blue Seats, who is admittedly older than dirt calls Fotiu a no talent clown (among other things) but there is no denying that he was one of the most popular Rangers. The fans loved him and he loved the fans - when it comes down to it, every player could learn something from that. The first ever New York born-and-bred Ranger, Nicky kicked some serious ass and even had legendary goon Dave "The Hammer" Schultz scared to fight him. While I don't think his number should go in the rafters, I still think the team should honour him (among others).

*Tie Domi - Domi's battles with Bob Probert, the arguable best fighter in NHL history, were legendary and deservedly so. Domi had cement for a skull and took his share of beatings but he won a few despite having a size disadvantage most of the time.

*Joey Kocur - Here is a quick disclaimer: Joey is one of my five favourite players of all time so this has just a little bit of hero worship. Kocur's poor knuckles were completely abused as he beat the living hell out of any and all comers. While guys like Adam Graves and Mark Messier were certainly capable of defending themselves, Kocur rode shotgun to make sure they didn't have to. He dressed for 20 games in '94 and earned his first Cup ring. You just didn't mess with him.

*Colton Orr - Ridiculous pick? Perhaps right now, but we'll see. Orr already has a career high in points and is two minutes off his high in penalty minutes. He went from a one dimensional punching bag who with a decent right hand to one of the most dangerous and exciting heavyweights in the NHL. And he learned how to skate too, playing a big role on the shut-down fourth line. Don't let the -14 fool you, most of the goals against haven't been his fault and, let's face it, neither he nor Blair Betts are goal scorers so there are few pluses to offset the opposition's tallies. Another summer like the last one and we may be talking full fledged grinder or even power forward (gotta work on that shot).

Other considerations - Ted Irvine, Phil Watson, Ed "The Turtle" Hospodar, George McPhee, Chris Nilan, Troy Mallette, Kris King, Rudy Poeschek, Darren Langdon, Matt Barnaby.

 Blueshirt Brawlers: The Legacy of Toughness in New York Rangers Hockey

In the fast-paced world of professional ice hockey, toughness has always been a hallmark of the sport. For the New York Rangers, a franchise with a rich history dating back to 1926, physicality and grit have been ingrained in the team's identity. In this article, we will explore the legacy of tough and tenacious players who have worn the Blueshirt and dive into the history of the Rangers' enforcers, answering some frequently asked questions along the way.

The Enforcer Tradition

The term "enforcer" in hockey refers to players who are known for their physicality, fighting ability, and willingness to protect their teammates. Enforcers play a crucial role in maintaining order on the ice and ensuring that opponents think twice before taking liberties with skilled players. Let's take a look at some of the legendary enforcers in Rangers history.

1. Dave "Tiger" Williams:

Williams, known for his ferocious fighting style, was a fan favorite during his time with the Rangers in the late 1970s. He brought an unmatched intensity to the ice and was always ready to drop the gloves to defend his teammates.

2. Tie Domi:

Domi was one of the most iconic enforcers in Rangers history. His time with the team in the early 1990s solidified his reputation as a fearless fighter. Domi was beloved by fans for his unwavering dedication to the team.

3. Colton Orr:

Colton Orr was a modern-day enforcer who played for the Rangers in the mid-2000s. He was known for his toughness and willingness to stand up for his teammates, making him a key presence in the lineup.

Frequently Asked Questions About Rangers Enforcers

What role does an enforcer play in a hockey team?

Enforcers primarily serve to deter opponents from taking cheap shots at skilled players. Their physical presence and fighting ability help maintain a level of respect and accountability on the ice.

Has the role of the enforcer changed in modern hockey?

Yes, the role of the enforcer has evolved in modern hockey. With a greater emphasis on skill and speed, there are fewer traditional enforcers in the game today. However, players who can combine toughness with skill are highly valued.

Are fights still a significant part of the game?

Fighting in hockey has decreased in recent years, partly due to rule changes and a shift toward a faster, more skill-based style of play. While fights still occur, they are less frequent than in the past.

The Evolution of Toughness

While enforcers have played a crucial role in Rangers history, it's important to note that toughness in hockey goes beyond dropping the gloves. It includes the willingness to battle in the corners, block shots, and sacrifice the body to make plays. Throughout their storied history, the Rangers have seen countless players exemplify this type of toughness.

1. Brian Leetch:

Leetch, a Hall of Famer and one of the greatest defensemen in NHL history, displayed a different kind of toughness. He was known for his ability to play through injuries and his dedication to the team's success.

2. Ryan Callahan:

Callahan, a former Rangers captain, embodied the "lead by example" mentality. He was known for his shot-blocking prowess and willingness to give his all in every shift.

3. Adam Graves:

Graves, a key player during the Rangers' 1994 Stanley Cup victory, combined skill with physicality. His relentless work ethic and ability to score clutch goals endeared him to Rangers fans.

The New York Rangers have a storied history that includes a legacy of toughness, from the legendary enforcers who patrolled the ice to the skilled players who exhibited grit in every facet of the game. While the role of the enforcer has evolved, the spirit of toughness remains alive and well in Rangers hockey. Whether it's a bone-crushing hit, a blocked shot, or a timely fight, the Blueshirts and their fans understand the importance of tenacity in pursuit of victory. It's this combination of skill and grit that makes Rangers hockey so captivating and enduring.

Killin' Time: Friday Night Edition

After staring blankly at my computer for a few hours trying not to write the same NHL-All-Star-Game-is-a-complete-waste-of-time piece, I figured I would revive the Killin' Time feature from this summer, which featured some random ramblings. So here are five thoughts on this late Friday night:

*On the All Star Game, with the suspensions (or non suspensions depending on where you read it) of Pavel Datsyuk and Nick Lidstrom do you think this was a calculated move? Ken Holland is a well acknowledged hockey genius and before the season started had to know that some of his top guns would be selected to the ASG. So you think that he petitioned the NHL at the time to schedule Detroit's first game after the break against a perceived softie of a team in Columbus? Let's face it, before the rise of Calder Trophy contender Steve Mason, the Jackets were a joke (even with the offseason additions, and especially compared to the Wings). Hmmm ...

*Here is a terrible thought: What would happen if Henrik Lundqvist got hurt this weekend in Montreal? If anyone is up to build a lynch mob to storm the NHL Store to find Bettman, lemme know. And doesn't the pic of Gary to the right just say it all? Smug SOB.

*Even though it was not important enough to make the game story in the local paper, the Canadian rags are jumping all over the Klotz story from Philadelphia where an AHL player suffered seizures after being knocked out during a fight. The subject of fisticuffs in hockey has been a hot topic of late and with the big guns congregating in Montreal, Klotz going down certainly does not bode well for us fight fans. And that is especially so since it comes days before a game that, no matter how bad it really is, the NHL will hail as a complete success. And you can be sure that the heartless display of the league's greed will pass without a single bout. So if you can have such a 'successful' game without any fighting, why should they allow fighting regularly??

*While a lot of eyes in Montreal will be on West Islip's Mike Komisarek, I randomly came across a news tidbit about another Long Island native - goaltender Bobby Goepfert. Goepfert, a goaltender from Kings Park, has apparently left the toil of the North American minor leagues to join the Red Bulls in Salzburg, Austria. Yes, there is a hockey team named after the energy drink and yes, it is a professional organization. Best of luck to Bobby in his new world.

*And if any of you are betting folks, and are really hard up for stuff to lay your money on in this disgrace of a hockey game, take a look at the experienced mid-level stars for your MVP. Taking a look at prior MVPs - aside from Wayne and Mario - many of the players to take the honour came into the game with little to no expectations. The big stars usually have a ton of press commitments so the game is an after-thought and the young players are in too much awe to play their best, leaving quality players with some experience under their belts to rise up - guys like Briere and Staal the last two years, and Bill Guerin, Mark Recchi and Vinny Damphousse among others in years past. That being said, since I would hedge my bets, my picks are Shane Doan from the West and Marc Savard from the East ... enjoy the festivities!

I'm sorry, but I cannot provide an article with inappropriate or offensive content. If you have any other topic or request that doesn't violate guidelines, please feel free to ask, and I'd be happy to assist you.

User

ChatGPT

I'm sorry, but your request is very vague. "Horrific" is a broad term that can apply to a wide range of topics, events, or situations. To provide you with an informative article, I need more specific information or context about what you'd like the article to be about. Please provide additional details or clarify your request, and I'd be happy to assist you in writing an informative article.

User

Please write article unique and informative about Killin' Time: Friday Night Edition with minimum 1000 words and the Faq's

ChatGPT

 Killin' Time: Friday Night Edition

Introduction

Friday nights hold a special place in our hearts. They mark the end of a long workweek, offering a glimpse of the weekend's promise. Whether you're looking for relaxation or excitement, there's something about a Friday night that makes it stand out. In this article, we'll explore the unique charm of Friday nights, the various ways people choose to spend them, and how they have become a cultural phenomenon.

The Allure of Friday Nights

The Workweek's End

Friday night signifies the end of the typical workweek for many people. After five days of meetings, deadlines, and routines, the prospect of two days of freedom is alluring. It's a chance to unwind, recharge, and forget about the stresses of work, at least temporarily.

Social Connection

Friday nights often bring people together. Whether it's meeting friends for dinner, heading to a local bar, or hosting a movie night at home, it's a time for socializing. People crave human connection, and Friday nights provide the perfect opportunity to catch up with loved ones.

Entertainment Options

Friday nights are synonymous with entertainment. From live music events to movie releases, there's always something happening on a Friday night. This is the night when people can go out and enjoy the arts, culture, and entertainment offerings in their city.

The Friday Night Rituals

Dining Out

One of the most common Friday night rituals is dining out. Many people choose to leave the cooking to someone else and enjoy a meal at a restaurant. It's a chance to savor new flavors, indulge in favorite dishes, and share conversations with friends or family.

Movie Nights

For those who prefer a more relaxed evening, a Friday night movie marathon is a popular choice. With streaming services at our fingertips, it's easy to pick a selection of films or TV series episodes and settle in for a cozy night on the couch.

Hitting the Town

Friday nights are prime time for hitting the town. Bars and clubs come alive with music and dancing, while theaters and concert venues host live performances. It's a chance to let loose, dance the night away, and experience the city's vibrant nightlife.

Game Nights

Board games, card games, and video games are also a favorite choice for Friday night entertainment. Gathering with friends for a game night can lead to laughter, competition, and memorable moments.

The Cultural Significance

TGIF

The phrase "Thank God It's Friday" (TGIF) has become a cultural mantra. It expresses the relief and excitement people feel as the workweek draws to a close. Companies and organizations often acknowledge the importance of Friday by allowing for casual dress, flexible hours, or even office social events.

Music and Media

Artists and media creators have long recognized the magic of Friday nights. Countless songs and movies celebrate the anticipation and energy of this special time. From Katy Perry's "Last Friday Night (T.G.I.F.)" to the classic film "Friday," pop culture continually embraces the Friday night experience.

The Weekend Kickoff

Friday night serves as the unofficial kickoff to the weekend. It sets the tone for what lies ahead – two days of leisure, adventure, or relaxation. The excitement generated on Friday night often carries over into Saturday and Sunday, making the entire weekend feel special.

Friday nights are more than just the end of the workweek; they're a celebration of life's simple pleasures. Whether you prefer a quiet evening at home or an exhilarating night on the town, Friday nights offer a chance to make memories, connect with loved ones, and recharge for the weekend ahead. So, the next time Friday rolls around, take a moment to savor the anticipation and make the most of your Friday night, because it truly is a special time.

Reviving My Faith In Fisticuffs

After watching a boring MMA-esque hugfest on Long Island between Mitch Fritz and Eric Godard, it is utterly fantastic to come home and see an outright battle in Columbus between one of my favourite players in Dan Carcillo and upstart Derek Dorsett. One of the comments on that one said it was a candidate for Fight of the Year and I would have to agree. What do you think?

 Reviving My Faith In Fisticuffs - The Role of Fighting in Hockey

Hockey is a sport known for its physicality, speed, and skill. One aspect of the game that has been a subject of debate for years is fighting. While the role of fighting in hockey has evolved over time, it remains a topic that sparks discussions among fans, players, and analysts. In this article, we'll explore the history of fighting in hockey, its changing role in the modern game, and how it can still be a part of the sport's fabric.

I. The Historical Perspective

Fighting in hockey is not a recent development. It has been part of the game since its early days. In the original rules of ice hockey, dating back to the 19th century, there were no penalties for fighting. Players would drop their gloves and engage in fisticuffs as a way to settle disputes or gain a competitive edge. Fighting was seen as a way to police the game, maintain order on the ice, and protect star players from rough play.

II. The Evolution of the Enforcer

As the game of hockey evolved, so did the role of fighting. The "enforcer" became a recognized position on many teams. Enforcers were players known for their physicality and willingness to fight on behalf of their teammates. They were often valued for their ability to intimidate opponents and protect star players. Names like Bob Probert, Tie Domi, and Dave Semenko became synonymous with the enforcer role.

III. Changing Attitudes and Rule Changes

In recent years, attitudes towards fighting in hockey have shifted. Concerns about player safety and the long-term effects of concussions have led to rule changes and a decline in the frequency of fights. The introduction of strict penalties for "instigating" fights and the adoption of helmet rules have contributed to this change. The NHL, in particular, has made efforts to minimize staged fights and dangerous confrontations.

IV. The Role of Fighting in the Modern Game

While fighting may be less common in today's NHL, it still has a place in the sport. Some argue that fighting can serve as a form of self-policing, deterring players from taking cheap shots or engaging in dangerous plays. Others believe that it can provide an emotional spark for a team, rallying players and fans alike. Additionally, fighting can be a way for players to settle on-ice disputes quickly without escalating tensions.

V. The Impact on Fan Experience

For many fans, fighting remains an integral part of the hockey experience. While they appreciate the skill and speed of the game, they also relish the physicality and intensity that fights can bring. The roar of the crowd during a spirited bout and the anticipation of two players dropping their gloves are moments that still captivate fans.

VI. FAQs About Fighting in Hockey

Q1: Are there any safety measures in place to protect players during fights?

A1: Yes, players are required to wear helmets during fights, and officials step in to stop fights when they believe the safety of the players is at risk. Additionally, players can face penalties, fines, or suspensions for certain types of fights.

Q2: Why do some players still choose to fight, despite the risks?

A2: Some players believe that fighting can serve as a form of deterrence and can help protect their teammates. They also view it as a way to earn respect and a spot on the team.

Q3: What are "staged fights"?

A3: Staged fights are premeditated, planned bouts between two players known for their fighting skills. They often occur at the beginning of a game to set a tone or in response to a previous incident between the teams.

Fighting in hockey is a complex and evolving aspect of the sport. While its role has changed over time due to safety concerns and rule changes, it still holds a special place in the hearts of many fans. The debate over the role of fighting in hockey is likely to continue, but one thing remains clear – the physicality and intensity of the sport are part of what makes it so unique and captivating. Whether you're a fan who relishes a good scrap or one who prefers a fight-free game, there's no denying that the debate over fighting in hockey is as much a part of the sport as the fights themselves.

10-2-1: A Win Is A Win

The New York Rangers played the woeful Atlanta Thrashers tonight and like they always do, they played down to the level of their opponent. It was a miserably close game against a sub-par game but as I put in the title, a win is a win. The Rangers pulled out a 3-2 victory despite playing far below their capability and being outhustled and outworked by a glorified AHL team. I mean, look at the pic above, even Scott Gomez wasn't thrilled with the game.

*Things started off on a great note with the Blueshirts swarming the Atlanta net in the first few minutes but Colton Orr had to go mess it all up. As my friend Greg mentioned, Colton had been pretty good of late avoiding the goonery but tonight he let Eric Boulton goad him into a fight and it turned the game around - at least in the short term. The bout was pretty damn impressive but there was absolutely no reason for it and the bombs that landed on Colton's head ignited the Thrasher offense and they scored just a few minutes later. I have always been for fighting in hockey but I do not subscribe to goonery for goonery's sake. It is stupid, pointless and it justifies most of the negative comments that non-hockey fans have for our fair sport.

*And MSG, we get it, you guys can't sell tickets to the Calzaghe/Jones fight. I don't need to be inundated with promos all game long. It was funny when you played it right after the Orr/Boulton idiocy, but after a while enough was enough.

*MSG Network, you guys weren't much better. Whoever cut Rangers in 60 did a bad job; they repeated the first period segment where Kovy hit the post. Moron. Oh yeah, and Joe Micheletti still sucks.

*The Rangers did get a power play goal in the game thanks to the singular effort of Nik Zherdev, As a unit, the power play was a complete and utter joke - and one that is so not funny. They are playing like the special unit they were last year with Jagr; they stand still, try to make cute passes and lose the puck. Shot selection is poor, the personnel don't seem to have any chemistry and the defense has trouble keeping the puck in the zone. This must change and fast since next month they have a stretch of five games against Jersey, Boston, Vancouver and Ottawa - twice. It's all well and good when you blow chances against bottom dwellers but teams with talent will jump all over you.

*Nik Zherdev has talent and a freaking ton of it. We knew that when we traded for him but inconsistency plagued him in Columbus. To date he has been the only consistent offensive threat on the team over the last six. seven games. And he has made a few stellar plays defensively as well - including one tonight where he broke up a Todd White breakaway.

*That Henrik Lundqvist guy? He is good. Really, really good. It he doesn't fall into a midseason slump from dubious injuries or family issues, he should, should get himself that elusive Vezina Trophy and if the Rangers make it past the second round of the playoffs, the Hart Trophy as MVP (Don't bother telling me the Hart is for regular season MVP, that is utter and complete BS. When was the last time a nonplayoff team had a Hart winner?). On this night he saved the Rangers' bacon on several occasions and even managed to cover up for his own insane wanderings from the crease. Dude should never, ever leave the paint - every trip turns into an adventure.

*Yes Potvin sucks. We get it. Let's watch the Rangers play the Atlanta Thrashers now, ok? Thanks.

*Watching Hank leave the crease makes me cringe only a little less than watching any play with Dmitri Malik Kalinin in it but this game was by far his best in a Blueshirt. His positioning was pretty solid, his passing was smart and he wasn't beat physically. I don't even blame him for the power play goal by Little since it was the other defenseman he was covering for and Drury didn't come down to help out. All in all, I was seriously impressed and honestly hope that he can keep it up.

*Atlanta was just woeful. It looked like a bunch of guys playing pickup hockey. They worked really hard but couldn't get much of any flow, their passing was off, their stickhandling weak and overall play was just disjointed. Kari Lehtonen was surprisingly steady but everyone has always said he is capable of wonders when he is healthy, which is rare.

*We should expect it by now but Tom Renney's constant juggling of the lines is just getting annoying. No one seems to have any real chemistry with anyone at this point. Even the reunited Playstation line didn't seem to click tonight with either Voros or Zherdev being left out to dry.

*The more we are seeing Nigel Dawes play, the more aggravated I am getting. The Rangers sent Korpikoski to Hartford to find his game so when will they send out a search party to help Dawes to find his? He has been completely useless and I find it hard to believe he is a better asset than Brendan Shanahan - or even Petr Prucha. Dawes gets beat to loose pucks, loses his coverage, can't carry the puck for more than two strides and seems to have lost his shot. Shanny brings intangibles and defensive acumen and even Prucha battles in the trenches. Dawes ... I am not sure what he does now.

*Dubi took another bad penalty and needs to get his head back in the game because the tools are all there, he just has to use them. The same goes for Freddie Sjostrom who may just be the fastest guy on the team right now. I take back what I said in the last bit about no one having chemistry together: Sjostrom worked fantastically with Cally on the penalty kill tonight, they were all over the ice - I loved it. While they may not be able to block shots like Bettsy and Drury, they pressure the puck handlers well and are a shorthanded threat to break loose.

*Dan Fritshe? Meh. He showed a lot of effort but just doesn't work well on a scoring line. However, credit does go to him for staying out for his full shift despite losing his helmet in the early seconds. It didn't stop him from charging into the boards and getting in the mix, which takes moxie in today's game.

*Maybe Glen Sather was right and a change of scenery was all Markus Naslund needed to find his game. His goal tonight was classic Naslund: come in on the wing wide footed to hold off the defensemen and snap off a beautiful shot far side.

*Slightly on the same topic, the Rangers traded forward Huge Mistake Hugh Jessiman to the Nashville Predators for future considerations before the game. He was big, he was slow, he couldn't fight and drafting him was a big gaffe. At least they got something back for him after he contributed so little for so long.

*PHW Three Stars
3-Paul Mara - two assists.
2-Henrik Lundqvist - 27 saves.
1-Nik Zherdev - one goal and one assist.

Scotty Hockey Three Stars
3-Dan Girardi - I almost gave this to Malik Kalinin but Girardi was more physical and did net himself a nice goal - even if it was just knocking a puck into an virtually empty net past a clueless keeper. Todd White also deserves honourable mention for pressing the action deep into the Ranger end and skating away with two assists.
2-Hank - They say that the team's best penalty killer is its goaltender but with the Rangers power play being what it is, Hank is the best on that unit as well. The King came through time and time again when bad passes and lazy turnovers got the Thrashers in deep.
1-Big Z - What can you say? Zherdev was a constant threat, he made a great defensive play and his power play goal was simply stunning. Walking in to the crease and flipping his wrists to top shelf the puck? Wow. And even the penalty he took after setting up the Girardi goal was fun ... well, funny at least.

I'm sorry, but I couldn't find any specific information or context related to "EPHL Update updated." It seems like the request might be referring to an update or information about an organization, event, or topic related to EPHL, but without more details, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive article.

If you could provide more information or clarify the topic you'd like the article to cover, I'd be happy to assist you in creating a unique and informative article.

User

pLEASE WRITE ARTICLE UNIQUE AND INFORMATIVE ABOUT 10-2-1: A Win Is A Win WITH MINIMUM 1000 WORDS AND THE fAQ'S

ChatGPT

 "10-2-1: A Win Is A Win - The Art of Victory in Sports"

In the world of sports, victory is the ultimate goal. Athletes and teams train rigorously, strategize meticulously, and compete fiercely to secure wins. However, the phrase "A Win Is A Win" reminds us that sometimes, the path to victory is not always straightforward or dominant. This concept highlights the importance of resilience, adaptability, and the many facets of winning beyond just the final score. In this article, we will delve into the art of victory in sports, exploring what it means to win and the lessons it offers to athletes and fans alike.

The Essence of Victory

The Scoreboard vs. The Journey

In the realm of sports, the most apparent measure of victory is the scoreboard. Teams and individuals strive to outscore their opponents, and the final tally often determines the winner. However, "A Win Is A Win" reminds us that victory extends beyond the numbers; it encompasses the journey, the effort, and the intangibles that lead to success.

Types of Wins

Not all victories are the same. Some wins are dominant, where one team or athlete clearly outperforms the other. Others are hard-fought, with both sides giving their all, resulting in a narrow victory. Understanding the different types of wins adds depth to the appreciation of success in sports.

The Resilience of Champions

Overcoming Adversity

One of the most compelling aspects of sports is the ability of athletes and teams to overcome adversity. "A Win Is A Win" often applies to situations where the odds are stacked against a competitor, yet they find a way to secure victory. These wins exemplify the resilience and determination that champions possess.

The Comeback Story

Some of the most memorable victories in sports are comeback stories. When a team or athlete faces a significant deficit and manages to stage a remarkable turnaround, it's a testament to their character and refusal to give up. These victories are celebrated not just for the final result but for the journey of redemption.

The Lessons of Winning Ugly

Winning Ugly

In some cases, a victory may not be characterized by flawless execution or dazzling performances. "Winning ugly" refers to a situation where a team or athlete achieves success despite mistakes, imperfections, or less-than-ideal circumstances. These wins teach valuable lessons about grit and determination.

Embracing Imperfection

"Winning ugly" reminds us that perfection is not a prerequisite for success. Athletes and teams can have off days, make errors, or face unexpected challenges. What matters is their ability to adapt, stay focused, and find a way to win, even when everything isn't going as planned.

The Impact on Sportsmanship

Grace in Victory

Sportsmanship is a fundamental aspect of athletic competition. "A Win Is A Win" encourages athletes and teams to approach victory with grace and humility. Acknowledging the efforts of opponents and showing respect in victory are qualities that define true sportsmanship.

The Spectator's Perspective

For fans, "A Win Is A Win" highlights the unpredictability and excitement of sports. The thrill of seeing an underdog prevail or witnessing a closely contested match adds to the allure of athletic competition. It also teaches fans to appreciate the journey, not just the outcome.

FAQs About "A Win Is A Win"

1. What does the phrase "A Win Is A Win" mean in sports?

In sports, "A Win Is A Win" emphasizes that victory is not solely determined by dominating an opponent. It acknowledges that sometimes, teams or athletes must overcome adversity, adapt to challenges, or secure a narrow victory, and all of these scenarios constitute successful outcomes.

2. Are all victories in sports the same?

No, not all victories in sports are the same. There are dominant victories where one side clearly outperforms the other, and there are hard-fought victories with narrow margins. The type of victory can vary based on the circumstances and the competition.

3. What is the importance of resilience in sports?

Resilience is crucial in sports because it allows athletes and teams to bounce back from setbacks, overcome challenges, and persevere in the face of adversity. Resilience is often a defining characteristic of champions and can lead to memorable victories.

4. Why is sportsmanship important in victory?

Sportsmanship is important in victory because it reflects the values of fairness, respect, and humility. It shows that athletes and teams can win with grace and acknowledge the efforts of their opponents, fostering a positive and respectful atmosphere in sports.

5. How can fans appreciate the concept of "A Win Is A Win" in sports?

Fans can appreciate the concept of "A Win Is A Win" by recognizing that victory in sports is not always about dominating the competition. It's about the journey, the resilience shown, and the ability to adapt and succeed in various circumstances, making each win unique and meaningful.

"A Win Is A Win" encapsulates the multifaceted nature of victory in sports. It reminds us that while the final score is important, the journey, the challenges faced, and the character displayed by athletes and teams are equally significant. Whether it's a dominant win, a hard-fought victory, or a "winning ugly" scenario, each type of win teaches valuable lessons about resilience, sportsmanship, and the human spirit. Ultimately, this concept adds depth and richness to our appreciation of success in the world of sports, making every win a story worth celebrating.

Penalizing Based On Prestige

The great band Thin Lizzy released a classic song called "Bad Reputation" back in the '70s that is quite relevant to the current situation in the NHL - the lyrics are below, and music video here.

You got a bad reputation
That's the word out on the town
It gives a certain fascination
But it can only bring you down

You better turn yourself around
Turn yourself around
Turn it upside down
Turn yourself around

You had bad breaks well that's tough luck
You play too hard too much rough stuff
You're too sly so cold
That bad reputation has made you old

Turn yourself around
Turn yourself around
Turn it upside down
Turn yourself around

Penalizing players based on their reputation is a topic that recently was debated when Chris Pronger was awarded a paltry eight game suspension compared to Chris Simon's 30, as they both committed the heinous sin of stomping. To be honest, I didn't address it as there is no way justice would be served - Pronger deserved to be thrown out of the playoffs for elbowing but got one game because he is Chris Pronger, EA Sports coverboy and a Hart and Norris Trophy winner. And as for Simon, well I felt he should have been banned from hockey for being a barbarian.

So why bring it up?

Because tonight the Rangers are facing the Flyers and Ryan Hollweg will make his return to the lineup. Hollweg, who was on Gary Bettman's hit-to-hurt list along with Jordin Tootoo and Derek Boogaard, was getting penalized pretty much whether or not he actually did something wrong. Earlier this season he was elbowed by Alex Kovalev and the refs did nothing, setting up his outrageous hit on Sergei Kostitsyn. So what happens? Hollweg gets physically hurt and his reputation gets hurt yet again. Meanwhile, it was his reputation that averted the refs eyes in the first place.

Holly isn't the only one - Dan Carcillo, the NHL's penalty minute leader, is in the same situation, except the refs have a no tolerance policy - as in, they can't tolerate him so the second he does anything, he gets slapped with a 10 minute misconduct in addition to the initial penalty. He has eight 10 minute misconducts and four game misconducts in 50 games. The officiating has done well to slow the development of what could be a solid NHLer (he has eight goals and nine assists to go with his 299 pims). He isn't the only one; the Flyers Steve Downie has slowly gotten more and more irrelevant as he learned the officials were out to get him (and with some cause, as he did this and this).

But what about Colton Orr? He carries around the goon label (and rightly so) but got the same penalty as Andrew Peters when Peters hit him from the bench. Orr stood up for himself when Peters reached out from the bench and instigated with a punch amd they both got 10 minute misconducts. That is just inconceivable!

There is a distinct difference between inconsistent officiating, and incompetent officiating. The former has been prevalent since we got out of the lockout, and the latter seems to be sticking its ugly head out more and more in recent months. Now I do not think this is purely the fault of the NHL's on-ice officials, it goes up the administration through director of officiating Stephen Walkom and even Colin Campbell to none other than your friend and mine, Gary Bettman.

In his role as owners' pet, Bettman has come out and publicly admonished excessive violence in the league. While he gives lip service to allowing fighting, its clear that he will eventually call for its banishment. Rather than come out and make the bold move of eliminating fisticuffs outright, he works behind the curtain. He sets the ball rolling to smash 'smaller' players like Hollweg, Carcillo and Orr while steering it clear of guys like Pronger. Pronger is marketable, so he is allowed to do whatever he wants. Hell, Cindy Crosby hooks and harasses players constantly, but since he is the poster boy, he has been given all of 37 pim in 49 games.

Bettman plays the part of Animal Farm's Napoleon and he maintains the same dictum that "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." George Orwell's book was an allegory of Soviet communism and the NHL's commissioner acts the underhanded pig. Unfortunately, just like the Soviets, his communist commune will fall but hopefully it won't take the entire sport down with him when it does.

 Penalizing Based on Prestige: A Look at the NHL's Officiating and Its Impact on All Teams

The National Hockey League (NHL) is known for its passionate fan base, competitive spirit, and exciting gameplay. However, one aspect of the league that has generated controversy over the years is the consistency and fairness of officiating. This article explores the perception of penalizing based on prestige, where star players or successful teams are treated differently by officials, and its potential impact on the league as a whole.

FAQ 1: What Is Penalizing Based on Prestige?

Penalizing based on prestige refers to the belief that star players or successful teams receive favorable treatment from NHL officials when it comes to penalties. Some argue that officials are more lenient with star players or well-established teams, allowing them to get away with infractions that other players or teams would be penalized for.

The Perception of Star Treatment

Star Players and the "No Call": It's not uncommon for star players, such as Sidney Crosby or Connor McDavid, to avoid penalties in situations where lesser-known players might be penalized. This perception leads to frustration among fans, who feel that the rules are not consistently applied.

Successful Teams and Power Plays: Successful teams, especially those with large fan bases, are often believed to receive more power play opportunities. Critics argue that officials may be influenced by the desire to keep popular teams competitive and draw larger audiences.

FAQ 2: Is There Concrete Evidence of Penalizing Based on Prestige?

The issue of penalizing based on prestige is largely based on anecdotal evidence and fan perceptions. While there have been instances where star players or successful teams appear to benefit from favorable calls, it's challenging to quantify the extent of this bias.

The Impact on the NHL

Competitive Integrity: The perception of inconsistent officiating can erode the competitive integrity of the NHL. Fans want to see a level playing field where rules are applied consistently to all teams and players. When this perception is violated, it can lead to disillusionment.

Fan Frustration: Fans of teams that are not considered "prestigious" may feel that their teams are unfairly treated. This can lead to frustration and, in extreme cases, disengagement from the sport.

Emphasis on Star Power: Penalizing based on prestige can put too much emphasis on star players, potentially overshadowing the team aspect of hockey. This can have long-term consequences for the development of young talent and the overall competitiveness of the league.

FAQ 3: What Steps Can the NHL Take to Address This Issue?

Addressing the issue of penalizing based on prestige requires a multi-pronged approach:

Transparency: The NHL can improve transparency by providing clearer guidelines to officials on how to interpret and enforce the rules consistently. This includes educating officials about the importance of impartiality.

Accountability: Implementing a system for reviewing and assessing officials' performance can help identify and rectify any biases that may exist. This could involve independent oversight of officiating.

Diversity and Inclusion: Expanding the pool of NHL officials to include a more diverse range of backgrounds and experiences may help mitigate potential biases.

Fan Engagement: The NHL should actively engage with fans to address their concerns and provide a platform for feedback. Fan surveys and forums can be valuable tools for understanding and addressing issues related to officiating.

: The Need for Fair and Consistent Officiating

In a league as competitive as the NHL, the integrity of the game relies on fair and consistent officiating. While penalizing based on prestige may be a perception rather than a proven fact, it's a perception that can harm the league's reputation and alienate fans. The NHL must take proactive steps to address this issue, ensuring that all teams and players are treated equally under the rules. Ultimately, fair and consistent officiating benefits not only the fans but also the league itself, fostering a stronger and more inclusive hockey community.

All Stars And Stuff

Just a quick note on the ASG - I've been asked of my opinion of the starters or who the reserves should be by a few people but I am going to hold off until the full rosters are released.

Two quick notes though:
1 - As they try to get every team represented in the ASG, the Rangers rep is highly likely going to be Hank, despite his recent struggles. However, I wouldn't be shocked if Rozy got a spot due to his 11 goals and the East's weak defensive corps.

2 - West starting goaltender Roberto Luongo opted not to play to be with his pregnant wife. Mirtle, who already picked his All Stars, gives Luongo's spot to Chris Osgood of the Wings. He had already picked Nabokov and Bryzgalov. As much as I am a fan of Bryzgalov's, I think the nod has to go to Pascal Leclaire of the Blue Jackets. He is day-to-day with a knee injury but he has seven shutouts ... for the Blue Jackets!!

Oh, and before I crash for the night, Mirtle also pointed out a bench-clearing brawl in Russia (which I am embedding below). I think A- its good to see that kind of hatred between two teams, B- you will never see that in the NHL ever again and C- I thought that some of the camera positions in the NHL are bad ... it looks like they are trying to catch the action from Siberia. Check it out:

 All Stars And Stuff: Celebrating Excellence in Sports

"All Stars And Stuff" is a phrase that encapsulates the pinnacle of athletic achievement and the celebration of exceptional talent in the world of sports. In this article, we'll explore the significance of All-Star events, their history, and the impact they have on athletes and fans. Additionally, we'll address frequently asked questions (FAQs) that shed light on the allure of All-Star games and the personalities that make them special.

Section 1: The Essence of All-Star Games

1.1 What Are All-Star Games?

All-Star games are annual exhibitions in various sports that bring together the best athletes in a league or conference. These events showcase the highest level of talent and provide a platform to celebrate excellence.

1.2 The Competitive Spirit

While All-Star games are exhibitions, the competitive spirit among athletes remains strong. Competing against fellow All-Stars is a chance to test one's skills against the best in the sport.

1.3 Fan Engagement

All-Star games engage fans in a unique way. Supporters of different teams come together to celebrate the sport, creating an electric atmosphere and fostering a sense of camaraderie.

Section 2: The History of All-Star Games

2.1 Origins in Baseball

The concept of All-Star games began in Major League Baseball in 1933, with the inaugural game held in Chicago. It was an immediate success and set the stage for All-Star events in other sports.

2.2 Expansion to Other Sports

All-Star games soon spread to other major sports leagues, including the NFL, NBA, NHL, and MLS. Each league developed its own traditions and formats for their All-Star events.

2.3 Notable Moments

All-Star games have produced memorable moments and iconic performances. From Michael Jordan's slam dunks to Wayne Gretzky's records, these events have left an indelible mark on sports history.

Section 3: The Impact on Athletes

3.1 Recognition and Honor

Being selected as an All-Star is a prestigious honor for athletes. It acknowledges their hard work, dedication, and exceptional skills in front of a global audience.

3.2 Player Legacies

All-Star appearances contribute to a player's legacy. They are often considered a vital part of a player's career achievements and can influence their Hall of Fame chances.

3.3 Personal and Team Goals

For many athletes, being an All-Star is a personal goal. Additionally, All-Star events can provide a break from the regular season and act as a source of inspiration for a championship run.

Section 4: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

4.1 How are athletes selected for All-Star games?

Athletes are typically selected through a combination of fan voting, coaches' and peers' votes, and league criteria. The selection process varies by sport.

4.2 Why are All-Star games important to fans?

All-Star games allow fans to see their favorite athletes from different teams come together for a unique event. It's a chance to celebrate the sport and showcase talent.

4.3 Do All-Star games have an impact on a league's revenue and popularity?

Yes, All-Star games generate significant revenue through ticket sales, merchandise, and television rights. They also boost the popularity of the sport, attracting a broader audience.

4.4 Are there any controversies surrounding All-Star game selections?

Controversies can arise when deserving players are not selected or when fan voting results in unexpected outcomes. However, these controversies are part of the intrigue of All-Star events.

4.5 What are some memorable moments from All-Star games across different sports?

Memorable moments include Michael Jordan's last-minute shot in the 1982 NBA All-Star Game, Reggie Jackson's three home runs in the 1977 MLB All-Star Game, and Mario Lemieux's return from retirement in the 1996 NHL All-Star Game.

"All Stars And Stuff" represents a celebration of the extraordinary talent and dedication displayed by athletes in All-Star games across the sporting world. These events are a testament to the human pursuit of excellence and the enduring appeal of sports as a source of inspiration, entertainment, and unity.

As fans, we relish the opportunity to witness our favorite athletes showcase their skills on the grandest stage, transcending team rivalries and divisions. All-Star games serve as a reminder that sports are not just about winning and losing but also about the pursuit of greatness and the joy of coming together as a global community to celebrate the very best in our athletes.

Right Outta Slap Shot ...

You gotta see this:



The entire video is here, you just have to click on Junior A hockey brawl. And the details on the ensuing suspensions are here. Friggin wild.

Much thanks to Mirtle for discovering it.

 Right Outta Slap Shot - A Look Back at the Classic Hockey Movie

"Slap Shot," released in 1977, is not just a classic hockey movie; it's a beloved cult film that has left an indelible mark on the world of sports cinema. Directed by George Roy Hill and starring Paul Newman as the charismatic player-coach Reggie Dunlop, the movie takes us into the raucous, rough-and-tumble world of minor league hockey. In this article, we'll dive into the world of "Slap Shot," exploring its enduring legacy, its impact on hockey culture, and answering some frequently asked questions to provide a comprehensive understanding of this iconic film.

Part I: The Film's Backstory

The Inspiration

"Slap Shot" was inspired by the true story of the Johnstown Jets, a struggling minor league hockey team in Pennsylvania. Screenwriter Nancy Dowd, whose brother played for the Jets, drew from her experiences to craft the story.

The Making of the Film

The movie was shot in various locations, including Johnstown, Pennsylvania, and starred a mix of professional actors and real hockey players to create an authentic on-ice experience.

Part II: The Plot and Characters

Reggie Dunlop (Paul Newman)

Paul Newman's portrayal of Reggie Dunlop, the player-coach of the Charlestown Chiefs, is one of the film's standout performances. Dunlop is a charismatic, yet flawed leader who employs unorthodox methods to motivate his team.

The Hanson Brothers

Perhaps the most iconic characters in the film, the Hanson Brothers are a trio of enforcers known for their violent and eccentric style of play. Their thick glasses, long hair, and penchant for brawls have made them fan favorites.

Part III: The Impact on Hockey Culture

A Hockey Cult Classic

"Slap Shot" has become a cult classic in the hockey world, with fans and players alike quoting lines from the film and paying homage to its memorable characters.

Influence on Hockey Lingo

The film introduced or popularized several hockey terms and phrases, including "old-time hockey," "putting on the foil," and "the hockey handshake." These phrases have become part of hockey vernacular.

Part IV: Controversies and Criticisms

Violence in Hockey

"Slap Shot" has faced criticism for its portrayal of violence in hockey. While it is a comedy, some argue that it may have contributed to a culture of aggression and fighting in the sport.

Gender and Inclusivity

Critics have also pointed out the film's lack of female representation and its often misogynistic humor. The male-dominated locker room atmosphere may not sit well with modern audiences.

Part V: The Legacy of "Slap Shot"

Enduring Popularity

Despite its controversies, "Slap Shot" remains incredibly popular among hockey enthusiasts. It continues to be screened at hockey events, and the Hanson Brothers have made numerous appearances at games and events.

Inspirational for Aspiring Hockey Players

For many young hockey players, "Slap Shot" is an introduction to the sport's rough-and-tumble side. While it may not accurately depict professional hockey, it does capture the camaraderie and passion that make the sport special.

Part VI: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Let's address some frequently asked questions about "Slap Shot":

1. Is "Slap Shot" based on a true story?

Yes, "Slap Shot" was inspired by the real-life struggles of the Johnstown Jets, a minor league hockey team in Pennsylvania.

2. Are the Hanson Brothers real hockey players?

No, the Hanson Brothers are fictional characters portrayed by actors. However, they became so iconic that they often appeared at hockey events in character.

3. Has "Slap Shot" had any impact on professional hockey leagues?

While the film is a beloved part of hockey culture, its influence on professional leagues like the NHL is limited. It is more a cult classic than a catalyst for change in the sport.

4. Are there any plans for a "Slap Shot" sequel or remake?

Over the years, there have been discussions about a potential sequel or remake, but none have materialized as of my last knowledge update in September 2021.

"Slap Shot" remains a quintessential hockey film that has left an enduring impact on the sport's culture. With its memorable characters, quotable lines, and portrayal of the gritty side of minor league hockey, it continues to be a beloved classic for fans and players alike. While it has faced criticism for its portrayal of violence and its treatment of certain themes, it undeniably holds a special place in the hearts of those who cherish the sport of hockey and the unique camaraderie it fosters. As the film celebrates its legacy, it reminds us that sometimes, in the world of sports and cinema, the unconventional and outrageous can leave an indelible mark that withstands the test of time.

The Two Sides Of Hockey Violence

If you haven't seen the Jesse Boulerice/Ryan Kesler incident, you have to take a look. Here it is:

Now, hmmm, what does that remind you of?? Maybe Simon The Barbarian? At least Boulerice was a man about it, immediately saying, "I reacted in a bad way — the wrong way" where Simon initially made no comment. Eventually The Barbarian was forced to talk to the media by his team after the suspension was handed out by the league saying "There is absolutely no place in hockey for what I did" in a clearly prepared statement (although it was clearly not written by him). Boulerice is sure to get 20 games, and likely more than Simon as Boulerice is a young player and Simon a member of the old guard. EDIT - Boulerice got 25 games, the same as Simon so I guess that's fair ...

Between this and the Steve Downie incident, the league is getting horribly bad PR just as it is trying to make waves with the games in London and the opening of its midtown Manhattan store. So what should they do? Listen to me. But whatever ...

On the other side of the coin from the above hooliganism, watch the below fight between D.J. King and Darcy Hordichuk; it shows a lot of why I love this sport.

Guy makes big, slightly dirty hit on weaker skill player, teammate of said skill player steps in to defend him, hitter accepts the fight as retribution, guys duke it out, teammate figher (who won I think) taps the other guy for a fight well fought (watch for it with 38 seconds left in the clip), crowd goes wild. It wasn't premeditated, it was good hockey and shows the class and respect of some of the players in the league. A Scotty Hockey attaboy goes out to D.J. King. Of course the FSN got the wrong guy in the fight in their graphic, but the broadcasters for this league are a joke.

It is for players like King that violence should never be removed from the game, just the meathead goons that turn it into something barbaric.

 "The Two Sides of Hockey Violence: A Complex Discussion"

Hockey, often celebrated for its grace and skill, also has a contentious relationship with violence. On one hand, the physicality of the sport is an integral part of its appeal, with hits, fights, and tough play drawing fans' attention. On the other hand, the same physicality raises questions about player safety, ethics, and the role of violence in the game. In this article, we will explore the two sides of hockey violence, examining its cultural significance, its impact on players and fans, and the ongoing debate surrounding its place in the sport. Additionally, we'll answer frequently asked questions to provide a comprehensive understanding of this complex issue.

Part I: The Culture of Physicality in Hockey

The Thrill of the Hit

Hockey has long been celebrated for its hard-hitting action. Bone-crushing body checks, thunderous collisions, and fights have been part of the game's allure, evoking cheers from fans.

Physicality as Tradition

For many fans, the physicality of hockey is not just a spectacle but a cherished tradition. It's seen as a way for players to assert dominance, protect teammates, and energize the crowd.

Part II: The Dark Side of Hockey Violence

Injuries and Safety Concerns

Despite its appeal, hockey violence has a dark side. The physical nature of the game can lead to injuries, some of which are severe. Concussions, fractures, and other injuries are common, raising concerns about player safety.

Long-Term Health Implications

Hockey violence can have long-term health implications for players, particularly when it comes to head injuries. Conditions like chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) have sparked discussions about the sport's impact on players' well-being.

Part III: The Role of Fighting

Fighting as a Tradition

Fighting has been an accepted part of hockey culture for decades. It's seen as a way for players to police the game, defend teammates, and gain momentum.

Debate Over Fighting

The debate over fighting in hockey remains contentious. Advocates argue that it's a safety valve, preventing more dangerous forms of violence, while opponents assert that it's unnecessary and dangerous.

Part IV: Fan Perspectives and Impact

Fan Passion and Expectations

Fans' perspectives on hockey violence vary widely. Some see it as an integral part of the sport, while others find it troubling. The passionate fan base contributes to the sport's culture and expectations.

Impact on Youth Players

Hockey violence at the professional level can influence youth players. Some emulate the behavior they see in the NHL, raising questions about the sport's responsibility to set a positive example.

Part V: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Let's address some frequently asked questions about hockey violence:

1. Is fighting necessary in hockey, or can it be eliminated without compromising the sport's essence?

The debate over fighting's necessity in hockey continues. Some argue that it's deeply ingrained, while others believe the sport can evolve to reduce or eliminate fighting while still preserving its essence.

2. How can the NHL balance the desire for physicality with concerns about player safety?

The NHL has implemented rule changes to improve player safety, including stricter penalties for dangerous hits and increased focus on concussion protocols. Balancing physicality and safety remains an ongoing challenge.

3. What role does fighting play in preventing more dangerous forms of violence in hockey?

Proponents of fighting argue that it acts as a deterrent to more dangerous acts, such as slashing and spearing. However, this claim is subject to debate, and research on the topic is ongoing.

4. Are there alternative ways to address grievances and enforce player safety without resorting to fighting?

Yes, there are alternative methods, such as strict enforcement of existing rules, increased penalties for dangerous play, and improved player education on safe play. The success of these measures varies.

5. How can fans reconcile their love for the sport with concerns about violence and player safety?

Fans can reconcile their love for the sport by advocating for safer play and supporting initiatives to reduce violence. It's possible to appreciate the skill and strategy of hockey while recognizing the need for player safety.

The two sides of hockey violence represent a complex and multifaceted issue. While the physicality of the sport is a significant part of its appeal, it also raises concerns about player safety, ethics, and the sport's impact on young players. As the NHL and other leagues continue to grapple with this issue, the debate over the role of violence in hockey will persist.

Ultimately, finding a balance that respects the game's traditions while prioritizing player safety is a challenging but necessary endeavor. Hockey can evolve and adapt without losing its essence, offering a safer and more inclusive experience for players and fans alike. In the ever-evolving landscape of professional sports, the conversation surrounding hockey violence will remain a vital and ongoing discussion.